Thomas Kuhn on Scientific Paradigms and Revolutions

Подписаться 1,4 тыс.

Просмотров 2,1 тыс.

50% 1

A brief introduction to Thomas Kuhn's images of science and how a paradigm and scientific revolution works. Kuhn introduces a naturalistic account of the dynamics of scientific change with implications for our understanding of scientific progress and for science education.
Big thanks to A.C. for the musical track. Check him out:
/ ac4ever
/ @ac4everofficial886
linktr.ee/AC4ever

Опубликовано:

22 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 9

@kuldipdhiman 8 месяцев назад

Very well presented. Thank you very much.

@uhf54 3 года назад

Dude, thanks for using an open license.

@uhf54 3 года назад

The video was great!

@victoriamujicamora8023 2 года назад

Hello, i wanna know more about your investigation. I'm from Venezuela and I Will talk about this, can i send You a mail? Because this thing is very important to me

@victoriamujicamora8023 2 года назад

I Will talk this in my university* sorry my English is not good

@MattBrownPhD 2 года назад

Victoria, please feel free to send me an email. You can easily find my email address via searching at my university.

@damianbylightning6823 7 месяцев назад

Uhh, you lost me at "...his ideas are original..." I suppose if we ignore the ideas that Popper used to get us to where Popper was at and then ignore Wittgenstein, we can then say that Kuhn was original. Sadly, I think both Popper, Wittgenstein and others existed.

@MattBrownPhD 7 месяцев назад

Like every scholar ever, Kuhn draws on other sources for his ideas. Wittgenstein is an important source for Kuhn. Popper, much less so. Ludwig Fleck is probably the most important source for Kuhn's ideas, and obscured by the fact that his work was not available in English for a long time and Kuhn's acknowledgements of Fleck were vague and inadequate. None of this prevents us from acknowledging the originality of Kuhn's work.

@damianbylightning6823 7 месяцев назад

@@MattBrownPhD My point is that originality does not apply to Kuhn - and doesn't seem to apply to anyone else now.