To the Moon! Apollo 11's great adventure 

favorite comment so far xD brilliant ^^

I was 10 too.

I was 8.

Amen🙏

@Saul Goode - You sound like a flat Earth believer... oh wait, you are :-)

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ewc7RG2zuOE.html

@Saul Goode No, NO ONE believes your ridiculous conspiracy theory crap. It's only nutjobs like you.

Yes now go on the sun and bring back some sunrays too

Me too. I remember going quickly outside to see the moon as the astronauts were landing and noticing it was eerily quiet outside except for hearing the "beep" on the neighbors TV sets.

@@jgstargazer In the early seventies I lived on the east coast of Florida. We would watch the liftoff on tv and then run into the front yard and watch the rocket climbing into the sky. It was a thrilling sight.

too bad this entire thing was faked by our government. humans cannot get to the moon.

I mean. . . open heart surgery is nothing to sneeze at.

@@gives_bad_advice I must confess...excellent point.

United?!?! Really believe that? How? Plus your "crew" still has a lot to answer to.

You just keep thinking that way you'll be ok.

Here is an astronaut aboard the ISS talking about what NASA is currently working on, so that one day real moon missions will be possible: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ewc7RG2zuOE.html

@@fixedstationary1719 yeah, and here is the man who inspires all your BS conspiracy theories ;) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rlcJnZBPQEc.html

@@illinoisjones8003 So...you're one of those schizoid conspiracy theorists? Let me guess, you also believe the world is being taken over by lizard aliens and Bigfoot is your next door neighbor.

Tell me about it … we go from news people like Walter to Don Lemon. Sad

More rockets are planned to be launched in 2019 than at any time in the past. In 2018, we launched 1 less rocket than we did in 1969, 111 vs. 112. With fewer failures, 3 vs. 19. Nostalgia likes to wear rose-tinted lenses.

twistedyogert .........do actually believe that??? It’s all a BS and I don’t care what shape the earth is nobody can leave low earth orbit period from the moon to satellites materials temperatures space ice measurements nothing matches NASA seemed to miss the fact people where going to get smarter too.........the dumbing down project didn’t work as fast or the way they wanted it to.........anything space is garbage

2023: nuclear rockets are almost being launched thanks to American politicians who sturred up a conflict they had nothing to do with. I live in Brussels, capital of Europe, scared for what is coming, whishing i good fly to the moon. Peace to all citizences worldwide, who have nothing to do with wars created by all money and powerhungry politicians.

They never made it to the moon!

It amazes me too. Why people seem reductionism is beyond me. The moon hoax deniers have nothing else in their lives so they will not be persuaded. Luckily there are people doing incredible things every day so the opinions of those who shout 'hoax' literally mean nothing. The rest of us can bask in the glory of the these remarkable achievements.

My most recent video supports the Apollo landings, and refutes a lot of the deniers' arguments.

@@scholoryteller6614 Maybe you can refutes NASAs arguments, like losing all the data and technology so they have to start from scratch in 2020. But then again maybe Chrysler can no long build the old 440.

The earth is not flat but nobody walked on the moon.

Perfectly stated!!!

Speaking of stress, Buzz Aldrin's heart rate jumped to a whopping 88 BPM during liftoff! :)

koomo801 Cool as a cucumber!!! Absolutely amazing bravery that these guys possess. My heart would have exploded!!!! LOL!!!

Might as well have been "The War Of The Worlds..." Really.......?

AvengerII Ralph!

Suuuure he was. Wink wink

@@stillperfectgenerations5852 And now Buzz is telling officially that he was the first man on the moon...that they swapped name plates because they had put each others suits by mistake. You gotta love them... Nasa, Never A Straight Answer. Making up things all the time.

@@ExperiencedGhost That was a joke for the Conan O'Brien show, fool

No, it was because it was easier for Armstrong to leave the cabin without damaging the LM. The door opened from left to right and with Aldrin stationed on the right they would both have to have changed places before opening the door and in the cramped conditions it could have caused problems. They tried it in a simulation and they damaged some instruments, so it was decided that the commander would always come out first.

Uhhhhhh there arent any.....

best liar.....

@@tomschmitt6911 Evidence?

Many of us watching the actual event in 1969 expected him to sink into moon dust.

Luck of the draw, that's why it was Armstrong. Not saying he wasn't brave, they all were. But the reason why it was him, and that crew, was just luck.

What are you? One of the men in Black.

Yeah you could almost say brain dead.

@@shealdedmon7104 So, you think him to be one of the Men in Black, and yet you casually reveal yourself as a non-believer? Are you suicidal or something? :D

@Chris Watt - That's why conspiracy believers refuse to believe they've been fooled by conspiracy theorists :-)

@@yazzamx6380 Oh, how clever, deny the FACTS and continue on in you delusion. You must be very proud of your quick witted and completely UNORIGINAL thought processes, your brilliance is truly stunning. Just keep believing EVERYTHING that proven LIARS are telling you, because that makes complete sense. Never and I mean never question ANYTHING your controllers tell you no matter what evidence to the contrary is presented, you're the best dupe ever. Congratulations, your critical thinking ability has been successfully been erased.

@@chriswatt6747 _Oh, how clever, deny the FACTS and continue on in you delusion._ The FACTS are that the Moon landings are genuine. _Just keep believing EVERYTHING that proven LIARS are telling you_ You mean, like Bart Sibrel? :) _Never and I mean never question ANYTHING your controllers tell you no matter what evidence to the contrary is presented, you're the best dupe ever. Congratulations, your critical thinking ability has been successfully been erased._ No, Chris, we don't need a primer about how to be a hoax believer :)

@sanitman1 - Nope. And who told you Von Braun had anything to do with what was written on his grave stone?

@@chriswatt6747 - You cried "Never and I mean never question ANYTHING your controllers tell" Great, so go ahead and give us a taste of your 'critical thinking' with a few examples of the Apollo hoax claims that you question please (or better still, claims you know to be wrong) and lets discuss them. After all, even as an Apollo hoax believer, you can't possibly believe ALL the claims stated are correct. Right? :-)

Lol you believe this crap

@@Profile.4 I am doing research on conspiracy theorists, What is your education level. Be honest.

@Zdravý rozum I am doing research on conspiracy theorists, What is your education level. Be honest.

@@87aggietim I have a PhD in conspiratorial science

@@Profile.4 Yes. I believe you do.

@@NeilBaker722 - You said "My dad worked on contracts for NASA too" - That's funny, I've seen your ignorant posts about spacesuits (that not even your fellow hoax believers take seriously) for YEARS and you've *never* said that about your dad. So you're lying Neil! :-)

@@yazzamx6380 I'm trying to track your logic but I'm not having any success.

@@NeilBaker722 - You *deleted* your original reply here my cowardly friend, that says all we need to know :-)

@@yazzamx6380 I haven't deleted anything; I added the last sentence. You are desperate to preserve your precious delusions aren't you?

@@NeilBaker722 - You're really not the sharpest tool in the box now, are you :-) If you haven't deleted your original reply then the question is where is it? *IF* you are telling the truth and the reply is still here, then the FIRST thing that should have occurred to you is that it must have been flagged as spam after you edited it, and hence only YOU can see it. That's IF you're telling the truth (which after the claim about your dad, is doubtful :-)).

Good one! But, what's really sad, it true. We went from newsmen like Walter to Don Lemon and the like

Blame high IQ women getting jobs instead of having kids, and 1 million+ per year immigration from 3rd world countries.

@@ErichLRuehs worse yet, there are those who think outrage actors like Hannity or Carlson are reporters

naturalbornkillr ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-vl6jn-DdafM.html Well apparently, NASA is planning on heading back.

There you go. It just does not add up does it?

@@TrenchcoatAlexander I had a car two years ago. I sold it a year ago. I can no longer move around at high speeds. Does it mean that I never could? Because that is the kind of "logic" presented here.

@George Labe-Assimo, well apparently every president says were planning on going back but we haven't. Now that CGI is so much better it will be easier for Hollywood to go anywhere we want to. Dont forget nasa and our government says we cant go past low earth orbit, well the moon is supposedly 238000 miles away. And Bill nye says Earth is a closed system and theres no where to go. lol, dont get all triggered on emotion- your never going to be Captain Kirk or Luke Skywalker.😂😂😂😂

@@TacticalBuffoonary Yes, you need a heavy rocket to go to the Moon. NASA hasn't had one until recently, and the new one hasn't been fully tested yet. Why are you guys not understanding the relationship between the capabilities and available equipment?

Okay - tge _Apollo_ astronauts have faked their "halfway on the way to the Moon" footage in low Earth orbit. What other lies you want me to tell you?

Colleen Humphries is that you in the picture?

@@andrewpheasey3477 Yes, it is me!

There was a time in history when anything was possible.

I'll taketh thy cheese by force Maybe they'll send Bigfoot? They really should.

My most recent video addresses the Apollo deniers' arguments.

Found a clip today of Buzz saying the liftoff was smooth and like they werent moving and no noise. The next clip of Neil, he said it was like a train on bad tracks and loud, they sat side by side so who is lying?

Not "people".. hoaxtards. A particularly stubborn subset of imbecile.

@MI6 There is no source. Hoaxtards fall for trolls who cut and past questions to answers for fun, but hoaxtards take these fabrications and run with them.

I'm guessing that in the absence of any evidence, you're hoping that a mockery will do?

Space Shuttle, ISS, and the unmanned rovers.

MrHalvnir - It was for the development of rocketry for the defense of the nation. There is not much difference between launching people into space and launching bombs at an enemy nation.

It did, however, have to wait 52 years (1960-2012) for man to return to the Marianas Trench, the deepest part of the ocean.

@@kevinskinner4986 Well, according to your logic, you'll have to wait patiently for another 2 years before NASA puts a man on the moon again, won't you? Good luck with that.

@@kurt44mg42 Since my post appears to have been marked as spam or something, I'll post again. If you'd like them to go back sooner, maybe you should write your State Representative and tell them your desires given that NASA's goals and budget are ultimately decided by Congress. Of course, you'll never do this because in classic hoaxer logic, you don't want NASA to have any funding because they're "stealing our tax dollars", and then when NASA fails to achieve or continue their work due to lack of interest and public funding, their failure to return is TOTALLY "proof" of fakery and not a self-fulfilling prophesy of your own creation. Meanwhile, I'll be sitting with a bowl of popcorn when that time comes looking forward to how you people try and claim the new ones are fake too in order to cover for your previous claims that it is "impossible".. I'm sure you'll have "proof of fakery" up within an hour.

@@kevinskinner4986 Firstly, I'm not a US citizen and, therefore, have no particular dog in this fight. But since it appears you are, why don't you write to your representative in Congress and ask him to divert some of the $718 billion of your hard-earned cash -- which has been allocated for military toys spending -- and give it to NASA so that you may, in 2 years time, break out the popcorn...that is if you still have any money left to buy popcorn with. ;-)

@@kevinskinner4986 Addendum: If Congress can approve over $700 billion anually for the omnipotent United States military, surely it can "sign-off" on just 1% of that figure ($7 billion) for NASA to launch one final lunar landing mission, can't it? Think about it: the entire -- 2011 inflation adjusted -- budget of the Space Shuttle Program, which lasted 30 years, was only $196 billion ($6.5 billion per year averaged)! Moreover, with all the advances in today's technology, just one more successful lunar landing in this 21st Century would certainly shut all those lazy, crazy "hoaxers" up once and for all, wouldn't it? Imagine, if you will, another Armstrong and Aldrin triumphantly standing on the moon's surface again, next to "Old Glory" fluttering proudly in the wind, er...sorry, erratum, there's no atmosphere on the moon -- but you get the picture, don't you? Anyway, all those slimy, limaceous, snivelling, obnoxious "conspiracy theorists" would have to come crawling on their hands and knees begging forgiveness they ever doubted those brave, heroic Americans who first walked on the moon 50 years ago. C'mon, everybody!!! "Oh, say! can you see by the dawn's early light. What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming; Whose broad stripes and bright stars, through the perilous fight...[goddamned limeys!]" Indeed, just the mere thought of it creates a lump in your throat, makes your bottom lip quiver and brings tears of joy to your eyes, doesn't it? God bless America, and all who sail in her!

When did they say that?

It's a good thing you didn't tell that your sister, since it's a lie.

I know Fred Haise personally. You're full of confirmation bias.

#TIM RUNDALL...well said

Look at the video of the CBS simulation...Neil releases a panel next to the ladder, the pallet drops open, a preset camera is in the bundle which is what is photographing him as he comes down the ladder...After Aldrin comes down and they read the plaque, he says he's going to change the lens to wide and put it on the tripod.. which a camera.in the LM photographed him dragging it to the spot. Geeze adults, really?

the rocket that remained after the module was separated was taking the pictures

That camera was at least 18 inches away from the lander. Probably on that big shelf called the MAESA that swings out 18 inches. It's like they planned this...

tim rundall - The camera is attached to the lander. This part of the mission is not rocket science.

No, Collins saw plenty of stars when the conditions were right for that. Your contention is that the stars should be observable in the outer space at all times. Your contention is wrong.

"AmericanPatriot"...NO, you are most definitely NOT patriotic. A patriot is proud of our country's achievements and doesn't believe in bullcrap conspiracy theories. You're just a nutjob loser.

@@Jan_Strzelecki Uh, Jan darling, if you watch the press conference with the three of them, even Collins admitted they never saw stars. Go check it out.

@@AmericanPatriot-1776 The astronauts were asked a question about seeing stars under very specific circumstances, not just could they be seen (it was a 2-part question, the first part about the firmness of the surface, but this is the part about stars): PATRICK MOORE: ‘And, secondly, when you looked up at the sky, could you actually see the stars in the solar corona in spite of the glare?’ ARMSTRONG: ‘We were never able to see stars from the lunar surface or on the daylight side of the Moon by eye without looking through the optics. I don't recall during the period of time that we were photographing the solar corona what stars we could see.’ COLLINS:’ I don't remember seeing any.’ So, you can see that Armstrong answered something that wasn't asked, about seeing stars while photographing the solar corona from lunar orbit, which makes sense given how bright it was. Collins' answer followed on from that part, saying he didn't recall seeing any.

No, if it's supported by evidence then it must be true. Moon landings are supported by evidence. Moon hoax theories are not.

"It looks so fake it must be real" Elon Musk

@@doddijones Oh, yes. You've been conditioned to expect space to look the certain way, so _of course_ the real thing is going to look fake.

@@Jan_Strzelecki Wow. I saw the tinfoil hats that they used for the Van Allen belt radiation.

@@doddijones As if you knew what the Van Allen Belts radiation is 😆

It's a shame it never happened and the lied to everyone.

@@pmsl no citizen will ever go there because you can't.

@@pmsl the globe is a satanic lie. Look into it.

@@pmsl you have a lot to learn.

@@ee.es00 And you have a lot more to learn than *atheia kid.* For starters, you shouldn't believe everything you read off the internet just because it makes you feel good about yourself.

Is that what the voices in your head told you? Maybe you should take off the tin foil hat for a while.

jim cherkas there is a lot of tell in the audio of the Apollo missions. One of the astronauts said while frolicking on the lunar surface, “We’re off to see the wizard”. I wonder what he was referring too lol.

No he didn't, he said, 'you generally have the impression of being on a desert-like surface, with rather light-coloured hues.'

NASA Admits: We Can't Leave Earth's Lower Orbit

Bill Nye says Earth is a "Closed system" theres nowhere to go.

50 years later we don't have the technology to fly at mach2 while sipping champagne....

Yes, lets see how Bart Sibrel deliberately lied knowing that people like you would just blindly believe him without question and without thinking for yourself :-) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-jghYBAI3i6o.html And seriously, can you REALLY not see the major flaw in his "flag blowing in the wind" claim?

Jane is a good fit for this show. It’s always been hosted by the best, even if a last hoorah of a stellar career. Glad to see her in her element.

U

Until I saw the Golden Spike report DID NOT know Jane Pauley was on CBS

just another overpaid fool.

_why is there no crator blast from the rocket as they landed?_ The Lunar Module didn't make a noticeable crater because: a) it was spread over wide area, b) the final stage of the landing wasn't long enough, c) the exhaust force wasn't high enough; d) under the thin layer of dust, the surface of the Moon is rather firm, as evidenced by troubles the astronauts had when trying to plant the flag. _And why are the landing pods so clean n dust free?_ Because there's no atmosphere on the Moon, so there's nothing to hold the dust particles in place to hover in place and settle on the landing pads after it landed. Essentially, every dust particles blown away from the landing area would continue to move away. The astronauts boots, on the other hand, got dirty because they were dug partially into the soil, and one boot could throw some dust onto the other and vice-versa.

Hi, on Earth, grains of sand or dust blasted up by a helicopter would become trapped by the surrounding air to create large swirling dust clouds around the helicopter, where after landing the dust/sand in those clouds would eventually settle back down to cover objects and the ground. For example: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RKlrvf3lUxk.html In the vacuum of the moon, there's no air to trap the dust particles blasted by the LM's rocket engine to form dust clouds, so instead they fly away in straight lines at great speed, eventually landing a long distance away. For example: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-gFuP-ZUNz_8.html Also, here's a close up of the surface directly below the LM, where we can see the top inches of loose dust have been blown away to reveal the more tightly packed dust underneath with cracks in the surface. If you look carefully you can even see the radial lines created as the dust was blown away; www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a11/AS11-40-5921.jpg There also appears to be a slight brownish discoloration of the surface too. I hope that information helps :-)

@A.C. B. ART You forgot to say that vaccines cause autism and that jet fuel can't melt metal beams.

@@yazzamx6380 i found this what do you of it? Check it out specialy at 2min 24sec. He says the dust is electrically charged and it sticks to anything it touches. Let me know what you think please. thanks. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-EFqpgmZAZgo.html

Sinjin Smyth 😂😂😂

Another dumb meskin….dime a dozen these days.

Yep I would.cos we never went there

@@melgrant7404 I am doing research on conspiracy theorists, What is your education level. Be honest.

@@87aggietim sanctimonious much

@@87aggietim There are a number of academics (such as Professor of Mathematics, Colin P. Rourke and PhD in Physics Luis E. Bilbao) who believe the Apollo lunar landings were faked. If a person believes a certain conspiracy theory it certainly does not mean they will believe all. Your contention that a low level of education is a major factor for belief in conspiracy theories is flawed, and your other 'proofs' are thus brought into question.

@@87aggietim you and your hypothesis are hopelessly stupid...

What I smell is your ignorance.

@@Jan_Strzelecki I think we could actually have a decent conversation, if we put aside personal abuse. I at least have some grasp on the extent of my ignorance, and have thus chosen to question this perceived reality, courageous enough to stand in the face of ridicule from those who defend the bewitchment of the dancing shadows on Plato's wall. There is much power in the question, as Socrates demonstrated, and an intelligent question would yield far better results than attacking one's person. I do believe that such weapons with which we lash out are the very ailments we endure through wounds afflicted on us. Take time to consider these words. I am here at your defense.

@@passage2enBleu Hey, you started it. "Smell the rat" - that's kinda self-explanatory, isn't it? If you want to have a decent conversation, why won't _you_ start it? Explain your reasoning.

@@Jan_Strzelecki Do you believe the first words in the bible 'In the beginning God created the Heaven and the Earth'? That's a good place to start.

@@passage2enBleu No, it's not. It's outright irrelevant. The Moon landings either happened or not - the origin of the Universe makes no difference here. Saying that it could've been faked because of reasons isn't the same as proving it was.

Yes, the children and the simple minded are impressed!

@@stillperfectgenerations5852 Is that why you schizoid conspiracy theorists believe everything Alex Jones tells you?

@@ct92404 you sure seem to know a lot about this Jones guy! What does that say to the people reading here? Youre another dumb NAShole, thats my guess!

@@stillperfectgenerations5852 Take off the tin foil hat and do something productive with your life.

Search RU-vid for *Apollo EVA* and watch hour after hour of original footage.

There isn't a telescope powerful enough to actually observe the astronauts on the Moon. Not today, and not in 1969.

It is so depressing how uneducated you are. Really, it is. Enclosed. Lol you havent taken a science class in your life, have you

NASA Admits: We Can't Leave Earth's Lower Orbit.

The moon landings are fake. Green screens, which were created and first used in the 1940's, were used to manufacture this BS.

@@yiuyiu7328 you're an idiot!

Something tells me your brain is transparent.

Do you understand why?

Preach N Truth oh my god you don’t know what you’re talking about. You do realize that according to Einstein’s laws of momentum, you can’t get flung off of the space station (even if it’s traveling at 17,000 mph). Currently the earth is orbiting at 15,000mph yet no one is flying out of the atmosphere. When we say that someone is traveling 5mph (on a bike for instance) we are subtracting the 15,000 mph that the earth is spinning.

TheProphetPepe .........the space station is 240 miles off the ground and ur saying that the rules and laws of any theory apply the same for objects on the ground to where ........where do u people want to draw the line.........and the earth based on the model science gives spins at 1000miles per hr and orbits around 67,000mph again more facts bud

Preach N Truth and I don’t think you understand how the space station orbits. The space station(or any orbit for that matter) is merely a constant state of falling, but due to the rotation of the earth, they never hit the ground.

TheProphetPepe ........and???? I didn’t say anything about it hitting the earth or the ground......how did u even come up with the statement u just made???? I also believe the USA to be one of the biggest lies in the history of mankind 900,000lbs low earth orbit bigger than a football field again not sure how or why anyone wld believe that kind of garbage.......see to many people believe what they see on TV and believe what they r told to believe Alone based on materials used to so call build the iss I’m amazed they can get tax paying people to be ok with their daily budget that we cover and pay for and the American sheep believe it without questioning anything U know what makes me believe that YOU because u made a comment and post on nothing I spoke about or even asked just jumped rt in blind didn’t ya....yup u sure did deputy dog!!!!! U sure did

TheProphetPepe ..........people need to wake up stop believing all the lies and fancy stories and all the fake CGI propaganda NASA puts out that they say is fake phones because CGI doesn’t mean real CGI means fake

??? Gold foil is still used to this day to protect spacecraft from the heat radiated from the sun; goo.gl/LZJaqq

Yazzam X Wow Scientism at its finest

@@VaughnFelixMusic No, science at its finest.

@@VaughnFelixMusic - That's a child's response with all due respect, try the adult's approach by actually addressing the point I made please.

@@VaughnFelixMusic WTF is "scientism"? That isn't even a word, you nutcase.

Because that's what NASA was directed to do. Sending men to the Moon is incredibly expensive, and once they'd beaten the Russians there, the US public lost interest and Congress began cutting their budget. The fact is most people can't see a point to sending men to the Moon, so NASA wasn't allowed to do it any more. It is not, and has never been, a question of technical capability. It is a question of funding. It makes no difference how easy it is to get to the Moon technically if no-one stumps up the money to pay for it.

Yes, this was their best guess at what was happening at this time.

The Apollo 11 astronauts went STRAIGHT INTO QUARANTINE for THREE WEEKS after they returned to Earth (just in case they brought back any 'space germs', a rather silly procedure that was dropped for the missions that followed). Therefore the footage you're referring to would have actually been filmed a *minimum* of THREE WEEKS after their return to Earth. Facts matter my friend, they really do :-)

No stars in any video from the time. I don't think they had stars back then.

You said "No video of the whole earth spinning" Sure, 'spinning' at the rate of one turn per DAY. That should look like a carousel to you, right? :-) But lets get to the point here, you are repeating classic flat Earth believer claims, so you're a flat Earth believer, right?

28VDC. So?

No, Collins said he didn't remember stars in response to a question about seeing stars in the solar corona (atmosphere of the sun) despite the glare! Hence context matters :-)

Yazzam X that’s the fact idiot they were asked about it in relation to being on the moon Collins put his foot in it and they looked horrified

He lied too. JFK and the moon landings. JFK was a theater production and Cronkite starred as the news anchor. Look into it.

@@simplequestioncanuanswer2457 Look into what? Conspiracy theory crap?

@@ct92404 then believe it and dont look into it

Yup. Fox News has poisoned so many minds

What technology was not available? Apollo Machines: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-mucb4Ttt1oY.html&app=desktop

Just because you don't understand the science doesn't mean it's fake.

@@Jan_Strzelecki I know the difference between science and scientism. You got to really love the truth to come out of the lie.

@@passage2enBleu Okay, tell me your what you consider to be the best example of such lie.

Begin with 'The Primer Fields'.

@@passage2enBleu I've started watching it, and it's kinda interesting, but... right at the start, in the first part, at 8 minutes it falls into the trap of saying "this looks a bit like..." And from then on, there's no claims of any mathematical proof or justification. Instead, it's focused on publishing an image of this double magnetic field over anything with a plane. That's not proving anything. It's an interesting idea, but it doesn't really feel expressed. And of course, it has nothing to do with the veracity of the Moon landings.

Did the voices in your head tell you that? When are you conspiracy theorist nutjobs going to get it through your thick skulls that no one takes you seriously? Take off the tin foil hat and get a job.

I used to be a big NASA fan, even left all my inheritance in my will to them. And then I had my eyes opened.

@@passage2enBleu do tell more

@@passage2enBleu And then you started smoking pot and living under a bridge, you mean.

@@ct92404 Happy Daze!

It 'no longer exists' in the same way Shuttle and Concorde technology 'no longer exists'. If we need a need Space Shuttle or a new Concorde or a new Saturn V to get people to the moon, we will design and built a NEW craft. Hence look up NASA's massive SLS rocket due to launch next year that will take people back to the moon in 2023.

The tech is, the money is not.

@@yazzamx6380 The excuses believers come up with is more of a mystery than the alleged mission itself.

@@illinoisjones8003 - Give an example of an excuse please.

@@yazzamx6380 You just made one. How do you know FOR SURE what you just stated? Did you get your info from NASA?

I know its real because my great grandparents heard it on the radio.

It must be fake because somebody on the internet told me it was.

We moon hoaxers don't believe anything unless we are told by other moon hoaxers.

_They went to the moon before Atari but they cant go to the moon with second generation VR Occulus Rift._ They could, if they had enough of them and stacked them high enough. But don't you think it would be easier to use rockets? _The went to the moon in black and white and they can't go now in 8k._ The maximum resolution of a screen in any given time has nothing to do with the capability to land on the Moon. _If your selling this crap I ain't buying._ You've bought another crap already anyway. You see, the thing conspicuously absent from your non sequiturs is money and public interest. Sending men to the Moon is incredibly expensive, and once NASA had beaten the Russians there, the US public lost interest and Congress began cutting their budget. The fact is most people can't see a point to sending men to the Moon, so NASA wasn't allowed to do it any more. It is not, and has never been, a question of technical capability. It is a question of funding. It makes no difference how easy it is to get to the Moon technically if no-one stumps up the money to pay for it.

@@Jan_Strzelecki How much money in dollars? A lot of money and no funding are vague non answers. How much exactly. Nasa budget each year is 20 billion . Keep that in mind. with your no funding idea.

​@@simplequestioncanuanswer2457 _How much money in dollars? A lot of money and no funding are vague non answers._ And this is a vague statement which doesn't really tell anything. _Nasa budget each year is 20 billion._ They'd need to save _all_ of that for 10 years in order to land on the Moon again. _That's_ how expensive going to the Moon is. Keep that in mind.