.. time calls wisdom so that everything doesn't happen at once our infinite Creator is wiser than we can never be our omnipresent omnipotent omnificent present moment of infinite intelligence of infinite Realms of infinite energy with never a beginning never and creator of our Quantum in Trinity time space lights Unity Quantum Light color sound infinite created first son father Time space best friend of all Mind SpaceTime circle square triangulated triangle rating fractal mind 369 Body ring Spirit frequency vibration ring ArcLight 9 Observer thought charge thought me TRis majestic three times three Atlantis Babylon Tesla Tower homie
You're close.. consciousness = simultaneous events = memory.. captain kirk and Spock go back in time to review all your memories with the U.S.S. Enterprise.. your mind does the same. Memory is redundant in the block universe if captain kirk steers our EXTERNAL mind (why dying is safe) Non time.. explains all
@@waynehilbornTSS Quantum Light color sound mind 369 vibration frequency ArcLight 9 Observer thought charge thought Me trismegistus 3 * 3 Atlantis Babylon Tesla Tower homemade who am I Lucifer light bearer Lady Liberty book in hand torch light held high chain broken power 3 ICU Mirror Mirror I see me wisdoms unconditional love Rings forgiveness our master key and breaks that wheel of out of order caramel pendulum energy swing swinging around the world right now just like in the days of Noah.. Solomon's Temple of 3 Body Mind Spirit say me the first thing built is The Mercy Seat pp1 molecule Amnesia Veil through all previous subconscious Beast mind rule of Self in our world lifetimes in Mercy Mercy Me I am Judas Iscariot you see
@@waynehilbornTSS time father time space space time is quantum light color sound in angular momentum creating our 1 through 7 infinite elderly time dimensions of infinite octaves a dimension being the new entrance into the new new octave black hole hole in mind where Singularity of my adult life is absorbed manifesting our previous Octave of which we live we all stand on the shoulders of giants Cosmos we live in the universe of infinite thought thought me every single one of us created unique complete individual Immaculate Conception from First Lite free will our Eternal Birthright three lights above the heart three lies below 7 s u m say I am of IAMO MONENT wheel within a wheel oh Ezekiel
Yeah, the more I learn about physics, the more I realise that flow of time is an illusion created by the brain. The "arrow of time" is real, but it is not a flow, but a gradient of entropy across time dimension. I have also been thinking lately about the hypothetical universes with more than one time-like dimensions, have those ever been described mathematically by physicists? If so, what have they found?
Relativity is something that goes far beyond what people even realize it's the way the objective becomes subjective. I have some mind-blowing realizations for the world that I need to share
@@carlbell2226 says me and reality. But I recognize how futile it would be to explain anything to somebody who doubts your words before you even tell them. And isn't equipped to understand any way. Like my favorite parable in the Bible says don't throw diamonds and gold to the swine. If anything is I'm telling the truth but I have no one to tell it to because everyone either doubts or they're not smart enough to understand. And that last part is very puzzling to me because it's not very complicated. It's not like I'm throwing a bunch of equations that people because it's logical correlations and symmetries and all of the complicated mathematics has been done for centuries and decades depending on what you are talking about. The only challenge for me is to put it down in such a fashion as to where it's understandable and make sense do people who are not mathematicians on one hand but it also must be made rigorous and scientific which it needs to be in either case but rigorous and scientific to their standards which might not necessarily be correct themselves since they operate in a materialistic paradigm which they have disproven with their own experiments math and science over and over and over again for decades now yet they still cling to their false beliefs well demanding that any explanation given is something that falls under their own paradigm. It would be hilarious if it wasn't so important. On one hand I got a group of uneducated people not capable of understanding the science on the other hand there's a group of scientists not capable of believing in the non-physical reality of existence. So both sides are blind. My model I'm talking about explains far more than what I said. It explains existence.
People act like they think relativity is limited to physical space and locality somehow. They don't realize by the very fact that relativity is a phenomenon that they are literally standing in the center of the relative universe wherever they are and the distance from there to the observable boundary is literally the size of the universe and nothing else exist beyond that point for each different relative framework. This is defined by causality and the speed of light is representative as well and so is the Planck length. Relativity also deals with the subjective framework of a person or a thing in relation to the objective framework of the universe. The opposite is also happening on the quantum scale when the waveform collapses and probability turn something that was objective and random and chaotic to something that is concrete subjective and actual. Anything that is quantum would be subjective but it comes from the realm of objectivity when it is in its probabilistic state and before that random. The very first thing that come into existence are subjectivity and objectivity and the relationship between them. An actual reality would be the absolute nothingness they come from that is impossible two exist because of information. These things are all there is in the beginning. But since everything is cyclic there is no beginning
You might be interested in the ideas of the philosopher of science Michael Silberstein. He, along with a physicist and mathematician, wrote a book entitled ''Beyond the Dynamical Universe'', wherein he sums up the contemporary debates in physics (theoretical and philosophical) such as the arrow of time, interpretations of quantum mechanics, relativity, etc and uses the idea of the block universe, as well as other considerations and findings from modern physics, to put forward a view called the Relational Blockworld (RBW). He takes this idea and insights from cognitive science/neuroscience to argue against physicalism, not only about consciousness, but physicalism as a metaphysical thesis in totality. He instead opts for a type of neutral monism. I happen to find this view very compelling, not only because of the arguments in the book, but because I think it meshes well with personal experience.
The part about “time traveling to the past is stepping into someone’s future” makes too much sense and I had never even thought about it before. 🤔 so if Person A is born in say 480 B.C. and lives to 400 B.C. And I time travel from 2024 A.D. to 460 B.C. Then although for me the relative view is moving into the past while for Person A it would be their Future. That makes a ton of sense and I’d never even considered that before, dang
Mathematics consistently shows us that the truth is simple in its form. The block universe is has simplicity at its core. All we have to do is give up free will. I’ve always contended that we have free will in 3 dimensions but not in 4 dimensions (4 has greater truth). That is why we are deluded. We feel we are free in 3 dimensions but all our choices we would make again if we returned to the choosing point. Hence we are not free in 4 dimensions. It’s block universe all the way folks 😊
Mathematics, and the natural events it can explain, are not amenable to human will. Water will not boil at 0 degrees (°C or °F) no matter how much anybody wants it. Each new scientific discovery further restricts our "free will" in the three spatial dimensions. These natural events are timeless, unchanging, and inalterable.
First couple of minutes, you keep talking about mathematical understanding….. what if math is only something we use to understand our reality but its not actually true. Kind of like our eyes, we see reality as we do but we do not see all dimensions of space. We dont even see the full spectrum of light. All i know is, the more we learn, the more we realize we dont understand anything.
@@MattHanr that’s not true. If you went at 1/2 the speed of light and someone relatively passed you at 1/2 the speed of light, theory of relativity states 1/2 + 1/2 is not 1
The formula is still the same@@CutleryChips It's the formula's which are relative. That's why maths is the ONLY truth in the universe for that fact. Relativity.
I Subscribed because I thoroughly enjoy having my mind and my imagination stimulated I can feel the dust being shaken off of my brain cells as I embrace the theory put forth even if for a small time. There is always new information to be gleaned from videos like this if we follow along with intent and curiosity. There are times when I can embrace Presentism and view the past as ground rules for navigating the present experience. Nothing happened in the past the ground rules are just put in place to give us a perspective and attitude about the present we are experiencing. The future is an artifact of the brain trying to make sense of the continuum of the present experience. We make sense of the world by creating distinctions among the stimuli we experience on this journey so we can break those stimuli and the continuum into mentally digestible parts. The Growing Block Universe must be what most materialist physicists experience as our Universe hence the expanding Universe theory they expound. I always thought it was a natural requirement when they went from the original big bang to inflation theory. At least this has some basis in the cause and effect nature of our Universe. I may not agree with it but I can certainly see how someone who believed along those lines made sense of what they perceived. And when we look through the Hubble or JWST we are looking into the past as those light particles carrying the information from those times fly past us on their journey to surround us in the past. I am 13 minutes in and the only problem I have with this theory so far is that the block Universe doesn't fit the observations on the Space Station experiments. The Universe as we know it is a fluid with specks of matter scattered about. We now know that empty space is not empty it is filled with something whether that something is dark energy or an electrical charge or something else we don't know yet. However we do know that a drop of water when floated in space on the Space Station forms a sphere not a block caused by equal pressure around the interior perimeter of the drop of water putting pressure on the surface tension that undulates while trying to equalize the pressure on the inside.
Oh man, I just realized as I was watching the video. It's very likely that right now we are being watched by other guys from the future. From within this dimension! Guys behave, who knows, it could be anyone!
The universe exists in one signature frequency. But this is one of an infinate amount of universes and each is as it were super imposed over our own current universe but operates on a different signature frequency, there are infinate universes. When we dream our mind phases from awake frequency to sleeping frequency and this frequency allows entry to an alternative world that the dreamer perceives as their dream world and universe
Have fun with this, my friend: 🌐🌖🌐🌒❤️🌘🌐🌔🌐 ⤵️ *SR🌒GR🌘HH* ⤵️ There are issues with linear thinking based on the Hubble constant and reverse inflation. Having a singularity as zero point, even in QM, is problematic because it requires time dilation to be instant. Using holographic principles and implementing applied graduality in Möbian mathematics provides a much smoother transition regarding transfer of energy and entropy. Understanding that time dilation in relativity also is less drastic locally because of quantum fields, quantum entanglement and holographic principles. Once you approach extreme gravity fields, such as neutron stars and black holes, the normal attributes and effects of gravity is less severe within the local relativistic grid, because the matter that is caught in the gravity field is indeed light itself and gravity is a function of light, so the acceleration experienced by the subject is much more gradual and doesn't necessarily lead to spaghettification, because matter is fundamentally made of light, thus rendering a smoother transition within local fields. There is a possible misconception that black holes are more destructive to local events, because we have implemented a differentiation between matter, light and energy. Proposing that light and motion are the fundamental forces in physics solves several of the empirical findings in our universe - from local events to the very large. IMPORTANT NOTE: There is also a possibility that the laws of nature might change from region to region in the universe. Applying the same unified functions everywhere might not be applicable - based on the observer. Quantum Mechanics combined with holographic principles in conjunction with relativity might produce variations that are stable within physicality as a whole. But they might also produce temporal shift variations that might fluctuate between timelines, not compromising the stability of the system as a whole. Temporal shifts pose little/no threat to quantum fields in macro or micro, because the energy transfer between two or several more points are conserved within holographic principles. Best way to explain is superpositions of quantum fields. But using spherical understanding we might end up with hyperpositions in addition, meaning that within multiverse theory and/or paralell physics, we can propose that local variations might occur elsewhere. One might suspect that this could be inherently unstable, but hopefully stability is ensured by *Special* and *General Relativity* in conjunction with *HyperTensored Holigraphy* QM & QFT are ultimately functions of HH, because all forces, all phenomenons, energy, polarities and particles are fundamentally holographic, thus made of light. Diverge Planck and apply HyperTensorality to: v=d-(t³c³) If one might observe local effects that seem irreversible to the observer, the stability/instability of said system might return to its relative position in space as they where when the temporal shift gradually occurred. A Rosen/Einstein bridge might be folded back onto itself, reestablishing pre-existing physicality relative to the initial motion through space time. Quantum Entanglement might provide a reasonable solution to reoccurance of paralell shifts that within time dilation could possibly be "stored" in the same field, but according to the observer. Matter and energy that exist in local time at one point might be shifted and parallaxed with *EPR ≡ ER* Local EPR might occur continously between substances that share the same locally observed quantum field and the energy accessible could possibly be much greater than within relativity, because e=mc² isn't truly applicable when dealing with motion on a quantum level. When taking into account that matter in itself consist of light, e=mc² is rather moot. Energy is indeed conserved within relativity and as we know we can't break relativity within relativity itself, but when we apply quantum and holographic principles, we could propose that *e=cc²* The accuracy of this correction must be investigated, but it is strongly suggested through quantum entanglement and holography that the state of energy in the universe is much greater than what relativity proposes. Corrections might be suggested and *e=c³c³* might be suggested within HyperTensored spacetime *(HtH)* ***Note that these corrections serve as an introduction to the dimensionality of HH, rather than replacing the causality of relative tensor vortices. Considering sphericality to QE in EPR we might unlock a deeper understanding between gravity, relativity and QM. There might be spherical and macro EPRs that beam QE through quantum fields in absolute zero and this might give us access to zero point energy that is much greater than fission and much less complicated than fusion, because the input energy is more or less the device itself. Stability and security is better overall because zero point energy doesn't require usage of unstable materials... This has to be investigated further to test the hypothesis. ***** Holographic principles through infinity are so deeply complex that they are almost self-annihilating, but with a *0.38 zeptosecond/0.00087𝑉p stability* *(6.25 × 10^(124)* Hertz) ≡ *6.25 TredeCillion* Hertz This frequency is prevalent through the Holoverse and is rather difficult to manipulate or exploit, because it is rooted in *HtH* and how these interlinked properties behave in the *SR/GR/HH* conjunction. IMPORTANT NOTE: There is never one singular source for any given system. There are always a plurality of systems and subsystems to ensure the stability and security of the spectrum of the laws of nature, physics and life. If there was only one singular source for any given system, it would ultimately lead to instability and degradation. Stability of the laws of nature are almost impossible to compromise, because ultimately light is the very foundation of matter and gravity. Even though quantum mechanics might seem random at certain conjunctions, the configurations are governed by quantum entanglement that principally are benign in nature, because changes to the information/polarity exchange are secured in relativity that ensures a certain degree of stability. Complete equilibrium in any given system is prohibited by the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, but it may at the same time be rendered void when entering the quantum realm, where exotic effects might be empirically observed. This is easiest explained by double slit experiments that prove quantum entanglement can not only give parallel energy patterns, but also plural outcomes without loss of energy but possibly provide divergence of energy, thus rendering the 2nd law of TD moot, possibly invalid or maybe incorrect in its current understanding. This can lead us to energy production that leave us with little to no loss of energy. Runaway effects that might go critical such as in fission production are less hazardous, given the correct protocols are in place. Weaponizing quantum energy production should be avoided at all cost and is not feasible, because subatomic particles cannot be concentrated in practical weapons. Using such technology should either way be separated from military science regardless. Civilian and military sciences SHOULD always be maintained. How life itself originated is a whole other field and might be discussed both metaphysically and naturally. As I view it, I think it is interesting to entertain several avenues instead of focusing on a singular source. Life itself is pluralistic, so why shouldn't there be several sources without excluding any existing. The universe≡is fundamentally an endless array of hypertensored holographic projections. Information is fundamentally secure within systems. It cannot vanish and is stored within *SR/GR/QM/HH* 🌘🌗🌘🌖🌘🌕🌘🌔🌘🌓🌘🌒🌘🌑 🌑🌒🌑🌓🌑🌔🌑🌕🌑🌖🌑🌗🌑🌘 🌕🌒🐙🌘🌗🐬🌓🌒🐙🌘🌕
Only in this video I began to appreciate the idea of the Block Universe. This now leads me to the desire to read the book, "Beyond the Dynamical Universe" by Michael Silberstein which attempts to redirect our approach to solve hard problems in fundamental physics.
I agree with this block theory. there is objective shape to the universe, the shape looking like its moving, but this an illusion create by us. And so this is for me the answer: C^2=E/M where C^2 is the illusion creat by us and E/M is the never changing shape.
Relativity means that relativity is universal and wherever a relative frame of reference is in the universe is literally the center of it and the limits of the observable portion of it is literally the limit of the existence of the physical universe. It is the present moment that literally allows for differentiation in time and space otherwise we would be all places and all times at the same time
This is just whining honestly. In the same way that your movement and perception is limited through space (You can't instantaneously teleport to the edge of the observable universe, nor see it from your current position), your movement and perception through time is limited too. I don't see how any of this has any relevance to this specific moment in your life. So...deal with it and go to work.
@@Princessk8 True if we are speaking about intent. If we are speaking about simply the mechanics of physics then yes you could actually "teleport" to the edge of the observable universe and even beyond. The probability is just infinitesimal.
First Principle..Know Thyself. Chronological time a created tool for coordination, psychological time is an illusion, a manifestation of the " ego".... I am.. is creation of time,though.. ❤
I’m not sure if you are aware of this, but the present moment is the spiritual dimension. This is where you can experience God, spirit of the universe or whatever you want to call it. The only way I know this is because I experienced it. I’ll be glad when we reach the point , that we realize that they are one
The idea is essentially a hard drive space. The information is static and unchanging in the hard drive, and our experience of this information is like the needle reading the memory, which produces an image of a program on the "screen" lol
I love the realization that we are never in the past and never in the future. The only thing that is eternal or infinite is the present moment. Unfortunately most religious people are not aware of this, if they did they would interpret religious texts from Jesus, Mohammed or any truly awakened person would be interpreted differently and closer to the truth than religious people understand. However , I do believe that our world is slowly awakening
I don't think we can justifiably claim that these mathematical structures actually correspond to reality, at least not with any justified confidence. What we can say with more certainty is that the symbols we use to describe our reality exhibit a kind of self-similar, self-describing, and symmetric structure. When Plato discussed his Allegory of the Cave, I believe the shadows on the wall are not representations of physical reality but rather the shadows formed by the symbols we use to describe our world. Many seem to assume that these structures are somehow more "real," but I argue that they are not; instead, they are byproducts of symbolism. If we think about it rationally and as unbiasedly as possible, we could observe that there has never been a mathematical or scientific statement, proposition, or proof represented in a non-symbolic form. Furthermore, to verify any such proof, one must use yet more symbols. Any symbolic system that can be represented in binary-whether it’s a language, mathematical statement, or computable function-can be said to belong to the same basic "Symbolic Realm," akin to Plato's Realm of the Forms, possessing the symmetric properties inherent to finite sets of symbols. These forms arise from our symbolic representation systems. While symbols themselves lack direct causal power, they can exert immense conditional causal power, meaning their power ultimately relies on interpretation. Philosophically, this can be illustrated by the fact that at the foundation of every current scientific theory lie unproven assumptions. This is often referred to as "axiomatic thinking." While it is highly useful in many contexts, it is risky to make strong ontological claims based on assumptions that are ultimately unproven. A counterargument often labeled as "coherentism" suggests that what matters more is whether beliefs are coherent with what we already know. However, this approach has its own issues, as anyone familiar with basic logic knows that starting from a false premise can lead to deriving false conclusions. Another counterargument is that this idea might not be falsifiable, which is a valid critique. However, I argue that the opposite position is even less tenable, as we cannot test whether these symbols accurately reflect reality without relying on more symbols. When we objectively examine these symbols, we do not find anything "real"; instead, we find more symbols pointing to yet more symbols. It’s not "turtles all the way down," but "symbols all the way down." To be clear, I'm not suggesting this is how objective reality actually is, but rather that the symbols we use to describe our world inherently possess these properties.
Symbolic or not, there are some things that math explains extraordinarily well. Irrespective of one's symbolism, the phase transitions of water are known precisely and are not subject to human will. Axioms need no proof, which is why they are called axioms. One plus one does not equal one.
@@drbuckley1 Axioms need justification just like any other objective or empirical statement. What if I just made up an axiom that says, "All women find me attractive"? That is an absurd example, but it should illustrate the point: simply declaring something as self-evident doesn't make it true or rational; it remains just an assumption until it is critically examined. For a more relevant example, consider classical logic vs. non-classical logics like "intuitionistic logic." Not all of the axioms that underlie classical logic are accepted in intuitionistic logic-for instance, the law of the excluded middle is rejected in intuitionistic logic. This raises questions about the nature of axioms: if two consistent logical systems can flat-out deny each other's axioms, are these axioms truly self-evident, or are they context-dependent? If a single counterexample can challenge an axiom, is it truly axiomatic, or does it reveal the limitations of the framework in which it is assumed? A statement becomes dogmatic not because it's true or false, but because it's presented as incontrovertibly true-and that's a red flag. If an axiom is defined by some sort of authority and is presented as incontrovertibly true, how is that not dogma? Nothing is incontrovertibly true, except dogma.
@@drbuckley1To be clear, I use axiomatic thinking every day. I also use related concepts like "first principles thinking," "Bayesian reasoning," and others on a regular basis. These are tools in a problem-solving toolbox, but all of them share a fundamental weakness. They are consistent systems using a finite set of symbols, and they can never provide a "complete answer." Practically speaking, it is often impossible to determine what "truth" really is, but one can often use these tools to say with much greater levels of justified confidence what is not true. I believe followers of what I call "scientific absolutism"-and I literally mean that like a religion-seem to place way too much confidence in their beliefs, similar to how any devoutly religious person might. While science is a powerful method for understanding the world, it’s important to remain aware of its limitations and the provisional nature of its conclusions.
My basic position is that "absolutism in general is an untenable position," and by "untenable," I mean specifically "not able to be maintained or defended against attack or objection." I further assert that any formal system of knowledge requires symbols, and if you give me a statement in that set of symbols, I can systematically show how the truth of a given statement is relative to the observer and their interpretation of that statement. All I have to do is randomly select an interpretation, and there is an extremely high probability that the statement will be nonsense. To understand what is being said, I must know the rules of the system of symbols, which requires a lot of background knowledge, such as knowing how to read in the language or set of symbols, just as one example. Meaning is not inherent in the symbols themselves but is constructed by the observer. At the end of the day, we can't say for certain if these symbols actually reflect reality, but we can say with a high degree of certainty that they do, in fact, reflect yet more symbols. Absolutism, in general, is untenable.
@@drbuckley1 So your "one plus one does not equal one" comment reminds me of Terrence Howard's discussion on the Joe Rogan podcast where he claimed that 1x1=2. There were a bunch of people who seemed to get angry over this assumption. While I don’t agree with Howard’s claim, it highlights the importance of conventions in mathematics. By convention, 1x1 equals 1, and I can show Howard’s claim to be incorrect using these established conventions. For example, consider logarithms: log(1) = 0, and log(x*y) = log(x) + log(y). The inverse of the logarithm is exponentiation, so 2^log(2) = 2. Additionally, 2^0 = 1, which is true by the convention that defines any non-zero number raised to the power of 0 as 1. However, this outcome is tied to specific conventions. If we describe multiplication as repeated addition or exponentiation as repeated multiplication, we follow a different set of rules. An observer unaware of the logarithmic or exponentiation conventions might not understand why 2^0 = 1, just as they might find Howard's claim plausible within a different conceptual framework. This shows how mathematical truths are deeply connected to the conventions we use to define them, and changing those conventions can lead to different results.
Are we traveling through time, or does time flow? Do we flow, or something else flows? Well, both, the Universe flows, we do the same. We do as it does. However, we are not going anywhere. Traveling through time is not the same as traveling through space. We are not going anywhere in time, we are going anywhen. And this means that we are always here. The Universe is always here, we are always here, so when we say we are traveling through time, what we actually mean is that we perceive change as if we are walking into it. Like you are standing in a pond and you are walking and it feels as if the pond is flowing. But, in reality we are standing in a river. So get the analogy, traveling forward in time (in the future) means walking up the stream. Let's say you make 10 meters upstream, so you are now getting the water that the people behind are going to get in a second. But, by the time it gets to them, it's not the same water. This means that there is a future, but it's impossible to get there by traveling (walking). The only way to get there is wait for it to come and only when it is at your legs it becomes the present water. And then it's the past. You say you want to go to the past. You mean go downstream and try to find the water that was here a while ago. The exact same water is real, it's over there, but good luck finding it. It's like trying to shoot an ant with a bullet and shooting up vertically hoping the bullet will fall on the ant. That's why we can't "travel" to the past. And there would be no way to come back also, because you would need to go upstream again and guess what. Maybe we can project though. But that's for a future video :)
We travel though time at the speed of light, but can only go forward. We cannot travel at the speed of light in space, but we can travel back and forth through it. While time and space seem different, Einstein's insight was to combine the two into spacetime.
Without change everything on this planet would not have come to be. Even planets were formed from changing matter. But man has a duality of nature. First his reality keeps him firmly on the ground most of his life. But at times, he wants to escape it and therefore looks for floating ideologies
Yeah but why is there an arrow of time? And how did it get a direction in the first place I mean the arrow could have been pointed any other way right? Wrong are moving from nothingness to Infinity. And at the same time we are dissolving back into nothingness in the opposite direction because mass and energy and space and time are moving in the opposite directions in opposition of each other. The point of criticality is where they meet. Accent time and space are the the ones that allow movement they are the ones that decide the direction. While energy and matter are the ones that decide the speed in the entropy
@@drbuckley1 no it is the physical indicator though. We are in a duality between nothingness and everything. Nothingness is larger so there is an imbalance. Luckily there are two dualities. nothingness and number. or multiplicity. Potential infinity. The physical universe, which is expanding and aging as it expands. Entropy radiates heat and the qualia of matter and energy back to space and nothingness leaving the computational particles in thermal equilibrium, finally anyways, and heat death and evaporation. It is like the one way valves inside of your blood vessels that keep blood from flowing backwards.
Please note that the temporal invariability of the laws of nature is an assumption and by no means uncontroversial. You cannot use one assumption to support another assumption, in this case the block universe. Incidentally, the variability of the laws of nature or of the fundamental constants of nature would not contradict the block universe, because variability can also be inherent in this block. Ultimately, I do not believe that this sophistry helps us in any way in terms of epistemology, because it makes no difference to our subjective experience. Nevertheless, it is of course fun to philosophize about it.
The universe is non linier, and the perception that we call time is actually an infinate teleports from one frequency to on other frequency and onto to a multitude of other frequencies the transition from one frequency to another is perceived as the passing of time. Therefore as time actually does not exist, it cannot be considered as a dimension, as time does not exist.
You are wrong about the block Universe my friend at least in the first part of the video it does allow for the passage of time in a way but time is not something that moves is the present moment that moves in the present moment is special literally the center of existence and the subjective framework are relative reference frame that allows our mind to enter the physical universe as Consciousness and manifests itself the way it does. That is what causes the moment of now as well and one of the things anyways and one of the reasons for it. Time is a dimension just like space but we can't perceive it directly like that and it is literally the way infinite spatial dimensions exist at the same time because with every spatial Dimensions there is a fourth temporal Dimension that allows the whole thing to bend back upon itself so it can begin again and not interfere with the last three dimensions and that way it literally just doubles itself every rotation instead becoming a confused mass of infinite Dimensions that we can't even conceptualize and there's a reason for that because they don't exist like that things to space progressing everything forward as the dimensions rotate perpendicular to each other with every step that means every time a full rotation is made it is one step ahead in time from the last so it does not interfere with the last one it makes a spiral instead of a closed loop and every three spatial Dimensions just are folded right back on top of the previous three and doubling them inside not in number
Come outside the universe you would not be able to perceive anything within it so you can make out any distinctive shapes at all within it. It would literally just be a singularity to you from outside of it or a particle if you were even larger because that's all particles and singularities are they are just different sise universes
The block University it's only something that you would perceive as a block from outside of it and you would perceive the universe as a completed Infinity but you would literally be in a place beyond measurement just like everything below the Planck scale is beyond our measurement and that is where the boundary lies and at the edge of the observable portion of the universe and at the edge of the Event Horizon of a singularity and at 99.999% the speed of light. All of these things are singularities and they are a kind of plank limit
Time and distance doesn’t exist, so how does time have a constant. Time is not a dimension. Perception only senses one frequency, if you could tune you senses to an alternative frequency your perception of your physical reality would have changed. As the Universe actually has no beginning, it has no end it’s more like an ongoing infinitely, so being infinate so no big bang. The future, past and present are all in the now. The future exists, as personal connections to alternative realities and having premonitions, proves that the future actually exists and the nature of premonition proves this fact to be true.
Are the present moment definitely is privileged it's the place where consciousness is that's why it is the present moment. Time does the flu or move or anything like that time is a block like a spatial dimension. It is consciousness that moves through time just as everything else does with the present moment is created by consciousness everything else doesn't have it. It is the subjective frame of reference that is carried by an electron that creates Mass. That's why a photon travels at the same speed for my reference points but it's when the electron can't travel at the same speed. What is subjective the other ones objective that's why there's a particle wave duality involved
@@aeixo2533 ya. I voice type and my phone is both deaf and dumb. and I don't proofread comments with simple English that should be correct 100% of the time but obviously isn't.
the only way to alter time is to step outside of time, were god is and its far but if you could go outside of time then you can stop time and rewind death time.
Hello, thank you for your good program. The reason for Iran's delay is very important in two ways. First, Israel did not accept Tehran's attack. done, and on the other hand, the death of the previous president of Iran was not true, they were kidnapped by ships, and these two factors worried Iran.
Existence lies at the point of criticality where opposites come together. This is true not only for time and things like that before everything all the processes of life happen through chemical reactions at the point of criticality. You can't even have fun unless chaos and order create probability. The point of criticality is the present moment and I call it the point of paradox. Or the point where paradoxes is resolved. I am very close to submitting the mathematical proof in the paper but I am not a scholar so I'm not very well versed in doing these things. I should say I am a scholar not an academic.
hey sir i love your video, but you are wrong sir about time. there is a universal creative time that we dont know of yet untill we meet other beings that has been here before us. also past present and future is one entity time. but its separately from space. thats how jesus prayed to god to raise lazarus from the dead, god outside of time reversed time so lazarus would come back from the dead. all three time cycles are here still past present future are still here, jesus said that god is still in the same day here even tho its been thousands of years since adam & eve sin. you are right that there is a lock on time to us but not if you and a military team leave and go outside of our space where god is. you will need a compressed lighted body thats self contained. take care. owens.
DEAR GODDESSES AND GODS, WELCOME TO THE PLANET OF GODDESSES AND GODS FROM THE PLANET OF APES, Mind of humanity is fooling other mind on earth in the name of consciousness, as you cannot understand anything beyond mind, so all your study on conciousness is not more than the study of your own mind, dear intelectual of this planet 🌏 are wandering like dogs after its own tail ❤
einstein was wrong! space and time are not one, they are separate from each other. jesus said god brought everything to this location in our universe some planets dont have time there. meaning nothing ages there, and in other locations, it has time but no space. you can only look in the location but you cant enter in this area cause it has no space. einstein took us to exceptional heights in science, but we know now for a fact that our time traveling is just a good fantasy time has a block on it just like you said here. i wont get too religious on you here but if time travel was real satan if he exist he would go back and stop jesus from dieing here, he would tell every demon to protect that guy jesus with all your power and satan would've won against god here condemning mankind to eternal sin forever jesus would be alive today lost thinking why didnt gods plan worked jesus would've never died here unless he got robbed or in a car wreck he would be alive and angry.
That doesn't make sense because Satan is not omnipresent, omnipotent, or omniscient. So no, he couldn't ever kill Jesus since Jesus is all those things. Satan is not equal to God. He is subject to God
The subject is already too complicated to comprehend... The loud background music doubles down making it more difficult to understand. Way to go..! Rather than having it delivered with a softer tuneful harmonious background music, instead you go with a agitating discordant music that comes loud in background with the audio...!
