TOP 12 Personal VTOL Aircraft | Best Ultralight Flying Vehicles 

with 20 minutes flight time ?

@@johncostello3174 that will be improved over time, but i also think it's the best because it's very lightweight and compact compared to the other drones. Second best imo is the blackfly because of it's enclosed cockpit that gives more comfort.

Absolutely

Really, think it through properly and compare with Black fly, then come again.

That steep incline take off is an issue though.

But it's so uncool... Only the developers can love it.

its way better than all these

No, it only has 20min flight time if you weigh 80kg. If you go up to 105 kg the flight time is only 5 mins. That is too little for 100k dollars.

@@drakZes the flight time is 2mins with even 80kg, its a scam u never see it flying for longer than some 30s without cut

Good choice!

Bass boat.

Never too late to start )

Is it cold or rainy where you live?

The noise of these things won't let common adoption happen.

Other than the awkward pilot position during takeoff and landing, the Black Fly is surely one of the more efficient designs.

Agree it has decent range also amphibious which is cool

What didn't you like about Scorpio? :) please share information

Cab still walk with the loss of one leg ..

Glad you enjoyed it!

Glad you like it!

its scam lol

@@strammerdetlefno it isn’t 🤣

All I know is I want one bad. I would make tremendous modifications to it, longer flight time, covered roaters, enclosed cockpit. Additionally ad grapple, maybe even deployable kite wings for added flight time and recharge capabilities. It's amazing tech.

it’s a bigger consumer drone, how is it amazing tech? honestly asking

It's the only one that actually works and is in production

​@@ryanbrink2755 most practical

@@ryanbrink2755 it works for 2 minutes lol

vtol can include traditional helicopters. they would all rank higher.

It also would give me a sense of security in that you wouldn't be able to fall out of it.

Toroidal props.

would drastically increase the required cockpit size, increasing the entire size of the vehicle to compensate for aerodynamics :( would look sick as fuck though

Theres a company called airbourne motorways or motorworks that make gyroscopic evtol rotors like you mention. It would be cool if tvey livensed their product for fast tracking it to production.

@@lurch789 I don't think ANY "mainstream" personal aircraft is going to be for "stick and rudder" pilots. They're going to be mostly computer-controlled with the absolute minimum amount of pilot input possible.

The Last Starfighter

Interesting choice👍

To me, the Jetson looks complete, and the Blackfly looks unfinished)

Jetson one looks great but 10 mins flying time is simply a joke. Pointless

The jetson one. It actually has a 20-minute flying time.. I plan on getting one!

@@melodyblanco5196 20 mins tho.... It's so lame. It needs at least an hour or 2 to be useful

There is already a separate direction for large high-speed drones, f.e. Maca Carcopter and Big Drone

😎😎😎😎😎😎There is an interesting design of aircraft, but they rarely talk about it, because this thing is secret. The topic of pulsed plasma thrusters has been developed since the early 60s (see PPT - Pulsed plasma thruster) - they are usually designed for spacecraft. But we will talk about a little-known design - these are plasma propulsion panels for aircraft, where the same Pulsed plasma thruster, but reduced to the size of a pencil and stacked in the form of cells in the panel. The design resembles a conventional plasma TV screen, where there are also discharge cells that activate the glow of pixels on the screen. And plasma propulsion panels have long discharge cells, the arrester has a railgun architecture (just rail contacts or coaxial), and the ionized discharge air is accelerated there by the Lorentz force to enormous speeds - a kind of ramjet engine is obtained. Just imagine! - tens of thousands of small ramjet engines assembled in a panel and firing plasma synchronously with a huge frequency (hundreds of kilohertz). Thus, plasma propulsion panels create lift by pulsed emission of plasma jets from railgun cells. There are tens of thousands of cells in the panel, they shoot at a frequency of hundreds of kilohertz, a huge pulse is obtained, and the plasma swirls the air into toroidal rings - the aircraft is held on this air cushion. Horizontal acceleration is created by the same plasma panels on the sides of the device (they glow, from the side they look like "portholes"). Such devices like "triangle" or "disk" have been observed for a long time, they are mistaken for alien ones - but these are terrestrial devices. They are classified and used for espionage and secret actions. Pulsed electromagnetic technology generates microwave radiation, therefore it is harmful to health. They rarely fly - only military missions. Therefore, they are not suitable for a citizen. This maintained the secrecy. Now they are already declassifying - many people know about this secret technique. When declassified, they will be used for cargo airships. But there is a danger that they are now going to be adapted to deliver small nuclear charges to decision-making centers - such means of delivery are not specified anywhere, are not conventional. This lowers the threshold for starting a war. It would be necessary to declassify them as soon as possible. That's why I'm writing about it. However, I have written before - starting with the book "The Elimination of UFOs" and many articles. There are also videos on my RU-vid channel - "Declassified UFO" and "UFO Anatomy". 😈😈😈😈😈😈😈😈

Unfortunately, so far no ultra-light VTOL aircraft is capable of this. Wait another 5 years)

I personally think blackfly is better

@@TopBoxy More like 10 years. battery tech is not advancing that fast.

@@corail53 make that 20, esp since more dense and powerful batteries ALWAYS come with more weight till that day

​@@TopBoxy Because they don't want utilise thermique engine power and gazolina High energy capacity

Kiwigogo Nr one

@@SparkySlow 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Falling on that floor looks like knife 🔪 😳

This man will not only change the way we describe fun….but the way we describe COMPACT. I’ve been following your work here and there and the only message I have for you is …PLEASE MAKE THIS HAPPEN FOR EVERYONE TO TRY IN OUR LIFETIME!

toroidal propellers?

It's not that bad but couldn't be less wide

Have fun!

@@TopBoxy sure will

Perhaps the panels are too heavy, and the recharging time from them is insignificant

@@TopBoxy yeah but the idealism is significantly superb to future tech companies imagine something like that that’s technologically evolved to where you cut out batteries all together

Thanks!

And not paralyzed

Don't underestimate the power of gain. This is a potential multi-billion dollar industry. They will create new categories, make simplified legalization and the like...

@@TopBoxy you bring up a good point and I’m always keeping that idea in my head on standby because we have seen that the changing landscape of the industry has historically changed and even driven the regs. For example, the entire FAR 103 Ultralight was itself created after folks in the 70’s were building and flying tiny, relatively slow fixed wing aircraft. It only makes sense that something similar bubbles to the surface eventually as small personal drone-inspired manned aircraft start hitting the scene and the FAA has to create a ruleset to fit them into. But the internet being the lazy internet, people see a polished promotion for one of these things and assume because it looks official, that everything including the regs to allow them to fly in the airspace is already in place. What would the internet be without overhype, instant gratification over substance and glossing over boring things such as reality.

The Jetson one is legal in the us without license it's registered as a toy

@@edwardseaton9447 you are misinformed. The FAA regulates all the airspace in the US. Everything from a model airplane to a model rocket has regulations. Every MANNED aircraft, from a hot air balloon to a paramotor to a Cessna 172 to a Boeing 737 has regulations covering what they are, who is qualified to pilot them, when and where they may operate.. Toy is definitely not a manned aircraft category in the US. If it doesn’t fall under the FAR Part 103 Ultralight Aircraft regulations, where no pilot certificate of any kind is required, then it falls under another Part.

@@chriskelvin248 well here in northern California it's registered as a toy as long as it's not by a air port or on the city

Thanks for sharing!

да особенно авария, почему-то только российского летательного аппарата, прозападным либералам это должно понравится💩

Fingers crossed!

No one cares

Cool, thanks

Disagree. Thing has limited use and only has a range of about 40 or so miles before a recharge. Unless im thinking of the wrong item.

Solar power is just marketing. It is hard to imagine how much time it will take to be fully charged with solar energy. With further electrical storage development, even more.

I wonder why they are still not used anywhere? Maybe they don't put out enough power?

Yeah, it's only many thousands of dollars more expensive to make and use them

@@TopBoxy They are nearly impossible to CNC. They do use them on boats and someone has figured out how to CNC them now.

​@@jaslll4396 CNC?

😂😂😂😂 concur

Luxury BMW or drone?? It's not an unreasonable choice, particularly for those seeking a genuinely remote existence. For example I have seen many budget holiday homes on Scottish Islands. A drone is a reasonable choice in such circumstances.

@@markthomas7279 to each their own…if I was going for remote I wouldn’t get there in a drone. And I’d definitely never buy a BMW. But yes, cool toy!

Sorry, we are not representatives of these companies. You can google for information

then you need a licensed pilot

@@TopBoxy Ok, get a pilot’s license, Then you can increase the speed snd range. Personaly i think a drone license would be enough because this doesn’t act like any airplane

And there are many Micro Helis around. Or if you live in a Lake area things like, Icon A5. Well good for the Kids who can work there Hobby and get Paid, if somebody is stupid enough investing in this Electric shit.

If there would be Practical Other Options, you would see the Millitäry have them 10 years ago.

@@youcanhandlethetruth4695 The US military had single person, collapsible helicopters around 70 years ago, but although these were proper aircraft, they decided to not use them. Most military requirements can be carried out with unmanned drones, one only need look at how Ukraine are adapting domestic drones into attack drones, dropping munitions onto the enemy or flying explosive laden drones into them. The military rarely need to get one soldier someplace that only a passenger carrying drone can achieve...

@@felixcat9318 Their is one thing i could think of. Escape Vehicle for Snipers after they did their target.

It's always like that with the first. Doesn't that mean you shouldn't even start?

My pleasure!

Yes, I think so