TOP 10 ACTION MOVIES ON 4K UHD BLU-RAY 

Yep. . Same here!

Absolutely

I totally agree with regards the quality of 1917. I was blown away by it and my first viewing was in 4k. Im not so sure I would class it as an action film though. Saying that im not sure what i would class it as. Lol

.... you must not own dune (2021) or tenet lol

@@chrissyboy7047 War drama maybe lol🤷‍♂️

Yep, exactly how I felt as I just finished watching my 4K disc in my PS5. Incredible movie, made better by a wonderful migration to 4k disc.

Visually, yes! Sound-wise, it’s not great (but that’s more due to Nolan’s sub-par mixing).

@@psychomoth06 it shits me the fact that he got stuck to DTS-HD in all of his movies

4 look the best imo , the colours and action is just amazing to watch

That full screen 16:9, the crispy and awesome visuals with the awesome use of colours and the audio and music is amazing on that movie, definitely a must for any kailju fan and just action films in general!

Top Tier 4k release

Agreed, reference stuff right there

Well... After it came out now...do you like the it?

Bought my copy of Fallout on 4k on day 1, but i cant agree it's a crispy one, it's great overall dont get me wrong, but in certain scenes it has way too much film grain that looks very bad, to me atleast.

Strongly disagree. Definitely not crispy. More like grainy

I like the changing IMAX aspect ratios in MI:Fallout, but MI:Ghost Protocol is still my number 1 of the Tom Cruise depictions of Ethan Hunt. The bright, crisp opening scene rooftop zoom-shot, chase, and shootout, with an immersive sound-design, let you know that you were in for something "special"! The detonation inside the Kremlin and nighttime shootout on the Moscow bridge literally knocked me off my seat! The climb outside the Burj Khalifa and the sonic surround-effect of the raging sandstorm was epic! Still gives me chills simply writing about it! The fact that the Oscars have yet to recognize any of these movies for even a NOMINATION in Sound-Editing/Design is a travesty!

@@familiatrois3813 oh man, youve made me really wanna watch my copy of GP, but yeah, these movies are definitely not getting recognized enough!

the Atmos sound for No Time To Die. was really loud when I played it through a regular soundbar 2.1

Great Atmos track as well!

I love The Hunt for Red October! But it is Die Hard that is missing from this list!

Aaaaaagreed...

The packaging for apocalypse now is flimsy as hell. One of the worst

I hate Disney, they will never make their Atmos mixes better, they don’t care

Goo Goo Gaga

You are right, it was filmed at 120hz, even at 60hz in the 4K blu ray it’s super cool

Yes, that's what I thought. I recall reading that it was shot in 8K 120fps.

I had always wondered about the HFR. I watched it on Amazon, but it looked like any other movie. I’ll have to grab the 4K disc sometime.

Pity the actual movie is garbage

@@Chopperwocky Facts, the only cool scenes are the train and the first chase.

It did what to you?!?

@@batman4452 I guess this is wrong interpretation or a wrong translation from my French thoughts to US, or maybe it did !! 🤣🤣

You forgot Ben Hur 1959.

Collateral is very clearly an upscale

Collateral was filmed digitally at 1080P and looks like absolute dogshit but we all have our say.

@@colinbooth531 Agree. It looks like crap but it was nice to see the movie again.

Really nice to have on 4K even if the improvement in quality is minimal. I'll take this movie in the best quality available and we pretty much have it now 👍

Same here

You will see it's one of the worse 4k implementations around, pretty underwhelming, typical money grab right there.

Yes, I strongly agree with you because the amazing lighting, shadows, and overall look of the incredible cinematography done for "Apocalypse Now", simply puts that film in a special class of its own, as far as I'm concerned. I'm sure I've viewed that film at least 25 times, first seeing it in a theater, in 1979, then on "The Movie Channel", several times, followed by getting the VHS version, then I viewed it on 2 different DVD releases I had, followed by 2 different Blu-ray releases, and then, of course, now having the UHD 4K Blu-ray versions of the 3 different cuts of the film, that are part of the absolutely terrific 6 disc set, which our "Films At Home" guide, just displayed for us at the end of his highly interesting video. Yup, I so appreciate the amazing look of the film which cinematographer Vittorio Storaro achieved for "Apocalypse Now", that IMO, the credit he deserves, equals that which belongs to the efforts of Francis Coppola, as the work of both men resulted in the creation of a film that will not only continue to withstand the test of time, but will still be here, enthralling future film & movie fans, many decades after I leave this mortal coil.

Some parts of the movie weren't quite accurate, i.e. the amount of flak in some scenes was over the top, and the last dive bombing scene... Maybe most other parts were accurate, though

Joseph, I agree that all of the war films that you listed, except one, are worth taking the time to watch because they are either exciting, or at least interesting, or both. But I've watched "A Bridge Too Far", on 2 occasions, once when I had it on DVD, and then, a few years after that, I watched the Blu-ray edition of the film. But even viewing the film for that 2nd time on a high quality 80 inch screen, with a great surround sound system, equipped with a high performance subwoofer, the film still struck me as an overlong, dull, & repetitious try at simulating scenes of combat, so it's not surprising , that it sparked so little public interest, that it failed to make American film goers want to go see it at theaters, in any large numbers. The basic reaction among most people who did see "A Bridge Too Far" in the U.S. seemed to be right along the lines of how Roger Ebert described the movie when he gave it 2 stars out of 4. Mr Ebert wrote: "Such an exercise in wretched excess, such a mindless series of routine scenes, such a boringly violent indulgence in all the blood and guts and moans they could find, that by the end we're prepared to speculate that maybe Levine (the film's producer) went two or even three bridges too far. The movie's big and expensive and filled with stars, but it's not an epic. It's the longest B-grade war movie ever made." Yes Joseph, though you did list such fine war films as "Saving Private Ryan", "Patton", and "The Longest Day", "A Bridge Too Far" certainly shouldn't be included among such company, since the movie commits the ultimate sin for a war film which involves large numbers of people being killed, which namely is that the film's scenes of battle not only seem fake & totally unconvincing, but that before long, the viewer realizes that the war scenes are so mediocre that they just become monotonous. The film needed a more resourceful & dynamic director, who's highly skilled at creating convincing action scenes, like Steven Spielberg, whose "Saving Private Ryan" is such a masterpiece among war films, that veterans of World War II have commented about how just seeing that film brought back to them intense feelings of fear and loss that they experienced during that war, which usually stay more in their unconscious minds than being too likely to surface during their day to day lives. BTW, most veterans of combat just think of "A Bridge Too Far" as either being phony, or just see it as something that's pretty funny, when it isn't seeming merely dull to them. Finally, it must be said that though "Saving Private Ryan" is only 5 minutes shorter than "A Bridge Too Far" is, due to the dull & repetitious way that director Richard Attenborough had his would-be epic unfold, just about anyone who saw both films, some years ago, will likely remember "A Bridge Too Far" as seeming like it was at least 45 min to an hour longer than "Saving Private Ryan" seemed to be.

Hoping Zulu gets a 4k upgrade in the future.

"Sergeant York," based on real life WW1 hero Alvin York, and played by Gary Cooper, is one of the best films of all time. It's really a superb love/religion/war movie all wrapped into one. Truly a must see.

Not as surprised as any of the John Wick movies missing the cut.

@@LennyNero2019 He explained it at the beginning of the video but when there is 5 out of the 10 being war movies maybe he should have made a separate list for that genre.

@@LennyNero2019 LMAO... Well... You aren't wrong. 🤣

That would be Star wars.

Great movies and beautiful packaging!! Not enough respect for the 70's and 80's

at the top of that list should be Nolan's Batman Trilogi, he did the restorations himself

@@xepfeon oh really nice yea those discs look awesome

@@jerebadine i've bought a lot of 4k releases on iTunes, based on Jeff's reviews