"This Will End in a Russian Victory" - US Military Specialist Speaks Out on Ukraine War 

I remember Bush 2 threatening Hussain because Hussain threatened to kill Bush 2's Daddy. Inspector Scott Ritter said there were no WMDs. Iraq was a personal vendetta. Probably one of the biggest blunders carried out by a superpower ever, and we're still at it.

The REAL REASON WHY NULAND and BLINKEN are obsessed with Ukraine. Until recently (more specifically since social media), populations simply believed whatever the media published. And after ww2, the media extensively pushed an anti soviet rhetoric. This is not a defense of Marxism or related philosophies, but merely highlighting the geopolitical conflict between Capitalism and Marxism. As we learned from congressional hearings in the 1970s related to operation mockingbird, the CIA operation mockingbird hijacked the American media. And the CIA had found a common enemy in the Karaites, the forefather of the judaïque reform movement aka cultural secular Judaism . Stalin had expelled the Karaites from the crimean peninsula (Source: TabletMag) to Kazakhstan. Although stalin was a Georgian, the Karaites never forgave the Russians. This hatred has continued and has been taught in reform synagogues. Even American Jewish philanthropists like Julius Rosenwald envisioned Crimea as a possible jewish homeland prior to the establishment of the jewish state partly because its the birthplace of the secular non torah Karaites. Ive had long discussions about this with my Jewish Kazakh father-in law. This secular community thinks they were specifically targeted despite being a minority of those being banished to Kazakhstan. What they seem to not realize the Catholics were sent in greater numbers, especially the catholic Armenians. I needed to put the historical context prior to getting to where the Russia-phobia in America comes from. After the establishment of Israel, the 3 letter agencies saw an opportunity to leverage this community as agents of ‘American imperialism’. In exchange for America guaranteeing the security of their homeland, these communities that were scattered across Europe, Caucuses and Central Asia would become agents of US interests. The 3 letter agencies would fund the political careers and the CIA/US military would ensure Israel security. Meanwhile, through operation mockingbird, these newly recruited agents who also worked extensively in the media would push anti-soviet rhetoric in the US media. You can see this Russia-phobia expressed through Nuland and Blinkens obsession with Crimea. Its as if they have an aspiration to regain control of the birthplace of Karaites. Even many synagogues in my neighborhood have either Ukraina or Sevastopol in their names.

But really "we have legitimate security interest in Taiwan" && we need to respect China's red lines is in conflict. US cannot have legitimate interest in any other countrys land, it's by definition illegitimate. But they may have interest in TSMC a capabilities but that's it.

@@JoelBergmark Just like how the US often claims to have "legitimate security interest" in Ukraine, of all places. They'll come up with any excuse as long as it gets the tax payer's money flowing.

If Beijing is sincere about peaceful reunification with Taiwan, then daily and reckless military provocation across the Taiwan Strait is NOT a good idea. Taiwan is a part of China and Taiwanese people are Chinese. But the reputation of the Chinese Communist Party among the Taiwanese people is very poor. Surveys show that less than 2% of the population supports peaceful reunification with the mainland.

did they get married or what?

@@TomStan-sw2wj A marriage of convenience is what it is.

Lol

Excellent said😊👍✌✌

This was pretty funny, in a tragicomic way.

Really

​@@CarloSmith-fm6psu are brainwashed

Nobody has done more to strengthen Putin and weaken Russia's democracy than the west who traded with Putin and scared Russians to consolidate around him after war started. Russian oppositionist.

The enemy is within .

Well they are, but we made them enemies. Thanks CIA!

Why would they want to keep Germany down? And if the Americans are out who's looking after global security? The Russians no thanks

All 3 points are accomplished actually

Well U.S. goals

Spot on!

Bull. Germans make five times what Russians make.

US committed all war crimes and broke all international laws, fitting a criminal above the law.

USA is so self righteous and arrogant they make the laws that everyone else is expected to abide by but none apply to themselves

They have committed all crimes, and all of them are against international law! But the problem is that they control the US, the International Court of Justice, the UN and the SC... As a global hegemon. So that they and their followers were neo-Nazis, terrorists... They will never judge, because that way they would indirectly condemn themselves. We could see that in the wars surrounding the breakup of Yugoslavia, and now in Ukraine, as well as in the wars in the Middle East... In which the US actively participates, of course choosing its servants to be the proxy army of the US and NATO, while from a safe distance from the sea and from the air, the US and NATO bomb the side in the conflict that has an obstacle in achieving hegemony, or rather that does not want to be a servant of the US. Those who want to be servants of the US, even though they are mostly neo-Nazis, take care of Croatia and Ukraine, and Bosnian Muslims, or terrorists in the case of KLA Albanians from the south of Serbia. But it must be said that it is a smart policy of the US, in selecting those who, especially during the time of Nazi Germany and Hitler, were the main support and servants of Nazi Germany. And that is the right of Croats, Muslims from Bosnia, Ukrainians, Albanians... As neo-Nazis, and faithful servants of every occupier even before Hitler and Nazi Germany. As long as the American hegemony is in force, neither they nor their loyal puppets and servants will be held accountable for anything, for any crime, because the Americans will declare their terrorists, puppets and servants as "fighters for justice, democracy and freedom in the world"?! And promote those monsters in their media and stanize the other side against which the Americans or their proxy puppets are at war... By the way, the US controls all the mainstream media in North America in South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, a good part of Asia, and all of Europe in the countries NATO and the EU... And that's exactly what the people from the video above are talking about.

On behalf of the criminal, globalist lunatics!

We lost count of how many US presidents are wanted for war crimes. All of them back to JFK at least.

I agree

Russia will continue to exist long after "Uncle Sugar" has fallen face down in the dust. We aren't the people we once were.

As they did several times in the past. But they will try again and again.

@@TreeBeard2008like in 91?

@@titobandito1555 Maybe, but I've meant open war.

We need to throw off the influence of the internstional global rlite who have been placing their people in power and undermining our sovereignty and constitutional rule of law!

Exactly American people want no part of this nonsense. This is all on Biden and his bad administration. No one asked us for our opinion because we don’t want it.

We don't need the rest of the world. The rest of the world needs the U.S.

it costs $1.30 Trillion every year to US citizens , and they loose all their wars..

I agree ! The U.S. of A. are the bully of the world since decades wanting to impose their rules to every other kid in the playground & telling to everyone who may play with who & with what toy .. Each period in history got its world-powers & empires : the Persians, the Mesopotamians, the Egyptians, the Greek Empire, the Roman Empire, Spain & Portugal were ruling the world in the 15th & 16th centuries, the Ottoman Empire, the British Empire, & since W.W.II the U.S. of A. were the most powerful country, but it is coming to an end, & it is difficult to admit you are not nr.1 anymore .. but it is also pathetic to want to hold on to that power by all (desperate) means, accumulating a preposterous national debt & destroying everything around you & taking down as many countries with you as possible .. it's (NOT) like in sports : you are the world champion, and then you ain't anymore .. but in geopolitics leaders are not playing for a gold medal by proving their strength & abilities, but "playing" with weapons, human lives, infrastructure, destruction, killing, .. They are "fools of war" !

Mental colonization continues to persist in the minds of many Filipinos. It's because Philippines became an American colony after losing the American-Philippine war, and even after gaining independence, the minds of many of its people remain enslaved and loyal to their former colonial masters.

Well, Philippines still chooses to deal with US and allow military bases to be built

Stockholm syndrome

Who gave the present president of Philllipines' father sanctuary? 😂

Cia killed the president's father and now he is under control of usa.

$ 16 billion a year

YOU DONT TELL THE WHOLE TRUTH. THROUGHOUT ALL HISTORY, KREMLIN OR WEST WAS ALWAYS COMPETING, TO BOOT OTHER AROUND TOO MUCH. AS IN WW2, BOTH RUSSIA AND WEST GOT THEIR ARSES KICKED BY TURKS. BECAUSE DARDENELLES ONLY PROPERTY TO THE TURK, AND NOT RUSSIA OR WEST. AND THIS WAS A FAIR OUTCOME. ALSO YOU DONT TELL THE WHOLE STOREY THAT: IT WAS PUTIN WHO FIRST TRIED TO TAKE OVER A POCESSION OF THE AFGHAN COUNTRY. BUT THE MUJAHADINE WERE JUST TOO STRONG AND THEY KEPT WHAT WAS THEIRS. RESPECT TO THESE PEOPLE FOR THIS BRAVERY. ADMITT IT.

WELL OKAY THEN : PUTIN HAS HAD HIS ELITE MEN IN ISRAEL FOR DECADES, AND NOT CARED ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE THAT WAS GOING ON. PUTIN TRIED TO TAKE OVER AFGHANISTAN, BUT THEY WERE TOO STRONG TO LET HIM SUCCEED WITH IT ALL. PUTIN HAS PUT HIS MILITIA REGIMES INTO, IRAQ AND SYRIA, SO THAT THE 'IDLIB' NATIVES HAD TO SUFFER. AND HE HAS PUT HIS GUN CONTROL REGIMES EVERYWHERE ELSE. AND SO, 'AS A REALLY HONEST PERSON,' I WILL SAY THAT YEAH THE WEST HAS TO HAVE GREATER MODESTY TO ADMITT ANY MISTAKE, AND REPAIR IT. 'BUT' OH FOR 100% CERTAINTY, 'SO DOES 'PUTIN'.

@@spudwesth Imagine if that was for paying the rent, food, utility & basic equipment costs of the homeless population instead. Or perhaps given as a universal basic income to the citizens regardless of societal/social standing.

David T. Pyne tells us the truth about the war in the Ukraine. Time for a peaceful foreign policy. Nuclear winter is a tabooed subject by all normal citizens.🌻

In fact , there's nothing as bad as concealing the truth . Maybe all their predictions about Russian resilience were wrong . The CIA and other Western intelligence gathering organs failed woefully in their assessment of Russian military strength . Unfortunately , it's the Ukrainians who are dying in their tens of thousands. .

They all say the same tired old line. When I hear that I just turn the video off - he lost me

💯% ✔️

Agreed

He also said that the secret of politics is to make a good treaty with Russia.

I agree! Btw. it's "von Bismark"

ъ The USA now belongs to England! The last independent and popularly elected president of the United States was Kennedy. The USA is now a colony of England. The president of the United States is now being exposed and chosen by the elite of Britain! The people of the USA are slaves of England!

Rule No. 1: _Don't March on Moscow._ Rule No. 2: _Don't Bluff Beijing._

@@Gamm420 суть самое главное.

Exactly. Apart from Putin, there were 3 other opponents on the ballot paper to vote for in the Russian election. Russia also invited international observers from 36 countries to witness the elections.

@@Shenzhou. your absolutely right. And Zelensky canceled elections in his country. So who is the dictator.

I agree. When he started the same old rhetoric "Putin dictator, kills the opposition " I stopped watching. No one ever backs up that statement. I've been watching Putin for 4 yrs now trying to see that in him and see the opposite. So thank you for your bravery to say that.

He just said that to avoid being taken down by the whole US administration. He has to play along on these to be totally branded a radical.

@@janicewilliamson2534yes, exactly🙌. If people only took the time to listen and research, instead of naively accepting the narrative spoon-fed to them.

Навальный. Он умер в тюрьме от разрыва тромба(сердечеый приступ). Сидел в тюрьме не из-за того что был оппозиционером. он очень противоречивая фигура и точно никогда не был Иисусом как его изображают западные СМИ

Yeah, they just rote repeat those things without any substantiation at all. It is ridiculous. "Brutal dictator" - where, how? Because of what exactly is he a "brutal dictator"? Just saying something doesn't make it true.

Has he not heard of Killary?

I couldn't have put it better than you have 👍

How old are you?

🎯 🎯 🎯 🎯 🎯

Jimmy Carter and Donald Trump are the only presidents of the United States who were not warmongers

Notam Chomsky did that many years ago, named the crimes and why the President was at the time…

exactly.

The American President's have no influence on foreign policy. It's the alphabet agencies who control the President's of America's foreign policies

This also happens in Bar fights , people get hurt & Die for being DUMB ! 🇷🇺 💲 🇨🇳

yeah, I raise an eyebrow when he said that. People are praising this guy in the comments. I wouldn't trust him completely just based on his stand on Taiwan/China. He is still a hawk, just less 'hawkish' than the rest of the crazier hawks.

This guy is 100% deep state, but one of the less bad ones. I wonder about his connections to Israel.

There's no good reason for us to be there. Or anywhere. No more war .✌️ peace

And he criticized Biden for spreading misinformation about the Ukraine, and here he still continue to spread lies about the relationship of Taiwan & China. So much for trying to "save" the Truth (1st casualty of war is the truth, as he claimed. Of course, hot war between US & China hasn't start yet, but other wars (like info wars, trade war, tech war) with China has started since Obama times...

If we need Taiwan’s microchips as a national security interest, that is our own damn fault for giving computer technology away. That technology should be here not there.

China seeks win-win cooperation for *mutual gain,* whereas the US only sees a *zero sum game.*

America is absolute evil.

Big correct excellent said👏👍👍✌

Being US foe I dangerous, being US friend is deadly - Henry Kissinger

America is a real threat to world peace

Semiconductors

​@@9thebearTaiwan is a part of China though - it's a Chinese province (and this is according to international law).

ф The USA now belongs to England! The last independent and popularly elected president of the United States was Kennedy. The USA is now a colony of England. The president of the United States is now being exposed and chosen by the elite of Britain! The people of the USA are slaves of England!

@@MnemonicCarrier Well, his answer is still valid. He never said they weren't part of China. You can also find that information on the State Department's website. It has never been mentioned in the MSM over the last ten years. Before that, the One China Policy was mentioned many times in the NYT and similar outlets.

It's to protect the freedom of navigation shipping lanes that everyone uses to trade with who? "China". 😂😂😂

It's all relative. He might be a "brutal dictator" but he is still an angel compared to those that are responsible for the deaths of half a million children in Iraq (looking at you Madeleine Albright) and those responsible for setting up a proxy war fighting Russians to the last Ukrainians.

@@skepticsr_us I can see a certain value in your theory of relativity. However, Putin's "brutality" seems to be used by Western leaders as a favorite justification for all of the atrocities they commit around the globe.

He literally assassinated his political opponents.

He's interesting but was surprised he also thinks Putin a dictator.

@@skepticsr_us👍

Because they are all selected by the TRIBE you can't get elected in Israelistan without Jewish money and lobbying backing you up.

Because the system is stacked against him.

They've got guns

Oh, you don't want him as the president either. Yes, he might have a clear head on Ukraine/Russia but you can sense the hawk in him when it comes to China/Taiwan. You would want somebody a lot lot better than him, trust me.

He is a lot like a lot of US warhawks in that they promote peace for white people and white countries, but they want wars with Asian countries, especially China! Many of them, such as John Mearsheimer and Tucker Carlson said the US should manipulate Russia into fighting China and only after China is defeated should the US turn its attention on Russia!

I am with you and wholeheartedly endorse this comment with hoisted thumb.

Probably silenced by the media for his views that go against the "mainstream narrative."

He's probably been silenced by the media for going against the mainstream narrative.

The media ostracizes him because his views go against the "mainstream narrative."

@poiujnbvcxdswq yes, because the west has been working their hardest to send all manufacturing to china and other such places as they follow their green deindustrialization agenda.

TSMC

@poiujnbvcxdswq If that is what you call "national security problem", then maybe solve it via your own nation - i.e. start producing the chips by yourself? It's not like chips are a natural resources that can be produced only in one place, by digging a chip mine in the ground ;-)

Absolutely spot on. Once U. is part of Meeetooo alliance then VP is set check-mate because he can’t budge without attacking a member country and this would automatically launch a response from the alliance. This situation was not acceptable because of the power it would have given to the best and friendliest country in the World.

You are correct my friend. Putin is an hero to his people, i lived in Russia for 5 years 2010-2015 and the love for their president is pretty universal in the population. I met the occasional person from the oldest living generation in RU that proclaimed support for the Communist party that usually gets a few % every election. But even they had nothing against Putin they were just set in their ways in old age:)

They also like to omit that Donetsk and Luhansk begged Russia to save them from AZOV that shelled their cities since 2014

@@joyholtzhausen8976 and VOTED by 95% to be annexed

It wasn't mistake because since 2014 Russia hurry up to create its own money-sending bank system, its own card system (MIR) for visa and MasterCard replacement, invest more money to food produce (including very big greenhouses across the country, in north Siberia Tiumen city for example) etc. etc

Same with Biden calling President Xi a dictator.

Just like Joe calling President Xi a dictator.

Seems like they have to make an obligatory anti-Putin remark one way or another.

Yeah, he lost me with that remark.

Taiwan remark too. But still remarkable to have a US "insider" confirm what we all know.

Salva my brother from KZN Durban

@@Percival5 Salva Russia from China

me too

@@Mr.Patrick_Hung Russia and China one big family ❤️

@fred6319, I diagree strognly with you. After Russia had occupied Crimea in early 2014 the Russians managed to agitate a big part of the people in Donetsk and Lunhans to start an armed rebellion against the legal governent in Kiev. The Ukrainian governement sant the it's army to these two provinces and it would have crushed the rebels, but the the regular Russian army came to the rescue of them. The Russian army had at that time a clear technical and military educational advantage over the Ukrainian army. So then the Russians had a realtively easy job in the Eastern Ukraine as they also had had a bit earlier earlier in the occupying of Crimea. These two easy military operations probably let Putin and his advisors to believe, that the occupying of whole Ukraine might be a relatively easy and quick operation, but it wasn't to be so in February 2022. Also the Western negative reaction was stronger and much more long lasting than Putin had anticipated. glory to Ukraine ! Glory to the heroes !

@@vesakaitera2831 legally Crimea was never actually made part of the Ukraine because Nikita Khrushchev botched the paperwork when handing it over.) On 19 February 1954 the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union issued a decree transferring the Crimean Oblast from the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic to the Ukrainian SSR. According to the Soviet Consti/tution (article 18), the borders of a republic within the Soviet Union could not be re-drawn without the agreement of the republic in question. The transfer was approved by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the Soviet Union; however, according to article 33 of the const/itution, the Presidium did not have the authority to do so. The const/itutional change (articles 22 and 23) to accommodate the transfer was made several days after the decree issued by the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet.[1][2] The question should have been submitted to the open discussion of the Supreme Council of the Russian SSR. Moreover, a referendum should have been conducted to find out the opinion of the residents of the two republics. Nothing of that happened. The Presidium of the Supreme Council gathered for a session on February 19, 1954 - only 13 of 27 members were present. There was no quorum, but the decision was adopted unanimously. if somebody stole Crimira it was the leaders of the Ukraine Ukraine annexed Crimea in 1991, grossly violating the rules of international law. Crimea became part of independent Ukraine illegally, and repeated attempts by the Crimean people to redress this injustice met with opposition from Kiev. In 1990, the Parliament of the Ukrainian SSR adopted the Declaration of State Sovereignty, which hid behind the words Expressing the will of the people of Ukraine... and spoke of a new state being established within the existing boundaries of the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic based on the Ukrainian nation s right to self-determination. But did the Ukrainian nation have the right to self-determination in Crimea if the number of Ukrainians on the peninsula made up only 25.8 percent of the population? The answer is obvious no, it did not. This was the first step in the annexation of Crimea by the Ukrainian state, which, at that point, was the Ukrainian SSR separate from the Soviet Union.

@@vesakaitera2831 So what did the Ukrainian state do next? On 24 August 1991, the Supreme Court of the Ukrainian SSR, again on the basis of self-determination, declared the independence of Ukraine, arbitrarily identifying the Crimean ASSR as a territory of the newly established state. By doing so, the founders of Ukraine ignored a law requiring a separate referendum to be held in Crimea on the Crimean ASSR s status within Ukraine. This was done deliberately, since Kiev knew perfectly well that the people of Crimea would never vote in favour of becoming part of Ukraine. At the same time, a huge scam to manipulate history was being prepared: on 1 December 1991, a referendum was held illegally in the Crimean ASSR that did not deal with the issue of Crimea s status, but retroactively confirmed the Ukrainian Declaration of Independence in the autonomous republic. Moreover, anyone who had ever stepped foot on the peninsula was allowed to vote. This was to make it seem as if the Crimean people supported Ukrainian independence when, for the most part, they actually boycotted the referendum. In this underhand way, Ukraine took its second step towards the annexation of Crimea. In the US Declaration of Independence, it says that the Creator endowed people with unalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Just like Americans, Crimeans also want to live, be free and be happy. That is precisely why they spent decades trying to break away from the Ukrainian trident, something they finally managed in 2014 when they returned to Russia.

@@vesakaitera2831 the history of the Crimean people s struggle against its illegal annexation by Ukraine, which began in 1990 and ended in 2014. Questioning the choice of the Crimean people in 2014 seems to be the reason why the US permanent representative to the UN Security Council is keeping quiet about the Ukrainian annexation of Crimea in the 1990s. After all, no one in the world could doubt the results of the Crimean referendum held on 20 January 1991. If it is a case of the deliberate distortion of facts, however, then the situation looks a lot worse.Crimea was never part of ukraine ukraine annexed it when they became independent from the soviet union

@@vesakaitera2831 September 2013, and Carl Gershman, NED chief from its launch until summer 2021, authored an op-ed for The Washington Post, outlining how his organization was hard at work wresting countries in Russia’s near abroad - the constellation of former Soviet republics and Warsaw Pact states - away from Moscow’s orbit. Along the way, he described Ukraine as “the biggest prize” in the region, suggesting Kiev joining Europe would “accelerate the demise” of Russian President Vladimir Putin. Six months later, Ukraine’s elected president Viktor Yanukovych was ousted in a violent coup. Writing in Consortium News earlier that month, investigative legend Robert Parry recorded how, over the previous year, NED had funded 65 projects in Ukraine totaling over $20 million. This amounted to what the late journalist dubbed “a shadow political structure of media and activist groups that could be deployed to stir up unrest when the Ukrainian government didn’t act as desired.” NED’s pivotal role in unseating Yanukovych can be considered beyond dispute, an unambiguous matter of record For example, on February 3rd 2014, less than three weeks before police withdrew from Kiev, effectively handing the city to armed protesters and prompting Yanukovych to flee the country, NED convened an event, Ukraine’s lessons learned: from the Orange Revolution to the Euromaidan NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DEMOCRACY Central & Eastern Europe | Events| Ukraine’s Lessons Learned: From... Ukraine’s Lessons Learned: From the Orange Revolution to the Euromaidan February 03, 2014 12:00 pm - 02:00 pm Ukraine’s Lessons Learned: From the Orange Revolution to the Euromaidan Sponsored by the International Forum for Democratic Studies at the National Endowment for Democracy McCain also made a quick dig against German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President François Hollande, who recently helped broker the cease-fire deal in Minsk. Angela Merkel Francois Hollande and Poroshenko al confessed that Minsk accords where a trik to build up an army to attack Donetsk and Crimea

That part was his opinion. He's entitled to it.

@@Aminah6623 Sure, but what`s the use of talking to people who are blithering idiots?

He Has to say that. Almost everything else he said was totally based though

@@societyreborn33 Why should he have to say that? Imagine I would call you bastard, swine, whatever, but afterwards I behave myself so very politely..., but would you have listened to me after I had insulted you?

@@user-yp2mw2ko9k you are not wrong. But being pro Russia can cost people in his position money and jobs etc. I think he's intentionally walking the fence and saying what he needs to keep people from calling him a Russia troll or Putin bot. His message is legit though

Don’t forget he is American 🙄

There is no legal way to invade another country. Every army first of all is meant to defend their own territory that has been establishes ages ago. Any country today going into another with their army, regardles of prior history will be counted as an invasion and whoever drew the sword first becomes the aggressor bud. There is always a peaceful way to resolve such matters but putin made it difficult and nobody in the country he has invaded is blaming anyone but him.

It's baffling how Russia is a part of Europe, yet not allowed into NATO. While the United States locate across the Pacific Ocean, is a NATO member.

​@@Shenzhou.Not really if you think that the US might need to continuous war in order to support it's economy.

@@Shenzhou. But it is adjacent to the North Atlantic (Treaty Organisation).

Nato is a US tool created by the US for the US

@@Shenzhou. It has something to do with Russia's history. A Russian friend told me the West never accepted them

Blame it on the boogie

which would lead to Russian subs a few miles off the coast completely leveling the US

And Russia wouldn't be able to stop it anymore if NATO would be allowed to get entrenched in a country as big as Ukraine (was).

Russia had a chance to join NATO 🤷‍♂️ but yes everything is big bad Americas fault and the rest of the world has no agency or decision making ability 😂

​@@titobandito1555Are you high on something? Russia has a chance to join NATO? Then who would they counter? Aliens? 🤣

@@anujmchitale they *had* it was a possibility in the early 2000s but Putin.

Exactly. The truth is that Navalny died of a blood clot, and that before his death, Navalny was supposed to be released in a prisoner exchange deal.

Let’s ask a Tibetan shall we?

✋

​@@9thebearBetter educate yourself on what the US was doing in Tibet to provoke the Chinese. It's a very interesting story.

So how many countries of the world were bombed by China?

I took the red pill and went into the Matrix by doing a Google search of "CIA Regime Changes." I now understand the Jackell and Hyde nature of Uncle Sam.

And sadly now Finlands' idiot leader has signed it up to become the first moonscape if any serious war breaks out between Russia and the EU. Russia actually likes Ukraine and shows great restraint. They have no such love of Finland, or most of the EU for that matter. They used to have close ties with France but we see the little Napoleon there has managed to completely ruin that relationship so they are back in the same boat as the rest of the EU, and would be likely just as helpful.

In hindsight, Ukraine in NATO would have secured peace!

@@brianrasmussen2956 I don’t think so, the goal of Americans was the subjugation and possible destruction of Russia. They thought they had done that in the 1990s, Putin changed that narrative. They wanted access to the resources in Ukraine and Russia and to keep Russia alienated from the rest of Europe, example the destruction of the gas lines. Europe with Russia would become more independent of America.

Mistakes are unavoidable, what's needed is to learn from mistakes. But when stuck in a hole, the first thing that should be done is to stop digging.

All true

I would not label him as intelligent about what he said on China/Taiwan.

The US is on the decline and will become a regional power. No one can stop this. Its how history and Empires work.

Russians refer to WW2 as the Great Patriotic War.

War is not a crime rather the last resort when all forms of diplomacy fails and is totally necessary in defence of the national realm and people. The western nations have played a dishonest, insidious, and evil game with Russia's security and the ethnic cleansing of Russians in Ukraine.

All wars start with at least one side demanding that the other side surrender unconditionally. That is the crime. Refusing to surrender is not a crime.

Wish he didn't have that hawkish attitude towards China when it comes Taiwan but I take 1/3 delusional over full blown delusional at this point.

that putin is a brutal dictator?

Interesting angle🤔

And Syria too...

During peace talks in Istanbul, Putin even withdrew Russian forces outside of Kiev as a *gesture of goodwill* in order to create favorable conditions for peace talks.

@@Shenzhou. And Putin asked himself "how can I stop this g*ddamn war?" Several times he asked for a peace talk and still does. Zelensky had issued a decree banning peace talks with Russia. Washington no longer speaks to Putin at all and Zelensky continues to send drones

@@Shenzhou. And Putin asked himself "how can I stop this g*dd*mn war?" Several times he asked for a peace talk and still does.Zelensky had issued a decree banning peace talks with Russia. Washington no longer speaks to Putin at all and Zelensky continues to send drones

Russia also has time on her side. The unipolar world is dying while the multipolar world is being born.

that animal has a lot of blood on his hands. if us gaev ukraine sufficient weapons ukraine could have defended themselves without such losses which thmesleves might wll be lie. what he counted 500 000 himself.

​@Shenzhou. Not by the looks of it, China looks set to stall, which will cause a knock-on effect with it subsidised economy

​@@DerekYoung1 They've been saying that about China since 3 decades ago. _1990. The Economist: China's economy has come to a halt._ _1996. The Economist: China's economy will face hard landing._ _1998. The Economist: China's economy entering a dangerous period of sluggish growth._ _1999. Bank of Canada: Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy._ _2000. Chicago Tribune: China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin._ _2001. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas: A hard landing in China._ _2002. Westchester University: China Anxiously Seeks A Soft Economic landing._ _2003. KWR International: How to find a soft landing if China._ _2004. The Economist: The great fall of China?_ _2005. Nouriel Roubini: The Risk of a Hard Landing in China._ _2006. International Economy: Can China Achieve a Soft Landing?_ _2007. TIME: Is China's Economy Overheating? Can China avoid a hard landing?_ _2008. Forbes: Hard Landing in China?_ _2009. Fortune: China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover._ _2010. Nouriel Roubini: Hard landing coming in China._ _2011. Business Insider: A Chinese Hard Landing May Be Closer Than You Think._ _2012. American Interest: Dismal Economic News from China: A Hard Landing._ _2013. Zero Hedge: A Hard Landing in China._ _2014. CNBC: A hard landing in China._ _2015. Forbes: Congratulations, You got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing...._ _2016. The Economist: Hard Landing looms for China._ _2017. National Interest: Is China's Economy Going To Crash?_ _2018. The Daily Reckoning: China's Coming Financial Meltdown._ _2019. Zero Hedge: Seven Reasons Why China Is Facing A Hard Landing In 2019_ _2020. Forbes: Remember The China 'Hard Landing'? We Got One._ _2021. Bloomberg: Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize._ _2022. Bloomberg: China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n._ _2023. Bloomberg: No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy._ ... Yet it's already 2024 and China's economy is still going strong.

Another nice landing by China Southern