Тёмный

Tired Light, Varying Constants and a 26 Billion Year Old Universe | Rajendra Gupta 

Dr Brian Keating
Подписаться 262 тыс.
Просмотров 4,4 тыс.
50% 1

Relaxing the temporal constancy constraint on coupling constants in an expanding universe results in Friedmann equations comprising terms that may be interpreted as dark energy and dark matter.
When tired light (TL) is included to complement the redshift due to the expanding universe, the resulting covarying coupling constants (CCC+TL) model not only fits the Type Ia supernovae data as precisely as the LCDM model but also resolves concerns about the angular size of cosmic dawn galaxies observed by the James Webb Space Telescope (2023 MNRAS 524, 3385).
The model complies with the baryon acoustic oscillation features in the galaxy distribution and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) (2024 ApJ 964, 55). I will show that dark energy and dark matter of the standard cid:clip_image002.pngCDM model are not arbitrary but can be derived from the CCC approach based on Dirac's 1937 hypothesis. The energy densities associated with dark matter and dark energy turn out to be about the same in the Lambda CDM and the CCC+TL models. However, the critical density in the new model can only account for the baryonic matter in the universe, raising concerns about how to account for observations requiring dark matter. Analysis of some key parameters of structure formation shows that due to the universe's increased age, such structures can easily form without dark matter in the CCC+TL scenario. It requires reconsidering alternatives to dark matter to explain observations on gravitationally bound structures. The model's consistency with the CMB power spectrum, BBN element abundances, and other critical observations is yet to be established.
Win a meteorite: visit briankeating.com/list
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @drbriankeating
📚 Get a copy of my books:
Think Like a Nobel Prize Winner, with life-changing interviews with 9 Nobel Prizewinners: a.co/d/03ezQFu
My tell-all cosmic memoir Losing the Nobel Prize: amzn.to/2sa5UpA
The first-ever audiobook from Galileo: Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems: Ptolemaic and Copernican a.co/d/iZPi9Un
📺 Watch my most popular videos:📺
Neil Turok • Why Neil Turok Believe...
Frank Wilczek • Nobel Prizewinner Fran...
Eric Weinstein vs. Stephen Wolfram • Stephen Wolfram vs. Er...
Sir Roger Penrose: • Nobel Prize in Physics...
Sabine Hossenfelder: • “I Don’t Care About Yo...
Avi Loeb: • UFOs & UAPs: The Situa...
Follow me to ask questions of my guests:
🏄‍♂️ Twitter: / drbriankeating
🔔 Subscribe ru-vid.com...
📝 Join my mailing list; just click here briankeating.com/mailing_list
✍️ Detailed Blog posts here: briankeating.com/blog.php
🎙️ Listen on audio-only platforms: briankeating.com/podcast
#universe #podcast #briankeating #intotheimpossible #science #astronomy #cosmology #cosmicmicrowavebackground #intotheimpossible #briankeating

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

7 май 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 52   
@DrBrianKeating
@DrBrianKeating Месяц назад
Enjoy the first of two talks by Guota on The INTO THE IMPOSSIBLE Podcast. Stay turned for my interview with Rajendra summarizing his model and the controversy surrounding it.
@PhysicsNative
@PhysicsNative Месяц назад
Thanks Brian, for hosting R. Gupta. Wish you’d have more of these technical “colloquia” on your channel, not only of the controversial topics (Stacy McGaugh presented one on MOND), but also mainstream/standard cosmology research, experimental and theoretical. Gupta’s model may seem like a stretch, but the whole idea is to look at what happens when certain assumptions are added in a consistent way to the standard model and the predictions compared with different survey data. As an aside, both Gupta and Moffat (of MOdified Gravity fame) assume a varying coupling and both complained about not being able to use existing CMB code from Planck et al. since it assumes a constant G. Moffat was able to show that the TT power spectrum is insensitive to his version of a cosmologically varying G, consistent with the recent work “A Cosmic Glitch in Gravity,” which assumes a modification of early dark energy density, leading to a glitch in large scale dark energy density and a resolution of the Hubble tension. There are also quite a number of groups working on anisotropic cosmological observations, putting FLRW into question, Sarkar, et al., Migkas, et al., Aluri, et al.,…
@RWin-fp5jn
@RWin-fp5jn Месяц назад
Good to know there is still room to have alternative explanations for cosmic redshift. Tired light is an interesting approach to retrofit back to observations which is always a good thing to try. But it is not without its own can of worms. I would still prefer to have a more down to earth explanation as to why redshift does hint at distance (this is something no one challenges) but not necessarily to speed of outer galaxies. There is another option; redshift could point to all galaxies having the same virtual arc speed around our galaxy and thus a virtual faster speed the further away they are. So we would actually see the rotation of our own galaxy, projected as redshift on all galaxies, which tangent light would get diffracted 90 degrees inward at the edge of our galaxy. This may sound weird, but we are reminded that we see the a similar phenomenon at the very core of our galaxy (the BH Sag A*) as per recent EHT telescope image. Sag A* is rotated 90 degrees from its actual position (we see it head-on in stead of edge-on) and here we also see the tangent light of its nearby stars 90 degrees diffracted away from us. This is why the central galactic bar is redshift to deep yellow as opposed to the bluish spiral arms. If indeed our galactic plane is nothing but a naked Kerr singularity than this same property would occur at the outer border of our galactic plane. In fact, as an alternative to current galactic rotation causing virtual outside redshift, the very birth of of the naked singularity (emergent spacetime bursting beyond the Sag A* event horizon) may have caused the one-off redshifted arc-rotation picture of our outside world. And we currently see a kind of ' frozen' one-off picture of the outside world. Obviously this would mean our Galaxy was formed 13,6 Ga, not our universe. In either case, it provides a much better explanation for redshift of outer galaxies being merely an internal Milky Way optical illusion, rather than an outside reality. It solves EVERYthing. Our universe wouldn't necessarily be expanding, so no need for the mysterious Dark Energy. And we solve Hubble tension. Question; are comoslogists still interested to interested to erase paradoxes, or do they cherish them?
@danthomas6470
@danthomas6470 Месяц назад
Science is a self correcting system. The more we know the more we know we don’t know. So every theory has room for change always. But this is pure pseudo science. Why? In science you have a hypothesis and perform tests that would prove your theory. You post the results of your test including a control. Then you wait and other scientists test and challenge your theory and it is either accepted or disproven. NEVER does a scientist declare his findings fact. Because it has to align not only with your test but with the millions of other tests performed by experts in cosmology. He is not an expert in cosmology. He has a philosophy degree and was a professor of physics. Cosmology incorporates fields far beyond just physics. If a scientist has a theory and declares it the new truth before it can be tested in the peer reviewed arena, don’t bother reading it. It’s junk science. I can submit a peer reviewed article and claim it fact but that would be done.
@mcasanovaiii
@mcasanovaiii Месяц назад
An appreciation for your work is an amazing thought. Thanks be to all of it.
@DrBrianKeating
@DrBrianKeating Месяц назад
Appreciated
@chriszachtian
@chriszachtian Месяц назад
It would be great to lift the veil of those dark somethings and to see that the solution was already there.
@tnekkc
@tnekkc 6 дней назад
A physics major called me a "Tired light crank" 20 years ago. He wanted me to help him understand Kip Thorne's book on gravity.
@nulliusinverba4942
@nulliusinverba4942 Месяц назад
It's great to see other points of view than Lambda-CMD.
@stepantucek8529
@stepantucek8529 Месяц назад
its lambda CDM model. Sometimes I write the same mistake CMD.
@lwss1617y
@lwss1617y Месяц назад
Great! I did like it a lot. Prof. Gupta delivered a lecture on ccc+tl,..., slides and all, and the effort is to be praised, whether on not one agrees (for now) with its tenets. The fact that dark matter would not have to be a necessary fact "out there" has a great appeal to me. For reasons that I cannot understand, dark matter, though perhaps correct as a concept, repels me. Thanks!!!
@nunomaroco583
@nunomaroco583 Месяц назад
Hi, that work deserve some credit, but contradict many things that the Field, take for granted.... good luck.
@DrBrianKeating
@DrBrianKeating Месяц назад
Hey, thanks
@WMConsultingService
@WMConsultingService Месяц назад
thanks brian this helped alot to alleviate the anxiety of the new data from JWST. about time we get to see some analysis, soon we will find out that some of these galaxies are from the other expansion next door or that light is interacting with something special as it moves through space.
@stepantucek8529
@stepantucek8529 Месяц назад
I don't like the dark matter and dark energy issues for several years. I'm glad now is a REVOLUTION IN COSMOLOGY! Finally
@shivanshrai1171
@shivanshrai1171 Месяц назад
Felt humbled and relaxed by the might of uni
@esasakkinen8505
@esasakkinen8505 Месяц назад
What if TL is due to the even dustiness of the universe and the DE parameter also varies depending on how distinctly lumpy the dust is arranged... Do the coupling constants have to vary at all?
@JerryMlinarevic
@JerryMlinarevic Месяц назад
TL is caused by photon interaction (grinding) with gravitons; this is also the cause of light bending (I.e. no curved space!). You are very much welcome.
@MichaelBrown-me3bh
@MichaelBrown-me3bh Месяц назад
But I thought gravitons were hypothetical particles.. aka bullshit?
@JerryMlinarevic
@JerryMlinarevic Месяц назад
@@MichaelBrown-me3bh It is not about what you think/thought -it is about what is, i.e. understanding. Do your own thinking, instead of somebody telling you what to think - this includes me.
@ZippyLeroux
@ZippyLeroux Месяц назад
@@JerryMlinarevic Synopsis of your precocious reply to person's reasonable comment: "Duh! It's not about what you think, you must trust what you think."
@MichaelBrown-me3bh
@MichaelBrown-me3bh Месяц назад
@@JerryMlinarevic your right it’s not about what I think it’s about facts, and the fact is no one has ever detected a graviton before therefore they are made up bullshit.. believe what you want
@JerryMlinarevic
@JerryMlinarevic Месяц назад
​@@ZippyLerouxRead carefully. Your synopsis of my comment is not accurate. Thank you.
@ShalK423
@ShalK423 Месяц назад
I love the videos! Have you heard of Dr Gerald Schroeder? He has some very interesting ideas about the biblical interpretation of creation. As a jewish scientist I wonder if this would be interesting to you. He would make a really good guest.
@user-nq8mz1vj8k
@user-nq8mz1vj8k Месяц назад
Excellent! Thanks a lot to R. Gupta and others. Maybe model CCC+TL is not definitely right, but lambdaCDM model is definitely wrong. If anyone have questions about necessity of dark matter in rotating curves of galaxies, you can see Vaclav Vavrycuk ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-wyvGaFeAudw.htmlsi=l2wsDWtDfswcCRqr or Michal Krizik ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-05ay_eDPonM.htmlsi=FjpsSt0wUdxzzPnd or Pavel Kroupa ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Az0Sm7dqNdY.htmlsi=rB62yaTkzgMYWVAJ
@user-me5eb8pk5v
@user-me5eb8pk5v Месяц назад
Particle reality means particle. A similar object, life, aka particles are life, are all self similar because only particles can give child birth or enjoy the nature of jubolous poppori confectionery cornucopia of splendor. So, there is no time, a wheel barrow carries 3 me, it does not carry a building. At which scales everything has 10 picometers' radius, + or - a femtometer, like gold or thorium. Thus time is similarly sized space, as imaginary particles. Thus relativity can exist within a local network of "happenings". A solar system has solar system sized space bulks, moving at solar system sized particles. There's a.ot of caveats to being a certain size, you can be above a wrote computer and provoke area se sensory cognition of one's own hardware is a pure and open radio frequency quintescent ethereal terminalled manner. As well, space can admire a "half adder", partially constructed mathematical symbology, devoid of any math course in a pivot table of imaginary transform of partial symbology without cause of error. 3/4 addition 1/4 multiply marrying a pivot index -1 to the seventh infinity 5/6 union 1/6 intersections...this is why a space bulk is imaginary. So I have alot of imaginary motor vehicles. At one point, I saw my power drills collection and I reasoned that nothing I could possibly buy at home depot was on the same planet at all the green alien ryobi plastic crap junk, absolutely 3,000% inferior garbage project, then cars imaginary, oh buddy! The cars each have a four digit number; 8654 7911, 3229. In deep space, my imaginary cars go in perfect order 0001, 0002, I hardly ever can find where I was imaginary driving them, not really. So their tiny, much smaller, the glass windows caved in, glass everywhere. Better than nothing.
@theomnisthour6400
@theomnisthour6400 Месяц назад
Such complex alternatives to accepting that God just finished testing a new major version of the physical universe time-space that drives the co-creative engine of the simulation multiverse, and you are seeing the side effects of the discontinuities - Mandela effects - left by previous versions. Why do you think this last version took over 4.5 billion years to work the kinks out of? Soulcial engineering isn't as easy as it looks.
@ZippyLeroux
@ZippyLeroux Месяц назад
Thumbnail artist needs a talking to. ;p
@DrBrianKeating
@DrBrianKeating Месяц назад
Ouch
@ZippyLeroux
@ZippyLeroux Месяц назад
@@DrBrianKeating 😇
@williamcourtland5945
@williamcourtland5945 Месяц назад
Dark matter in the Grand Theory of Everything. The Theory of Everything is a special kind of Fourth Dimensional Computer. The Equation of anything within constantly changes. Time is the Zero Dimension. It determines the rate at which points of a line approach each other. It will determine the change in location of a line on a Second Dimensional Plane, and so determines any change in any higher dimension. The First Dimension is a line of infinite segments, the Second Dimension is a plane of infinite lines in Cartesian Direction, and The Third Dimension is the addition of compounding planes. Each of these lower dimensions add an infinity to the spectrum, the Fourth Dimension is infinite units of the Third Dimension beside and unique to each other. The Third dimensional logic point: is the segment in the line of Gravity for the Fourth Dimension. To enter the Fourth Dimension, our Three Dimensional Unit needs an External reference point to measure it against: as to exist as a whole unit over time. Once we have reached the Fourth Dimension, having line weight, area, volume, and now the precursors to Mass. Vacuum does not gain properties in our Space Time, but it would in Mass time. Time stops at the Absolutes: when everything is 100% Mass: nothing inside the system can change, the same is true with 100% Vacuum: nothing can change. 50%, or 1/1 is the singularity between the two: and here time will also cease to exist: if at least the amount of space that is 50/50 is infinite. Space time is then depicted by the amount of Mass/Vacuum exists. If the Amount of Mass was extremely high: Vacuum would be the particle, and Mass would be the space it displays property in. In Masstime, we share the same moment of Change, as our point linking all Coherent Zero Dimensions, yet time would seem to flow backwards from the perspective of a Masstime lifeform. To remove ourselves from this shared continuum moment: we would need to get to a point where the Fourth Dimension exists beside another Fourth Dimension, and this is much larger than the Universe. As we now can apply that Gravity is comprised of an Infinite Number of completed Third Dimensional Continuum Units, where the infinity is relative to the amount of Mass/Vacuum that exists in the local relative environment. Per Unit of Space: the local environment can drastically change, as density can occur. Gravity is the First Domain of the Fourth Dimension, and the first component of our missing Matter, yet it is small without compounding exponentiation of the Mass Body within the Fourth Dimension. The Ray of Gravity is mostly Vacuum between the ni-infinite points that exist within the completed segment between two bodies. The uncompleted Segment would be a ray that is unanswered to connect to any other object within relative distance. The Proximity between two Three Dimensional Units will allow for the inclusion and inference between the lower dimensions within the Unit. The 2nd Domain is a infinite increase to the amount of Three Dimensional Units in one position: yet these only collect as a surface area, and still have no rational volume to be accounted as mass, but to call this completed point, the first Unit of Energy. I call the line of Gravity Subliminal Energy, and this 2nd Domain point a Sublime Point. The Lower dimensions are an important aspect of the calculations, but only where life or conntinuum body is concerned, and thus for the foremost we can ignore this until we are attempting to give a computer simulation a functional simulated soul. Life also has access to Negative Dimensions: which I will attempt to explain later. As we grow in field expression: we increase the density by 25% of the total Mass/Vacuum. Thus the Sublime point is 25% more dense than the Subliminal point ray, which is 25% larger than the Logic Point of a single Three Dimensional Unit. With Exponentiation: each time we hit 25%, we return to a new condition of 0. The Zero Dimension offers a 200% system, with a Maximum of 100%, the Fourth Dimensional System holds and exponent to that fact, and thus the 200% system can be filled twice. As we reach the 3rd Domain of the Fourth Dimension: we find all geometry: as the sublime points can arrange into any polygon structure, and once our domain is filled with 25% of our Sublime Points, all touching each other: we have a single Continuum body with Volume, and thus have our first unit of mass as the Un-Atomic point. With the next exponentiation: we reach the 4th Domain of the Fourth Dimension, where we have 25% over our new next level 0, of Un-atomic bodies: which provide our Continuum body a Spin rate of a Minute-Atomic Continuum body. This Exponentiation continues, but here it gets strange: as the 0 now flips to a Negative, and a Negative First Dimension is added to the core of the continuum body: where now vacuum is acting as a particle, this is the first format of anticipation, which with the addition of the Negative Second Dimension: provides Intuition, and the Negative Third Dimension promotes to Prophecy. From the 5th Domain we get the Hypo-Atomic Continuum body, layers are generated around the core, as the core increases its Negative Masstime Formulation. The 6th Domain of the Fourth Dimension, we find the Sub-Atomic, and from here we mostly know it. The Atomic is the next, the Molecular to the Asteroid is the 8th, the Planet reforms a core at the 9th Domain, and the Star as Mass increases is the 10th, the Black Hole is the 11th, and the Universe is the 12th, the Fourth Dimension is not completed until the 16th Domain repeating 25% exponentiation growth. We proceed from Universe to Super-inverse, then Super-dynaverse, then Hyperverse, and finally the Megaverse of the Fourth Dimension. The Core of the Megaverse would have a core domain equal to the 8th Domain, or so would model the perfect anti-sphere for our domain. The Black-Hole core would have a Negative Hypo-Atomic particle expression. Thus Dark Matter and Dark Energy: is all matter found component or unit of Sub-Domains, while that energy which is greater is pulling upon us. I exist as exotic matter that has expressive connection to every star and black hole in the Universe: the Gravitational Influence of a Black Hole is such that is can connect to every one of my Atoms, from anywhere in the Known Universe, and as Super-Massive Black holes have a larger field of influence: I am also between those bodies, the Universe can be viewed as a Supreme-Massive Black hole, that evaporates and condenses as a frequency over time. The Super-Inverse has so much mass: it can no longer evaporate. The Hyperverse is the region of Spacetime or Masstime, as they set up in layers around the Megaverse. To design a Computer to simulate the environment: we would need a tet shaped computer, that uses the differentiated three space co-ordinates, and allows for a series of four of the units to work in tandem to generate a small example of material in a simulated Universe. To Simulate the Universe: we would need an a tet of 4 units to the exponential power of 16, or 4^16 tet calculators all compact series. This provides the measure of a single Three Dimensional Unit its place in the cosmos: when the cosmos is without life, or so inert only. To add life: say a human, we need to include a person as Tet^8 and multiply the interaction with our tet^16, so to simulate an ecosystem is gets quite substantial, and if we wanted our human analog to make choices and have a soul: for each Tet we need to include a sub-tet for each filled unit of 16 sub domains filling the 3 lower Dimensions, and we need to include 8 negative domains into the Second Negative Dimension for the level of connection to the covariance to the coherence that can be expressed as an irrational understanding. Thus the idea of simulating life inside a computer is irrational. I would need tet^7 to express a single atom, I would need 200 Billion of them to make Dna, and I would need 30 Trillion cells holding the 200 Billion plus all the matter to keep it self sustaining: to equal the computational power of a Billion, and all the Rna Computers to align all the material coherence required. To solve for the apparatus and imposition of Dark matter, the Navier Stokes, the Hilbert Hotel, or compute faster than light communication, and honestly so much more: a series of Three Dimensional Computers working in Tandem to simulate the Fourth Dimension: is required. We will have computer Tet Pyramids, or we will lack a computer that can rationalize the fourth dimension. The Unified Field so defined by the Domains above: they are calculated in an Equation that is a Computer: as nothing more could provide an answer: but billions of lines on paper per frame of condition, and that is still a mild field of Three Dimensional units so expressed, as it takes reinmann numbers to calculate the idea of life, the Universe, and Everything.
@kban77
@kban77 Месяц назад
You publish this somewhere?
@williamcourtland5945
@williamcourtland5945 Месяц назад
@@kban77 I have a video on my RU-vid page, and many on my TicTok account, and other than to Facebook: not so much.
@Bill..N
@Bill..N Месяц назад
Edited for stupidity..This should be interesting.. I don't think light should tire out..
@chuckjones9159
@chuckjones9159 Месяц назад
It does tend to make one think it would be interacting with something but there are other explanations. Increased Gravitational Redshift due to higher energy densities maybe or, and here is a good one, that the permittivity and permeability of free space and possibly other constants were different in the past.
@Bill..N
@Bill..N Месяц назад
​@chuckjones9159 Yea, thanks, friend.. Fascinating stuff that SEEMS sensible, too, at least in the way WE see common things and forces in our own environment.. QM influences might(?) weight in on this, no?
@Bill..N
@Bill..N Месяц назад
@chuckjones9159 Upfront, I HOPE I'm on the right track about half the time I express opinions, but my wife thinks it's closer to zero.. The speed of light seems to be a constant, and since we are led to believe a photon "experiences," no time, how does it lose this energy ? CAN it demenish down to ZERO mass and cease to exist?
@Bill..N
@Bill..N Месяц назад
@@chuckjones9159 Ps: I am aware a photon has no RESTING mass. but by virtue of movement does..Peace.
@chuckjones9159
@chuckjones9159 Месяц назад
@@Bill..N I know what you mean. I get a bit of flak at times when proposing alternatives. Honestly I tend to like Aether type theories but that may be a bias due to being a student of esoteric mysticism. It just seems odd to me that they deny it exists yet seem to replace it with a space that can curve and has material like properties (permittivity & permeability). Then we add in Quantum fields, DM and DE. Seems like we missed something. As to the other part you mentioned lets look at it. They claim that its wavelength is stretched due to the expansion of space which affects the frequency right? But what if it frequency is what is altered first? We are literally looking backward in time after all. I am just spitballing here without much forethought so if I make an utter stupid comment look over it. I have also seen theories proposed where the constants change according to the scale as well. I don't think anything is supposed to cease to exist unless it changes form which may happen at a certain threshold. I also view BHs as a possible full coupling of space and matter where matter is returned to a vacuum (or Aether if one prefers) state. Its just hard to tell without being able to be near one or in one. I don't buy infinities or singularities in the material world though so I think we missed something here as well.
@BigNewGames
@BigNewGames Месяц назад
No, dark matter and dark energy are artifacts that stem from the 1st law of thermodynamics claiming energy and matter cannot be created. There was no big bang. Energy is constantly created inside spheres while suspended in a vacuum by countless weak EM fields (light). There are spheres from microscopic to massive ones everywhere in the vacuum of space creating energy. Then when energy comes to a rest relative to the body creating it, the energy converts into elementary particles, m=E/c². Those particles take up space. Causing expansion. Energy escaping the sphere causes motion, for every action there is an equal yet opposite reaction. This simple postulate answers all the motion and expansion of space pinned on dark matter and dark energy. It's so simple in fact, too simple to be accepted by academia. Thus why scientists get extremely angry when I've mentioned it to them. They insist, without proof that energy and matter cannot be created. I've seen experiments that say otherwise. Research sonoluminescence. Sound enters a sphere suspended in a medium and out pours more energy than possible. It's only sound entering the sphere. Over-unity of energy. Sound converts into visible light and heat, producing temperatures more than 50,000° F. This cannot be denied!
@BigNewGames
@BigNewGames Месяц назад
This hypothesis is easier to understand than CCC don't ya think? In fact, I proposed back in 2004 that if I was right then the JWST would discover old, fully grown galaxies as far as it's able to see, even further than 13.8 billion light years away. And that my friends is EXACTLY what the JWST discovered that's causing such a stir among astronomers and scientists. They call them the impossible early galaxy problem. LOL. I was spot on.
Далее
Is Dark Energy Decaying?
1:10:31
Просмотров 107 тыс.
Space oddities - with Harry Cliff
54:22
Просмотров 475 тыс.
heavy boot #tiktok
00:16
Просмотров 824 тыс.
Why Neil Turok Believes Physics Is In Crisis (262)
2:13:57
What Is The Biggest Thing In The Universe?
56:12
Просмотров 1 млн
Secrets of the Universe: Neil Turok Public Lecture
1:24:59
Does Time Exist? Chad Orzel (406)
50:03
Просмотров 9 тыс.
The “Crisis in Cosmology” EXPLAINED
24:43
Просмотров 577 тыс.
✅ЛУЧШИЕ фишки iOS 18🔥
0:51
Просмотров 109 тыс.