Tiger Woods and Lee Trevino have amazing conversation on the range 

Ye sure he did jr 😂😂😂😂

​@@ben12333I believe it

​@ben12333 the best part of you ran down mummy's leg, didn't it, Jr?

​@@ben12333Get a life 😂

They call’em “Lee’s fleas”.

I've always admired Lee. He came from nothing and having nothing to now being a who he is now. It shows if you want something bad enough you can have it if you stay persistent. He's always been the same happy gregarious man who loves the game of golf. As all these legends continue to die off guys like Lee, Jack, Gary become even more precious to golf fans, because they're the remaining links to what the old school game was all about. It's a way different game today, but we can't forget it's roots.

It was the same with Chi Chi Rodriguez

When you have 92 professional wins and 6 majors you can teach. I thought it was cute when Tiger countered with what he does, and Lee rebuttles "I don't do that".

Nola in the building ⚜️

I was there at that tournament as well. Lee shot 24 under par with no bogies for the tournament. What a remarkable feat.

I think Lee was telling things from a different perspective than Tiger is used to. Also respect for elders is good for humanity, and Tiger is a smart guy.

Agreed. Lee can definitely be annoying at times. Couldn’t help but notice that Charlie didn’t pay hardly any attention to Lee.

Dunno about you but respect is earned not given. Old people don't get respect for being an Elder. As farcas golf goes Charlie definitely should respect him in that regard.

Yea... you can't just respect your elders... cuz dumb people get old too. Lee is not that. He is treasure.

You and me both

😂

@@stangetz534 legend! I mean Tiger is GOAT I say Jack and Tiger are my tie. Tiger for the amounts of wins and the way he did it. Jack, well I don’t have to say much. But what Trevino did coming where he came from. It’s absolutely incredible.

Glad you enjoyed it!

Lee famously said, "You can talk to a fade but a draw won't listen."

97 Faldo won in 1996 You are welcome

Tigers short game alone won him a minimum of 5 of majors.

Different methodology but both were short game wizards. Lee tended to play more stock shots (and played it very well) vs Tiger who always had an arsenal of different shots for every situation.

In every game there is always some aspect of the game that someone is better than you at. Lee is a legendary ball striker. Woods is mainly known for having the best short game and putting in the world at one time. In chess it is the same. We have specialists in certain openings and people that are known to be the best endgame player or the best tactician etc etc. Just because you are world champion at something doesn't mean you are the absolute best in the world at every single aspect of that game.

Are you quite young?? I should not presume that you are, but in my long years have realised that life is a constant learning experience.

@@jpcoll2011 no I'm far from young and I agree on your learning call...the comment was meant somewhat in jest

I dunno, I watched him play at Augusta the other day.

You could add Ray Floyd to that group with his very distinctive swing.

Tiger also knows what Lee went through as a minority in golf and the pathways he helped create for minority golfers like Tiger.

agreeGe chad

Charlie is a beast already, he doesn't need to listen to some boomer when his old man is the GOAT

@@SiLoMixMaster He will never surpass his dad as the GOAT if he has that attitude. You might notice that Tiger was listening and he is (in many peoples' opinions) the GOAT. Tiger knows that he can learn from the other greats of the game.

Generational divide. He probably thinks he has the greatest golfer of all time as his teacher so he doesn’t need to listen to others. He is just a kid after all.

What a clown comment

yeah im sur he talks in his sleep as well 😂..but if anyone wants tip playing in the wind lee sure is the master of them all 👌

Tiger would have welcomed that competition, with those clubs and with that golf ball.

@@jamesanthony5681 Tiger was crooked with a metal driver which was far easier to hit straight. Those guys had far more repeatable swings.They all had great short games. Young Tiger was great. In his search for perfection and less stray shots he made too many swing changes and bulked his body from weights and enhancers.He was always an injury or a new swing in progress away from his goal.

@@thetruthfornow6045 Too many swing changes, I'd agree. At Tiger's peak, he was better than all his competitors with all 14 clubs in the bag. No other golfer can make that claim, neither Jack nor Hogan. Tiger would have found a way to correct an errant drive with the old persimmon driver in the '60's,' 70's.

@@jamesanthony5681 he definitely dominated for 10 years. Only Bobby Jones could compare. But he beat hacks who were intimidated by his length. The only other long hitter was Daly who had his issues. By 2009 Phil, Koepka and DJ came along and had respect but no fear of the red shirt. They were able to hit their drives farther and Tiger was reduced to his four letter curses as he did not win a major for the next 10 years which would be his last. Jack beat Arnie in 1960 in a major. He beat Norman in a major in 1986. In between he had 16 majors and 19 runner ups. I would call that GOAT material. Tiger does.

@@thetruthfornow6045 Hacks? Mickelson, Ernie, Vijay, Couples, Duval, Furyk, Davis Love III were all hacks? I go back to my earlier comment: Tiger was better than anyone with all 14 clubs, and could beat you anywhere on the course: Off the tee, fairway, in the rough, 100-120 yard wedge play, putting, chipping. Mickelson couldn't beat him and Phil knew it. Likewise, Ernie. (FYI: Phil preceded Tiger on the PGA Tour). Today's equipment - the clubs, golf balls - and the way courses are manicured, has brought the average player closer to the top player. If you could transport Tiger as a 20 year old back to 1962 and give him the persimmon woods and those golf balls, where you could shape shots much more than with today's ball, then there'd be greater separation between him and the average player on tour, no doubt. As far as the GOAT conversation, Jack has the most majors, runner ups, top 3's, top 10s, etc., so you'd have to give it to him for his excellence over a longer period. But as far as who was a better golfer at his *absolute peak* , that's a separate conversation.

You clown

How do you know Charlie couldn't give a darn about what Lee is saying?

@@jamesrobinson1529 - Probably because Charlie quit paying attention to Lee pretty quickly and was by himself hitting chip shots.

Are Stocks really that profitable? Heard so much about the fluctuating market prices and complexity of reading chats and all that. I'll appreciate your feedback.

Yes it is but it's risky to do it yourself if you are inexperienced go get yourself someone good or you could look up *Nancy* *Lynn* *Lewis* on the internet.

Wow! I know Nancy. Met her sometime ago here in North Carolina during a fundraiser. Great speaker, full of humor and rhetorics too…”Mrs buy the dip “. Lol

I remember her from Fenner & Smith great woman.

Living off Uranium stocks currently. It's fun