This is mandatory viewing for parents of school kids. And cops who don't want to be relegated to history as the most despicable cowards imaginable. Thank you Tim for posting this presentation. I'm sharing it with all my students and friends again. I said Rory's presentation was the most important "self-defense video" people could watch, but then you had Mark on and now Ed...your channel keeps outdoing itself. I truly appreciate it and I hope my students are paying attention as well. Thanks.
A great video and packed with important information. When you get into any altercation go in with the attitude that you have already won. The rest is action and reaction.
I teach at a K8 school in the Bay Area. We had a student call in a shooting threat last school year. Frustrating that the deputies stationed themselves in the office and nobody except my fellow coworker teacher stationed himself on the playground/field.
With the Parkland situation I'm surprised by the sheer incompetence of the school's security personnel and the responding ( or truly non responding) LEOs. A tragic perfect storm of failures.
Obviously these are horrible tragedies. But we now have the political and social pressure to disband or defund the police and to send in social workers with police going to prison (chavinized) when the ROE lines are gray and shifting according to political winds or citizens responding to threats (Ahmaud Arbery shot by Travis McMichael who got life in prison). Who is willing to step up and have to deal with Soros-funded prosecutors after the event and juries stacked with armchair quarterbacks and racial anti-white bigots. With the FBI turning over every stone to find and arrest J6 protectors while ignoring BLM, Antifa, and the guy who shot Ashley Babbitt.
This video highlights the glaring truth that the gun is absolutely NOT the problem! I wish every anti-2A would have to watch every second of part1 and part 2 before ever speaking on the subject matter of “common sense” gun control laws. But why would I ever be delusional enough to believe common sense would rule the day, especially in modern-day America. I pray for our Country and her future!
In a colony near my friends house, a woman was murdered. The woman: 5'9", 70 kilos, black belt in Karate. The murderer: woman, 5'2", 48 kilos, no experience in combat sports and entertainment. Turns out the murderer was a beautician who came to the woman's house to give her some treatments. While the woman had a face pack on, the beautician started going through her stuff. The woman caught her and threatened to call the police. They got into a fight. The black belt kicked her a$$. But the smaller woman took a broken vase, lying on the ground, due to the fight and shoved it in the black belt woman's lower abdomen. Tool of violence at play.
Very disturbing information allows one to see the incompetence on multiple levels by multiple individuals. If I were a parent who lost a child in the Parkland shooting which should never had occurred. edited 7/18 went back and watched it again. Weird how all the security monitors didn't alert the police or one another, almost like they didn't see the threat as it actually appeared, either visually or in their mind. Were they under some kind of mind control? The blame goes wide even to the FBI (alerted twice) and 911 operators who had been called over 20 times about the shooter. Sad this didn't have to happen and cause so much grief and bitterness. God save us all..
Between the police that under react (as in this case) and the ones that over react, most of them do a very good job. But since we never know how they're going to act - The People have a RIGHT to self defense, and the defense of others "Firearms stand next to the Constitution itself, as the defender of America's liberties" - George Washington, Father of Our Country
Yeah, "enjoy" might not really be the way I'd describe it but the information is vital! The more I hear about the Stoneman Douglas shooting the more infuriating it is. And not at the killer; psycho killers are going to do what they do, it's evil but that's the world. More sickening was the crowd of cops cowering outside, too afraid to enter. They had guns, armor and numbers- two more things than those poor kids had! This "warrior cop" bullshit has to end. They better stop using that phrase or start actually acting like warriors!
And I will add, that if I were the first officer to arrive at an active shooter scene--I might well have taken my chances and gone in alone--simply to try to lessen the number of victims. One might never know for sure what one would actually do--in that situation.
Thank you Mr Tim. Such an awful act of evil. In a perfect world the teachers would be armed and trained in these parties scenarios (that will never happen). This particular coward of a wanabe officer was probably known as being a slug, just collecting a paycheck for too long.
And what was the police department policy on officers answering an active shooter call? Was a LONE officer even allowed to enter a building? Or was he required by department POLICY, at that time--to WAIT for a specific number of officers to assemble on scene, FIRST? If an officer violates department policy in such cases--he would most likely be in danger of termination, losing his pension, losing any indemnity from lawsuits for wrongful death, etc., and perhaps even be risking criminal prosecution. Personally, I would not be so reckless as to throw accusations of cowardice around--without FIRST establishing what those policy guidelines were, at that time.
It depends on the department: some department's policy states "an officer MAY enter by by themselves" while other department's have "an officer WILL enter by themselves". Very few departments have the "MAY" in their policy after the fiasco at Parkland. There have been incidents with some departments where the Chief, who was 30 minutes away from the scene, ordered responding officers not to enter, so victims at the front door waited over 30 minutes for the first officers to make entry and most of those victims bleed out and died. How do we know they were alive for part of that time? They were talking to the dispatchers until they passed out and died.
@@jsbcody And again, the issue is what was the department policy WHEN the shooting occurred? Some departments, I have been told--stipulate the officer CANNOT enter until there is a SECOND, or perhaps even a THIRD officer with you. Is that not true? It seemed to me that the word "coward" was being tossed around very casually--with respect to one particular shooting event.
@@yeshuaservant7 Broward was a MAY department at the time of Parkland. A year prior they screwed up in a similar manner for an active shooter at an airport in Broward County. The SRO Deputy was charged for basically failure to act and other charges. If I recall correctly, these deputies (the SRO, the supervisors, and others who initially responded) in question, blew off attending Active Shooter Response training. Florida Department of Law Enforcement went over everything to include training and training records and found Broward County extremely lacking and failed to correct the same mistakes that occurred in the airport active shooting incident. Here is a link to one of the public reports: www.fdle.state.fl.us/MSDHS/msd-Report-2-Public-Version.pdf The local municipal officers who arrived on scene went in right away but they were a few minutes later than the initial responding officers. The Broward County Sheriff at the time was an idiot, along with most of his command staff. Almost ALL departments now say a lone officer can enter (some say the lone officer WILL enter). It is all about stopping the killing, locating victims, and getting medics inside and treating/transporting the victims right away. That is the current standard for most of the country.
@@yeshuaservant7 My memory is that one news source reported that the sheriff of this county (SRO was a deputy) at the time of this shooting had changed policy before this attack from deputies MUST go in immediately/alone, to deputies MAY go in alone. I do not recall any source stating a policy prohibiting solo officer/deputy entry.
@@edmonk5291 I did not have a good opinion about the sheriff of Broward County at the time of that shooting. He appeared to me to be throwing his deputy under the bus--letting him be tried and convincted by the news media simpletons. But it all depends on what the department policy was AT THAT TIME. And was that made CLEAR to all officers, PRIOR to the tragedy? Rick (a retired CA officer), on his RU-vid channel Think Like a Cop--examined that shooting in detail. I would encourage people to watch his videos on the matter.
Please try to keep the foul language to a minimum. I'm talking to the people in the videos. I would like to share these videos with lots of people, but they will not watch anything with foul language. And they will criticize me for watching it and for sending it to them. I know it's hard to do, but it might increase your subscription rate even more. Thank you.
@Phil Walker - I understand your point and if it was possible to have these SME’s deliver their info profanity free it would be easier for some folks to hear the info. That said censoring the language would interrupt the flow of the conversation and would not show the authentic nature of the SME (subject matter expert). I have many church groups that follow me and they all understand the best info in this field often comes from rough experts who use profanity. The vast majority of my subscribers accept this and choose to focus on the good info rather than the foul language. I’d have to question if any of your friends are truly serious about this subject if profanity is going to be a deal breaker. Appreciate your post.
While I do agree with you that foul language is unnecessary, sometimes we need to pick our battles and not be too sensitive about minor things. These people are professionally helping us to be prepared in case we need to save ourselves or the lives of others. That supersedes any colorful vernacular that is not to our liking. Focus on the majors not the minors. Thank God for these professionals.
Personally I think the murdering of children is a little more offensive than foul language, and people who can't distinguish between those two "evils" are exactly the kinds of people who need to be exposed to this kind of information lest they be the victims such absurd sensitivity has destined them to become. Bullets flying at you is actually far more offensive than bad words. I know that sounds snarky, and it is, but it's also the truth. Victims are people who deny reality. Disliking messengers who are trying to teach life-saving truths about that reality, because the messenger is too crass or harsh or politically incorrect, is exactly why snowflakes become victims. If they can't handle the f-word, they're definitely not gonna handle violence.
