I really enjoy the informative Top 5 videos! And I appreciate the extra mile you go with the historical information and the cinematics. Really good list. Personally, I like the cost efficient tanks like the Kanonenjagdpanzer, too. But the Leos overall are the best tanks because they can transport beer on the barrel without spilling it :D From playing I think the T80s are incredibly good and I fear them, too :D
I agree with pretty much all of these, but i dont understand the lack of Chieftain MK10/11 when compared to the N.G Abrams. 3 more pen, no reserve trait and 5pts cheaper. In exchange the N.G Abrams gets better MGs 5% accuracy and 9 fire rate instead of 7. Id take the 3pen more any day especially with the amount of armour you see and the suppression on INF that tank main gun provides. The reserve trait is also such a turn off and with the machine guns tbh if there in use your tank isnt in a good place. I think the reason why you forgot about about the Chieftain mk10/11 is its divisions aren't great but it is one of a few standouts in an otherwise lackluster divisions. You should do under rated units by nation or div, ones you rarely see but when you see them you know there a problem. Extra points if you include mid units that become great at better veterancy or units that on paper suck but in certain situations just perform every time. As a brit main my example would be the airmobile gungroup at 2 vet these things are excellent in urban and forests. Along with the striker, 80pts for the ability to scare tanks at 2625m is actually pretty damn useful and with the 5 clip it is very good at being scary despite the accuracy only being 45%, but if it hits 338 suppression is very good at slowing down the bigger tanks and that's not even considering the 23 pen.
there is a thing that i hate about this game, the vehicles are VERY badly modeled especially BMP's Bradleys and all 30mm's the number of innacurate thing are insane and yet they add prototypes... i could also talk about the French which is the biggest impacted nation like the fact that T80BV as more range with 125mm ATGM than a missile carrier that fire 152mm ATGM..
@@sd_league completely agree. Bout time their T-80s look the part. Always hated how they looked in Wargame. Such an iconic vehicle just looked like dog shit.
I really thought I was the only one who played the BMP-3 and was genuinely surprised at how they performed, so imagine my shock seeing it be number 1 lmao
The Tow2 is great, but it's pretty expensive and has rather low survivability for it. Using it in fights vs other ifvs or inf can often be cost inefficient.
Bmp3 is way way better against infantry thanks to it's long range 100mm and has a way higher survivability thanks to 5 frontal armor. It wins every 1v1 vs other ifvs. Bradley doesn't do that.
@@sd_league Lets just agree to disagree as bmp3 doesn’t always win as that gun feels like it miss every shoot and 18 on atgm is way less threatening then 23 on some targets while 5 armor helps only agains non-atgm ifvs and the lowest dmg infantry at.
1889 Sovjet Red Army and equipment was in a different state then the same equipment 30 years later in a combat with completely different weapon systems. 1989 had not Javelins and Small Drones. Its kinda like saying "Mark V tanks were trash in WW1 because they really suffered in 1945 when the Germans used a few of them in desperate defense of Berlin".
@@sd_leaguewell he does have a small point, like bmps paper thin armor and poor reliability of loading ammunition. Like the T series of tanks in this game are over performing when compared to their IRL counterparts,and let’s not forget how corrupt the soviet government was at that time. Also shouldn’t US have access to m829a2 and a3 for countering Soviet heavy ERA sense the the Soviets decided to field bmp-3 earlier?.
