To win, know the rules of the game 

@@user-jy8iv3ux2e You should turn off this scam channel and seek the advice of somebody who is qualified in English law

LOL. He came across as a total pr1ck.

Yes, that is the key, ditch the fear. Strangely enough 'do not fear' is repeated in the Bible around 350 times.

How can I hire him, does anyone have contact details for him? Or does he have a website or any courses?

@@gwyneth7812 There's no one stranger than him, so he'll have a quiet life!

@@normanpearson8753Lord you made yourself an idiot, clearly you did not listen - he hasn't a quiet life - he is helping people - I think you had a Homer Simpson moment LMAO

@@gwyneth7812 but, you are listening to an oddball.

Most of the oddballs took the untested drug at the end of 2020 Silly gullible people.. why would you take a untested drug I say to people....😂😂😂😂.💯🇬🇧🇯🇲👍

you really are a completely deluded fool

nonsense

@@SuperMiloBass 🙄😄

@@crwonshe meanwhile... in the real world...

@@crwonshe You are correct. The "money" was taken out of circulation decades ago.

I think it makes you the creditor rather than debtor. Tom Barnett did video on this. Always respond to a question with a question. Never answer or remain silent.

"PERSON" is a corporation/fiction/slave, corporated or unincorporated.

If if if WE DO NOT STAND UP FOR THE VICTIMS.....WE CAN EXPECT TO STAND ALONE WHEN ITS ,,,,,OUR ,,,,TURN. AND IT WILL BE First they came for the Communists, AND I did not speak out. Because I was not a communist. Then they came for the Socialist.. Then the trade unionist. Then the Jews. WHEN THERE WAS NO ONE LEFT THEY CAME FOR ME

Yep. Thank Q. This is bs. 😂😂

Mass non compliance

Grow some balls and dig in …✌️🫡that’s what most need to do

Brilliant

That would be a tacit acquiescence. Why would you allow another to play with your toys?

Or stop giving money to the governments PERIOD

"You know you’re doing something right when you’ve got bots and trolls giving their energy to hinder your progress" Either that or he's just a f*cking idiot and other people aren't as stupid as his disciples.

Well said.

@@kathleendudley9526 Well no one presumes it went well! It-s retarded nonsense from word one .

I gain not much I have gained confidence I have gained knowledge I have experienced that system is definitely corupted But i can tell you what i lost I lost fear fighting the system I lost being bullied I lost stress I lost anxiety Its not about gaining here its about experience Its about showing the system that we had enough Im soooo looking forward to my next court 🥰 I have detached my self from the outcome I dont really care whats the outcome What i care is experience lessons and opportunities Lots of people crying how bat life is I dont cry, i take action Coz actions speaks louder than words So im the proof and example that everything is possible when you stop being ignorant and arogant thinking that u know the best when you know nothing But when the pain of safering is greater than the pain of change people will always safer 😃

@@marijakisieliene3189 My question was what did your client gain? I know your story from what you say, but was your client prepared for the challenges, the court battles? She did not know what to say, other than your own script. Perhaps she now knows how to speak without a script? Is she gaining in her own empowerment and knowledge? Is she going to continue this battle, detaching herself from the outcome? Is she willing to approach this for experience? Lessons and opportunities which you are doing? Are you willing to go to prison should they decide to incarcerate you? And if so, for how long? How challenged are you by the courts? Or is it the folks who come to you for your script?

Congratulations on learning to count to three. Now you can have fun looking for patterns of 3 everywhere. Next week, try 4.

We were told thousands of years ago by a sagacious individual just who rules this world, evidence everywhere, and what we should do about it. The atheist, scientist, Darwanist, secularist, won't save you. Don't let them take the chance of paradise from you.

didn't exaclty work out well for him did it...

@@SuperMiloBass if you take everything literally of course....the Bible is a book of instruction for this system was build by the elites with full of metaphors so to understand metaphors you have to be a grown up and not just take it as if you reading it to a child or being naive, the parallels from the realm are all there.

@@user-un8ug7lx6c what are you taking, drugs do not work.

Spot on! I'm working very hard to undo all the adhesion contracts I've unknowingly gotten myself into throughout the years. I always tell people the first step in freeing yourself is realizing that you are NOT the all caps name. Understanding what has been done to us all and seeing through the fraud is huge step towards regaining your freedom.

@@mechanicsoffreedom fantastic stuff my friend! Keep it up! I’ve only dipped my toe in so far however I just can’t stand to see others criticised for trying by others who never have tried.

Well said.

Some come here just to insult people who merely wish to be free. It's a strange thing to see.

@@MHLivestreams Crabs in a barrel.

@@MHLivestreams should we support you in your wish for unicorn milkshakes too or help you to understand they don’t exist ?

@@Towertrips I have been reading your many many comments and replies for quite a while now. Also, the comments of Sir something and Roger Ramjet... it is interesting to study your comments which most of the time are merely ad hominem attacks and basically nyah nyah nyah... kind of childish really. You seem to have loads of time to reply to people's comments and are very passionate with regards to forming a rebuttal here. I usually admire folks who are passionate about topics. I am still studying your comments and those of the other people I mentioned... " naysayers" shall we call this group? I certainly don't know everything about these topics and interviews BUT I know my own situation and the decades I have spent being "non-compliant" in a specific area that has saved me 100's of thousands of dollars. I see some definite connections between my personal situation and most of these topics that I am relatively new to. I am curious, why are you so opposed to the conversations here? What drives your passion to call most of these people names and run down the stories and sharing of ideas?? What's your angle? Is it an angle??? Of course you are NOT obliged to answer me...hahaha or are you??

@@MHLivestreamsor in other words to find excuses to evade responsibility... yeah I understand exactly what your position is

Utter nonsense

Absolute twaddle.

@@user-bq3og5pz9w if I say it three times does it become true 😂😂🙄🙄

It’s taken as your will and because you put a written notice before their court it’s now in their records ( case) and you expressing the same statement of your will. ( never change a word or add a word or take away a word as if written in stone) Remember your entering into their paper world of legal persons , stop using one tongue mouth, put one’s words on paper as a notice before the court. ( never get in to a oral battle with these people you will never win within their system of legalese language), Your words only come through the written form and never oral that way it stays on the record which you will get and use at your court when you have the man summoned to appear and answer on the witness stand. Learn to write simple notices and keep the words down to 10- 30 words that express what it’s is you require. Notice who ever pleads, orders, acts on i behalf will assume all liability. Notice who is my accuser bring forward s/he , as i have the right to cross examine that man or woman. [cf: acts : 25:16 ]. Notice is there a verifiable claim properly placed before the court and is it here today for reading and inspection. [cf: Trinsey V Pagliaro case law] . These are just examples And if you do open one’s mouth then say i have answered the court did you get my notice , did you read my notice, do you understand my notice ( and get an answer for each question you ask s/he ( magistrate) [never talk to the other side or look at the other side; nor react to what the other side says ]. Your just waiting for a man who claims the wrong and damages to appear and take the witness stand, other than that you do not see hear recognise anything,( because no one is believed until on their oath, ) so who you talking to again,( That’s right no man or woman, ) So just look and speak to the man in the black robe or suit,

​@@user-bq3og5pz9w nice examples here, but perhaps you could clarify a couple of points: 1. Why the use of all lowercase letters, including the word, "i"? 2. Why the use of "i" instead of "my” in, "i behalf", assuming we as men and women are corresponding with them in plain English? Thanks in advance.

Thumbprint should be in (blood) red. To denote a natural, living man / woman.

​@@AntonyClayton-eq1ul Yes, I would, not disagree with my documents,, But on there's they would not accept them, in this day and age. When doing our documents, we register mail back to ourselves, so we keep the "Original," and send them a copy, because when we put the registered mail in a strip that is 6mm wide 30mm-40mm long on the top of the "Original," back to ourselves to prove it has been through the postal system, then on its return, scan and copy keep the "original" for our records, and send them a copy, because if we sent them the "Original they would overstamp taking over the court. Now, if it's their document, I would do it in blue ink. As they are only sending us a copy, I would scan a copy to both a computer and a paper copy to prove I have returned it, only in case they try to commit postal fraud. Men/women are the keepers of their own records, easy to handle if the case arises, at a later date, no arguing with the Postal Service knowing how to be the Post Master of our own, documents and the media between the law and legal system. The postmaster general knows the Postal law, as do judges/Barristers/etc as they do not want to end up in prison. Yes, in blood on our documents, as we keep them in our records office, and the copy that is sent is a copy with no blood on it, but their documents have blue ink

This is utter rubbish- police act on bench warrants all the time - why do you post this nonsense ??

@@Towertrips Yes, why do you post nonsense, so, no good trying to "Gaslight" me I know what I am writing about and you do not. The police do not come with a "Bench Warrant," they lie and when asked to say show it, they cannot produce one and it would have to be served with an affidavit of the one who wanted that "Bench Warrant" to be served, so, they can be held to account for their action.

@@peterthompson6651 I work at a court and I see bench warrants / witness summons issued every week and the witnesses collected by the police

iv said it several times with different guests but all we get are a smattering of info......no links nothing

YT always cuts off his links and disabled them as clickable...

Well the only actual rules he spoke of was the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and that's freely available on the government legislation website.

there aren't any... it's all complete nonsense. Can't you see that? If it were true, they'd be sharing court judgments and other evidence. They don't because they're lying to you and playing on you for views. Educate yourself from qualified individuals not random anonymous individuals who aren't even prepared to tell you their last name, show their face and have no qualifications.

What rules or you looking for ?

😂😂😂😂you’re already under their jurisdiction 🤡

Their*

I concur.

Why? Common law is superseded by modern statutes

🤣

​@@andrewdavies7827[If one clicks their heels 3 times, doesn't that make one a member of Ze SS?]

@@islandaerial3414 This 3 times thing is nonsense if it's the usual SovCit rubbish .Even then it's very hard .

@@normanpearson8753 Your ignorance is showing. There is NO such thing as a Sovereign Citizen. And YES getting a tacit agreement is possible because, it is in their rules. See A Warrior Calls. But hey, stay ignorant, that is exactly what they are banking on

@@islandaerial3414 your souce references are self published books 😂😂😂

How do we find her info?

Scamming isn’t something to be applauded 😂😂😂

a lesson in how to behave like a child in a court with the result of being removed form the court, tried in your absence and getting an arrest warrant issued. Wake up!

Since when have scammers commanded respect? What a distorted view of the world you have.

pay no attention to the two paid trolls that populate these comments with bullshit nonsense replies... clearly paid and I hope they are at least well paid but I doubt it.

Serves you right, could have had a slap on the wrist for driving like a 🛎️end, now you’re a serial offender

Three is used in legal circles often.

@@G-ra-ha-m It's a contractual process! This is the most pertinent thing that this individual being interviewed misses. Learn what the purpose of "questions" are for!

When does he do the great shows? I only seem to get the crank nutjob freak shows

Exactly....you just keep ya head firmly up your sovtard backside

B∅∅tl.-ïckers, they're obedient plantation workers, pleased with their subservience.

And not óne of them can articulate any actual point to argue, instead choosing to merely insult. Very petty minded, Stockholm syndrome.

​@@MHLivestreams Yes but your idea of arguing your point is simply to endlessly repeat bare assertions and offer as evidence only the previously stated bare assertions of others.

@@Rev_Arthur_Twunt no, it's based upon vast experience, and the lack of any meaningful dialogue.

On pink paper for all the difference it’s going to make

@@Towertrips yes in their court absolutely, but it’s no the record and once you establish your court of record it’s going to be gold dust.

@@user-bq3og5pz9w there’s no such thing and never will be

@@user-bq3og5pz9w Can you please elaborate, if youtube allows?

By which you mean evading your responsibilities

@@jayargonauts Hahahahahahahahahahaha .. thank you I needed a good laugh. How exactly do you take away avoidance of responsibilities from what @andrewleese3840 wrote?? Try harder mate.

Changing scripture just slightly there, careful with that, remember what Revelation says.. Revelation 22:18 (KJV) For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book, *If any man shall add unto these* things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And *if any man shall take away from* the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. Matthew 7:13-14 (KJV) Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that *leadeth to destruction* , and many there be which go in thereat: Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

@@thebishopelect Fairy tales

@@nineteen8486 I don't CARE what YOU think! Romans 3:23 (KJV) For ALL HAVE SINNED, and come short of the glory of God; John 8:34 (KJV) Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin. Some things to think about above your own mental drivel.

@@thebishopelect KJV, HA HA HA, LMFFAO, PMSL, that is laughable. A doctored bible that was written with omission. WAFJ!!!

@@garytyme9384 YOURE THE JOKE Gary, it says what it says in EVERY Bible. John 8:34 (KJV) Jesus answered them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin. That means YOU and you're going to hell because OF that you smug scoffing prick. Remember that verse, NEVER FORGET IT. Here's another for you to shove down your smug prick throat. 1 John 3:6 (KJV) Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him. EVERY time you sin you PROVE who you serve. Now FO

How much and how many mortgages can be offset? Is the limit based on your trust, if so, how does one know how much is in it?

May be found on Telegram

@@andrewdavies7827 plenty. Thanks for asking.

Brilliant? He’s wrong

@@stevebudd6078 About?

@@Zizzyyzz don’t ask questions

@@stevebudd6078 Ok.

@@Zizzyyzz Give your head a wobble. All the people Vobes has on his nonsense show are either lying or looking for clicks - this anonymous horror adds bullying to his nonsense … we had some of this in the 60’s but at least we had the excuse of acid and dope …

Yes

Or Mickey Mouse

Maybe he is Mike Baker, or perhaps Master Baker Mike.

@@organickevinlondon you are hilarious

Not MM but mm.

@@terryboy1235 but only from his padded cell …

@@stevebudd6078 You are already in yours!

You taking the piss😂

@@boxingbill100 well spotted …

Promissory notes are cash in legislation.

@@MHLivestreams In a 1969 case, Lord Denning said "a promissory note is as good as cash." Meaning that PNs are NOT cash.

@@mastermike4103 they are to be treated as cash, that's the whole point.

Or fantasist Walt

He is neither, so don't worry about it.

He’s a Walt

@@marinalobas9821 Well , former is more formal , but ex is OK. imho

I would be more concerned about his personal conduct