This Strategy Changes The French FOREVER 

OK nvm those violins were loud af 🤣🤣🤣

not just knights but most units tend to attack the nearest thing even if its just a house if you A-click, ignoring nearby enemy units. this is why micro is so important when you attack an enemy base, to make sure your army attacks the enemy army instead of a random house while they get shot with arrows.

unless you're only playing custom games you should find people on your level pretty fast

@@bigsmoke4592 yeah, slowly but surely starting to become more even. Really thought we were on to a winner last night... but not quite haha!

Landmark when finished build cannot change location if overrunned. By making Wonder not Landmark, it could be built up in other places if destroyed, give more strategies in play (this is impossible in 1v1 but able in team game).

it would cost wood to repair or rebuild lol

Dont think so. I bought a new computer last month to play this game specifically

yes, yes it is

Depending of the situation and civs

It is if you are beastyqt

It was definitely beasty's advantage. However, kasva got 3 out of the 4 small deer packs spawning on his side.

The Pit

Everyone can see it on the map

Going to play a little devil's advocate on this one. I think that late game AoE4 is very unexplored because so few games reach that point. Most late game matches even with pros just turn into spam fests with no thought or strategy as they just hope their unit comp wins against the enemy by brute force. Kasva tried to win by spamming units into a choke point right next to Beasty's defenses and production. Not once did he try and push another flank to force the armies to split. What if he took 10 spearmen and built 8 or 9 rams on that west flank? He could have forced beasty to overcommit and allowed his east flank a better opportunity to break through. I have a hunch that rams in Imp are under valued. They are cheap and only cost 1 pop. Perhaps the investment of needing infantry to build them feels too much? Maybe allowing them to be built from the siege workshop might make players use them more? I do not know that statistics but i would venture to say that only around 5-10% of games reach this level of stalemate so players do not have plans or strategies on how to break strong defensive positions and often just attempt to make the more expensive stuff they can thinking they can just brute force the issue. I say all this with being open to the possibility there is not enough in the game to counter strong late game defensive positions and maybe something like petards from AoE2 should be added to give players an option to quickly destroy a large amount of infrastructure that opens a window of aggression. However as of right now my position is that players will learn how to deal with stalemates eventually it just takes longer since they are exposed to it so little compared to something like fuedal aggression which you see almost every game.

Trebs are very usefull

First stone wall came up at 17 min into the game. Only way to curb it more is to just not allow walls to be built ever. Compared to AoE2 walling is almost nonexistant in AoE4.

Then they would again gain the ability for a 2nd tc without counterplay which is way too strong and would be again the only playstyle for them which would be boring. I would rather see a buff in their bounty system. Either something like 15 Gold per deer or a buff to their boni, so that people would again play more around it.

@@OptimusCrime4444 I think the bounty buff would make em more versatile but that would make it broken. A faster TC doesnt make a civ hard to beat ... do you see most people do an early 2TC with Ottoman despite the extra stone? If anythign it'll slow the Rus aggression down cause they'll need the extra food to boom

@@MrAtaguas yeah, but the devs intendet that if you go for a second tc, it should be able to be denied by super fast Aggression. In the two tc meta not even the fastest french build order could deny it. You could not stop the two tc from rus to happen. If you try, you would be far behind. And if you go two tc yourself, you are stsrting from a disadvantage, because rus would build their tc faster and have a 20% wood gather bonus together with whatever foodgather modifier you got from the bounty. This Was the reason rus was the strongest civ by far, because you would start from behind by default. This is bad gamedesign

@@OptimusCrime4444 that doesn't make any sense what about the french vil production bonus and song dynasty. A advantage in villager production isn't game breaking and having 1 or 2 extra vils at 6 minutes aisn't gonna do shit

@@MrAtaguas it was broken and they finally nerf after 6 months 🤷‍♂️

Why?

@@maxmustermann3811 because of the ability to mass produce armies, the military schools that save a part of the resources, having the possibility to build stone walls and the janissaries have damage bonus against cavalry.

@@WardaddyXCIV i know, Just kinda random to say: If kasva played Otto He would have won, Its Just a Random statement

@@maxmustermann3811 I know, it was just something I thought watching the match. Just it

English and malians cant get 6000 stone plus another 6000 for this Many walls and keeps

i though this allways would happend on this kind of maps, this is why I ban them

Because of the cold winter, many great generals have tried in the past, none actually achieved it.

Guild Hall withdraw stone

Guild hall landmark

The pitt

@@selucusptolemy3149 Thanks