Time Does Not Exist. Let me explain with a graph. 

LOL

Eureka!

Its kinda sad that this is so true for many of us! Merry Christmas!

@@lundsweden Agreed - I was of course just joking but it is as you so true - Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all - just not Uncle George - he knows why....

underrated 😂

Then time should be universal, but it changes around black hole or other high gravity objects

​@@deepakkushwaha4060that's why time is also realitive to the observer

This law doesn't depend on how we feel or think. It works the same for everything, even at the quantum level. If a molecule moves at light speed and comes back, it ages less, as if it's traveled to the future. The interesting part is that everything feels normal while traveling, the time ticks normally, but the real difference in time only shows up when you return.

​@@cyuxie😅Edge d,&😅ef,w,e😅fr😅

​@@cyuxie😅is gr

Just read Einstein. General theory and special relativity. Einstein defined space time. This video is nothing new.

But time does exist, let me explain with reality

All living things on this earth have a time limit.

This explanation has a problem: why the person who remains younger due to travelling near the light speed (you say just one second younger) don't see the other older person 300 M km away if the time is a real dimension, and why we can not move backward in it? Abs if your answer contains 'space-like' or 'time-like' phrases so the time is not a dimension.

So, by not understanding the topic ... you're qualified to rate it?

Same for me,

what did you say?

@@sayagarapan1686 exactly 😆 I wish my English is better, but no matter what I always will watch any sci-fi movies with translated subtitle in my own language, since if not I got confused easily with those mumble jumble complicated words.

The way I conceptualize it is essentially like looking down our world through various sized straws as we continue to accelerate. We start with a big gulp straw, boba tea straw, soda straw, coffee straw, until you’ve reached seeing nothing, which would indicate you’ve reached the speed of light. You’re narrowing off your peripheral view the faster you go, or in this case, closing your aperture to the amount light that travels with you.

Since when do we flatten? Contract is not not same as flatten..isnt that news to anyone else?

100% agree - you can achieve this effect / experience using hypnosis too!

@@stephen_101 And magic mushroom's.

Spot on. His mind controlled time in his body which is DNA. There ya have it.

Thats effect of gforce on your body/brain. Blood flow and the "manufacture" of thinking processes if you ask me. If a camera would register time slowdown that would be proof of something. Human in extream conditions just dont function as it should and cant be proof of anything other than cool story.

I wonder if the stress hormone has an effect on recorded memory. If you are in fight or flight mode then your senses are heightened and perhaps the more primitive parts of the brain take over leaving the rational part to observe in high detail like a slow motion video recording. Perhaps this is also part of the cause of PTSD after stress i.e. more things are recorded in memory than during normal activity where we fail to observe an record and time passes quickly.

Exactly. I became more confused as the video progressed lol

Good videos but the titles are pretty clickbaity. 🤔

Universal time does not exist. Time is relative

I think of it like this: Dimension = measurement...so Time 'exists' only in the same manner that the mile or kilometer exists, for example. The 'dimensions' are just human methods of record-keeping rather than actual properties of nature like heat energy or magnetism.

But you were not moving at the speed of light in one direction in order to experience time dilation. You were stationary in a coma. Unless medical science has progressed in ways I am unaware of.

how did you end up in a coma

I've had that experience twice, thatnks to an inexperience with gin & tonic. One minute I was thinking, "This is my last one, I'm switching to clubsoda," & the next thing I knew it was morning & I'd definitely been traveling on a different vector, as no time had passed but clearly I had done some traveling in space. However, to all of my friends (bless them!) both time & space had moved quite normally, if perhaps a bit uncomfortably. Many years ago, never again, tho maybe I'll just down a couple of those tasty monsters on my deathbed, as I prepare to move permanently into another dimension, where there had darn well better be cheese, too!

@@marksneddon Uh, yeah, duh. Thanks for clearing that up, I was like all confused, I thought it was called transmogrification. What ever would I do without your words of experience.

are u dreaming when ur in coma ? where u r at that time ?

Who tf is Alex you talk like you know him or something, calling him by first name basis like he's a friend of yours.

Lol obvious sockpuppet account

Alhamdullillah, not too long ago, Allah (S.W.T.) made this concept clear for me. When you ask your Creator to Guide you and give you important and useful knowledge, you will learn more about existence, the universe, and your purpose in life than you could have ever imagined. Ask your Creator to guide you. Allah is the Creator of the Universe. Allah is the AUTHOR of the laws of physics. Allah is One and Only. He doesn’t have a beginning or an end. Allah (S.W.T.) has no partners or children. NOTHING of Allah’s creation resemble Him. May Allah (S.W.T.) guide you and bestow upon you His Blessings; Ameen.

Alex is the dude making the video. He introduced himself right at the start.

Please, learn to use the Oxford comma. It makes these kinds of things easier to read.

Information limited by perspective, I like that.

What's amazing is that you can see inside of something if you are in the fourth dimension looking at a three-dimensional object, this is what always amazes me and in the book they have to be careful not to move somewhere and accidentally put their hand through someone or even through themselves. It's an excellent serious and I would highly recommend it. The three body problem starts slow but God damn does it ramp up fast and by the second book you can barely stop reading.

@@magichands135 It is beautifully displayed in the 2007 movie Flatland. Its even free right here on youtube.

@@zuilok By looking at the title Im a bit afraid its more about the 2nd and 3rd. Does it dive any deeper into the 4th dimension?

@@magichands135 You are correct. However the entire thing is a bit flipped on its head because in this film the main protagonist lives in 2D aka Flatland. And the third dimension is just as incomprehensible for him as the fourth is for us.

I think this video is intentionally misinforming the general public. I think they mixed up how speed is not time, perceptual time is a conscious concept and not a strictly physical concept. Speed is relative, time is a conscious and experienced constant, light is an objective particle that, according to the internet, is traveling in a "wave-like pathing"

I like your concept. I wonder if the math agrees.

@@hbl142 that s basically the Penrose diagram. Therr are a lot of videos on this topic. Look for it.

And the Big Bang traveled back in time?

@@hbl142 think of this, you can't use math to explain the mind understanding concepts

What does it help? Answer: nothing Our people still starve Wars being waged Disease is killing us Malaria for Christ sake!

​​@@Pdx616you think all those can be solved? Wars will never end Starvation will never stop Disease will always be here All that is just nature, understanding the universe is us trying to understand that nature

@@Pdx616it’s fun learning these things

Why can't time be a space also? If we existed in that dimension we could move forward and backward in time like we now walk forward and backward in a hallway.

Well said!

😁

Well said, and, much appreciated.

The time is not relativistic and it is exactly relativity that has prevented quantum field theory from making any real progress! The truth is that time is nondimensional it simply doesn’t have any physical dimension whatsoever! That is to say that time is not a physical entity in any true sense and therefore geometrical concepts of time fall short or give answers that do not reflect the true nature of what is taking place, such as length contraction and other matters of that ilk. Even that theory suggests zero dimensionality of time when one moves at exactly the speed of light in a vacuum this reduces the destination time to 0 because one is perpetually suspended above the 1 dimensional surface of the destination. Clearly this is evidence that the mathematics is indicating something that just isn’t complete and therefore doesn’t work. Proving this would take many pages of complex proofs, however.. the math has already been done, it just isn’t public knowledge.

Whoosh. Everything IS happening all at once, its just our perception that its not. That was kind of the whole point of the video.

Maybe another thought: imagine the appearance of an object in 4D (just skip one dimension and imagine an object in 3D) and then apply this thought to space-time by just skipping one space dimension (just like in the video). Now imagine how objects would appear in that space-time. Imagine how you would appear as an 4D object in space-time (ok, skip one dimension so you can imagine a §D object). You would appear as a kind of bent and curved spaghetti, with one spaghetti end marking your birth (appearance in the world) and the other end marking your death (disappearance from this world) all aligned along the time-axis. Now of course immediately you can ask: is this object fixed or can it move depending on your actions. A fixed spaghetti means all your actions are predetermined, and you are just experiencing your actions that are already there. A movable spaghetti means that by your actions and decisions are not predetermined, and therefore you can change the appearance of your space-time object (your spaghetti) depending on the places you visit (depending on your actual movement through space-time) during your life. A movable spaghetti also means there must be another additional "time-like" dimension in which your 4D spaghetti can move. This other dimension defines then the choice realm or the choice dimension. So our world must be at least 5 dimensional, with 3 space dimensions and 2 time dimension.

It is happening all at once to some conscious. Time is relative.

You're welcome

True

you say this to all the smart guys huh? lol

Or is it?

I saw this comment before watching the video so my expectations were high, and wow you were totally right haha

It's usually never the fault of students that they aren't able to understand what the teqchers taught them

Nope, the stick figures didn't help me much. But he did turn a simple concept into a mind bending one.

@@lastyhopper2792 - What is or are teqchers?

You may think more like myself, then, and would benefit from checking out Steven wolfram's computational understandings of things. He breaks down both space and time as essentially various different ways the universe processes information, and that is it. Seeing as we are a part of the universe, that is also true for us. What might really blow your mind is that linear time, as we experience it, is simply a byproduct of us being trapped within three spatial dimensions of existence. Beyond that, everything is occurring simultaneously, as if beings at that level of existence had such a perspective as to see you essentially stretching through the universe like a giant snake of yourself, from the moment you were born to the moment he died. Obviously, it wouldn't look exactly like that, but describing movement through the fourth dimension table language that is only designed by three-dimensional understanding requires even more sloppy shortcuts then language normally does, which is a pretty ridiculous amount, in the first place

@@sethrenville798 - Hogwash.

The vector you saw was 3D 😁 2 space (x, y) + 1 time (z).

@@tim.martin well if we want to get technical, what I saw was 2D since it was a representation on a 2D screen ;) What I meant was that I've never seen the 4D vector explanation for time dilation at high speeds.

@@vokhev Because its made up rubbish you even used the word "concept" -(an abstract idea) as in not a physical thing, aliens on another planet would have a totally different concept of "time"

You should check out Science Clic, they did a bunch of highly technical yet very easy to digest videos on this years ago

@@vokhev Consider what is the man (AND THE EYE ON BALANCE) who IS standing on what is THE EARTH/ground. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. What is E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky ON BALANCE. This CLEARLY explains and proves the fourth dimension. c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE !!!! Indeed, E=mc2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution. Notice the TRANSLUCENT blue sky ON BALANCE. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE, AS c squared CLEARLY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS what is E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE. “Mass”/ENERGY involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE consistent with/as what is BALANCED electromagnetic/gravitational force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). Accordingly, ON BALANCE, what are OBJECTS may fall at the SAME RATE. By Frank DiMeglio

I agree, I am blown away how beautifully simply it is explained.

Same here. It has opened my mind to hypothesize further on this subject. I think the universe is a conception of consciousness, in our case, consciousness is using a machine (mind) which is limited in it's capacity or frequency. I also think that through meditation the mind can be expanded, perhaps by opening the third eye etc. Then all the concepts, including the conceiver will be revealed to you. To me everything is lot more clearer as a wave.

Time is real. God created time. God is infinite as he is outside of time. You been brainwashed

You're joking, right?

@@michaelmccarthy2369 time is encapsulated in materiality, Spirit is Eternal

for me this video did not help, im not a scientist so i could be totally wrong, but from what i understand time cannot be the 4th dimension because time exists in all dimensions, and if it was the 4th dimension that would mean that you could travel in both directions of time which would allow for backwards travel paradoxes... right ?

@@mtxdp4392 there are no paradoxes because you're only traveling through time non-linearly, time travel is the 5th dimension, when you saw the stickman rotate, you wouldnt see his other arm because it was in the past

it is just a made up theory! Time is not the 4th Dimension. By definition the 4th D shall enable movement in yet another 2 more directions, which time doesn't do.

Agreed!

Yeah the graph really helped, hearing about it is one thing but actually seeing a representation of it is amazing

Check out ScienceClic English for their explanation about traveling through time as a dimension in their General Relativity video. It’s very well done and intuitive like Alex’s. They both have a little something the other does not, which is why I like them both.

The model is simple and easy to understand but wrong, not in the sense that it's not good enough for how complex reality is but in the sense that you can break it using simple logic and basic understanding of relativity.

Enjoyed the visual way to explain this! Still not sure if I get it though :)

i just wrote same comment dude, truly nicely explained

Not icing on a cake , without cake there is no icing so it's cake under the icing 🎂

@@levanigvelesiani7848 ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity. c squared CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY represents a dimension of SPACE ON BALANCE. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Great. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. WHAT IS E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma; AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. WHAT IS GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. (BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand.) It all CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE. By Frank Martin DiMeglio The maria occupy ONE THIRD of the visible NEAR side of WHAT IS THE MOON !! Think about it. This IS fundamentally related to the surface gravity of what is THE MOON. Attention: The rotation of what is the Moon matches the revolution !! Now, consider the gravity of WHAT IS THE SUN !! ON BALANCE, the crust of the far side of what is the Moon IS about TWICE as thick as that on the near side !! (The gravity of WHAT IS the Sun upon WHAT IS the Moon IS about TWICE that of what is THE EARTH !!!). BALANCE AND COMPLETENESS go hand in hand. GREAT !!!! LOOK around. Think. Piece it ALL together !!!! By Frank Martin DiMeglio News flash !…a monumental breakthrough in physics !! How can WHAT IS the Sun exist against (or in comparison with/contrast to) what is outer "space" ? HOW CAN IT EXIST IN SPACE AND TIME ON BALANCE? HOW CAN WHAT IS E=MC2 BE THOUGHT OF? Why, in other words, does (and can) the Sun have (or enjoy) what is a PREPONDERANCE of being? Why and how can it (come to) exist? The answer is TIME, SPACE, AND WHAT IS E=MC2 ON/IN BALANCE !!! GREAT. Consider what is THE EYE ON BALANCE. MAGNIFICENT ❤️. What is gravity IS E=MC2 (ON/IN BALANCE). ACCORDINGLY, ON BALANCE, the orange (AND setting) Sun AND the fully illuminated (AND WHITE/setting) MOON are the SAME SIZE as what is THE EYE (ON BALANCE); AS WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma. Great ❤️. INDEED, this is CLEARLY why (ON BALANCE) the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. Fantastic. WHAT IS E=MC2 is taken directly from F=ma, AS TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE; AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution !!!! PERFECT. THINK. BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense ON BALANCE. By Frank Martin DiMeglio

@@addy405 You don't know that Addy - the icing could have been supported by a carbon nanotube scaffolding and the cake deposited underneath it through a tiny hole one crumb at a time . WOAH. LOOKIT MY HAND , MANnnnn. FAR OUT , MANNnnn.

@@SabbaticusRex hahaha nice thinking! then it would be Icing on the Crumbs as they were formed in a non homogeneous way they would not constitute for being a naturally formed cake sponge. :D XD

That’s a good one, my friend

It's honestly the nearest I have come to understanding the relationship between Space and Time. Many thanks Alex

Our existence does not conform or bend to the known Reality....but rather we bend our Reality to conform to our Existence! Snow McCall 12/12/22

I agree. I taught relativity for many years and think this is the clearest explanation.

Much mor simply: ds²=-c²dt² + dr². Thas is a correct description. However, the visualization is not correct.

So time exists because of the big bang and we must be in an infinitely expanding universe. We could be moving close to the speed of light without knowing it relative to a stationary object but then again what is stationary? If we are both flying apart at half the speed of light then each one looks like they are travelling at light speed to the other yet the effects of relativity wouldn't be observed. Maybe there's no such thing as a stationary object.

@@groovejet77 I tend to think that there is no such thing as an object that is standing still. More than moving, I think more about each object's reference point in "space". Because space is expanding, your reference point is constantly changing within that ever-expanding space.

I think your brain fell off when u crossed a "wormhole" in your own mind.

If you expect the space expansion is consequence of moving in time dimension that could have any speed [m/s], than it means it is kind of a spatial dimense measurable in meters, but not kind of time dimense measurable in seconds. In that case you need any additional extra time dimension, because it expect the shape of 3d space in next aditional 4th spatial dim. where you can move in the times pace. Due to the fact the moving is not "single dimensional" function, it is fnc meters and seconds.

Time has no direction.

Your dream sounds like a Nightmare

@@samox5471 whether my dream involved any level of "new insight" or was just a "random nightmare" obviously can't be determined. i am, however, being persuaded by the "block Universe" theory of time and space and can't help but note that this new and novel theory tracks very closely to various elements of my dream.

Just say you like the content. Saying your 4 year old goes wild is a bit much.

@@brandonleesanders you're replying to a wrong comment. the 4 year old is mentioned elsewhere. I've seen a couple of you bitching around, are you paid to do this and how much? asking for a friend.

You can hook it up to your brain and change process and time sensation feed or release yourself from the temporal frequencies, interesting.

@@brandonleesanders (..think you put thiis reply wrong in the comment .. next one down I think 😊 )

Space and time are illusions.

You nailed it!

a very go good point of view

😂😂😂

A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF HOW PRECONCEIVED IDEAS INFLUENCE PERCEPTION OF REALITY

Bahahaha!!!!!

I know nothing of these topics but that’s usually how I regard it. I usually say that time is the measurement of the distance an object has travelled from point A to point B. I guess you could also call that change. But time would then be a singular and non-singular phenomenon depending on point of view. From the cosmic point of view time is the collection of all movement of all things simultaneously regardless of direction or distance travelled. From the point of view of a singular object, time is purely the distance travelled within set coordinates. So, I cannot comprehend this idea of time being a set direction that one travels through at varying velocities. And that one is being compelled to move in said direction. Unless that direction is the heat death of the universe. But in that case, how does velocity slow down entropy?

Yes but why does it change based on speed through space? The fact that it's not an absolute constant is what's puzzling. In other words, if time=change, why does increased speed cause change to occur at a different rate?

Totally agree... I have always said time isn't special, and isn't a dimension. All time is... is the measurement of change. The universe is always changing. Atoms are always moving and recycling. If everything was completely still and unchanging, time ceases to exist, because there is no distinction between one point in time versus the other. It's actually possible to time travel back to the past, all you have to do is reset all atoms everywhere to a previous state they once all existed, however, good luck finding the energy to make that happen. And how would you know where every single atom in the universe needs to be to get back to the exact same state. But even that wouldn't be real time travel, just a temporary duplication of a previous time, only if you could also determine and control the vector of changes for each atom to be identical to the previous state, then you have achieved actual (but not really) time travel to the past, where everything is the same AND heading in the same direction as it was before. Anyways, time is simply the measurement of change, and change is always occuring

​@@ryanj2768In other words time is more of a vector than anything else, since it's not a dimension or an entity.

Time used to slow right down when I was at school, but it speeded right up during the holidays!

@@antonioveritas true lol

It's misinformation, I believe

I don't understand how this relates to a person's perception of time still. If I am aware of time passing and mentally focus time goes slower. If you are unaware and pace through life at fast intervals it's like time speeds up. Side note: I feel clocks are an antiquated way of measuring time. Its not really a good way for humans to measure and perceive time. Thinking about how we divide time into a working day, should really be a way to measure the energy we can spend moving through space. I'm interested in our perception of reality in this case.

@@TheBrianthom Simple, our brains need something to compare against to perceive time at all. The less you're paying attention, the less "stuff" is happening, and in those gaps you don't remember much of anything because... not much happened. So of course after the fact it seems like hardly any time passed. Nothing to do with physics, just perception.

And he drops a book on us out of nowhere what a mad lad !

How have you been on youtube for 16 years.

Stranger still that you have the ability to think and express such ideas.

I''m quite intelligent but I don't have a fing clue what you are talking about.

@@Kris-ru5ue watch Donald hoffman. His ted talk is a good introduction. Then you would know exactly what he is talking about.

You're correct about our evolved limitations of sensing the universe around us, this is because evolution only cares about being able to survive long enough to reproduce effectively. As for the true nature of the universe that is a meaningless question. Meaningless because it's highly subjective it doesn't mean anything unless you are an observer in a specific context.

@@Kris-ru5ue use that big intelligence to explain its origins? You think intelligence is a happy coincidence of adaptation from gene copies gone wrong? If so, that sounds a stretch

Exactly.

I have had the experience of my consciousness traveling like warp speed through time and seeing what I assumed were past pictures of my lives. It felt like going in a tunnel and then arriving at some kind of very real destination. Think of the experience of Jodie Foster in the movie "Contact".

@@bluewaters3100 Your experience is simply imagination, memory, ideas, that is, neural networks with a beautiful electrical circuit, which caused some other chemical reaction in your body.

@@bluewaters3100 The movie "Contact" is science fiction. In my opinion, it was Sagan's futile attempt to get away from the reality that Someone created the universe.

@@rafageist Guess with mini brakers?

😆 😅

Lmao

😂😂😂😂😂

😂😂

You didn't waste 16 minutes. You just aged for multiples of NOW moment which is the only reality.

We have vectors right in front of us we can't see, its informative and mind blowing.

You are correct, and the base of evidence is displayed in the second half of your comment minus time but one is of the other indeed and are in an independence of sovereignty yet inseparable, can't be understood, spoken in any form of intelligentsia in any language or comparative communication but still is comprehensive and understood by parts of mankind and they seek to find the path that leads them on a journey to find proof of it's existence and drive that controls them ? or would it be just the pride of man that simply is the drive and force behind the minds of brilliance in today's scientific realm uuuuhhhhmmm Something to ponder either way A ? Tell me whatcha think

Prides of mankind, usually men of the mankind model, our future and the smart guys who could be In disguise as the modern day wise men but underneath their diplomas and indoctrinated certificates and multiple titles of importance by seeing the underbelly we could just see grown men fools and the jester's of the Kings court in whom they are not loyal to commiting usery as a means of production in order to sell their snake oils and potions, I mean books and programs that will never play a part in anyone's lives to improve them in anyway. In fact, could their agenda be of a more devious nature of misinformation and misdirection, slight of hand, they old tacticians of illusions or in general, people who's paid to do a job of misdirection and has a dedicated means of possessing multiple highly trained skill set to manipulate or convention, to convince or a con man that's where the con in con man comes from, and at the same time making more money from the sales of snake oil I mean their products, uuuuhhhhmmm something to ponder indeed Just, well, just a theory, if anything, I'm causing you to think in ways you probably haven't before and if you have then kudos to you, keep going... If not, then what are you waiting for for, if ones Is just simply only willing to entertain the idea of thinking in other ways of everything in everyday life, one may find the actual truth one never considered could be possible, question everything, everything. We have been deceived considering history, religion, political parties & issues, laws, schools, work, housing, authority, don't believe me, fine, don't believe a word I say, ease don't, I'm just an educated nut with degrees and diplomas who's just an educated idiot whatever, please research yourself just one of above mentioned hell just dig a shovel or two on a coarse of a month but dig nonetheless. If your interested in actual truth not what someone says is the truth, that a deal ? Search yourself stop being a follower your portion of your purpose is greater than you've been told... Dig

I'm 1 minute in and I'm already bored because time does exist. The person just isn't smart enough to come up with the right title for the video. Time exists therefore the title of the video is piss poor.

4min in? i thought time didn't exist

@@desimguy2022 nailed it!

Sariya sonninga bro..

Same!

So now are you both now convinced time is an "illusion", even though you experience it every single waking moment of your life?

@@NondescriptMammal correct, that is what I'm saying. Not so much an illusion as a perspective we live in, as you say, for every bit of time we're here.

@@andrewwalker8094 Yes I agree that it is a different perspective of time, and that seems valid... I guess I just object to the use of the word "illusion", in that it implies it doesn't exist in reality as a phenomenon (as is explicitly stated in the title). Clearly it does. Maybe the word "illusion" is being used more loosely than I am taking it, but if that's the case, everything we see is an "illusion" loosely speaking as well, when you think about it.

@@NondescriptMammal Very few influencers can resist the euphoria of 'splaining things away. Audience prefers it all to be 'splained away, over accepting limits and pushing thru regardless.

Delta t divided by square root of c square by squared make it equals to delta prime, because time illusion mirror-image is non-superimposable compared to absolute Steve of there dimensional arrangement of time space continuum of illusion of timeless space.

Yo girl that's cool. I just farted.

Like how each extra dimension is infinitely larger than the one beneath it, so you could look at our 3D universe as being an infinite number of infinitely thin frozen moments across the expanse of the fourth dimension of time, bookended by the big bang and heat death. Also, as far as imagining four spatial dimensions, you CAN imagine what a 4D cube (hypercube/tesseract) would look like if you unfolded it. Just like a 3D cube unfolds into six squares, a 4D cube would unfold into six cubes.

@@PoisonOkie911 a square unfolds into 4 line segments, a cube unfolds into 6 squares, and a tesseract unfolds into 8 cubes I think

@@angelxenmai4413 Hmmm... I don't know. I just read that in a Brian Greene book. The way they try to represent these things graphically there's a cube in the center, each of its faces is part of a cube, and there's one on the outside. I don't know if the ones in the center and on the outside really exist or if they're just a consequence of the geometry of the six cubes "connecting" them. Sort of like if you were to spin a circle about an axis it forms a sphere, but does that sphere really exist? The way I was thinking about it, if you think about it in terms of faces, a square has one, a cube has six, and a hypercube has thirty-six. So I would think a 5-cube would have 216. What does that mean? I have no idea.

This is a scary thought to me as then we wouldn't have a choice in anything our life is laid out

@@marcuscaunt2141 I dont believe in determinism to that degree, I think time is a perceptive deduction of reality, time as these scientists describe seems statically qualitative in ways that dont make sense.

gentleman, the book of islam, the qur'an, is talking about the same thing you said, he says everything has happened in the sight of Allah. it talks about the resurrection of people, and it talks about the state of people after they are resurrected.

@@bilmeyenbilir8446 so do lot of other religious books 🗿 philosophy not equal to science, philosophy just gives life meaning (or rather, tries to)

Whoa 😮

That’s a good point. Why do we only move one way through time but move multiple directions through the lower dimensions? So maybe time is not a dimension? Or we just don’t understand how to effectively move through it?

Time is a concept not a dimension.

@@CASHSEC I strongly disagree but you seem quite convinced, can you elaborate?

God will never allow time travel.

@@andreshernandez1180See my comments on existence and existence+1 as units to comprehend the same as the time concept. But the existence principal sits on a foundation that everything in the universe exists together but may change independantly from each other. So everything in the Universe all exist in the present and are always in the present. We are all stuck in the present. It's the present that moves along the "Arrow of Time". This arrow is a concept again to try to help our "concept" of what the Universe is. However it is all theoretical but most of it works for local practical applications so I'm not knocking it all I think is no one is ever going to time travel as we are all stuck in the present. Have a lovely Felix Navedas. 🎄🎄🎄

This video can make a child understand time as the 4th dimension rather than theTetrahydrocubeism shape shifter or whatever that geometrical cartoon is called ,kinda makes you start believing the whole living in the Matrix theory

nice thought👌

Don't use your peanut size brain, it might explode

This is the first coherent, thoughtful, and original comment I’ve read yet. Very intriguing idea. Not sure if you came up with this idea yourself or are just passing along someone else’s idea, but regardless thanks for sharing. It gives me a lot to think about.

No. We must move through dimensions. If you don't accept that, you can't even understand 3D space.

@dalecarrol7627 Dear Mr. Carroll, You're very welcome! I noticed that you were addressing another individual named Christian in the comments, but not replying to him in the appropriate way as you would on RU-vid. I wanted to advise you that what you are currently doing is making comments addressing the video, but what you want to do (and should be doing) is replying to comments from other individuals on the video who are replying to you. To do this, simply select the person's name and click reply. You'll know you're doing it correctly if the comment starts with an "@" symbol, which RU-vid will automatically add for you. For example, if you were to reply to me, the message should begin with "@shkotzim_bacon," which is my username. Make sure the message begins with that, and be sure not to delete it; otherwise, the person will not get a notification of your response. Now, moving on to the rest of your message. While I agree that time may not be real in the sense that it's just a construct of our minds, it does indeed exist in science. In the field of relativity, time plays a critical role as a dimension and, when combined with the three dimensions of space, it forms a mathematical framework called spacetime. It's fascinating that you brought up the topic of mass changing the flow of time, which is actually a concept in general relativity known as gravitational time dilation. Gravitational time dilation refers to the effect of gravity on the passage of time. According to general relativity, the presence of mass and energy curves (or bends) spacetime. This curvature of spacetime affects the flow of time itself. In the presence of large masses, such as planets, stars, or black holes, time runs slower relative to regions with weaker gravitational fields. This means that clocks closer to massive objects would tick at a slower rate compared to clocks further away. It's a remarkable phenomenon that has been experimentally confirmed. To put it in everyday terms, this means that the higher up you go on Earth, clocks tick faster, and the time experienced by your feet is a tiny, imperceptible amount slower than the time experienced at the top of your head. On the other hand, kinematic time dilation, also known as time dilation due to relative motion, refers to the time difference experienced by two observers moving relative to each other at constant velocities. This effect is described by special relativity and is based on the principle that the speed of light is constant in all inertial frames of reference. An example of this would be the twin paradox, where two twins begin at Earth, and one leaves in a rocketship towards outer space. When they get back, one is older than the other. The paradox arises because it's relative to whom is actually accelerating - whether the rocket is moving away from Earth or Earth is moving away from the rocket is relative to each observer. Therefore, which one is older? The paradox is resolved because the twin on Earth is in an inertial frame of reference, and the twin, when he is in the rocket turning around, is in an accelerated(non-inertial) frame of reference. Therefore, when the twin arrives back on Earth, he realizes his twin has aged more than he has. If you'd like to delve deeper into the topics of light and relativity, there are various resources that can help expand your understanding. Some recommended resources include books like "Relativity: The Special and General Theory" by Albert Einstein or "A Brief History of Time" by Stephen Hawking. There are also numerous educational websites, lectures, and documentaries available on platforms like RU-vid or educational platforms like Coursera or Khan Academy. Furthermore, I am happy to recommend other videos and RU-vid channels if you're interested in that format and learning more. I'd be more than happy to answer any more of your questions or continue the conversation. Please let me know if you would like to explore these topics further. Best regards, Mr. Bacon

“ Just the measure of the distance between events is not a dimension itself.” Exactly. See my post.

From our personal perspective, I describe time as a measurement of change. It sounds like you were having a great experience where you didn’t need to think about anything changing.

Bollox. I’m sure you were aware of night turning into day and day into night, therefore signalling the passage of time

Be ause we exist inside of a black hole

@@LOTUG98 if we did live inside of a black hole, we would see nothing but light! And it doesn’t end there…

@@LOTUG98 when you say exist, are you referring to “now” or at some point in our future? I agree it’s theoretically possible we could be somewhere a big bang and a singularity

From the right perspective, the singularity in a black hole would look just like the Big Bang. I imagine that the universe is like a big swiss cheese. Each local universe is the inside of the event horizon of a black hole in an outer universe, and each local universe contains a multitude of black holes, each of which contains its own local universe. The outer universe of a given local universe isn't larger, but all the black holes together form an network of black holes. None of these singularities are the beginning of the universe, but from inside they look like they are the beginning of their local universe. This network is eternal. I think of this as the Big Cheese Theory.

That is correct falling is a result of spacetime being bent so that our direction of time is angled toward the center. And I believe a black hole is where space has finally been bent at 90 degrees (well between 45 and 90 degrees).

Ugh, I remember being so fascinated by this stuff when I was their age. Still am ❤

God bless u

You have access to one human mind. That mind has made the choice to not spend the energy required to fully understand this information. A reasonable choice given that understanding this information is not an imperative for survival. However, it is an error to generalise your choice to all minds. There are some who have the ability. and the curiosity to drive that ability, to understand. I applaud them although my interests lie in other directions.

@@sigmaoctantis1892 Yeah that is true

@@chaosmedulla You too ☺️

I concur , it seems nothing that important in my life. We're just vessels on loan. Our souls will ascend back to where we initially were created

Sorry, I’m afraid not.

that 2d man is tripping balls

No, you can't take a second because apparently time doesn't exist!

just take a second. lol get it?

@@diegooland1261 if you're going the speed of light, that would be one very long second!

I see it similarly. However, I don't think we need to be in a higher dimension to see nor reach it.

mmm bread

I see it this way, too. But more like our entire lives are recorded on video and next level 4D beings can see the whole video all at once because time is variable.

@@22lilacsky agreed

i see i cant die !!!

Yes, there is definitely a relationship between 'time' and distance. The maths required to enumerate such an equation is, alas, beyond me.

Distance=Time x speed

@@geoffas Distance=Time x Speed

Time moves along, that object still exists as a star at long distances. The starlight and gravity influences the universe as a star does, stars with this view may never really die out.

@geoffas it's called a Lorentz transformation and it's actually a fairly simple calculus. Most people could probably understand the equation within an hour or two if they have a good grasp of basic algebra. The derivation requires related rates, so that's calculus and differential equations, but that's undergraduate level stuff, completely within your ability