Definitely agree with Wing and Heady being in this classation, but it is my first time hearing about Neepy. It's not that I'm not giving him recognition, the way he entered the field literally said the boy's got some mad skills, speed and control, but I just feel like his combos don't really squeeze out the most of his potential and do not have this pure awe effect, like how , for example, Heady's do. PS: Issue fucking killed his opponents.
That was mostly pretty dope, but why put a really good set that nearly ended in a crash as a top set? BTW, that was Shinobi's set. I'm sure that they can find a better one than that by him.
Well, that's why it's an honorable mention. It's more of a personal preference thing; I just thought the rest of his round was pretty solid and with the music.
dude may get offended, but issue isnt bboying to me. FUnny how it was against a younger pac pac, and pac also dances with the same interpretive dance ish
That's most definitely not true. I think you might be confusing *combos* of moves and signatures with entire sets. It's easy to see some of their signatures and think that because they've been doing them for a while, that they use the "same" sets. If you mean that they should come up with new moves(which they do), then that's a different story.
+ConsciousBreaks watch clips of all the individuals on this list. you'll see the exact same "sets" being used for couple of years. if you have a sequence of signature moves/combos whether it be footwork, style or power that is your set
I made this video, so I've watched it more than enough times already. One example, FE's swipe>nike spin. That's an example of a combo, and I've noticed that people seem to associate 2-3 move combos with repeating entire sets. Like I said, if you mean that they should come up with new moves, then that's a different story. Nevertheless, it's their signatures, so why not use something they created, especially when it's mixed in a different way(which they are).
I think the problem is that you consider any "sequence" to be a set, which is just semantics then. Just to point out another example, Rush's Monkey Flip>Headstand>Flare>Elbow Up into Airchair is what I consider a combo. Yes, he has done this combo for many years, but if you watch his old videos, you can see that Rush breaks very differently now than he did before. I could agree with you if the Bboys repeated *actual* entire sets for years, but I think it's quite unreasonable the way you define it.
