Timebolt VS Recut | Silence Remover Software Review 

So good! It’s such a good time saver hey! 🙌🏼

Hey there! any idea when the next BF sale would be? I would love that 50% discount as well :)

It's going on now and I just did the same thing @BacKinnnnn did!@@JozuEdits - BRILLIANT!

So good!! Yep, it's going to save you so much time! Enjoy!!

So glad you're using it now, it's gonna save you so much time!! :D

Glad it was helpful!

No worries! :)

Thanks for watching!

Legend! Enjoy it! :)

No problem!

Sounds good! :)

Enjoy! :)

Thanks so much! Yeah Dave is a great guy! I don't think you'll regret your purchase. I still use Recut every week to save me hours of work! All the best! :)

You're welcome! :)

Yeah give the free trial a go and see how you find it! Thanks, I just used Final Cut Pro with the in-built tracking to create them :)

The fps has to match. By default it uses 30fps. If your timeline fps doesnt match it will delete. The way I use it with davinci, i export as xml as in the video and then import as a time line. Make sure project fps is 30

Unfortunately not. Recut might get them if they are less than a certain amount of time.

I was right (plus your website indicates this), but wow... Timebolt's UI is a lot more clunky than Recut's, which seems leaps ahead of Timebolt from a "maturity" standpoint. Also, pricing-wise, Recut seems far more persuasive. I also agree that I would likely never entrust my editing to a software that only did a 10% job at it and wasn't really meant for it from the beginning (like Timebolt or Recut). Thus, those extra features being added in Timebolt simply wouldn't persuade me to use it over Recut whatsoever. The value proposition as you demonstrate in your video is by far and away superior on the Recut side and, if I am ever to need services like Recut, I would absolutely pick Recut. Oh and lastly, the fact that they have to charge you for the "um checker" is ridiculous. It's such a minor coding thing that it should never be pay per use in software that is already fairly expensive for what it is. In no way do I believe Timebolt is worth more than say $60 USD LIFETIME. Nor would I pay monthly for it. Recut is hands down the winner for me. Thanks for sharing.

haha you know me too well!

I guess with the padding feature

Multi languages are not supported in many apps. If you use davinci the way it handles this is through transcription and unfortunately it doesn’t support arabic so I had to use timebolt

Absolutely! Still use it every week! 😊

@@NickKendall Awesome! Do you know if you can use it with video/audio for 2 speakers (e.g. podcast)? Or is it mostly for one person use? And no worries if you don't know the answer. I was just curious.

@@pauldittus You can. I'm guessing you solved this, but comment for anyone else reading.

@@millionairemoxieso actually I’m talking to Recut about having it so sections disabled in Recut are disabled in the video editor. This would be very helpful for podcasts.

Auto edit...in what program?

@@luckylukas2282yeah such a helpful comment 🙄