@sunsetlights100 you're* and no, he's 100% correct. None of these scammers will ever give you any real numbers on the efficiency of their magic electrolysis machines
I did a lot of research on Stanley Myers and it is as was said , he was poisoned by someone at the table. The sorry thing is that almost all of his plans disappeared, but we discovered that he was using a frequency shifting module that changed the resonant frequency of the H2molecules and it broke down the water fuel faster this way. So it was not just electrolysis alone. Great project to continue if you had the ability.
Decades ago, when he was alive I was younger. Somewhere I was told by a smart guy that he used some kind of 2500 cycles frequency at 1/4 amp? Someone reply???? I think the guy also said IF you SHAKE UP the molecules faster they break up and heat up faster like 700 % efficiency?
There is no doubt othat Myers was killed by the criminal elite. Myers used frequency & plasma in a small resonance chamber located in a modified spark plug. And possibly some catalyst. In that way electrolysis was achieved with much smaller amount of energy. I presume the HHO plasma was directly injected in the cylinder as fuel and ignition source. The principle can be used in existing combustion engines .... and the cost for modification of a car were said to be $ 1500 for 4 modified spark plugs and some electronics and water tubing ..... Pity that the youtube film only shows the non interesting things which makes the presentation useless.
so you put water in it , and the exhaust produces water ? what drives the car ? how do you make H and O2 ? with electricity , where do you get that ? a massive battery that needs a longtime loading ?
You forgot to mention Stanley Myers. that was in the US. A few years ago he developed a water fueled car. It was a dune buggy. He went coast to coast on nothing but water. Big oil tried to buy him out, but didn't want anything to do with them. A few days later he was found dead.
Hi, @markcompton2560. Did you listen ALL the way through, Stanley Myers gets quite a mention starting at 7.15, including has death. Just my 0.02. You have a wonderful day. best wishes. Deas Plant.
....yeah, lets ignore the fact that the chevy electro van, a hydrogen powered van, was introduced to the market when Stanley was 16. The big guys already had fhe technology AND consumer production before he even THOUGHT of the concept. The ONLY new claim he had was that he split hydrogen from water using less energy than he could CAPTURE from them recombining. Of course this breaks ALL the known laws of how energy works and was proven a scam YEARS before he died.
Science fair project 1975. Built electrolysis device consisted of two small mason jars equipped with large stainless steel washers connected to an 24 volt 10 amp dc power supply. It easily powered up that tiny cox airplane engine. However, needed to mix a little mineral oil in there to prevent it from seizing up.
Calcification refers to calcium buildup in the body. What you're referring to is known as limescale buildup from calcium. Distilled water is calcium free.
It’s not water dude that is actually hydrogen and oxygen mixed into your combustion chamber in your engine that is more efficient to run that hydrogen mix in your car just heat and water vapor coming out of your tail pipe. Basically you’re driving a humidifier purifying the air when you’re driving your vehicle.
You could easily use solar panels on the ocean to do electrolysis and generate large amounts of hydrogen and oxygen over a very long time for the planets atmosphere to become about 3-2.25% hydrogen per volume (just under the 4% combustion threshold for hydrogen) and then use a very very small hydrogen tank in your car to fill the gap to 4% hydrogen per volume in your combustion engines cylinders to have a very very long range car. You might even be able to use some kind of extravagant centrifuge to extract hydrogen right out of the air for a truly unlimited range for the vehicle. This could also give you the power to generate electricity from anywhere in the world with a small engine so you wouldn't need to transport energy through wires or fuels through pipes in theory. Also it would take a world of governments to make this happen so it's not like it's going to just start working tomorrow. The first thing would be to start using fossil fuels to power factories that make solar panels and other supporting equipment and then you could slowly transition to a water engine ran society. You could even fly planes indefinitely without the need to stop and efficiency would not be so important anymore once enough solar panels were put on the ocean to make hydrogen and oxygen gas. I think it's a win win win kind of idea
There are so many flaws in these ideas! Hydrogen is a very crappy fuel, as it has a very low energy density, is expensive to make, explosively flammable, had to be stored cytogenetically or under immense pressure. What you are suggesting is also horribly inefficient! Modern electric motors can be up to 95% efficient, and are superior to combustion engines.
The cars are ready, Toyota already has a vehicle for sale, BMW has been working on it for at least the last decade if not longer. The only problem now is putting the relevant infrastructure in place.
So sad to hear that inventor's developing water powered engine are dead,l think this invention should not be allowed to die just like that because of it's advantage to the society
Cars running on water? A gas shortage is one thing, but a water shortage (caused by millions of cars and trucks running on pure water) is quite another. For Pete's sake, California has water shortages now! Can you imagine how bad they'd be if all the cars ran on water, too?
Was a post mortem autopsy done with toxicology tests to see if Meyer was poisoned? I am in the camp that believes it is possible that he WAS poisoned. This is not an isolated incident WRT to improved fuel systems or better tires that don't need replacement.
THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME THAT A WATER POWERED ICE ENGINE TO BE CREATED. HOWEVER THERE DEVELOPERS HAVE NOT LIVED LONG ENOUGH TO DEVELOP A MARKETABLE VEHICAL.
@@Simon-dm8zv That would've been a valid point back when physicists still had some credibility. Now when they say left I look right, and when they say up I look down.
Hey guys. i built a similar engine too before i discoverd this video. I have some important enhancements i would love to share with him. Does anyone know how to find contact details of him or maybe a company he works with? Thanks !
🙏 Quick! Help shift the residence of these scientists to a protected sanctuary & they must be protected by bodyguards when venturing outside their office or home & only drink & eat home cooked meals ... We have lost many great scientists that invented water powered engines over the decades from mysterious deaths after drinking or eating with " journalists or corporation agents " or from sudden " suicides! " ... 🐕 🐈
the process of electrolysis to extract hydrogen from water is a very costly process. For a car, you must install enough batteries to supply sufficient electricity so it will provide enough hydrogen to run the car for more than just a few blocks,
Any idea what would happen to the water in northern Michigan in the dead of winter? How will they get the ice to flow into the electrolysis chamber? ROFL
Wake UP! This was don't in 90's however the developer was threatened and consequently murdered when he didn't give up his patent. This has all been patented with many patents...
Right now I am working on electric batteryless technology. No one will be a liar. You'll see it works and it's even cheaper. I will get the copyright done very soon. But success has not been achieved yet. successful at
A Filopino Inventor is the original inventor of this technology breakthrough. Unfortunately, he was not supported by the Phil Govt during that time.. until he decided to seek for Foreign investor... until... this time.
Yes but if he Tries To Go Mainstream with it He Will "Accidentally" Fall Off The Top of a Big Gas Companies High-rise Building ! That's The Sickening Truth About The Very Rich and Money an Greed No matter how much it Could Help Man Kind !
I always find it strange that in a world of 7+ billion people only a couple individuals have figured out how to run a car on water and if they actually do prove it, all plans and prototypes somehow disappear?
@@virtualrealityfitness283that's the interesting thing, we don't use water as fuel we use the hydrogen and oxygen as reducing agents in phosphorylation, glycolysis and the Krebs cycle, it's all returned. The only fuel there is derived from photons.
Yall clowning this comment but I know you've seen the price of bottled water. It's not a stretch. Govts banning the collection under an "environmental protection act"... might seem wild rn but it could absolutely happen.
Another forgotten invention was the Garret Electrolytic carburetor . Around 90 years ago they figured out how to achieve onboard electrolysis , inside the carburetor ! This allowed any car to now run on watergas HHO ... The patent is available online .
It would help your "case"@@rossmarshall3906 if you knew that 1 gallon of water contains 96 MJ of energy, while a gallon of gasoline contains 29 MJ . Obviously, neither basic science nor logic was ever your thing .
@@jdrhea6712 I know this has been a scam for 50 years and your a mark doofusicupia. I know videos like this one convince smooth brains who failed high school science into thinking they don't have to deal with the very real energy issues we have because, magic. Nothing can make this a viable technology. Even if you argue for cold fusion or something yet undiscovered the ONLY reason to demonstrate it in a car is so you have a place to hide the batteries. It's a scam
He had a brain aneurism! His family trashed the docs and car because they knew it was a hoax. Wake up! This entire story is total lies, every little bit of it.
Your water power engine is just electrolyzing water into H2 and O2 which takes more energy than you would use to power the car with H2. You have no net energy, you have not shown me so far how water can power an engine.
It's the hydrogen, which is 10 times more combustible than gasoline. You already know how far a full tank of petrol takes you, multiply by 10, and think about how much cheaper water is.
My dad told me a story of a guy back in my home country of Sri Lanka that developed a water powered car / engine back in the 60s or 70s. After he revealed it, him and the prototype went missing. The guess is that oil companies had something to do with his disappearance.
My god won't these stories never end... The "water" engine is a perpetuum mobile fairytale. It's just not physically possible. Big oil knows that and that's why they don't give a shit about some braggers. Always the same pattern: "I made an invention that defies physics" - "Can you show me?" - "No." - "BiG OiL iS kEePiNg uS dOwN!!!"
And the men in black turned up, ant took him away, and he was never heard from again..blah, blah, blah. I think that story has been flogged to death. It gets used for explaining away every failed crackpot idea, or perpetual energy scam. The only perpetual part that's true in these stories, is gullibility of the next wave or generation of people who get sucked in.
The oil lobby , government are preventing this technology from becoming available for the public until they lose their power....their is too much money & power involved with oil...
3x + as much as it take water to be water. Or A LOT!! In fact you will dump more energy into water then you can get out of it. This is why it has never gotten off the ground. And no the petrol companies didn't close it down. That is a old wives tale! Hydrogen is just a poor choice of a fuel.
It has been done in the 1980 but Stanley Meyers decided not to sell it to be forgetten; he was killed a few after his refusal. How much billions are at stake if this blessing is let out at wide 🙂
In New Zealand back in the early 1970s an inventor farmer built a water powered car that ran a large water wheel type of concept fitted directly to the differential spinning behind the back seat of the vehicle. It had no need for a motor transmission or drive shaft. The water that powered it was totally self contained so no extra water needed to be added. It did have a battery and an alternator in fact I remember it being more of a generator type of unit to power a small water pump that drove the encased water wheel and the whole system recharged itself. Although it took a bit of time to get up to speed on the road, but once it got going it had the power to tackle 1 in 2 gradients. I remember it being on TV news at the time it was in the early 70s and an oil crisis was happening so we had to have a couple of carless days each week to conserve local supplies. The invention seen as a great alternative. Necessity is the mother of invention. Unfortunately for the inventor he succumbed to being to made into a hay bale after becoming entangled in his hay baler. Mysteriously all evidence of his car tools and parts in his workshop disappeared after his inquest. As a foot note to this story rumour has it that a grainy 35mm video camera recorded the incident through a hedge. There was a lot of players neighbours friends and some of the press in that farming district at the time in contact with the farmer looking and waiting for more developments on the invention. With his permission he allowed them to film around the farm while he carried on his normal farming business.. One of the persons vaguely recognised in the film years later was a chief executive and eventually a CEO of a major Oil Co. All the players of this saga have well passed on now but you get the picture.
You got the part about his demise all wrong. In reality, we went into the barn, uncovered his spaceship that was buried in the hay and flew back home to the planet Zok. Unfortunately, Zok is not connected to the internet, so this is difficult to confirm. I have heard that a guy will send you a copy of the design for £1,000. I believe that he is situated somewhere in India.
@@hullygully1135 I know the answer to that one. The guy met an alien in his local bar. The alien got drunk and crashed his spaceship, so he murdered the guy and stole his beetle to get back home to Mars.
There are plenty of technologies that don't get adopted because companies like those of big oil crush them. They want no competition and with lobbyists, they manage to kill anything that would take away from their bottom line. This is just one example.
Then there are plenty of technologies that have a lot of hype but don't work or are not practical when the rubber hits the road. Case in point: The billions of dollars in EV startups that is being wasted. We already went through this in the Obama administration.
I saw a chap on tommorows world on bbc when i was quite young in the 1970s run a engine with tap water and it wasnt april fools day ! He vanished along with his engine
Yeah the technology would split water into hydrogen and oxigen and then mix the two to get an explosive mixture. The problem was so far that electricity is needed for the process to function and the energy input was too high compared the the energy output.
even if it is 100 % efficient in converting energy to work - the energy available in the first place is only as much as energy consumed to break water into H & O .
No it doesn't need any lubricants... no car does... it's just a scam to get car owners to spend money on unnecessary things so the oil company execs get richer. The red oil warning light on cars is just a prompt to make sure you spend money periodically. just ignore it.
Amazing how multiple people that came up with water engines were eliminated but this is OK. MULIPLE people have made them and put them in practical cars. They were terminated
@nicholasholloway8743 EVs failed for other reasons. It's shyte in the cold. It pollutes more to make and hold the demand of energy needed. Thats not impossible technology, though. Water engines mean it literally rains free fuel. 65% of the world has free fuel on the surface. You won't be able to justify selling water for $4-5 a gallon because we drink it too. So it would stay cheap fuel.
@@josephined8576 That's perfectly fine, there are plenty of other options for the future. But not the water engine - because you can't use water as fuel.
@@dertomm1 Debunked by surgeon - aneurysm causes severe headache hence victim will grab his head. Sudden poisoning causes difficulty breathing hence victim will grab throat. Stan ran out of the restaurant grabbing his throat.
Yes, my uncle in Prapsajarrawat, Punjab, India has a car that not only splits water molecules with no energy added from the outside (uses a very simple Hindu magic incantation to start), but also produces .999 pure gold and silver with the flick of a switch when you are waiting at a light. Yes! This is actually true, and he is currently making a YouTibe video with color animated graphics to show the car pooping out the gold and silver whenever it stops. It is a lovely time we live in. Spend more time on RU-vid and you will learn much! Much, much!
The only real issue is if you were to attempt to store the hydrogen instead of using it immediate after it's been produced. Storing this kind of substance could have disastrous effects and that's why Myers made it the way he did. Hydrogen on demand, it's coming soon to t
Where’s the energy source used to split the H2O into hydrogen and oxygen? I’ve seen 3 of these videos pop up in the last few months with identical talking points and none explain this most vital link in the process.
Good marketing !! At the end of the day how much less will it cost to the end consumer after taxes? How much will the mileage be for the end consumer? And, how much cheaper will it be as compared to current products and competitor products in global market? How safe is this product Vs existing engines?
Funny that they don't tell us where the energy required for electrolysis that splits water into hydrogen and oxygen comes from. Sure, once you've got the hydrogen and oxygen molecules you can get them to combust and produce energy. But, even without losses, it's not enough energy to produce electrolysis and move a vehicle.
It's a hydrogen engine that works with hydrogen extracted from the water on demand but where does the electricity comes from for the extraction of the hydrogen? It's has to be a huge amount for an internal combustion engine to run on hydrogen
+1 on that. People just believe eany shit they tell them. Energy does not simply spawn from nowhere. You should not have to be an engineer to get that.
This question of how much energy it takes to split H2O into HH and O hasn't been answered in any of these vids. Furthermore, why is the exhaust which apparently is pure wa er, not be recaptured and put back in to the water tank? Obvious questions that no one has yet satisfactorily answered.
I worked on HHO cells for years encounter multiple technical difficulties. They used electric from gas battery that was charged by car alternator. Car manufactures put 80 amps alternator a bit over car requirements. If you use a big water cell then your car will be short electricity ít needs thus ECU will inject more fuel mixture and raise idle speed to compensate for its shortage. I replaced 160 amps alternator to compensate for water cell. HHO gas injects into air intakes to chamber will increase torque but producing lean output. Thus fuel sensor (not oxygen sensor) will signal the ECU to add more fuel into the gas mixture. Therefore I have to buy a circuit to signal ECU to accept lean exhausted gas. The result is better gas mileage and clean exhausted gas that no one can smell any burn gas from exhausted pipe. Problem is doing smoke check I must turn off all HHO systems. Many believe that Stanley Meyers designs a circuit to weaken the bond between hydrogen and oxygen in the water. So far no one ever knows how to replicate his works!!!
This was done in 1990 he drive from Los Angeles to California it took 22 gallons for this trip, the oil company wanted to buy the blueprint and the car, but he won’t be in it. So he was murdered. And all paperwork and car disappear.
This is the way forward, but it is not ready to be used as an engine yet, a lot more must be done to make it much safer. Hydrogen is a highly explosive gas, and again in the event of a collision the gas must be made safe so that the driver and occupants are safe, which they are not yet.
Seems to skirt around the issue of where the electrical power comes from to drive the electrolysis process that produces the hydrogen. Is it free, does it come from batteries?
Yes it still uses a battery. This is not the first. There is another one in Asia but they ridiculed him although he is an engineer. These should be told just to give the plans for free to the people rather than economically profit from it in expense for your own life.
Way back in the 1960s, we have some science innovation entries in our school. My group's entry is water powered engine. We explainef that tbe secret is elecyrolysis. When the H is separated from O then recombined inside the combustion chamber that results in explosion from reombining H and O. Our group was awarded the funniest idea entry then. But it stayef in my mind. Now, I am continually vindicated.
I recall a hydrogen car Dodge made and that was shown at a car show around 1971. From what I recall, it split water using a small reactor so you didn't have to store much if any hydrogen. I think it may be the one Jay Leno owns. Engineers thought it would be the revolution of the car industry, although it was buried by the government, as it would've destroyed economies worldwide. Seeing as we have people in government who seem to not care, they might as well put one into production. EVs have caught fire and burned down many a home, so might as well get these going. A couple people here in California have them, but you have to have special permits to have one, and I'm not sure if those people have are totally "on-demand" hydrogen producing. I hope someone develops this technology. It's clean, cheap energy, but that's not what government is about, or we'd be driving them already. Perhaps some young engineers can get together and bring this technology to the forefront.
We used Electolises to split water in 8th grade science. There were 2 test tubes. One filled twice as fast. When they waved a flame under the Hydrogen it burst in flames. At that moment I thought. I could run my motorcycle on that.
I remember when someone first built this type of engine. He was approached not to produce it. It has been told his blueprints and paperwork was seized and some reporters say he had been killed others he had disappeared and never been seen again
Just one point speak against this Water engine. The physics itself. Theromodynamics! The fusion of H and O2 cause the energy, but the equal energy is required to split Water into H and O2. So ignoring efficency looses it would be a 0 energy result. The pictures showed combustion machine nothing more. Also some lies about reparing of EV Batteries! 8 Years Waranty! So it costs nothing. Even after the warranty are Modules that can be replaced. A replacement engine of a combustion car is 3 times more expensive than buyibg one module. But the old module could be repaired by cell replacemend and you'll get cash back. Some Teslas reached the 1 mio miles already with the first Battery.
You explained it perfectly, it takes the same amount of energy to split water into hydrogen, than recombining it produces. You can prove this in the lab, without the need for an engine. One interesting point is that during WW2, we powered delivery trucks in the UK using coal gas, which is 70% hydrogen. The trucks had a gas bag on their roof, which was half the size of the vehicle. A weight on top of the bag after filling produced pressure to the engine. The vans were used for getting produce (particularly milk) from local farms to the shops. They had a range of about 20 miles. If the farmer managed to get any air into the bag. When he started the engine, the whole lot exploded.
The energy cost to separate Hydrogen from Oxygen is higher than the power you can get from burning Hydrogen to power a car. Unless your source of power is Green power like wind or solar, which aren't exactly free. And the storage of hydrogen and the transport of Hydrogen is dangerous AND expensive. This cannot work at all.
Ive got a much better idea. Start with a traditional steam engine. Fit a dynamo to convert the motion generated by the steam engine in, say, a car. The dynamo produces the electricity needed to heat the water to produce the steam . Add enhancements like collecting the exhaust steam to provide heat to convert the water to steam. Solar cells on the roof of the car can augment the dynamo output, and a wind turbine on the roof can provide even more power when the car is at speed and needs the most steam. I should add nobody is allowed use this concept without my written permission.
Great :D You should definitely register this in the pertpetuum-mobile-departement at the patent office. They know exactly how to deal with those ideas.
I think the world is ready for this new engine! The really question now is how to export this vehicle globally? Sales of this new vehicle will undoubtedly be on the top of every other vehicle out there! Being it now the timing couldn't be more right as the global heat wave is to the roof.
The only good thing would be is IF it gets 100 miles per gallon of Hydrogen. Unless Stanley Myer's mysterious frequency is figured out to VIOLATE the 2ed Law and conseration of energy thing, we will also be dependent and alway loosing. I say F____ the gasoline engine and we go back to STEAM POWErED vehicles and start planting BILLIONS of PLANTS and TREES for Bioler burning. This is about as CLOSE to using WATER FREEly as we are going to get. MAYBE we should use the plants and Trees to MAKE ALCOHOL? burning cars? Light a match on a 200 proof bottle of alcohol and see what happens?
It takes a large amount of electricity to make HHO. And that has to be generated by the engine. I have built HHO generators and the best they can do in an car is supplement the gas fuel system for slightly better fuel mileage. It's also very flamable.
yea with electrolysis, there's a much better way to do it tho. Voltrolysis plasma field converts water into positively charged nanobubbles without an exothermic reaction and extracts electrons from the gas to make it unable to reform into water again until ignited, resulting in explosive water fuel with more force than heat.
