This star is 10 billion times larger than the Sun! A space documentary about mysterious stars

Подписаться 257 тыс.

Просмотров 232 тыс.

50% 1

In this captivating documentary, we explore the awe-inspiring scale of the largest star known to humanity, where the mighty Sun is reduced to a mere grain of sand in comparison. Cutting-edge visuals and expert insights guide you through the mind-boggling dimensions of this colossal celestial body, inviting you to witness the extremes of stellar magnificence.
As we delve into the mysteries of the universe, discover the science behind the biggest star and its impact on our understanding of cosmic proportions. From mind-bending size comparisons to the mesmerizing beauty of the cosmos, this video unveils the wonders of the universe on an unimaginable scale.
Animation is created by Bright Side.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Music by Epidemic Sound www.epidemicsound.com
Check our Bright Side podcast on Spotify and leave a positive review! open.spotify.com/show/0hUkPxD...
Subscribe to Bright Side: goo.gl/rQTJZz
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our Social Media:
Facebook: / brightside
Instagram: / brightside.official
TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@brightside.of...
Stock materials (photos, footages and other):
www.depositphotos.com
www.shutterstock.com
www.eastnews.ru
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more videos and articles visit:
www.brightside.me

Наука

Опубликовано:

22 янв 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 162

@ottoschnosel6996 3 месяца назад

Too many wrong informations,

@user-hy4hm4fm9s Месяц назад

what do you mean

@colognelotion4260 Месяц назад

Name one

@michaelharrington75 Месяц назад

@@colognelotion4260 Having to "wiggle and dodge space rocks" while traveling through the asteroid belt. The rocks in the asteroid belt are so small and so far apart a ship traveling through probably wouldn't see a single asteroid.

@hogg4229 23 дня назад

Too much*

@hogg4229 23 дня назад

@@colognelotion4260a car can travel 5MPS. C’mon dude

@Space_Library Месяц назад

As someone who's always been intrigued by astronomy, I found this documentary to be a goldmine of knowledge. It not only delves into the characteristics of different types of stars but also touches on their potential impact on our own planet. Engaging, informative, and visually stunning!

@hunterbohman7555 3 месяца назад

This video states that proxima a&b are traveling at 5 miles per second, and that a super car travels at that speed, at it's fastest. A super car can travel in hundreds of miles per hour. Not even close to 5 miles per second. That is wildly untrue and has me questioning any of the other information in this video

@ghostchick5275 3 месяца назад

It was probably an error - and an insignificant one at that.

@SharonD369 3 месяца назад

5 miles per second is 18,000 mph lol.

@adoptmetrades610 3 месяца назад

It's not wrong cuz it's very big and the universe bigger.

@adoptmetrades610 3 месяца назад

Even the earth spins around itself 3600km/h

@SharonD369 3 месяца назад

@@adoptmetrades610 No, the earth spins at 1609kph or 1000mph.

@contraversionmedia2556 3 месяца назад

You mean to tell me I could fit a million marbles in one basketball? There’s something off here

@MF-kr4hf 3 месяца назад

It's called the 'Theory of Relativity' for a reason..

@contraversionmedia2556 2 месяца назад

@@MF-kr4hf doesn’t matter how much this is a theory there is no way you can fit a million pencil erasers in that Basketball? I would’ve just believed it if there wasn’t an illustration of that basketball

@michaelschwartz9485 Месяц назад

If the marbles were small enough, then you could!

@contraversionmedia2556 Месяц назад

@@michaelschwartz9485 but they are not He using a general example of a marble not smaller or bigger

@hogg4229 23 дня назад

He didn’t say that. He said 1/2 of a pencil eraser. Pay attention.

@Blazeww 2 месяца назад

So. Voyager 1 isn't even close to 1 light-year away. More like 20 or so light hours. And 5 miles per sec is 2 miles per sec shy of escape velocity. Like space shuttle. Mach 17+

@McLKeith 2 месяца назад

This site needs to fact check.

@jetsetter8541 2 месяца назад

10 billion times bigger than our Sun ! Beyond imagination. ...

@xLUMINOUSx 2 месяца назад

Also beyond truth

@JohnHo1975 Месяц назад

10 billion times exaggeration

@TotalImpacteSportsNetwork 3 месяца назад

Jeez, this video wins the award for most factually incorrect upload !

@user-hy4hm4fm9s Месяц назад

ya think

@buggsy5 Месяц назад

It is not unusual for this "creator". All of their videos are loaded with factual errors.

@ahhongng9916 Месяц назад

5:26 BeetleJuice, i can see you [In boggo's voice]

@ahhongng9916 Месяц назад

6:18 HERZHELLZGARNETTZSDARR

@ahhongng9916 Месяц назад

6:45 VY cMa

@ahhongng9916 Месяц назад

8:00 too small

@raosohail3506 3 месяца назад

That's absolutely incredible

@colinoneill3659 3 месяца назад

ERRORS 1:52 "They don't have enough mass for those 'chemical' reactions." 8:15 "Yu Scai is a record-breaker in fuel 'combustion'..." Stars have nuclear reactions, not chemical reactions. 20:48 "Black holes are the 'heaviest' objects in space. This is a mischaracterization. Black holes range from as heavy as 3x solar mass to much, much heavier. I think they meant to say they are the 'densest' objects in known space. Also they mischaracterize the magnitude of the gravitational force of a black hole. Nearby a black hole gravity is indeed a phenomenon; but at astronomical distances, it acts like star-caliber gravity. 21:20 "[Betelgeuse] will turn into a white dwarf [until] it becomes invisible." It will eventually stop shining. Unseen is not the same as invisible.

@matthewfrazee3352 3 месяца назад

Stars are fueled by nuclear reactions not chemical reactions.

@brucemccheyne4699 3 месяца назад

You sure about chemical vs nuclear... jury is still out after you cut through the BS

@HE-pu3nt Месяц назад

I'm so glad you wrote all this, now I don't have to.

@karaburgei2344 Месяц назад

Betelgeuse will become a neutron star not a white dwarf as betelgeuse is a red supergiant. red supergiants go supernova and supernova cant produce white dwarfs

@colinoneill3659 Месяц назад

@@karaburgei2344 Thanks for the clarification. I had originally thought white dwarf and neutron stars were the same thing. The video quoted @21:20 was referring to a white dwarf becoming "invisible."

@RobertWilliams-mk8pl 3 месяца назад

Not chemical but nuclear reactions isn't it?

@hogg4229 23 дня назад

Yes it is nuclear, which is technically a type of chemical reaction

@daniels6276 3 месяца назад

I love learning about the universe.

@Snailmailtrucker 3 месяца назад

Better get ready to Unlearn and then Relearn some real facts !

@dougieh9676 3 месяца назад

Try a different channel. This one has too much misinformation. Try "Cool Worlds" or "The Entire History of the Universe"

@hexus4342 2 месяца назад

Beetle juice reaching the asteroid belt really !!?😒

@pennsylvanianlol Месяц назад

Betelgeuse is over 900 million km in diameter, the asteroid belt at it's closest to the Sun is about 330 million km. Betelgeuse would actually reach nearly 3x the distance to the closest part of the asteroid belt. It would even engulf Jupiter!

@adamhughes4442 Месяц назад

Won't happen next week though 😊

@aku7598 2 месяца назад

Why tell the biggest star in the universe when the star is in the Milky Way galaxy. Billions of other galaxies in the universe.

@larslarsen7457 Месяц назад

Actually Trillions😊

@user-hy4hm4fm9s Месяц назад

@@larslarsen7457 or even more

@AngularMomentumToys 3 месяца назад

Did you repost a video as copyright issues?

@kathrin-mariasamarrastehle6538 2 месяца назад

Very Interesting

@ImagineIf-SciFi 3 месяца назад

Amazing to think that one of the smallest stars, a brown dwarf, weighs 80 times more than Jupiter.

@dereknelson3080 3 месяца назад

They have no clue how much it weighs.... I mean cmon now. Can't weigh anything in space.

@jarrett7023 2 месяца назад

@@dereknelson3080 The trick lies in exploiting the connection between a star’s mass and the strength of the gravity it generates. For stars with planets, the strength of gravity dictates how fast a given planet will complete an orbit of any specific size, and Newton’s law of gravity can then be used to give the star’s mass. The same technique also works for binary stars, where two stars orbit around each other. Measuring the mass of isolated stars is harder, but also possible. That’s how they do it…..it is very possible to measure weight in space

@user-hy4hm4fm9s Месяц назад

a brown dwarf is not a star

@user-hy4hm4fm9s Месяц назад

it is a failed star

@PaulHigginbothamSr 3 месяца назад

I think 5 billion grains of san on earth beaches is a tremendous undervalue. Maybe 5 trillion sand grains. A billion would probably cover our local river. If ya'll look at avegadrose number of atoms it is much larger than that.

@theccpisaparasite8813 3 месяца назад

Avogadro en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amedeo_Avogadro

@MF-kr4hf 3 месяца назад

Probably a lot of atoms per sand grain..

@officialgreenhero1435 3 месяца назад

20:27 the new calculation says only about 40 years.

@komolkovathana8568 3 месяца назад

I don't know their Density, but if approximated Volume and "mass" is nearly proportionally SIMILAR.. Billion times of (our) Solar mass : {billion}^(1/3)= 1,000 Meaning, billion times of mass is only thousand times of size (diameter), which is already large enough: 1.4 million km. of sun's diameter x 1,000 =1.4 billion km. The larger Star (boundary)will be extended to (around) Saturn Orbit..!!

@lylecraig-eq7jk 3 месяца назад

I've not ever believed a black hole is what they said it is. That the centers of spherical celestial bodies have zer gravity. 😮😅

@stephenanderle5422 2 месяца назад

Just listen. This is a kid talking! What do you expect?! Info is all wrong.

@philipculver2719 3 месяца назад

Speculation, conjecture guess work. No proof for what they say. Just string a group of theories together to make it look like they know what they are talking about. It is not wise IMO to just accept this stuff out of hand. Sure there may be a few actuals facts to try and add credibility.

@HE-pu3nt Месяц назад

28:00. I noticed you used Lr to denote a heavy element. I'd be very surprised if Lr, lawrencium, existed in the distant universe. Do you know why? No of course you don't. You just copied the bottom of the periodic table without realising many of those elements are man made only. Many of them only last milliseconds, some only nanoseconds.

@hogg4229 23 дня назад

We’ll, considering you said existed in a different Universe. You have no idea if there is even a multiverse, let alone if it had/has this element. Don’t correct others while throwing none sense out there yourself.

@HE-pu3nt 23 дня назад

@hogg4229 distant, different, well I guess they almost mean the same thing.

@aduboi1534 Месяц назад

the reaction inside a star is not chemical.

@GamerDave1974 Месяц назад

I heard Astronomers say Betelgeuse going boom in the 10's of years, not10k or 100k!?! So much debate in these issues lol.

@neilfoss8406 Месяц назад

Referring to the energy from a star coming from chemically converting hydrogen to helium. Could there be a bigger mistake? It's not chemical. Its not atomic. IT'S A FUSION REACTION. As in our sun fuses 700,000 tons of hydrogen(approximately) into 695,000 tons of helium every second. The missing 5000 tons became energy. Oh and another significant thing about fusion is its directly related to the production of super novas and the elements. How many other things will I learn incorrectly by watching this?

@michaelharrington75 Месяц назад

13:40 "We have to wiggle and constantly dodge space rocks." Lol. That isn't true. The rocks in the asteroid belt are spread so far apart we probably wouldn't even see one while traveling through the belt.

@JosephJLopez-bo3jr 2 месяца назад

ASAP!!!!!!

@ABCD-tq7si Месяц назад

Not chemical reactions (intact at atom-level). Nuclear reactions instead.

@Himanshujoshi-bk2tg 3 месяца назад

Jisko🎉vo ❤

@danieleminardi4465 2 месяца назад

Chimical reaction?? Please. Atomic fusion!!

@kylecanovas Месяц назад

I swear this is a rerun

@frankorosz901 Месяц назад

Hydrogen molicles being smashed togeather to form heavier atoms up to iron atoms is called fusion. That is not a chemical reaction but a nuclear reaction.

@buggsy5 Месяц назад

Elements heavier than iron are also formed by fusion - it just requires the pressures and temperatures of a supernova to do so.

@hogg4229 23 дня назад

No car goes 5 MPS dude. Not even close

@Idonotsleep1979 Месяц назад

Sana meron tagalog dubbed para mas maitindihan ko

@aliayyad4342 Месяц назад

1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000° Beetlejuice ☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️☀️ 2000s suns

@patrickbennett439 3 месяца назад

49th!

@TWOCOWS1 3 месяца назад

The information is great, but the vid is haphazadly assembled/organized. it jump all over the place, back and forth. for example, it is talking about a magentar, but suddendly hops over to a supernova, back to magnetar, then space travel and rockets, then our asteroids, Voyeger space craft... the kitchen sink... Pls redo this and organize it better, then repost it

@user-td9rr1op8e Месяц назад

All stars are suns so there is no stars they are actually suns themselves independent

@SY-sk3xj 23 дня назад

Totally agree, scientists have the fundamental basics all wrong. If you skin the outer layers of the earth enough, then you'll see miniature sun. Probably very small sun but it's all the same.

@duncan3144 2 месяца назад

Nuclear reaction. Not a chemical reaction.

@tagorechandmeah425 2 месяца назад

Not chemical reaction. Fusion is a nuclear reaction.

@NewToronto 2 месяца назад

It's not chemical reactions. It's nuclear fusion.

@davemason1010 2 месяца назад

Stars shine because of NUCLEAR reactions, not chemical.

@tint6625 Месяц назад

@11:00 one scope equal billion tons ? I call that bs

@stpetersprayergroup4175 2 месяца назад

How to learn science 100% cos here in kerala? The tamil-africans are distributed my family 500 years

@Universallaws776 2 месяца назад

Actually the North Star is not at the very tip of the big dipper’s handle. If you follow The last two stars at the dipper’s bowl , the first star is in the line is Polaris the North Star.

@buggsy5 Месяц назад

Correct, it is the end of the Little Dipper's handle.

@AndrewJSy Месяц назад

So it’s larger than the Milky Way Galaxy?

@vv.prabhakaran9942 3 месяца назад

Pls translate it to Malayalam

@ramakumarak 3 месяца назад

99.8% of the mass actually xd

@MF-kr4hf 3 месяца назад

Y'all taking fact checking to a whole nother level..

@user-or5zb7su5x Месяц назад

I think there's some AI

@user-hc1se8on9m Месяц назад

Knowledge given in the video is flawed. Nuclear reactions in the stars are not chemical reactions!!

@alexanderorourke123 3 месяца назад

10 billion times larger than the sun the only thing i know that is larger than this is my Ego 😂😂😂

@MF-kr4hf 3 месяца назад

Uranus.

@alexanderorourke123 3 месяца назад

Your a brainie person eh

@user-oe7fx4uk2l Месяц назад

You can't fit a million half size pencil erasers in a basketball.

@nicolasolton 3 месяца назад

30 seconds of commercials atvthe start and 3 minutes into this video a 55 second commercial break? No thanks.

@abelardlindsey7579 3 месяца назад

The star that burns twice as bright lives half as long.. And B416 has burned very very bright.

@23pravesh Месяц назад

I like to read and learn about the astronomy. Only experts in this field should post videos that are factual. Too many discrepancies!!

@Mrjianhao 3 месяца назад

This is giving me more knowledge

@buggsy5 Месяц назад

Gaining knowledge is nice - but it is even better to know if what you learn is factual or in error.

@Mrjianhao Месяц назад

@johnhause7150 3 месяца назад

Its all speculation, not fact. Nobody was there in the beginning and nobody has ever seen what or how it all goes down.

@Snailmailtrucker 3 месяца назад

Everything that you said in the first 2 minutes was pure horseschit !

@MF-kr4hf 3 месяца назад

*HorseShit

@JosephJLopez-bo3jr 2 месяца назад

The time to get ready is noW!!!!

@jabe3780 Месяц назад

It's too bad they decided to make this video like it was for 8 year olds.

@nicolescuff 3 месяца назад

14:16 Saturn is less dense then water so what you just said was false

@jamesabbate 3 месяца назад

This video is full of incorrect information

@richard1835 3 месяца назад

A wonderful video on our magnificent universe.

@vv.prabhakaran9942 3 месяца назад

pls translate to Malayalam Language

@J91589 2 месяца назад

A star cannot be 10 billion times bigger than the sun… it would have became a black hole a long time before it got this big. Idk how they got so much wrong in this video.

@adamhughes4442 Месяц назад

I know. 10 billion times greater than our sun. Complete nonsense.

@bobbybob3865 2 месяца назад

Even Donald Trump wouldn't stare at this star.

@LovelyBeetle-pf4zk Месяц назад

easy to make money by resposting the same knowledge every week

@user-rk5jy6py4n Месяц назад

All nuculu

@marcparkinson4118 3 месяца назад

Note, to be a star, you have to have nuclear fusion. A brown drawf does not. Therefore, IT IS NOT A STAR.

@MF-kr4hf 3 месяца назад

Uranus is a Brown Dwarf..

@Lousy-Looter 2 месяца назад

Try tellem that in Hollywood....I want to be a star 🌟 😅

@buggsy5 Месяц назад

@@MF-kr4hf Is it? I would think that Jupiter comes much closer - and even it is about an order of magnitude too small.

@JamesLine-uz5bh 3 месяца назад

I bet none of you have witnessed any of this that you are trying to tell us!

@brucemccheyne4699 3 месяца назад

Speculative BS mixed with CGI and computer models gives you utter BS

@nicolescuff 3 месяца назад

12:41 not true beatlejuice is not one of the biggest stars anymore it’s losing mass

@douglasennis7291 3 месяца назад

That star doesn't look 10 million times larger than our sun 🌞 maybe 10millionntimes the size of the 🌎

@terrauncebowie6712 3 месяца назад

They luv to overexaggerate for views.

@euclideureka1142 2 месяца назад

bullcrap science

@ladygumshoe7402 Месяц назад

Thanxs for the video but i have to hive it a thumbs down. Too many mistakes, that its ridiculous!!!!!

@mohammadnadeem9564 2 месяца назад

James web telescope , Archimedes and Hubble telescope all are unraveling the glory and greatness of the creator of this universe, whom muslims call as ALLAH.

@warakpawairakpam270 Месяц назад

Wdym Allah is not real.

@ericchin739 3 месяца назад

No, its not. It is physically impossible for an object to be that massive - unless it were in a part of the universe that has a lower force of gravity. Not even going to watch this garbage.

@bojandimitrieskimilenkovic9226 3 месяца назад

This thumbnail is one of the dumbest I've seen this year, I mean that star isn't even a 1000 times bigger than the sun.......not up to scale maybe? And why is that? Just draw a curve in the middle of the thumbnail and put a dot next to it FFS.....