Thank you so much for watching this video. Below are some important links relating to this work. A short animation of the system: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-P4gvxs3jAHQ.html A summary of the system: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-kMwhjcT_NLo.html Blurb: The Shape of Knowledge is the outcome of a meaningful experience that occurred in 2012. In it are developed the foundations of a new science of philosophy, which promises to provide a solution to the disparity preventing our discourse from progress. Through the language of the Western canon, The Shape of Knowledge exposes the ubiquitous structure that conditions our capacity to reason the truth for our world. Then, through an investigation of the phenomenon of self-reference, in both the processes and products of thought, this structure is shown to necessitate its own existence. Underscoring it all is a principle of complementarity, which arises as the modality of the rationalisation of paradox. Experience is shown to be a relative process of making sense of the nonsensical nature of reality, and the emergence of paraphilosophy is our means of reconciling the present war of opposites-having now served its purpose-with the nondual nature of self-consciousness. Paraphilosophy is not an idea to be believed-it is the idea of the idea, which is our creative spirit. So this work is at root an inquiry into oneself. If you’re interested in reading the book, here are the Amazon links. You can also find the book at most distributors if you are from another country: 🇺🇸 www.amazon.com/Shape-Knowledge-Introduction-Paraphilosophy/dp/1803410221 🇬🇧 www.amazon.co.uk/Shape-Knowledge-Introduction-Paraphilosophy/dp/1803410221 If you’re interested in discussing these ideas (and similar ideas), you can join our community on discord: discord.gg/d5WB8gTHPK instagram.com/bonge.doc/ twitter.com/bejdavies
We are all looking for the same thing, whether we study history, mathematics or the occult. We are all looking for patterns. We cannot know the world. There can never be a THEORY of EVERYTHING. Godel's Incompleteness theory, Heisenberg's Uncertantity Theory, etc. Reality is like Indra's net with nodes of probability. We create a personal narrative from those nodes. As Jane Wagner said "Reality is a collective hunch".
I was taken aback by the title of this video. I quickly shuffled through old notebooks and luckily found the one I was searching for. An entry dated 9/18/10 titled 'the shape of consciousness' contains a poor sketch attempting to illustrate the self-referential nature of awareness and is followed by some twenty or so pages of notes. While my notes are meandering, immature, and divergent in many ways from several of your very well presented ideas here, I felt immediately a kinship with you, as though I must have caught a glimpse of something you also saw or felt. I rarely comment or reach out, but this feeling of shared experience, especially given the nature of how personal to me and private these notes are was enough to compel me to share. I am excited to hear more from you.
Good stuff. Nothingness can come before everything, but because everything comes from everything else, everything cannot come from Nothingness; and so, Nothing begins, and begins, and begins, and endlessly everything ends.
I love your videos, almost watched all of them in the last month. The art works are also matching and appealing to watch. Do you mind sharing what tool you use for the slight animation of the images? I could use a similar effect for a presentation I have to create on archetypes and their manifestation in sacred places.
Thank you so much man, really appreciate that. It's not super straightforward, but I'm using img2img with Stable Diffusion to create similar (but different) images, and then using these as individual frames. To blend the frames I'm using the cross dissolve effect on premiere pro. Also, you should check out my main channel if you enjoy this topic :).
