This video is a shitty review, it's just a commercial. Here's my review: I recently put Advan Fleva V701 245/40ZR17 on my 1997 M3 and I'm super happy with them. They are a little better than the Hankook Ventus V12 Evos they replaced. The Yokos work great in the dry and great in the heavy rains we've had recently. I haven't had them on the race track so I can't comment on that. They're quiet and comfortable. The name "Fleva" is terrible, but other than that they are great street tires at a good price.
This feels more like a paid ad than a review, which is more speaking to the frustrating lack of information regarding the Advan Fleva 701’s than a criticism of this video. I recently replaced my BFGoodrich g-Force Sport Comp-2’s - 205/40ZR-17 80W for a set of 205/40R-17 84W Yokohama Advan Fleva 701’s. The BFG’s being a 340 UTQG, the Yoko’s a 300. I really enjoyed the BFG’s and was hesitant to try the Yoko’s, as I couldn’t really find much in the way of information that aligned with my driving style and intended weather conditions - I tend to drive my Mazdaspeed MX-5 only on warm, dry days. I hope these comments are of use to someone. Road noise - the BFG’s emit a pleasant (and consistent) dull roar on most surfaces, while the Yoko’s are a fair bit quieter, the pitch varies greatly depending on the type of surface - odd. I’m not sure which, if either, I prefer. Handling - the BFG’s are somewhat heavier in feel which I really grew to appreciate. They almost made my MX-5 feel as though I do not have power steering. The Yoko’s are much quicker to respond and feel much lighter at all speeds - not objectionable, but a very different feel to the go kart like BFG’s. Compliance / ride quality - no question the Yokohama’s are much more supple over the rough stuff. I never found the BFG’s to be overly “choppy,” however I think the elastic transition from smooth to rough surfaces with the new Yoko’s takes this category. Cornering / Grip - the BFG’s never disappointed when taking long sweepers or sharp hairpins they are awesome! Very consistent and predictable. From what I’ve gleaned so far, the Yokohama’s are probably pretty close - the MX-5 is a light car… Rolling resistance / subjective feel - when switching from an all season Bridgestone to the BFG’s, the BFG’s always felt heavy and somewhat lethargic, and without a doubt were harder on fuel than the old Bridgestone’s. I find the Yokohama’s to be far more nimble and fleet afoot than the BFG’s and trust the fuel economy will rise. This was not a huge deal to me as I loved the planted feel of the BFG’s. Though I’ve only put a few hundred miles on the Yokohama’s so far, I feel as though they’re a welcome addition to my weekend fun car. I’ve had Yokohama Advan AD08’s (on my lightly modified daily driver) which I really loved , save their sticky nature (200 UTQG), and all the pebbles they tossed. I’m doubtful that the Fleva’s will live up to what I loved about the AD08’s, however I am confident that at this price point, and where my expectations lie, I believe the Fleva’s will prove to be a good choice. I can surely recommend the Fleva’s to someone who’s seeking an affordable 300 treadwear enthusiast tire.
@@tylerntran I hope you like ‘em! Wow, what a blow hard - I don’t really remember writing such a novel… I am glad you found it helpful, and I hope you enjoy your new tires.
Got that on my Fiat 500 turbo 2015 and it is lovely after 2 days. I had Pirelli (stock) that lasted 1 summer and a half, and Michelin Pilot Sport that lasted 2 summers only!! About the noise, it is true; the Yoko are the most quiet between the 3 brands I had. The braking time is shorter too on the Fleva and the turns are crunchy, but the Michelin could handle quicker turns at higher speed on a lower temperature (Spring here). The Fleva was slipping a little bit at 5-7 celsius. Here in Québec it is 5 degree at the moment, so my guess is that they are real summer tires. I asked for a good compromise between performance/durability and that is what my usual garages advised. Can't wait to try that in a month!!
@@DavudHdic happy about them, they are not very used after this summer, my guess they will last 2 more summers. Bites the curves incredibly on hot weather. Im living in Quebec so its more likely town driving but there are spots you can.be wild ;) They dont slip when you have to make a quick brake ..I have nothing negative to say, I will probably buy another set when they will be done! Oh and they are still perfect on the rain, can do quick turns with confidence!
I am using this tyre on my CRZ and in my opinion it is not as good as what had mentioned in this video. The handling is good but it starts lose its grip on wet surface. The tyre noise is just moderate, nothing to shout about.
According to their website it weighs the same. Higher than all competitors I am afraid. That's a pity. Nevertheless it is a solid and reliable sport tyre.
I was looking at these tires for my mr2 spyder staggered 15fronts and 16 rears. I see there is a xl version of these tires. What does that mean? Thanks
it means eXtra Load, able to carry heavier equipment as it has stronger sidewalls, XL(eXtra Load) will always be better than SLs(Standard Load). it's not bad to go XL from SL, but never go XL to SL you can see it in your car manual if your car came with XL tires stock.
Old comment, but they are two completely different tires. I think Fleva is newer and more aimed towards "normal" driving. Neova is closer to a track tyre.
Montati.... devo ammettere che già dalle prime curve infondono sicurezza, si sente lo sterzo più consistente e preciso.... pneumatico letteralmente incollato all'asfalto anche in condizioni di asfalto viscido.... minima rumorosità di rotolamento.... consumi un po più alti dovuti ad una maggiore resistenza al rotolamento. Pneumatico da acquistare.
