This is the first and last time I'll be testing this graphics card... 

Same 😂

Top comment 😂

@@RandomGaminginHD RandomGaming with glasses confirmed 🤯😂

As someone who is blind, I confirm

I think i can see the game better with my glasses off, thats how blurry it is.

as long game is launching it's playable for low end gamers xD I'm currently in that segment with my 750ti sadly games are moving to dx12 and I can't play recent titles. waiting for some more price drops to finally get 3070 or equivalent so that I'm good for next 5-6 years

That is literally what this guys whole youtube is about. I think the highest thing i've seen him benchmark is a 3050. He would happily recommend integrated graphics he loves his athlon integrated graphics.

@@AdamantMindset maaaan I was on a 750Ti for 6 years (2014-2020) and got a whole new rig wit ha 5700 XT, and today I just bought a 6800 XT

the thing i miss most after getting a better system is the amazing feeling of running a game at near 60fps with the settings you configured yourself, its very rewarding

oh yes I can confirm that, a friend of mine played (~2019) fairly recent games with an HD4770 (on an old af FX-CPU). Even RocketLeague looked atrocious. I couldnt bear watching him, but he would refuse me buying him something better. So when he had his Birthday, his friends and I bought him a brand new Rig with a 2400G which literally quadrupled his fps despite being integrated Graphics. (And it gave me the chance to overspend on the Budget without him knowing)

A I miss when we had loads of tiny cards on the market. Palit make some cool tiny RTX cards though

2 slots is 2 thicc. ONE slot or bust. Half height, too. Some of us have SFF Optiplexes. The RX6400 or T1000 come closest to these requirements, but are more in line with a GTX 1650 in terms of performance. But the T1000, though its feature set is awesome for its size, is too damn expensive. If AMD could just include the damn VCE with the low end of the RX 7000 line (RX 7400?) instead of cutting it out like they did with

@@RandomGaminginHD Yeston as well. Their design for RTX 3060 / RX 6500 is really nice.

There is the GT1030, a card 10x better than this. I once fell a victim for a Dell OEM R7 350X low profile card, when shopping for my bedroom TV video playback PC. The R7 340X was more terrible than the DDR3 version of the GT730. Even just for video playback, because the drivers were a mess.

@@hyperturbotechnomike AMD's drivers are pretty good these days

I did something similar but with an R7 240, this things OC really well. Mine did 1100MHz memory (800MHz stock) and 1050MHz clock (730MHz stock). and when running it in dual graphics mode with an R7 iGPU (also OCd to 910MHz because that was the maximum allowed) some games ran really well considering it was being run in shitty hardware lol. Some games had issues with frame timing tho due to the difference between the iGPU and the R7 240. Fun times :)

@@nachogsr5085 I also have an A10 chip, but I decided to go with dual R7 250s due to my slow memory kit (And I couldn't afford to replace it, it was cheaper to grab two graphics card lol), as it did bottleneck really hard the graphics card if I used Dual Graphics with that memory kit, although it should be fine with A10 systems with DDR3-2133 or higher. Ditching the IGPU and running on two identical cards did increase the CPU performance a bit too.

I used mine overclocked to 1250mhz for 5 years and it was a tiny beast. Never saw a card that benefited so much from a few more mhz, it was great to play kf2, overwatch and gta v at 1440x900p (with the 2gb gddr5)

For me, it was a GTX 460 from Galaxy

I used an R9 270X 4GB until last year, great card :D

My first ever gpu was a radeon 9600pro advantage

@@vasya_cat I had one of those, it had a whopping 512mb ram :D

@@vasya_cat i got a 9600 XT, flex xD

Was it GDDR5? And paired with what cpu? I've seen some tests w the RX 580 paired with a Xeon E5-1620 v2 and it really gave some great performance. But, I can't say if the video creator was in fact being honest.

As is usually the case, it wasn't anything wrong with the card, just the user's faulty expectations of what it should do. People should spend more time checking what they actually need before rushing out and buying something.

I went from R9 270 to 1050ti to RX 590 to RTX 3070, and I'm seeing that the 3070 is aging quite well, the 1050ti was already struggling at 1080p one year after launch, the RTX 3070 still tanks everything like a champ at 1440p even after two years after launch

@@HanCurunyr tf it’s been two years!!

@@nazmulfahad3044 Yep, Ampere was announced Sept 1st,, 2020 and the 3090, 3080 and 3070 launched Sept 17th, 2020

I also had an R7 240 and jumped to a 1050Ti lol GPU prices should be at their lowest right now since the crypto crash and next gen cards coming out. I ended up getting an RX 6600 XT because the ARC gpus weren't coming out in time.

3070 will carry you over trough PS5 age

I used one of those for a while it was great :)

I also had a laptop with a 5650m it was absolute shit unable to run bad company 2 without stuttering lol mobile graphics came a long way since then

My first new gpu that I bought in 2012 was Shapphire 7770 vapor-x , that was awesome gpu :)

My first pc I ever put a GPU in was a HD 2600 when it was still ATI.Then when i graduated college I built my first PC with Dual 6850s. Then computer after that had a R9290x. Love me some AMD even if I'm unfortunately (My wallet hurts) on team green this build around.

@@vespermoirai975 dual 6850 ? Damn the micro stuttering must have been hard lol

Whoa. Really? I have a Phenom II X4 955 (95W) and 2x2GB DDR2-800. Although I have the R7 250 2GB GDDR3 OEM model. Guessing you may have been running DDR3?

i used a non gaming laptop before my pc so a UHD Graphics. it was bad, as strong as a og xbox but maybe weaker

Hi! i'm also an EX-Intel HD user myself, used to play with an old celeron with only 2 threads (at 1,7 Ghz) and a old 2Gb stick of unknow DDR3 memory sooo yeah... i understand your pain.. x)

​@@julian-vanilla8379But that isn't a problem with the Intel GPU, it's a problem with the person who bought or uses the laptop for something it was never designed to do. The original Xbox played games very well, despite it's relatively modest specs, because the games were written with it's capabilities in mind. You can't buy one now and say it was crap, just because it can't play modern games in 4K resolution.

Interesting. I might have to check that out. I have the OEM R7 250.

Haha yeah I thought it was never going to load

I used and still own a XFX 2GB DDR5 and it ran games great at 1440x900. Games like Killing Floor 2, O.G. Skyrim (the special edition destroys the card lmao), Saints Row 4, Overwatch on low, GTA 5 would all run pretty good with the clock set to 1250mhz. Its a good card for 720p gaming, wish there were more of these low power low profile cards nowadays.

Compared to a Geforce 9400GT or Radeon 6450 1GB GDDR3?

i ate the gpus

i still using Gigabyte R7 240 2gb DDR3 in my main gaming pc.

@@coochiedingler8868 lmao

Haha

My eyes hurt haha

Haha thanks. I’m done with this card

Try Nimez drivers, maybe they'll help. Maybe not, it really depends in my experience, but if they did your issues it'll be worth it.

Unequivocally, the R9 360 will wipe the floor with the R7 250. It’s a GCN 2.0 card to start (250 is GCN 1.0), and has ldouble the shader count.

Yeah did a video review already. I use it as my capturing and editing system now. It’s fantastic

@@RandomGaminginHD thanks, must have missed that one!

GT1030 got trash driver support from Nvidia because "not a gaming card". Would target RX550 as the benchmark of entry level cards in current titles.

That is what one of my HTPC has is a 7890K and R7 250 in crossfire in a slim case. Works fine for that and old games.

They do work, but most likely the APU is going to slow down a R7 250 if you are not using the A10 7890K and with memory well over 2133MHz, pretty solid if you ask me. Memory will be your main bottleneck on these systems, so DDR3-2133 is the bare minimum, anything higher, as long as your chip supports it will make some big improvements to the graphics. For anything below an A10 7890K or slower memory kits, use an R7 240, no bottlenecks, same performance as if you were using an R7 250 with a chip bottlenecking it. Or do as I did, I ditched the IGPU and brought two 250s instead, they were cheaper than to replace 16GB of DDR3-1866 (And yes, I have the FM2+ board that has the dual x16 PCIe slots) and run well, overclock well, but are slightly loud (They are tiny Dell reference ones, with a teeny tiny fan, but are surprisingly well built for Dell standards), I am running them in a GIGABYTE Sniper A88X board with an AMD A10 7870K overclocked to 4.5GHz and with a custom boost of 4.7GHz. Didn't get rid of the system as it was my machine from when I was a kid, instead I finished it and sometimes I fire it up just because of the nostalgia, Good ol' times.

I had a a10 7800 on the am3+ socket with a r7 250 gddr3 boost card. I used dual graphics crossfire with it, and use that setup for a littler under a year. The key to 'performance' was to get the highest possible ram speed you could afford. I settled for 2133mhz gskill sniper and was able to complete far cry 3 and watch dogs on a *crispy* 720p 60 fps playthrough on $250, with a used case and power supply from my old system. I had to upgrade the cpu cooler to a 92mm arctic tower cooler, because using all of that *"power"* with a stock cooler would cause the system to severely thermal throttle. Overall, most of the games I played ran well enough, and better than the aging xbox 360 I had. GzDoom modding was what kept me on that dual graphics setup for a while, because it ran so well for the price I paid. I was using windows 7 at the time, and I upgraded when I switched to windows 10 due to performance falling off a cliff. Upgraded to a gtx 960 ti and used that until 2020. Never looked back, and now I'm on a pny rtx 3070 LHR.

Unless I overlocked any important detail even the 2400G in another video RandomGaminginHD did was mostly faster than this GPU. It was only better in 1% and 0.1% fps dips where the APU struggled a it more. Sadly the video about the 2400G lacked any info about the memory settings apart from being DDR4-3200.

It's totally unplayable, not that crazy.