This massive breakthrough in Hydrogen technology will change everything 

Firstly, I'm absolutely in agreement as to hydrogen power. We have well over 100 years of internal combustion engine development. Why re-invent the wheel? And, we are being bullied into believing that electric is the only viable option. I don't believe that this is a good path, and there are already questions being raised about the environmental impact of used batteries. Secondly, as an Australian, I'm very happy to see that the University of Wollongong is involved in the development of this hydrogen tech. Sadly, I'm not convinced that anything but electric will be given a fair chance as the whole EV thing has become political, but good on them for trying.

Glad to hear this guy

Studied Stan's work since March of 2006. It isn't easy to duplicate Meyer's technology correctly as it's taken me several long years to get at the science behind this technology and a whole lot of money buying all the equipment I needed and having somethings made by others which is very costly. I have run so many test that I have truthfully lost count but I never gave up and learned from my many failures. It's a false assumption to believe that if one had a set of plans of this technology in their hands they would be able to build it correctly let alone implement the technology into a vehicle as it's on the complicated side. The transformer alone must be vacuum resin sealed with the correct type of resin to get all the air out and prevent the wires from moving around. Movement of the wires cause the wire's protective coating to be rubbed off and thus cause the transformer to short out, and if it has air in it that air will get ionized and again cause the transformer to short out. If you can't make the water fuel capacitor on your own you will find out that having just one made will cost you big bucks at a machine shop. Then you have to source the wire, and all the other materials need to get this technology up and running and you are going to run into a lot of minimum order quantities and minimum buy amounts. For this technology to reach the masses someone has to take this technology into mass production and I have been working on doing just that as I slowly built up my little shop with all the things I needed to make this technology on my own for the sole purpose of one day going into a limited form of production with this technology. Once I get started this technology will create a lot of jobs as I can't do this alone. I will need circuit makers, assembly people, inspection personnel, quality control personnel, installers, troubleshooters, and the list goes on as this is going to be a major undertaking as it starts to phase out the use of fossil fuels world wide. If you wish to see the science behind this technology and/or give a donation to help the cause please go to OverUnity dot com and look for the subject, "Stanley Meyer Explained," under the board "Capital and Funding." I am known as h20power on that site.

Achates engine with hydrogen fuel should sound great...

Big oil will fight tooth and nail against this, and/or governments will tax the hell out of it

Have you considered the Francisco Pacheco Autoelectrolitic hydrogen generator? I've just completed my third rendition of his invention. The first one was only for demonstrating the principal. The second design was to test the efficiency, and the third one is for the on demand production for the purpose of heating my home.

Gaining 10% in efficiency for the electrolysis part of the hydrogen chain won't compensate much of the terrible efficiency of combustion engines. Not even talking of storing and transporting hydrogen.

Check out Mazda CX30 range extender - EV only 100 to 125 miles and then Wankel Engine charges the battery. 80% of Americans drive less than 50 miles per day. Hydrogen, Methanol, ethanol, DME, natural gas, propane are all good for a fuel. Transient Plasma Systems, Inc. designs and manufactures nanosecond pulsed power systems for automobiles to reduce the NoX.

Hydrogen has 27 % more energy density than gasolene, and gasolene has approximately 100 times the energy density of the litium ion battery. The theoretical NOx emmision never was an issue. Envornmental impact of buring HHO is non-existent.

Your comment about energy density is misleading. Hydrogen has a higher energy density ( by mass). However, it has a lower energy density by volume.

Now if they could only solve the storage problem. You see, a lot of the waste energy in using hydrogen as any fuel is not only extracting the hydrogen to get it pure, but also the amount of energy it takes to store it and subsequently use it as a fuel. Therefore, right now, even IF this video is accurate, it still takes more energy to make it useful than it'll give you, well beyond that of petroleum. Videos like these are so misleading because it preys on people's ignorance.

Nice animation again... but just , show a working device , this is just a nice movie with no proove of it working yet...

Hydrogen will be used as an energy source for fuel cells in cars/trucks. It won't be burnt directly in air; there is no risk of NOx emissions.

Are you sure about that hydrogen is not as energy dense statement? It's been said hydrogen has 3 times the power of gas/diesel.

When can we see this in the road? Plus electric is not the only viable future.it will take years to match to the functionality and experience of ic engine

Why not feeding O2 ( oxygen ) directly to the engine so nitrogen oxides won’t show up .

Poorly done vid Tell about the disc

Kinda cool, but still only solves one of the problems with hydrogen. A catalyst that splits up ammonia would solve all of the problems of hydrogen. Now that would be something worth writing about.

Why we should waiy for long time to fix it .difitnitly it will faster then we supossed.

2:15 means nothing

Exaggeration

Not true 1Kg hydrogen equals 34kWh if stored energy .1Kg if gasoline is 13kWh of stored energy

The real reason the hydrogen IC gets oppressed isn't necessarily because it's a bad idea. On the contrary, despite more fuel per pound needed over petrol, or the fact that it takes energy to extract it from H20, it's benefits still make a lot of sense as a green technology gateway coming from fossil fuels... I think the real reason it gets bashed isnt so obvious, but comes from the backing of electrification from certain economies across the world that have vested alot of time securing precious metals.. Those of which you see going into modern batteries, and yet the recharge time, and run time duration of very modern batteries still doesn't weigh in great when you think about uses involving long-distances milage, or hauling heavy loads where time and energy is lost waiting for a battery to charge vs instant energy via combustion.

As a consumer I demand more hydrogen vehicles.

Hai anna iam Nagendar Anna na age 42 datess.Monster qualification m.l.t medical lab technicians ,Srpt lo jobs unte cheppagalaru anna.with govt Jobs

Could you do a program on the Achate engine. This is a great engine.

In my knowledge, hydrogen produce about 115 to 125 MJ/Kg compared to fossil fuels which come around 55 MJ/Kg. Its not that hydrogen is not efficient, but its so damn explosive that the current IC Engine tech cant handle it

Except it wont