Tired of the bull crap. To be specific, the nonsensical lack of ANY work ethic. I am an AVID military historical fanatic and this video highlights the "IDIOCRACY " style 😎. CLICK BAIT. JUST SAYING 🤔.
@@andrewaustin6369 most of them use Chat GPT to write the script and then use the voice reader to narrate it. Then fill the video with stock video clips. I don't know this one is as bad as some, but it is clickbaity.
As a skydiver ... even flying slow and stright. I cant belive how accurate german flak cannons were in ww2. Lob a shell so far into the sky and hit a moveing target or have enuff cannons to hit close enuff. Thats crazzy. I try to understand it all but its alot for me to learn.
If we gave 200 to Ukraine,Russia would let 200 hit their target. That would stop the oil; and gas business in Russia,no more revenue, no fuel for tanks planes and rail. It would slow the Russians to a complete stop. Russian air defense has been orders of magnitude worse than any pre war estimates. It is like the West is encouraging Russia to keep invading, for some unknown reason. most likely European leaders are corrupted by Russian fossil fuel money.
Yeah but the way the US uses assumes a high loss rate. They usually fire a lot of tomahawks at once. When we hit Syria in 2017, I think we fired 60 and that was against an inferior air defense. I would imagine a US attack against Russia would be much larger and wouldn’t be alone. Of course that how nuclear wars start
Well, the unique thing with a Tomahawk is it's ability to fly really low, officially sub 100ft, but it's no secret that it can manage down to 75ft. Combine that with a RCS of under 0.5m2, half a person - then it's not visible on radar, Hitting something with that size, 25m up in the air travellings at 550mph. Using Flak. Good luck.
@orvarino who said anything about flak? Missles are most often shot down by other Missles, planes, rapid fire guns like Phalanx etc. Flak is not common these days.
I was working in the arms industry at the time Tomahawks came out. They were designed to deliver nuclear weapons. Although there was a conventional warhead option the opinion was no one would fire an expensive missile to deliver a 450kg warhead. Well since we were not in a nuclear war (and still are not) Tomahawks were used to deliver precision warheads on target (probably to save planes and pilots). So they started to be used, more were built and the unit cost dropped.
6:24 Correction: The Royal Navy’s Astute class submarine does not have vertical launch capability. It fires Tomahawk Cruise Missiles through its torpedo tubes.
You better make sure the democrats take the house, the senate, and the presidency. Otherwise the Putin-loving MAGA traitors will let Russia take Ukraine and beyond.
100 meters above the ground? That’s still too high. The sea launched variant could fly 50 feet above the water. The land attack versions depending on the terrain can fly 100 feet above the ground.
So this is why Hubble maped the entire earth brdore Nasa claimed that someone had made a mistake and made the lease convex instead of concave and then used the space shuttle to replace the huge lenses to concave so it could see the stars. The military has often funded nasa projects so that military hardware can be taken into space without us knowing about it. It seemed very odd at the time when nasa said that the wrong shaped lens had been sent into space because it cost about a billion dollars at the time to make it. Replacing it later so that it could do the job nasa wanted, instead of the military need made perfect sense to anyone paying attention. There was no accident, just deception.
Cause they like it that way . Not everyone wants your type of life. Some people want a more less controlled life. They can move their tent wherever they want without paying the price tag and taxed associated with that.
You don‘t need GPS only … the are landmarks too you can use to find your target. The Taurus from Germany uses 3 Typs of Navigation. 1. GPS/ Leonardo 2. Landmarks (big Houses etc) and 3. digital Maps
Not really, it was rumoured that the HIMARS was vurnable to GPS jammers, turned out it only "missed" its targets by few meters, which still get's the job done.
When we have fewer and fewer of our Americans wanting to defend our own country against Russia having to support other countries do for us is beneficial.
problem is that Russia it's not menacing the States and a lot of countries around the world need to defend themselves from the States... ...why more than 800 military bases around the world? That's why you ear every time more often "Yanks go home" and mind your own business...
no they have not, they say they are but they are not, they are only faster, not manouvrable at closing in on target, easy to shotdown. ruSSians are overselling their weapons as allways, dont buy it bro
Yes Russia has super sonic ballistic missile that are far easier to shoot down because of their trajectory. Also Russia can’t hit anything specific except by dumb luck. They are about as accurate as the ally’s WW2 bombing.
LOL! What a piece of click bait tripe. These things are seriously old school only useful against beduin and unarmed villagers which of course is what it was used for the past 20 years. No the Khnizal on the other hand is something WE should ALL be worried about.....
Where's the missile on the thumbnail? I think it's great, isn't too big of a payload and can be precise to not kill civilians or wrong targets; as opposed to many other bigger and fast curise missiles that are too destructive
Stop Russia in hours? What planet are you from? Maybe nuclear Weopons could. Then again the attacker would last maybe 30 minutes longer. Not recommended. I remind you that Russia has eqivilant or superior missiles. Just another case of describing a new "wonder Weopon" that is supposed to end the war. So far none of the wonder Weopons have made any difference. It's important to note the the us has refused to supply these missles to Ukraine.
nah. russia has been told if it launches or threatens to launch its nukes the whereabouts of Putin and his family are known at all times and they would be nuked in return. Putin values his family more than anything. how is Putin going to access his billions in the camen islands?
Another hype. Stop the Russians in hours?? What is wrong with these Westerners and series of game changers that are basically idiotic. The first Abrams Tanks to venture out of hiding into the front lines got roasted few days ago.
Right right... Navy can't even counter attacks from a NON navy force and keep losing ships and sailors. 😂😂😂😂 trying a different way to cope? How's the heating situation? What day is it to go wait in line for hours to get some eggs? Just lost more aircraft too. LOL
@@Bert-b8t Just so you know, that's totally, completely irrelevant. Russia having 30mm guns, even if they're better than a Western equivalent, does not reduce the effectiveness of the Western gun.
@@dancingferret6654 So flying into an airspace where whatever advantage you think you might have? Can be thrown right back at you. Sounds pretty relevant to me.
@user-kq4hf8se5b Very patriotic. Before you start WW3, be ruthlessly honest with yourself. A mistake, or a self deceit could lead to a humiliating defeat, or even the total destruction of the US as a nation state, and with it human civilization. This is not a computer game.
Deep analysis: It is a hidden message or intrusive thoughts about Ukraine war. More specifically, it has mainly something to do with the nuclear warheads, but I guess, RU-vid does not allow more direct expression🎉.
At around the 1:30 mark this video makes the claim that cruise missiles, like the Tomahawk, were inspired by Japanese Kamikaze planes. Really? And so modern cruise missiles weren't inspired by Germany's V1 cruise missiles, from WW2 - weapons that predated the Kamikaze tactics?
He wasn't referring to the Japanese planes. He was referring to how the weapon was guided. The German rockets were not effectively guided. The idea for the tomahawk, inspired by the kamikaze, was to have a true, reliable homing system vs a human being.
@@c2jones Really? My understanding was that the V1 were equipped with WW2 style gyroscopes and WW2 era autopilot... the lineal ancestors of the Tercom in the pre-GPS Tomahawk
@@geoswan4984 I think the narrator's comments, based up the designers of the original tomahawk, was emphasizing efficacy and accuracy. Because of the rather crude method of the V1 for calculating the impact point by the number of revolutions of a small propeller, the Germans could not use the V-1 as a precision weapon, nor could they determine the actual impact point in order to make course corrections for subsequent flights. In fact, the British publicized inaccurate information on impact points, causing the Germans to adjust their preflight calculations erroneously. As a result, V-1s often fell well short of their intended targets. Kamikazes scored 121 hits-a success rate of more than 34 percent.
The Tommahawk is a dam good weapon. Really reliable and hits the target over 96% of the time. It’s not fast but it has up to a 1500 MILE range. That’s incredible range from a cruise missile.
Hmm, I don’t see a connection with kamikaze, the tomahawk has its design dna more closely related to the german v1 self propelled guided bomb, which used pulse get engine and mechanical gyroscopic guidance, v1’s reigned terror over london during ww2 until British fighter interceptors developed strategies to catch them by diving from high altitude and tipping the off course using their wings, a highly dangerous manoeuvre but safer than trying to shoot them down and being engulfed by the explosion and shrapnel. The v1 was attributed to be the first cruise missile.
Tomahawks are GPS-guided and therefore susceptible für GPS-jamming. INS can take over for a short period of time, but the weapon looses a significant amount of accuracy. Russia's EW-capabilities have been significantly improved, therefore all GSSN-guided western weapons loose their effectiveness. Next generation of navigation is AI-targeting from all sort of sensors, where China is the leading nation.
Yes,and Russia tops the list of countries with no air defense whatsoever. The Europeans throw up the white flag as usual. The French could stop them cold if they sent their antiquated aircraft, but we know they talk a big game, and do less than any European country except Luxenberg.
They did pretty will in the opening moments of Desert Storm while the Iraqis still had one of the most sophisticated air defense systems in the world, built by the Russians........
@@buggerlugz6753with 50+ countries including NATO assisting Ukraine, Russians managed to take 18% of Ukraine’s land. I’d say their weapons are working just fine.
Actually there is no curvature of the Earth. Which is why the horizon is always at eye level. And the list goes on, and on, and on,…as to way we know, but not you, we don’t live on a globe. But, please, do go on. 😂
Operative word is "could". But like all supposed "game changing" weapons it won't do a damn thing. Russia is way ahead of you on in almost every sphere of military development. This is because in the US militarism and all development around it is focused more on being a money-making venture. The more obscenely expensive bits of kit they can turn out and charge the taxpayer for, the better. And every bit of whatever it makes has to be used overseas. All of Russia's development is home-grown, totally focused on its own defence and is a matter of national survival against the aspirations of corrupt lunatics. Might seem like a small point but the ethos differs completely. The US his new experienced invasion on its own ground. Russia has, multiple times. And importantly, most people have no appreciation of Russia's geography and shear size. In one country, you can drive almost 1/3 of the way around the planet.
Wonder if newest variants with GPS are subject to signal jamming. Seems like old terrain radar mapping and optical comparison would be a good back-up. Hoping US military has some secrets to keep them on course if and when they are launched.
I love my Jackie and our little dog. I love my sister though she pisses me off .I love the sunset on a spring day. I love my friends. I love our Lord who still loves though I'm am such a wrech; that is you answer.
Your title is absurd, these missiles travel far too slow and are too easily intercepted by modern counter measures. Hypersonics are the technology that is feared these days not these antiques.
In the Late 50's to 1975 the B-52's carried 2 AGM28B's Nuke Cruis missles. 650 NM range @1200 mph og 600 mph down low, 1.1 Mega Ton. Today the carry 20 AGM86's Nukes Ad Non Nuks. and the work. Don't know how well the HOUND DOG did Never had to LAUNCH in a real WAR. Thank your/my GOD.
Seems big slow and old . Does it have a low yield version that is immune to gps spoofing. If they were so good it would have only needed one or two with a 1 megaton yield
Для современных ПВО России дозвуковой "Томагавк" - лёгкая цель. Ещё в СССР были разработаны несколько видов сверхзвуковых крылатых противокорабельных ракет, летящих на предельно малой высоте ("Гранит", "Москит",...) - их сбить гораздо трудней. Сейчас у России появились на вооружении гиперзвуковые крылатые ракеты "Циркон" - их вообще нечем сбивать.
