Timothée vs Robert | The Epic Battle from The King I Netflix 

Important history comment: 19 likes Unoriginal useless comment: top likes Sums up why this world is in its current state.

@@BestMods168 Your comment isn't clear. Could you elaborate, please?

@@MarsFKA he was referring to the most liked comments being derivative, while insightful comments like yours are not given as much attention.

@@noahbarnes9770 Ah. Thank you. Social media, right there.

I was thinking the same. And historical accuracy actually makes for a better movie every time. A combination of French ineptitude and English innovations won the day. From the accounts that I read

@@HaylonHarroo87 I don't know man I find it quite funny.

It was the only way! And it did the world a favour

@@HaylonHarroo87 I’d assume not, however clearly demeaning seems to be a Hobby for you. Perhaps you should get a job at Renaissance Festivals as the people who sit in a pillory and hurl insults while others hurl tomatoes. :)

@@IMTHEMOTHERFUCKINGMAILMAN It honestly is quite fricken hilarious.

Not robert pattinson but the stunt double for sure

They do understand it. That's why they keep making these type of movies

@@DK_75 nah 2-3 movies per 5 years. Superheroes movies 3 per year

@@Charapos yea thats what I'm saying...

And they all get the battle scenes completely wrong. The idea that it's thousands of soldiers all having 1v1 combat is ridiculous. I think the closest I've ever seen it portrayed is the beginning of the first episode of Rome.

@@DK_75 They don't, or else they'd bother to do the bare minimum of historical research on the battle itself

I used to write him off until his little rant in the tent 😅 He's a great actor and I'm happy he's got more depth than that one vampire role. A lot more.

@@laurence2421 congrats you are like 7 years late to this discovery

@@jdrummerdd congrats to your mom because she bl3w me while I watched The King

He was really good in the lighthouse and Batman.

​@@laurence2421you too? She gets around.

Lmao a bit of projection going on there.

Why would you fight 1 on 1 when you outnumbered his army damn near 10-1 and your army has way more mounted cavalry and heavily armored knights? That would just be stupid. What does Bane say to Batman? Something like... "You didn't think I'd risk the battle for Gotham's soul on a fist fight with you?" That said you should probably just say as much. There's no dishonor in it. Not mock the other guys courage. Anyway the Dauphin wasn't actually at Agincourt but I'm sure if he was he wouldn't have risked the war for the throne of France on a duel with Henry.

​@@Ben-zr4hojoker says that to him you goon.

@@Ben-zr4hothe joker said this. Bane absolutely would’ve risked it lol..

Yet in reality none of that happened, he did challenge him, but not in person.

aquiles

Troy!

"A king does not kill a king"

Carolus Rex

Every king of Mewar.

Seen a Frenchmen or two in there as well 😏

Not to say totally fictional. In reality this would be a fight between a 12-year old boy and a 29-year old man (Henry being the latter). In reality the Dauphin was not there and I wonder if Henry even had to take up his weapon als the murderous fire of the bowmen and the state of the field made any proper advancement of the French knights impossible.

@@NKismynextgoal I don't know why Hollywood has to mess up Historical battles. The action is already there. Waiting.

@@NKismynextgoal I would have liked to see this instead of all this extra hollywood nonsense.

@@SuperChuckRaney its based on the play not the history of the battle so thats probably why its all a bit over the top

Agreed. The French forces had a lot of heavy cavalry, in full plate. Trying to engage those with swords, would be impossible, where as warhammers were designed to not only pierce plate with the stake-end, but the blunt end of the hammer was excellent in causing concussions and other fractures, when simply denting the heavy plate: The Warhammer was the weapon of choice against heavy armored troops.

​@@thegreenreaper6660You wouldn't really use the pointy end to stab through armor, as it'd get stuck easily, or sometimes not even penetrate enough to inflict a serious injury. The hammer head was really the primary 'side' because of the sheer amount of blunt force.

@@wr0ng569 TRue, though most warhammers had a blunt side ánd a spike on the other side. The blunt side could easyly cause big dents, resulting into broken ribs, or skulls, underneath the armor. The spike, which got its extra momentum from the weight of the blunt hammer, could actually pierce the plate as well. A well-aimed head-slam would pierce the skull, killing someone instantly.

​@@wr0ng569As someone else on a Shadiversity video put it, Flat end for rich people. Pointy end for poor people.

@@TheNapster153 Literally watched that video like 3 days ago hahaha Glad to see another shad enjoyer in here!

How?

@@hansoreva1 the actor playing the Englishman is French and vise versa

He sounds cooler with the English accent

@@hansoreva1 Britishman? Englishman.

Thimotee Chalamet is American, his first language is english and his second language is french, himo mom is full american his dad is french... so he aint a frencheman.

It has the same energy as Doctor Strange's pointing up while trading gazes with Tony.

@@AlienSensei He wasnt pointing up. He was showing one finger which was referencing the 1 reality where they beat Thanos.

Should've been a USMC infantryman then, rah

*King nods* "So I can date your sister? Sweet!" "No, dipshit. I mean kill the Dauphin."

😅 don't we all

Buzz kill. Probably was cut and pasted in, and was pulled back by cables

@@Mirthfultale You mean composited in. Not cut and pasted.

@@TheEpicAB yeah.

Horses are fucking scary. My aunt got ran over by one two weeks ago, broke 6 ribs and nearly died from her stomach rupturing. All because some guy accidentally spilled water on the horse.

@@Mirthfultale Joel Edgerton and director David Michod said in an interview that a stuntman actually did that 5-6 times - 'The King starring Timothée Chalamet - How the Battle Scene was Shot'

No metaphor here, it's just that they wear flat, leather soled shoes. Combine that with the extra weight of full plate armor and you are bound to slip and slide around like a fool

Henry purposely planned the Battle of Agincourt to take place on a ploughed field after a night of heavy rain. The French knights were so exhausted from wading in the mud that it was a decisive English victory from minute one

@@chelo4197 exactly, and he'd know that would happen if he had more real battle experience.

@@TheMegazapor it wasn't about battle experience. It was just unfortunate circumstances. The place they were to battle had been rained on the night before, and the field had been plowed...

@Evan Mauger it's a movie, based off a real set of events. The only deeper meaning that anyone could possibly think of probably wasn't intended by the creators

Merdemoii

would you want me to remind you some other time where those rosebeef were anihilated by french guys ? please my dear let our people have some honor !

@@alexandrelesimple1645 easily offended much? Sheeeesh, I know you guys ran away in both wars but come on man, be better

@@legitimate_opposition2002 well i didn't want to sound offensive, just want to put a reminder that we french are not always just some fools or cowards, nothing against you, nothing against your people

@@alexandrelesimple1645 My African grandpa had to pretend to be handicapped so that he wouldn’t be forced to do hard labour by some french guys lol.

One of the few actors to absolutely transcend the role that made him famous. Cant wait to see him as batman.

@@You0nlyLiveonce well said

Probably should have taken him on in the one on one fight when it was offered. Lol probably would have been better than slip fest.

It did? Not the man staring the other in the eye and taking on the battle for all of his men and country? Must be a Patton fanboy!

@@bugattirari9916 Timothee's acting helped build the scene but Pattisons reaction to his defiance was impeccably delivered.

Karl XII of Sweden. The last king to actually fall in battle. Gustav II Adolphus, the only king in Sweden to be named "the great", died in battle. Karl X, speared by one of the famous winged Hussars at the battle of Warzava (the hussar was shot dead by a Swede moments after, and the winged hussars soundly beaten and driven off). I guess it depends on the traditions of the country.

DarkSide0940 Yeah kay he still fought tho. Like what’s expected of kings then. I was only commenting on how that’s different from the quote lol

@@equa9612 eat a snickers, you're not yourself when your hungry. Seriously though you tell him to learn then get pissy when someone points out the norms of the times, and the logistical challenges of keeping prisoners in medieval warfare?

Dragonslaya2000 very true mate

Oh get lost. No one at the time had a problem with the prisoner massacre - it was a battle. Read some history and learn how no one batted an eye.

Agreed! His expression was on point and immaculate. I’m a fan of him after this show. Worth it

MUADIB

Same! It's a similar role to Paul. I was an instant convert, at first I thought he was too slight.

It's a movie, so you haven't even bothered to watch it lol.

@@nectarinedreams7208 What's your malfunction? I did see "The King" so what are you smoking?

Now wouldn't that be a sight

Troy xD

@Thelastmemelord Lol your kings weren't smart. A king must stay alive to rule.

well, almost every medieval king fought battles. it was a regular practise.

@Thelastmemelord Lol European kings during medieval time fight in wars as well. Even during the time of the Ottoman Empire, the Polish king joined his men in battle to stop the siege of Vienna. I don't know where you got this impression that european kings don't fight in wars from, but clearly you are misled by false information.

I grew up being that asshole that wrote him off because of Twilight. I'm really happy that Hollywood didn't do the same because he's absolutely amazing

@@cavemanzach9475 me too !

I watched his movie called remember me, then I realized how brilliant actor he is. Next year he surprised me with another beautiful movie called water for elephant. I liked him since then.

Paterson is the embodiment of let the work speak for itself

I prefer Jack Whitehall as Villager 6

Based Robert

@@SirDinzhi an*

@@catherinelopezlopez4570 this are the words of the dauphin my darling .. chill

@Anglo Commando Your Kings used to speak French you idiot

@Anglo Commando The language of CONQUERORS is SPANISH.

and then he turns around as batman taking out multiple opponents again lol

Robb Stark

nice joker profile from where did u get

@@juhievivek3424 It's just one of the posters.

Anyways it's a nice profile

Sick reference bro

*Palpatine smirk* Ironic...

partly french

French father, so you're only half right.

Fun fact this movie is full of historical lies.

@@Flying-spaghetto funner fact, its actually based on Shakespeares semi-fictional play and not actual history.

Though, knights were never deemed as invincible and that misconception only came about in the modern ages after plate armor lost its viability in the battlefield; if they were deemed invincible as they already were, their armor would not continuously improve over the years to come because why should they? They're "invincible" But history shows the opposite, so it's safe to say soldiers in that era did not see knights as invincible, but rather elite units with better gear.

Tho heavy cavalry remained as the main breakthrough force up until the 1700's.

Nope. Then pattay happened

But didn't the invention of guns and gun powder kill the medieval knight?

@@facundomontivero2299 Not yet, gunpowder weaponry was used in Europe as far back as the 1400s and Knights were still very active, in fact Knights used guns as well, on horseback too, with cannons for sieges. I believe it was when guns were mass produced and artillery(cannons) became common place that really killed them off. Before then guns were for the elite, but when the time came that even peasants can have them, then what was the point of training an elite warrior who's a master in melee and horseback from childhood to adulthood when you can simply train a peasant for a few weeks with a gun who can pull a trigger and kill a knight from meters apart.

A figment of Shakespear's imagination but a good one

Nate Otterby Thank you for the logical comment.

Very loosely based on the shakespeare play too... Mostly its just its own movie.

Except it isn't accurate to the play either

People using this idea to defend the show have clearly never read the original play.

There is some debate on that, someone said it feels like the movie doesn't know what it's going for.

Tis but a scratch!

in reality he would have most likely been wearing Hobnail boots which would have given him some traction. (not a ton, but not smooth slick either)

Difference between a ruler who fights 'with' his men. and one who wears armor and simply stands by while others fight. Armor and 'combat practice' with a sword do you no good if you dont have the actual experience to know just how different the real-world scenarios are vs the 'taught in a court' teaching :)

@@ShadowRhapsody81 which is the difference between the English Crown and other crowns. A lot of Kings in English history are warriors that fought with their men which gave thoses man hope and motivation.

@@Legohaiden In reality the Dauphin wasnt even there regardless of footwear to be pedantic about it

This is a prequel to twilight. He'll soon move to america and bang teenagers there.

@@allel26 and this person is suppose to play next batmant lol

Breh he didn’t even look like himself in this movie lmao

Lestat, c'est moi - a horrible anachronism, of course

Petr Koutný hes gonna be great as batman

Lisan al gaib!

_As written_

Thanks. Literally thought i was just watching a trash fight

@@georgeoconnell4512 it's actually such a good visual battle, I'm a sucker for long takes

Thanks. I was thinking it’s one of the most realistic and good battles I’ve seen, then it just comes to a short stop. I need to watch this

@@SlabOfSteak the actual battle is pure insanity. Disregarding historical accuracy as well as accuracy to the play (ie regarding this film as its own thing) I thought it was fantastic, would recommend

Shouldn't have talked shit about the Englishmen in front of them.

I thought is was the boys who were murdered dad's

@@tristman8413 I never thought of that! I'm not sure but would hope so.

Thanks guys I'm so happy that I got 33 likes

juhie vivek Lol

That is a very original insight and was not directly mentioned in the movie 100 times

Yes like Percy's death, so sudden. A dagger to the throat. The Dauphin died like an idiot. And Falstaff was crushed by dozens of men. Death in films is romanticized and this movie shows the ugly truth.

Not even close agincourt in history are more bloodier than the one in the film. It was supposed to be more chaotic, the English use wooden stake to protect their archers from cavalry and the French supposed to attack the English with their infantry after their cavalry charge fail. The French and English mainly fought on foot in agincourt and it was very chaotic and bloody, the French suffered heavy casualties in that battle including four of their leaders were killed.

I think you’ll like the poem Dulce Et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen. The title itself translates to sweet and honorable it is to die for ones country but the entire poem is a satire on war

Mariam Thanks, I’ll take a look at it

It perfect as a movie, having more doesnt make it better, especially with the way series are done. They'd probably make Henry either asian or african.

This movie was crap

They should dona ten episode series of Robert Pattinson slipping in mud.

The movie wasn't crap... it wasn't perfect either, it was enjoyable and featured many great performances, plus a questionable French accent by Pattinson... Overall, I don't think the film really settled on a tone or on Henry's characterisation. Falstaff was the highlight for me and probably should have been the bigger focus.

@@Foolnation stop no one’s trying to erase your history.

Well, in real history, it’s been mentioned that English/Welsh soldiers who lacked their own personal heraldry were always equipped with a coat displaying the Red Cross of Saint George, today’s English flag. This movie is, however, not very accurate in general, and decided to just have everyone in plain (and very anachronistic) armor.

It's easy, The English have bad teeth. The French fight with baguettes instead of swords.

@@dovahderps9239 That makes no sense at all, there's no way anyone would wear a coat into a battle.

Douglas Nakamura yes there is, it’s called a surcoat, and a gambeson is also a type of coat that was probably the most common type of armor worn by the average medieval soldier

@@dovahderps9239 Ok I stand corrected. It was a great movie though!

Robert > Timothee Every day!

Well, he's vengeance now, fangirls will be back

Stupid

when the long halloween animation is released : i am the night when the movie is released : i am batman!

@@spiderjerusalem4009 Funny thing, I think Timothee would work as Dick Grayson for the Reeves Batman verse.

That was my reaction too XD

I know right what a disappionting catch

This is heavily edited, the movie battle is longer and muddier

Jake Rolfe I think they’re talking about the battle between Hal and the French dude. Lol they wanted to see the hot guys fight.

It’s not actually the entire scene it’s just snippets of the battle in the movie, the actual scene is about 30 min or so, if you want to see that you have to watch the actual movie on netflix.

I dunno. He's tiny and like 120 pounds soaking wet. It's a tough sell.

@@derekreed4910 you all thinking that in 1400 men took steroids and were all tall and muscular.

@@derekreed4910 The average height of a knight around that time was 175 centimeters. A sword weighed about 1 kilogram. The armor, 25 kilograms at most. So not a tough sell at all. Knights weren't as big as you think

​@@derekreed4910you silly boy 😂 Only able to think in terms of what you're told.

"stay up there!!" 😩

Idk the archbishop and the counselor were so keen on making Henry react to "France's advances" and it was even stated that they wanted to conquer France plus Henry's sister told him to watch out for people's true interests so when the "assassin" couldn't even prove he was following orders from the French king I questioned if it was all a farse, specially cuz he didn't even respond to Henry's request for a real declaration of war...

I immidiaetly realised it was a scam, but not to pat myself on the back, i thought Henry knew aswell, i dont even know why i thought that..

@@jonathanramirez3109, In the end, it was just a ploy to conquer more land, however the counsellor had a point. The only way for a King to unite his kingdom is to fight against a common enemy be it Scotland, Wales or even France. France isn't so innocent either, in the past, they have also been known to take the Plantagenet territories in France and succeeded in doing so thanks to John I's mismanagement of the situation. They also on many occasions prepared to invade England as England had done with them.

@@spearshake4771 Goes back to her saying "All monarchy is Illegitimate" When you try to trace the bloodline of Henry V, Henry IV came to the throne by deposing his childhood playmate and first cousin. It's ridiculous when you look at the world, corruption led to the world we have to day and the ones in power create these rules to avoid the ones at the bottom to overthrow that power.

Historically speaking, instead of "loose" or "fire", they actually said "Nuke it from the orbit".

@@SteveL11 LMAOOOO

lol antiquity? bit ironic you got that wrong eh

this ain't antiquity homie

I remember a historian saying the archers were not commanded in a nock-draw-loose command. The draw weight of the longbow is around 300N, and you want your archers to fire as many arrows as quickly as possible. The nock-draw-loose command would tire your archers and their rate of fire (rate of loose?) would decrease.

No. His guards were also soldiers, and were angered at their leader's cowardice for not accepting the duel before the battle, ashamed of their leader for subsequently challenging an exhausted opponent in the middle of a battle (versus a parlay/truce to let his opponent rest first), and embarrassed by their leader's mud bath spectacle. At that point, they probably wanted him dead as much as everyone else. Disclaimer: This scene is, of course, purely fictional.

@@tekelupharsin4426 supporting that answer, as a former service member and combat veteran any leader that is willing to throw away the lives of their soldiers is no leader at all.

@@Solemnus88 What country/branch did you serve under, if you don't mind me asking?

@@tekelupharsin4426 U.S. Army

@@Solemnus88 Thank you for your service!

He’s a good actor but I just can’t stand that he’s barely 100lbs soaking wet supposedly taking down 200lb + men hand to hand. Dude needs to bulk for a solid 3 years to physically fit some of these roles better imo.

@@FormerGovernmentHuman yeah, exactly. he can act and does a great job but god damn, he looks so scrawny, you can't put him up against anything that weighs more than 60kgs. it just looks wrong. he also looks like he will have difficulties to put on enough muscles or even just weight at all. it's just that ectomorph build. can't really do anything about it except for juicing yourself up to the fucking gills and that'd just be stupid

@@FormerGovernmentHuman i agree, i mean i dont mind it as much in dune. but if hes gonna be playing a role that involves medieval hand to hand combat.. u would assume he would be somewhat built from the training.

he's the new DiCap

Such a bad line lmao.

@@croisaor2308 well he did said english is an ugly language so why use beautiful words right

Lol

So that's it? What, we some kinda Agincourt Squad?

@Austin Sullivan I am pretty certain he knew how to fight, he just didn't expect to being slipping all the time because of the mud.

@Doot Doot precisely

"""""""""""""""acting"""""""""""""""

The kneeling g and deep breathing is what gets me! And his soldier prep themselves knowing you about to go to straight war/annihilation ! and when The king sticks in his sword in the ground and nods his head. Human experience and intuition as its deepest!! Absolutely love it!

THE DAUPHIN WAS NOT PRESENT IN THIS BATTLE! LEARN REAL HISTORY, KIDS! ON THAT REGARD, THIS CHAUVINIST ENGLISH PROPAGANDA IS COMPLETELY RIDICULOUS AND INSULTING, ESPECIALLY FOR A FRENCH LIKE ME!

An American expression, of course. If Henry had said any such thing, it would have been 'With me!', but he would not have had to say anything. A dumb moment in an inaccurate film.

​@@marcdedouvan Go smoke a cigarette and eat a croissant. Get fucked, Frenchy. 😘

​@@1977ajaxYou... are aware the film is based on Shakespeare's play and not meant to be accurate to history, yes?

Swung

@@IrishRepoMan 😘😘😘😘😘

…But then he slipped in the mud.

I think the movie portrayed not only the brutality but also the unfairness and real struggle of war well.

+heavy armor

@@yseson_ the armor one would wear on the battlefield while fighting on foot was not as heavy as u would think. Generally it would not go over 50 pounds and 50 pounds would be pushing the limits. While on horseback u could afford to armor up abit more. The heaviest armor was jousting tournament armor would sometimes be as heavy as 120 pounds. However the shoes worn in this period had absolutely no traction what so ever. This was because the soles of the shoe was just leather. It was said that the English archers in this battle fought bare foot because of the mud. It was also said some fought without pants because a large part of the English army was suffering from dysentery. Not sure if i believe that fought bare ass but its an interesting tidbit.

I was glad he died but felt bad when I realized his countries invasion was based on a lie.

Mauricio Leopold Yeah, it was all for nothing. The prince was a prick but his attitude was more justified when you realise France was innocent. But he killed kids so he deserved to get fucked

Oh, you are so right. I noticed him years ago and he's already a "big" name. I'd like to see him as the next Bond...in a couple years. He would be more suave than any Bond ever.

@@kiddozoo idk about bond but that’s cause I really want Idris Elba in that role lol plus I don’t want chalamet to get stuck in that role…he’s got serious range

He already is

Drop the fucking Charade!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Great scene

Personally I am waiting for the next Dune movie. I really like him as Paul Altreides.

Rare to see so original soundtrack these days...

Nicholas Brittel is a wonder to hear. Also responsible for Succession's soundtrack, simply amazing

Killed it absolutely

The Duke!

Dune was legitimately one of the most well-made movies I’ve ever seen.

@@carpediem9750 he's a lot of fun in the French Dispatch as well

ATREIDES ATREIDES ATREIDES

Sema Fodje their descendants are rolling in their graves at this disgrace lol

You know every english monarch and the majority of "english" nobility are french decent since at least william the conqueror duke of normandy.... British people who laugh at france for their surrender in WWII are ruled by a french royal familly... Ironic.

WhoDarestheMAN gamer um... no

WhoDarestheMAN gamer absolutely false. Go read up on history.

@@vampirecount3880 actually the normans themselves were of nordic descent and settled northern france when the french invited them to guard their borders, so technically england has been ruled by vikings ever since william the conquerer, not to mention william the conquerer had english blood before ANY norman or french stepped foot in england.

Agreed excellent acting and filming

It was fabulous on the big screen.

@@kyeda 😅😅😅 fair enough but we do have fairly reliable accounts of the battle from eyewitness due to its importance to the French succession. And most most accounts and artwork of the battle often depict that like of stakes protecting the archers

Ihazbestplan Knives to meet ya Dauphin!

Ihazbestplan he reminded me of ramsay the whole time

i read this in ramsay's voice, not dauphin's voice

There is even a scene where Sir John is gasping for air while trapped in the mass of men, and the camera is above. The shot is identical to the one where Jon gasps for air during the Battle of the Bastards. Heavy Game of Thrones references and perhaps stolen as well.

@@dawn-blade similar scene but very different tone and purpose imo, The King more showed the legitimate anxiety and overall grimy and horrific nature of being in the middle of a battle like that, not saying GOT didnt attempt to do this and succeed, but this one was much more an anti-war depiction with how gritty everything was

Lol he was never in charge. Did you not see the ending? He was being played like a puppet from beginning to end.

Powerful? all he said was basically "you and i fight like men one vs one" "what say you" "you save your men" "i can not do that" "archers" and last one was "on me" that was it. And you think that was powerful? + he was played like a puppet just like the other guy said

@@farlord9264 many powerful words are said in a few words,

@@robanks3895 no

That was one of the worst speeches in a movie ever. The audience was not inspired or pumped up.

You’re right that armour does add weight, it just isn’t the type of weight you’re thinking of. If armour was that clunky and impractical, nobody would wear it. Even before science, armourers and metallirgists weren’t stupid. They took measurements for their clients in order to properly form the armour to their figure. The full plate harness was a series of overlapping plates that had to be hard in some areas and soft in others. Certain areas were left unarmoured to allow for equestrian endeavours and mobility in combat, using mail voiders to compensate. The plates were attached to the wearer through buckled leather straps and bits of string called pointes on their arming garments to take the stress of the component off of their body sleightly abd make it more bearable to wear. The sabatons came first and they wear pointed to the the lesrher arming shoes. These were optional for knights fighting on foot. The greaves covered the shins and were enclosed by a rivet, followed by the cuisse strapped around the knee/poleyn area and pointed to the waist of the arming trousers. A mail skirt was then put over the groin area, then the breast and backplates went on, followed by the placard and fauld covering the abdominal region. The gorget or bevor, protecting the neck, either went on before or after the breastplate. The vambraces, consisting of the upper canon on the forearm, the couter on the elbow and the lower canon on the biceps, went on, riveted at the forearm, strapped at the elbow and pointed to the shoulder. Afterwards, the pauldrons, covering the shoulders, overlapped. The last bits to put on are also the most modular, the helm and the gauntlets. The helm came in a variety of types, like the simple sallet or the fully enclosed armet. Gauntlets could either be formed to the hand with riveted articulation or be of a simple hourglass shape to allow wrist mobility. Fingers were either separate, to allow for more dextrous martial manuevers, or mitten style, to disperse the impact of an opposing weapon hitting the gauntlets.

@@lt.branwulfram4794 The complexity of medieval armour.

This fight scene is very unrealistic and ahistorical, both the French and the English knights wore armour.

Knight armor isn’t bulky, knights were actually very mobile and flexible in their armor

"Realistic" he says... 😂😂

Ikr 😂

Pattinson has got a big 'ol noggin...and that armor is very form-fitting.

THANK YOU

Because he has genetic defects and is disproportionate. With that said I hate his face but he acted well in this and enjoyed it

RevelationNone Excuse me? U did not just say that?! 😟

King of England boss plays right there lol

Hes making a tremendous comeback. This, the lighthouse, and soon Batman. Hes a good actor

Yeah he killed that shit

check The Lighthouse

John Manci he’s already in great moves

The True National Socialist Idea don’t forget Good Time

My favorite line: “an event as pivotal as this one should be amply equipped to penetrate the fog of time elapsed”.

It's not fictional, actually; the protagonists and the battle are historical events.

@@paulybarr it's based on true events, yes. Very loosely

Cobbsta I was pissed with this scene

I was amazed and happy with this scene, literally clapped and had to replay it a couple times to appreciate it more

The characters are written after Shakespeare's story. The Dauphin was never at the battle, and he was not a massive asshole like depicted in the movie. French were not more cruel than englishmen. And Henry slaughtered every french prisoner, including the french nobility, which was a big big anti catholic act.

Fun fact, he's a terrible actor.

@@blackfox1320 you're a dumbass who's never seen any of his films, 🙄

@@blackfox1320 bro he's really good. He just started his career with a terrible role in a terrible movie. These days his performances are incredibly good

@@blackfox1320 I always thought he was a terrible actor too, but I changed my mind after watching Good Time directed by the Safdie brothers. And he was good in Tenet. He's definitely a good actor now. I'm sure he'll do well in Batman.

Fun fact, most of brit actors know how to speak French, so it's not a surprise.

Seriously. Compare this to the lighthouse without looking at the screen and there's no way you'd be able to tell that either of them are Edward from Twilight.

To me, the craziest one yet is his southern accent in 'The Devil All The Time'

@@tracexxface a máster piece!

@@tracexxface without a dialect coach, unbelievable

@@tracexxface DELUSIONS

Fucking same lol

lmao same "he's gonna get fuuuucked"

well of course it had to be Agincourt, you numbskulls

They had to, it was foreshadowing. Many great men died in Agincourt. Heroes and great officers of WW1 and 2 (that is true, actually), great swordsmen and knights... And of course; kings, warmongers. He was only but a pebble in a stack of stones :3

Gun-Slinger Swordsman Really? I thought it was sad as hell. The banality of his death.

I felt bad for him. It's ridiculous that the knights he rides up with don't dismount and help their prince whilst he's being stabbed to death. They don't even flinch

@@kieron7087 why would they he threw away their lives instead of just fighting someone who was half his size in an area where he wouldn't of been immobilized buddy was a dumbass and deserved his death

Nicholas Madison That’s true, I can’t defend the strategy of sending them in without giving a fuck. The mounted knights charged without lances and out of formation. Plus they were against arrows that can somehow penetrate plate armour and the french didn’t deploy their own archers or men at arms etc. I could go on. I felt bad because Pattinson is a somewhat likeable actor haha

@@kieron7087 in the actual historical battle it was even more of a slaughter. The french barely even reached the english lines.

He is great in everything he does, watch his indie movies, he is so underrated

@@xo0o0 i saw him in the film where he wanted to get a haircut. It was different but good.

@@511dydy his film choices are really amazing

Yet his death was an embarassing moment.

He is always been good! Just hated that stupid twilight crap!

Agree...it was slow, but really good.

@@effewe2 I liked kingdom of heaven better as far as epic type tales are concerned, but they're both excellent films.

ALL IS WRONG! YOU LIKE LIES AND RACIST PROPAGANDA?

Well.. "armor", since it's just for show. It's not actual armor :p

@@DutchGuyMike Yes, we know. It’s still a fantastic design that has me in awe.

@@strigonshitposting793 True that!

@Liam R Sure. That’s your opinion. I do not care.

was quite common in medieval times though.

Timother, come hither! Dost thou willow wither?

Kick everyones ass? He ran into a crowd, pulled a guy off his horse and wrestled with him, got trampled and drowned a guy in mud, and then has his men shank the dude. He showed amazing bravery but it looked like he was just surviving to me.

Your Boy Mr Mac C’est la vie, mon amis! Truth won’t ever be universal!

They fight for England on French soil. Truly heroic and patriotic...

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundred_Years%27_War Before you start to see things as simple as you put them above

@Jude M The English were pillaging the French countryside. Again. If that's not being the aggressor, I don't know what is. Were the French nobles really better? Meh. Is it an amusing way of telling the story? Absolutley. It's it while based on Shakespeare still a real thing? Yes. Is it good? YES! Is it accurate - kind of.

The fact that they make the English seem like the "victims" and heroes here is something... but not to worry lol, soon the French will get their MVP

The king nodded to arrest dophine not to kill

@@skazala really oh well then he messed up if you let someone go out leave them alive you make a enemy

@@immortal_dawn4472 he is going to be bargained for something that's all why enemy

@@skazala usually people want revenge when you capture them or anything like that so it's better to kill them then risk making a enemy in the future

@@skazala I've never seen that show it was just in my recommended

its not because of armor but because os hollywood

From the Dauphin's point of view, England is invading unprovoked and killing his people. Remember, in this film, king Henry is tricked into going to war. In the Dauphin's point of view, he has to stop the unprovoked and war hungry King Henry here and now for his own honor, country, and father/king.

THE DAUPHIN WAS NEVER THERE! START TO OPEN A HISTORY BOOK, IDIOT ENGLISH!

it's a movie loosely based of of a play not even the actual battle, not a documentary. The English knights wore armor as heavy as the french, armor isn't as cumbersome as portrayed and the dauphin wasn't even at the battle and there was no duel. French leader was a young duke of orlean who couldn't control his men and ignored the advice of his commanders who had cornered Henry in the first place, witling down his forces while bolstering their own with another French army soon to be there. So while it might not have been the Dauphin it is true that the french leader was indeed a young brat who got baited into losing tragically. It is because of said armors that so many french knights had survived, forcing Henry to execute them as there were too many to keep captive.

Oh the irony am I right?

It's the name of the actors. For some reason...

worst thing is in real life the french Dauphin was not even at Agincourt.

in real life Dauphin died from diharea at Paris

Szproto et henri V est mort d'hémorragie gastrique sur ses toilettes

@@augustinguguss8513 there's a whole heap of innacuracies, but that's cos it was an adaptation of the play, not the event

Pls do not compare that rubbish GoT to LotR!!

Better

@@kysike666 rubbish on season 7 and 8

Smaller budget than both films. Still good

Now let's remember the big ass caliber Braveheart and Gladiator have.

The "On me" part especially,. It was like someone shouting "Stand to!" One of those phrases that will always resonate

Not to mention that it could bring down the Theodosian Walls with a single shot.

English longbow: i take years of practice for my weilder to be effective in battle which makes using me a shit battlefield strat as it takes far too long to replace fallen weilders. Crossbow: let's make longbows obsolete by making every village idiot being able to stand toe to toe with the longbowman Moral of the story: simplicity of use is the highest sophistication, no matter what nostalgic anglo propagandists try to tell ya.

@@9an13l how many shots per minute from a crossbow compared to an english archer?

@@turbotim129 irellevant since you can have many more crossbowmen, and you can make them much faster than longbowmen, so shots/minute is a pointless value, the important value is time and recources spent for making a capable weilder......

My compound bow draws up to 80 lbs and has cams

I hated it

@@razzle3993 because its anti climatic. But it caught you off guard.

That is how it ends my friend

You cant. lol.

Its Hollywood, no one other than history dorks care.

its not even based on the hostory ts based on the play

Or the real story. The Dauphin wasn't even there.

I don't think you know what a hedge knight is. A king is definitely not one.

@@blaizellee4441 I don't think you got my reference, lmao. "Daggering down someone for his armor" in combination with hedge knight refers to a game called battle brothers, where you try to kill highly armored hedge knights with peasants, who are equipped with daggers. That's all.

Rolling up with my high-initiative stabby guy while my club guy repeatedly stuns him