TIER LIST: WWE WrestleMania Stages 

Yeah wtf was that all about

@@darebrained Like the bottom left corner opposite them?

COSZM0 TM What’s that?

Saw a concept video on it and agree with it it be LEDs behind the pirate ship where there no setting and a long likely LED ramp

Well, since WM 38 is still unannounced we could see it in the RJS as a way to compensate for WM 36.

@@lourencorocha9636 Supposadly that is the direction they are indeed going so Wrestlemania 38 will most likely take place at RJS but the theme might be different since the last thing they want to do is repeat the same aesthetic

I mean, beyond the set, the card itself looked like utter garbage going into it. So I'm not sure how much of a "what if" it would've really been. If anything the card was significantly improved by the two taped matches.

I wasn't there and say its their best set

@@kevinlee9929 I missed most of the show because I was sick and i'll say it's my favorite stage in years

Yeah it certainly was the coolest stage they've had

30 was also great

My issue with 34's stage is that the font on the stage itself is different from the actual event logo. I think the same happened with 31's stage. But 33 is just fantastic... IT'S THE ULTIMATE THRILL RIDE!!!

@@BigEvil6686 33 was sick.

@@BigEvil6686 yh that’s fair. It’s an acquired taste I guess personally I quite liked it

aj's entrance is the one I remember. just him looking proud of himself, elevated above the fans, and as much as they bollocked up his titantron, with how terrible it looked, everything else was incredible

Mountain ramp are shit, but at least wm33 was not just a big screen

Fayde first thing I thought of him walking down was unreal

If you’re 10

just a suggestion to improve the quality of the video, I don’t think anyone is complaining buddy.

Visual aids for a visual medium seems quite e reasonable request here.

Yup, you're 100% correct.

Shut the fuck up

rj benjamin okay, rj

I saw a video of a maybe official concept for the 36 stage even if its not it’s probably close to it as they have the LEDs behind the pirate ship as there is no seating behind it and a long ramp like 33

You got 37 imstead and it was pretty dope. LOVED being at that Mania.

15 and 10 should be in Alright. 31 (even though it looks a lot like 28) should be lovely. Just look at how you have the massive stage of 31 and the little purple thing of 12 side by side in Alright, just no.

29 is tacky but still has the grand scale and is well built and its ridiculous in the right ways. 21 just looks cheap and amateur. If it was a wrestlemania from 10 years ago then it would be fine but not 2005 WWE

@@robertosobreiro6212 Yeah, I think they should fix this ranking levels. It annoyed me a bit. At least with 10, I could sort of understand because it's MSG, it's the iconic little ramp with the gates, it looks pretty nice. 15, however, is just a big hoarding. It might be better than 31 (if going by creativity or whatever) but in no way is it better than 25 or 23 or even 35, I'd say. While we're at it, 18 should also be lower. The nostalgia is so strong, I mean it's just a scaffolding, it looks cheap and industrial. Personally, I'll take an out of theme 19 or 23 stage or a bland looking 31 stage over 18 any day of the week, twice on sunday.

@@thecatthatgravityforgot8428 But I think they both look cheap and amateur. My argument isn't that they should both be in the best, I should make that clear. It's that why is 29, which at least in my opinion, looks more or less the same like 21 and yet it's in the best. I think they might be basing it on the picture they had because 29 is a wide (sort of) shot with the fireworks and looks cool but with 21 it's a closeup of the stage with Eddie's car which puts emphasis on the the tackyness of the set. That's something they don't see in 29 because I vividly remember (I just watched it this weekend lol) when orton would make his entrance, you could see the Bridge and it looked very cheap, like a cardboard cutout. And if you were to look at a wide shot of 21, it looks almost okay. Idk, it just might be me but I still think it shouldn't be in the best. They're both just about bearable.

@@plasmicsnake3429 In my opinion the Stadium Stages are all on another level because of the Size and the Wow! Factor compared to the Arena stages. If you would bring in a non wrestling fan he would never tell you that WM10 has a better stage than 31. Just the size of the ramp alone, the space, the Pannels, everything. It's another level when it comes to Stadiums

Your right it look different because the stadium added seating where the stage was between 24 and 33

@@Zombiekilleryamato and of you see aerial shots you can see the lake behind the stage side.

Plus WM 34 was my first ppv afer I've downloaded the network two years ago the day when it was wrestlemania sunday

the problem its too small they need to double or triple the price of tickets to make the same money but it would be nice if they held takeover or hall of fame there

thatll take about 7 hours. 4 for the mid card alone

But the question is, did you stay hyped?

15 and 10 definitely lower! I know it's nostalgia and everything but how do you put 10 and 15 above 23, 25 and 31? The Arena stages are all huge and massive and out there while 10 and 15 are nothing compared to that. 18 just looks like a big construction going on. Aren't you just looking at it with rose tinted glasses?

Well played sir