This Video Is A Lie 

rip imagine if this was top comment

This is gonna keep me up all night

damn its not as simple as it looks coz the sentence above is wrong so that means its not simple at least i solved one thing someone else can solve the rest i cant waste all day

"this is a lie"

What if both are incorrect.

why are people like this

@@ayman023 no no, they are right

Genius

but 5hen the fact that the video would be a lie is a lie so its true but a lie

If you were to create the time machine with one of your close friends with them knowing most of what to do and have them go through and kill your grandfather you wouldn't run into this problem

me at 2 am

You're thinking with the right head my friend. We're not all sexaholics, as some women believe.

He is a lie.

He is a truth

or is he even someone?

But what makes someone someone?

Ah yes bacon

but actually yes :)

Yesn't.

@@kilos5958 and sometimes no

Well yes, but actually no

Nes

8:47

@@panda11648 masterpiece.

@@butter6095 yes

@@emodenki4982 best thing I’ve seen all day

What if I can only afford 144 🤣

That's fun, but it's not based in any science. - a fellow Whovian

@@pance_9912 spoilers

@@pance_9912 Ignoring Occam's Razor, this statement can't be proved wrong nor correct though, so it kinda fits the theme of the video.

What episode / story is that from? I don't remember this

@@Branogeni Pretty sure its from The Angels Take Manhattan, but I could be wrong.

Pie

Lucky, you got pasta. I got Ninjamas, and I’m definitely not 5 years old

@@adgeifc4398 I'm eating pie rn how'd you know

@@bridgetcaton2881 duno man my brain said pie

Hahahahahahahaha

brilliant!

If everything in that video was a lie, so the statement "everything was a lie" isn't true either. That means everything in that video was true and it was sponsored by brilliant

@@witheredrose110You're too smart to be left aliveeeee

@@user-kt5qd2fj3k this is the task that cannot be solved: "This is a lie". It cannot be confirmed or disproved. There was even a guy whose name I do not remember who thought about it and found that there are sentences that cannot be disprove or confirm. Overall, this is also a paradox, and this is probably what the author of the film meant - to include a paradox in the title.

I've been having more and more deja vu recently to the point where it almost feels like I'm reliving the same 1yr. Gonna check out that K drama Mochii

Dude, I kinda feel blessed that there are people like you in the comment section. Thank you so much for your theory.👏🏻🥰

But memory isn't completely reliable, so if this were true it could explain instances of deja vu and could also possibility explain the mandella effect

@CutiePie Sadly, no.

@CutiePie yep

but then you're neither alive nor dead right? how can u say that you're dead

Did the same thing. I must know these lies!

ikr

I don't see the point in this comment tbh

Just click it anyway 🤣

It didnt say '(not clickbait)' so I didn't think I could trust what was divulged in the title lol

Proud to do

Efaga

Or were they?

I didn't like the scientific inaccuracies

@@bandito_801 thank you I agree this person is extremely scientifically illiterate to be talking about this subject.I feel sorry for the people being misinformed by these ‘deep videos’ they need to look at real science and not this malarkey

*vsauce theme intensifies*

It is sponsored, it's the saying that changes.

Hey Vsauce michael here How fast can you run?

It said everything in this video is a lie IN THE VIDEO...

Ikr

You seem like someone who has never had very much fun at all.

agreed

And, news flash, time travel isn't real!

i think the solution for the bootstrap paradox is that someone else or the same boy wrote that book then found a time machine and went back in time to publish that book in the name of william shakespear, then their future self loved william shakespear and found the time machine, went back in time and published the book, and it goes full cycle

@@betagamp no, the real answer is just this wouldn’t happen ever. It’s like saying a Giant ant knocks in your door. But ants aren’t giant, and they can’t knock on doors. So this situation is a paradox! The ant paradox! That’s what the bootstrap paradox is like, essentially.

Isn't that the definition of learning tho?

@@molrat it is, but I think he meant that the majority of us never truly learned anything “new” as in never before discovered or invented

@@MrBingo-rv4mk yh like for us to really learn we would have to discover something new

@@kristlecasey9506 Can you discover something new if it was already there?

@@goofy9827 someone's definition of new is subjective. It will be new to the person that's learning it but not new as a whole if that makes sense

Underrated comment🤣🤣🤣🤣

Yes that's kind of the red line through this whole video, however this video title is just a good example of a paradox so he had to do it.

Good explaining, underrated comment and makes sense

Everyone in comments is so smart. What do all these big words mean?

You should watch the series dark that series is based on that concept

@@khushjain2684 i watched it and didn't understand much 😅 very confusing stuff

Yes, this is my favorite too. I think this is how it was done in the third harry Potter book. They went back, but everything technically already happened the first time, they just didn't know. Harry even sees himself across the lake but assumes it's his father the first time around. I always loved that book due to how neatly the time travel wrapped up the story.

The video is titeled incorrectly, this is a shower thoughts video but somehow i think that's the point of the title that states a lie wich is a lie wich was the point of the title, got it? lol

@@loganwolv3393 Sure..... I got it.....

@@loganwolv3393 For sure...

He’s real alright I

Damn

Damn

Damn

Damn

damn

Yeah and even if you haven't, we know the light turns off because you can literally just put your phone on record and put it in there and then close the door and boom, now ya know

top of the fridge touches the button that triggers the light of fridge at an angle

lol guess i wasn't the only one

when the power went out i saw the fridge w/out the light on...

I did watched the lights getting off, it's hard to achieve that shit

Dejavu doesn’t occurs for you during the day? I get dejavu several times a week at any time

@@Sealedservant no it does happen during the day, what I’m saying is I believe deja vu is just our dreams that we forgot and randomly remember because we forget %90 of our dreams but idk just a theory.

@@SLITHERIS well sorry but I have to debunk it. I get a dejavu of a lot of things I do during the day that I never really dream about and I remember my dreams more than the average person.

@@Sealedservant bro he's assuming that deja vu occurs when we have a dream and forget about it,and something we do triggers us to remember the forgotten dream,in part at least,anyway,my point is,if you forget about your dreams,how can you recall that you didn't forget about it in the first place

I usually only get dejavu in familiar places, with things I know that I’ve done before, and if not then the places I visit that give me dejavu are places that are similar to other places that I go to. If it’s not just a glitch in the human brain, then we are blissfully ignorant and shouldn’t worry about it anyway.

but you wouldn't be older. If you went back in time when you are 50, you would still be 50 when you arrive. Perhaps die around 80, then some time later, you're born... again. But just as you have always been. And then you will grow up to time travel when you are 50... again. Its a loop. You will die from your perspective at 80, and will die at 80 from others perspective, but will cease to exist in a future where you grow older than 50 without time traveling.

@@vjexmixv yes but this scenario implies going to a separate timeline... so killing your grandfather won't affect you... going with the same timeline immediately creates an age paradox

@@faisaldeeb6479 no; the paradox is fixed if a new timeline is created: who killed the grandfather? You from another timeline. The new timeline’s you is dead, but the time traveling, old timeline you lives on. Rather, the paradox comes in the self fulfilling time travel system, famously represented in Harry Potter, where the events in the future cause the causes of the future events in the past, or vice versa with events and causes, because they are really both causes, and both events/effects.Like how harry saves his past self. In the same timeline. Only fulfilling the events of the past and future.

Wouldn't anti atoms be considered negative?

@@zmansadventures No, they don't take up negative space. They just have an opposite charge. They still exist as things taking up space with a positive size, albeit a very small size.

Sounds like a UB for me

Yeah I believed in that fat guy for most part of my life. Legend has it, I still kind of do... Or at least wish he was real.

I was never taught that... my parents never told me about Santa no matter how much one of my grandmothers wanted them to.

If colour blind people can see the true color of life then that means they can see colors and if they can see colors they are not color blind 🤔🤔 ...... think about it

If they can see the true colors of life, then why can't they tell the difference between some of them while we can?

@@meetbhatt7435 if we’re thinking in terms of the colors we see, then yes. Colors don’t actually exist.

@@scriptedjava265 yeah, they are just shades

no.

Ooooooooof 🤯

"I tell you truthfully that all I say are lies"

That sentence doesn't hold a boolean value

bro i was about to comment thids

How is that. Aparadox

yes its like he is sitting with you

Same

Date him

@@nokey6175 wont that make you A *Gay* ?

Lol why do so many people comment this

But there's new quantum physics studies states different... It was a study done on the wave or particle nature of a molecule ... I'm not sure if you have heard about it . But it basically ended with the conclusion that that molecule formed itself as particle when there were observers and when there were no observers that was just simply waves and that is not even visible...

So it just basically states that we observers give the world a shape . Physics aren't that easy as you think:')

@@shinihahaha4142 Oh of course! Quantum physics and all that are a completely different thing and really cool. And the whole Schrödinger’s Cat thing, as mentioned in the video, is really interesting. I just really dislike the fridge light and tree falling in the forest questions in particular, because _those_ are stupid.

@@TheOverArchiver Quite actually they are kind of... The fridge thing really sounds stupidest tho as well as the tree thing.. maybe they are viewing it from different point of view that seems amusing to them ... I really don't know 😅 .

@Edit Error welp this is getting confusing let's make a paradox out of it

@@urskunked Yes that's how I think time travel works too but is there any proof?

yeah imagine hitler never lived many people wouldnt die in the war and yyour grandma/ your grandfather would have another girl/boyfriend so you wouldnt live!

@@LaserKatze Your predetermined to incarcerate here from your last life weather you believe that or not so it would still be you born but it would be in a different body.

Noname ! most of time travel stuff is teorícal and if you belive in multiple worlds then that is how it may work

@@urskunked no shit but if you have done an action you wont get back to your original tieline anymore

For my fridge too!

There is also a button that you can press

@@w8754 you cant know if the door actually press on it without drilling a hole through the door to see Quantum physics fuck ye

@@adamhelberg9228 tho that sounds cool, you don't really need to drill a hole. Just slooowly close the door and you'll see the door pressing on the button when it's almost closed. And then you can just check the button on your own, with a finger or something while the door is open.

yes same

lol😂

What's so special?

Life's just hard man... I hope when i die, i would at least be reincarnated.. i just want to live.. i want to kee my memories.. not lost them.. but- wait- someone's- i feel like someone's watching me. I don't know what to do. Help. He-

@@MushroomManC you good?

@@MushroomManC are you alive or dead 😂😂 or you were really dead 😵😵 Doing overacting

@@MushroomManC join astral projection community or reddit and discord. So you can remember your past life. Or if you want to do astral projection intentionally. Practice meditation in Buddhist

Dudeeee, holy moly I just realized that.

My schrodingere fridge is always empty :(

... after he saw a certain episode of Wandavision.

That's sounds like speculation and conjecture that leads to a new conundrum !

OwO

Ladaladkdkdkd

nutshells in a paradox

lmao

Yes

Loool

Lol

Loooool

Tis da human condition.

You understand it for a moment, but your brain doesn't have the storage to contain all the information, so in reality you understood nothing.

what?

@@frostyfrostbite406 you must be quite smart. The human brain has ~3 petabytes of storage. If you have that all filled with information and not capable of consuming more information, you're quite smart. Edit: that just happened to me. Holy shit 2nd edit: goddamn it. I was supposed to sleep tonight.

@@tarkkokuokkanen1060 lol

no

Do read about the Ship of Theseus Paradox

Another way of putting the ship of Theseus paradox

Some think the matter matters, some think the timing matters, and some think the idea of the object matters

Vsause talked about this a little

no because title of the video is not a video

The title and thumbnail are not the video

That's the paradox. Say a true statement is said to be false, including the statement that says it's false. Since the statement stating that the statement is false, includes itself, wouldn't that mean the statement stating the statement is false, be false? But if the statement stating that the statement is false, is false, wouldn't that mean the statement is true? (You have no idea how long it took me to write this)

@@m07z You have no idea how many times I had to re-read this in order to understand it🤯

your* disappearing*

Im not gonna change ge my comment to the correct words

@@kingschapter9490 intensifies*

Well technically you wouldn't disappear

You might disappear because then he would’ve never adopted you, and you could’ve ended up being killed, or left somewhere, or get parents that are murderers.... you never know.

Ikr? cruel.

Maybe thats why he said this video is a lie so you just dont belive it and go back to reality

@@ihatemylife4213 and what exactly is reality?

Reality hmm it exists but is tiny but maybe over of course maybe not

vsauce lead us in a infinity loop because every question is copied from vsauce

@@lovrokorosak9144 yeh nah science 😑

feel ya xD

Same! Sometimes i'm in a random conversation with someone and I say, "I think I had a dream about talking to you," and they just slowly back away...

Correction WE are time travelers We came in groups to stop the invasion xD

what I've heard is that it's a phenomenon where the memory of the moment stores in the brain before the processing of the moment has finished, which causes the brain to think it's experienced that exact moment before!

Referring to Aristotle's logic - "Everything in this video is a lie." when negated becomes "Not everything in this video is a lie" which in turn equates to "There is a single truthful statement in the video". However, such an approach implies that the video is not homogenous but rather a totality of independent propositions and thus avoids the Liar Paradox. However, it does not resolve it. The idea of the Liar Paradox manifests itself when deliberating on the truth value of an utterance as a whole (i.e. in our case, when taking into account the idea of logical conjunction where "A and B is true" only when "A is true" and "B is true"). Therefore in a complex statement of the type: "A and B and C and ... " a false singular statement makes the whole conjunction false as well. One of the ways to solve the Liar Paradox is then, again, similar to your idea - adverting to fuzzy logic (where the things can be partially truthful). There are of course other interesting solutions as well - you may try looking up Alfred Tarski's theory on metalanguages and Saul Kripke's subsequent criticism, as well as Kripke's views on ungrounded statements. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_conjunction en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox plato.stanford.edu/entries/tarski-truth/

@@alexsavova8940 The statement "not everything in this video is a lie" does not simply equate to "there is a single truthful statement in the video." It also equates to "there are several truthful statements in this video," "all but one statement in this video is true," "most statements in this video are true," "a few statements in this video are true," and so on. I don't think that my comment needed to become this complicated, honestly. I only pointed out that the negation did not mean the entire video was truthful, only that it wasn't all lies, that the things said in it still may or may not be true and let it stand as that. I wasn't trying to resolve a liars paradox, just point out an error in logic. I don't really see how the logic is fuzzy. I think the logic is pretty clear, but I can see how it might make the ability to figure something out a little more complicated as is the case in things being partially truthful, so maybe you can say the logic makes the problem fuzzy, but not the logic. To me, fuzzy would refer to something being difficult to separate, difficult to determine, hard to see, but the logic I proposed was pretty simple. In actuality, the idea of a paradox is pretty fuzzy as paradoxes usually only manifest when something is not fully understood and logic is usually necessary to clear it up. I do appreciate the links, though, and I'm sure others who may stumble across your comment will appreciate them as well.

@@genostellar Probably, I didn't say it very clear - I meant "There is *at least* one truthful statement" (which I didn't clarify). Speaking of the "fuzzy logic" - I meant the theory of fuzzy logic (where truth can accept all values between 0 and 1). It is used primarily in Informatics. I'm not saying your logic is fuzzy (or flawed). Conversely, I liked what you said - I found it interesting and original. :)

@@alexsavova8940 Ah, I see. Thank you for clearing all of that up. I appreciate your comments as well. They are very informative.

Ahun smart as dumb

But are you really original if they took original part from your body (say a finger) to make the clone and the part that were taken were replaced by an artificial part? Neither you nor the clone would be original because both you and the clone were modified to create something whole

@@kingyg6489 you have a point my dude. Thanks for sharing

If someone managed to replace all your memories somehow, would you still be you? Our experiences create our personality.

@@kingyg6489 Excellent point actually. However, you still create your own experiences through your thoughts and actions. So while your body parts may not be original, your thoughts still are. But if you took like a couple brain cells and made a clone, no one would know.

what is the difference between a clone of a person and himself

But couldn’t it also be both true and false? Since the title is describing the video, since the video itself is true then the statement “this entire video is a lie” is a lie. And since the title is part of the video, it confirms itself while also establishing that its ultimately false. This makes it a paradox, which is the entire point of the video

you also can excape the paradox because he said 'a lie' and not '''false', because wether something is a lie or not only depends on the belief of the person who says it. but that's not interesting...

@@vaquishers The title is metadata, not part of the video.

This video is basically describing itself thus making it autological. The video ends in a loop but since it's a loop that meant it never ended in the first place which makes it so it is repeating its own statements but has different views to all of them. This means the video is neither a lie nor the truth , if it was a lie than the statement would be true but if the statement is a lie then the video is true , see none of it actually existed in the first place , rather it was just a trick played by our minds which think in a way in which we cannot absorb all of the knowledge. People say the world is running on the word "logic" but does logic really come in this point . Even the word logic isn't logically correct as In logic, an argument can be invalid even if its conclusion is true, and an argument can be valid even if its conclusion is false. ... All of the premises are true, and so is the conclusion, but it's not a valid argument. So if we really look into it We don't know that logic is true. In an abstract sense, we know that it's valid by confirming it with an argument. Truth is some satisfactory correlation between the conclusion and reality. If that's what you're asking about then the answer is the same for almost everything people are generally concerned with.

@@Theraot the title was mentioned in the video itself. Something I found out after watching the entire thing. Thus it is part of the video, as he himself has confirmed the very same paradox I just described

You are in my mind!

It's both since if the vid is a lie that's a lie making atleast a part of it true but u can still say that's a lie and the rest of the vid is true they give only 2 options when there should be more

We share the same brain cells

that video can be both a lie and a truth, since a half truth doesnt make a truth but still a lie. So the sentence is indeed a lie.

It's more like an illegal construct or, perhaps, a syntax error. It's not valid. B well all. :)

but.... is it the same axe, and wait u already got another one

If you've replaced the shaft and head of the axe several times, is it really the same axe?

@@bobross7058 That's what makes it a joke.

@@DownhillAllTheWay so the joke was you wouldn't actually get one of the same brand?

@@bobross7058 Oh boy! Jokes are always best when they are well explained. The joke is that the woodcutter thinks he still has the original axe!

Then.... What would you say for a person who's brain forgets things with time . I'm sure there's a disease exactly like this but I can't remember the name . What would you say that what makes them original? They can't even keep thier memories with them .... Will it be still them ? Without the memories...still the original them ? Even though they forgot half of the content of thier own life

@@shinihahaha4142 Well, I think you're talking about Alzheimer's and people have said that it didn't feel like they were talking to their S/O (Child, Wife, Husband, Sibling, Whatever.)

that's what I was thinking lol

What is drip, if not swag persevering?

Recently used in WandaVision lol Its interesting tho

@@kevindelacruz5900 lmao

@@bezeani8836 lmao

You ARE sort of a genius because you still thought of it yourself... You're just not the first to think of it-

I know a solution to the grandfather paradox lol

@@antarctica0061 but it was already made.thus is he really genius,he made something he already knew.but then how’d he not know it.that applies to you.your something you know you are.but how do you know that?That is a theory but it was already made.thus is he really genius,he made something he already knew.but then how’d he not know it.that applies to you.your something you know you are.but how do you know that?.that is a theory but it was already made.

I request elaboration.

I got that...

I’m so glad I’m not the only one who thought of that while watching this video 😂

Naturally

@@MisterPink. The Theseus ship one is a much older version of the cruise ship one that existed since the legend of Theseus, with a wooden ship. This comment is talking about the paradox after it, which is the same concept applied to the ever changing human body.

*:o*

😯

If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a liebut then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie but then If the title is lying then the title is the truth then if the title is the truth then it is a lie. 🤯

🤔

@@cen7465 Is title considered to be a portion of a video?

This killed one of the my last two brain cells

I had kind of the same thing. One day I thought: "is there anything we can know 100% for sure? I mean I'd say something like 'I know this table is made out of wood' but what if that's somehow just some kind of an illusion?" and then the next day I thought "there is one thing that I can know for sure, and it's that there's nothing I can know for sure. But if that's the case, then it means that there is something I know for sure, so not everything is unsure, but that would mean that I don't know for sure that I can't know anything for sure" so yeah think about that. Since then I've found a couple more things that you can know for sure either way, things like "I think so I exist", or "I'm 100% sure that whatever an apple is in my thoughts, even if it doesn't physically exist, tastes good in my opinion".

I hope someone reads that lmao

@@molrat I read it and I agree that apples taste good

@EC - 05FJ 805270 Castlebridge PS I know, I read it too and I responded to the last phrase.

But if this video is the truth, since it's called a lie, it's true that it's a lie, so it's a lie!?

@@payenappeule My head hurts😖

No this video is a lie so the title is a lie making the video and the title true

Which means its a lie

U prolly lying.

There are two possibilities: A: Let's say the planks were changes periodically. Like, out of a 100 total planks, 10 were changed once, a year later, 10 more were changed and so on until all 100 planks were changed. Now when the first ten were changed, the 90 old and 10 new planks became original. Like a drop of water in ink would make that drop pigmented as well. Thus, if the planks are changed gradually, the ship is still the original. B. The planks are changed all at once, than it is no longer the original ship because if the ink drop is taken away and only the water is added, the water does not become pigmented. But then again, it's pretty unrealistic for all planks to be changed at the same instant.