this person gave me their Secret Recipe 

Poo carp poo carp

​@@ScootinSilvia Bros acting like a 3 year old😂😂 you probably are😂😂

To Americans the "r" in carp belongs right after the "c".

Damn, all the pollution 😢

Don't release carp invasive

They deserve it, they go through a lot of stress

​@@ArcYT so do all the other fish they are out competiting which is why common cap are illegal to toss back

Tbf it's their last meal 😅

Why are the fish feasting on ass? 💀

@@UlrichLeland Ass food

If it's the latter, imma need that camera

@@ajb4230 🪦

​@@ajb4230 🧐

I thought the same thing why is the bait so big it's not like he's fishing for 60 lb fish 🤣

Man was trying to get a grouper lol. (Is that how you spell it?)

Thank you

There are native carp species like Buffalo that are visually similar to invasive. Do not kill those.

​@@siegehammer63 Ictiobus are not carp, weirdly enough. Despite their close appearance!

Or smoke em, they're great for eating.

​@@bleach-kun if animals don't want to get eaten why are they made of food

Nobody's eating fish from that place

@@alvarocostaalves *tell that to the homeless man who lives off of fishing both as a way to make money and feeds them self*

carp are bottom feeders honestly I'll eat any damn fish

Bruh he's just feeding the carp

Its gone in an hour

Jello, Oreos, coca cola, etc are used by war mongerer elites using the tears of 1000 virgins

Carp rods are big so u can cast a heavy ass dough ball or ground bait on your rod....

You can buy 2 lb 2.5, 3 or 4 lb rods for casting 4 pound ground bait balls ...

@@wenchfisterx most people don't use 4lbs baits lol I'm giving him an idea for when he fishes with corn again which does not weigh 4lbs Also what's your profile pic

@@mattburke9554 he is using a pack bait ... He could use any weight he wants

@@wenchfisterx I was referring to his old carp videos with weightless corn

He said in another video that common carp are naturalized in the northeast. Asian carp in the midwest are the really invasive ones that we gotta get rid of.

@@jeffshepherd1342 But I consider carp (both Asian and Common) to be in the same category. They are 1) human introduced, 2) destructive, 3) non-native. Having grown up in the fingerlakes I have seen the damage they do to a fishery. The responsible thing to do then is to NOT release them if caught. And yes they are damaging/harmful, including the Common Carp: nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.aspx?speciesID=4 www.in.gov/dnr/files/COMMON_CARP.pdf Copy pasted Seems like common carp aren’t as destructive but they’re still a problem

NOT ALL CARP ARE FUCKING INVASIVE YA NUM NUTS

@@subyouwont ya may got that point but would it not be feasable that do to humans a fish type got over fished and was taken from that ecosystem then when re introduced after that got used to it missing and a end result is a slight destructiveness from then being back in the water?

@@subyouwont just because you consider them to be in the same category doesn't mean everyone does.

They are naturalized where this guy lives and are legal to release

@@anotherrandomperson5070 Ah okay good stuff, I've just seen what the European carp has done to my local river and it's devastating. Have a good day 😊

No. Im Not killing fish because some government determines they’re invasive. Everyone who enforce this is just a fan of harming wildlife. Ecosystems have been equalizing of millions of years with human intervention the Carp aren’t doing any damage except becoming part of the ecosystem it will fix itself leave the fish alone you’re all animal abusers

@@stephenborgelt998 PSA: "NATURALIZED" just means the government got too overwhelmed to continue hunting the species. Carp are extremely competitive and invasive leeches on North American Ecology. If you catch one. Kill it. If you don't like the taste, use it as compost or just leave it where it is in some grass. They. Are. Invasive.

Who cares bro, gotta live your life somehow.

@Harry Satchel The s i cook is the bomb

why - stinky tofu is a thing.

lol tbh proably a decent snack for the fisherman till they get a good one.

Genuine question from someone who is from the UK and has barely fished. Why is it illegal to release the fish back into the water and classed as releasing an invasive species, when the fish was already in the water? If he didn't catch the fish, it would just be swimming around doing its thing anyway.

@@JayPea-lk5rt cause the fish is invasive, and when ya catch it you have a chance to kill it and prevent it from repopulating a ton.

@@pieceofcheese9046 it seems wrong that you are basically forced to kill the fish, personally think that's wrong and you shouldn't be fined or prosecuted. The people who are the authority should do more themselves to get rid of the invasive species instead of relying on Joe bloggs the fisherman to do the job for them.

@@JayPea-lk5rt there are fish that have gotten out into the wild that are not native. people forget *NOT ALL CARP ARE FROM ASIA LET ALONE INVASIVE*

@@JayPea-lk5rt It is wrong to let a fish get its mouth impaled and almost suffocate just for fun.

I was just about to comment a similar thing. I've found that cookie dough works pretty well too.👍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿

LMAOO

i just realized that when i saw your comment LMAO

-_-

The funniest and unfunniest line i seen

I'm sorry for your loss Mr Thomas

Retribution

common carp aren't invasive..............

@@bku12 literally look it up it is a ghost carp i’ve caught them at this spot

@@NECarp what specifically is making you think it’s a ghost, the fact that the colour is a bit lighter then usual? Cause in that case every single carp in the river near my house is a ghost carp. Fish can look a lot different just depending on the body of water.

@@bku12 This would be considered a ghost due to the marbling on the head.

Koi and carp are the same thing, koi are just different colored.

​@@NECarp mate give your head a wobble. It's a common. There's no pigmentation just pure scales. I run a few syndicates in England, big boy 40lb in them.I know what I'm talking about, you clearly don't

don't tell this guy about muddy water fishing

@@Yoruharu Wait, you think I'm more concerned with mud than the literal pile of trash floating next to the riverbank 😭😂

@@dalentces2492 that is one of the least dirty body of water i've ever seen bro, idk why you're so afraid of a few floating plastic when some other body of water is more worse than that.

​@@Yoruharu it's one of the most disgusting rivers I've ever seen lmfao Cities are just fucking vile in my humble opinion

​@@Yoruharu What kind of 3rd world country are you living in right now 😂 If THIS is the cleanest body of water you've ever seen, I can only feel sorry no lie

Carp are not native to North America

You are correct. They're a wildly invasive species and a serious problem in American water ways

bighead carp, silver carp, black carp, grass carp ( but some pond stock grass carp for algae problems) are invasive. But not common carp, mirror carp and leather carp are considered naturalized in most of states of the us.

It was a common carp that are native. Asian carp is the invasive species.

@@dylansherman4609 neat

U should get a method feeder it helps to keep the pack bait on

not that specific species of carp

@@organiccastle75 Common carps are invasive.

not everywhere

@@VienQuitonm one google search proves that common carp are practically naturalized everywhere and thus, not invasive.

​@@redronin8288 you understand a species can be naturalized and still be invasive right? these terms are not mutually exclusive.

I think it means 'hotdog water'

They are not invasive

Kill da carp eat da carp go to hospital die, save da environment save da environment, so soft bro who cares we aren't gonna be around when these fish "destroy the ecosystems"

bighead carp, silver carp, black carp, grass carp ( but some pond stock grass carp for algae problems) are invasive. But not common carp, mirror carp and leather carp are considered naturalized in most of states of the us.

No across all the us but where’s this man lived it’s not invasive

@@skylarbee-gm9gm What on earth are you talking about? All carp in North America are invasive. All carp originate from asia, that's where all of them are from. It may not be illegal to release in some states, I don't know enough to say all states follow that, but I do know they're invasive, and ecologists are desperate to stop them, especially before they spread to the great lakes.

@@Sneaksatacks do you really think that he would release insavive carp back into the water? I don’t think so

@@skylarbee-gm9gm I don't know. He probably wouldn't do it maliciously, but i don't really know him. Maybe it isn't regulated in his state, or he just didn't know. Just search up carp in usa in google, you'll find plenty of info somewhere.

@@Sneaksatacks I don’t know pretty sure there’s a video somewhere that he explains the carp is native?

It's not a felony, it's a common carp

they are not invasive everywhere

bighead carp, silver carp, black carp, grass carp ( but some pond stock grass carp for algae problems) are invasive. But not common carp, mirror carp and leather carp are considered naturalized in most of states of the us.

Everyone says that but never explains how they harm the environment, in general no one ever explains how invasion is any different from permanent migration

@@kirbe5039 as someone who was highly dedicated in environmentalism earlier in my life, I can explain, or at least provide sources that can explain better than me First off, "permanent migration" is not really a thing. Instead what happens is a new species comes into the habitat, changes it to fit their needs, then the habitat moves on. There's very few cases where an invasive species doesn't alter the preexisting environment However, that doesn't mean it can't change. Some habitats have adopted certain non-native species in, essentially making them a part of the system. I don't have any examples off the top of my head, but it would be very unlikely for this not to have happened The biggest issue with invasive species comes with humans, when we take one animal and put it somewhere else. Most of these events have happened way too recently for the habitat to have adopted the species. Some of the best ways to combat this are A) manually trapping and killing each species or B) introducing more of a native predator (called biocontrol) Now, the problem with carp specifically? Well, as the National Park Service of Mississippi says: "Invasive carp cause serious damage to the native fish populations in the lakes and rivers that they infest because they out-compete other fish for food and space. Carp are also thought to lower water quality, which can kill off sensitive organisms like native freshwater mussels." This includes all carp, not just the Asian species. However, as the NPS notes, silver carp are one of the worst However, unlike other invasive species that could be caught with traps and killed with poison, we can't do that with fish because, well, we don't want to poison the Mississippi River. So instead, certain barriers have been established along the river and its tributaries, meant to prevent the carp from making it further up the stream. These themselves won't kill the carp, which is why we need fishermen to go and personally kill them, thus why so many states have a kill order for all carp species

@@NickSmith-fe7lp that doesn't really explain why it is something that we should worry about after all it is a part of nature, and before you say anything about human involvement, humans are apart of nature just like any other animal therefore a human introducing a new species into a habitat wouldn't be unnatural by definition.

@@kirbe5039 that's such a bad reasoning. "It's part of nature that an animal was taken halfway across the world". Bullshit, and you know it, yet you don't admit it So what, all extinctions caused by humans is "part of nature"? Every time humans have killed off a species, that's just nature at work? No, that's not how it works And you know what? Even if it was, why shouldn't we try and save the species and the environment? Why should we just let it die by our own hands? We aren't a part of nature, or at least an equal part. We created nature in our heads, defined it as we do all other things. We are higher up than the old natural order, which is why we must not only protect it, but preserve it Your whole argument falls apart the second someone actually thinks it through. The only people who claim "we are part of nature, therefore everything we do is natural" are either children or people highly uneducated on sustainability and environmentalism

He literally said it was a Common Carp

@@absolfusion3688 and he clarified further it wasn't an Asian carp later in another video yes. I am aware.

bighead carp, silver carp, black carp, grass carp ( but some pond stock grass carp for algae problems) are invasive. But not common carp, mirror carp and leather carp are considered naturalized in most of states of the us.

just one major question about the molasses are we talking: mild, bold, or blackstrap? highly doubt it's blackstrap cause that stuff is more bitter than sinner's hide.

They aren't that bad honestly. Just make sure you bleed em right away.