This shredder will change the recycling game 

Such a wonderful journey!

Releasing it soooooon

That could be a nice addition!

From the testing we did up to now, there is almost no feedback, an the few that is still there is very limited. This was our fear as well, as it would have made a very unfriendly machine, but anyone can use it, it doesn’t require much strength or anything.

keep in mind this was a prototype to test the concept of the moving screens, next version has much improved safety!! stay tuned :)

Yes, this one was purely to test this concept of a single shaft shredder with this manual sieves/pushers. The second version is lower with a 800mm tall hopper so the rotor is not accessible anymore.

You mean... other than you're NOT buying overpriced, cheaply made crap from CHINA? 🤦🏻‍♂ - Max Giganteum

I bet it looks like a saw tooth to match the blade-studs.

Good idea 💪

We aim to release this shredder by the end of 2023, subscribe and stay tuned!

Esperamos se pueda dar en este 2024

We aim to release the full machine in the second half of 2023 🤞

@@Precious_Plastic Looking forward to it.

Esperamos todos para poder fabricarla

Im in the business, some things are just not profitable to do. In fact most things aren’t profitable to recycle, need financial aid from government to properly recycle most things. Thats why landfills are so profitable, cause companies just prefer to dispose their stuff

Coming in Q4 ❤️🙌⚡️

Soon :) We aim to release this new shredder within 2023, stay tuned!

perhaps replacing the motor with a "small commercial unit from china" is where the static is coming from.... did the original motor generate static?!?

Your mistake was in dealing with anything that has to do with China... 🤔🤦🏻‍♂ - Max Giganteum

@@MaxGiganteum I agree, but there are realities that we need to deal with. Yes, it would be better to NOT buy from china, but in this case we really didn't have an alternative. Believe me, if there was a domestic or European version that we could afford, we would have bought it. I don't like it, but I have to admit that the thing works a lot better than our PP version did. And we are back to shredding and remelting fairly large quantities of #5, at least for our 2-3 person volunteer operation.

​@@briangilbert3884 No alternative? There is ALWAYS an alternative. You mention that there wasn't a domestic or European version that you could afford. That tells me all I need to know and it's always the same. You bought what you did because of the low price and that's it. End of line. The truth is that it's better to spend more time and save up what you need, find a donor, find a sponsor, manufacture your own or find SOME alternative that will work. China is a communist country. Communists are evil by default. Explore every avenue and do what it takes to get your mission accomplished without dealing with that which is evil. For the record, I'm not suggesting for a second that everyone in China is evil or is on board with communism because they are not. However, the communists rule the roost and any goods, services or monetary considerations that go into that nation are consumed by them. Think about that because every time anyone does business with anyone in China... it only gives them stability and makes them stronger. One must think long term and not get caught up in short term considerations. When speaking of long term, I'm referring to decades and further... 50 years, 100 years and longer. Why? Because they do. Seek out and find the alternative. There is always an alternative. Even if it takes some time. Peace & good vibes! - Max Giganteum

From way over here, the first obvious improvement is maintenance and longevity- this design features removable cutters. The Shredder Pro would require a complete breakdown to confront failures. MOREOVER, in the instance of a significant jam, some builds of the first Pro suffered disabling damage to the frame containing the cutter shafts. Just a couple off the top of my head, without benefit of practical use of either version.

@@mavigogun 1. Easier maintenace IS one addvantage of this design at the cost of slower speed (if previous design would have the motor with the same power and the correct gear ratio it would be FASTER than this one. 2. Longetivity: NO! No difference. 3. IF you would design proprely, you CAN MAKE previous design machine that would suffer no damage in case of significant jam. Mechanical engineer with a degree here btw. :)

@@mavigogun My point is: adventage/dissadventage ratio is BETTER with previous design.

We redesigned the previous version already, you can find it in the how-tos. But bigger motor implies other modifications (that we did) : like stronger bearing and box, resulting in a quiet expensive and difficult to built machine. So we rethought the concept instead of adding another layer. And I can assure you that this one is easier to built, to maintain, cost less and shreds faster. By the way it has been designed by several mechanical and electrical engineer with degree and experience. Check the other machine Weima is doing, they are on the very proper side of things !

Yann CLM: you didn't exactly understand what i said. Let me clerify. I didn't mean to increase the motor any further, just use the same power motor as this one has. Your previous design is slower because you didn't use the proper gear ratio. IF you would, than previos design with THE SAME power motor would cut faster. And cutting faster is the most important thing if you want to be productive. Yes this design has a little easier maintenance, but it cuts SLOWER than the prevous design (assuming both designs would be optimised to their maximum potential). Building cost for both designs are very similar, not much difference. I didn't said that previous design is allways better. But i said previus design would be better if both designs would be optimised to their maximum potential. :)