TOP 5 POKER RIVER CARDS OF ALL TIME! 

Woah… exactly, every, hand

🤣

😂😂👌👌

u remember ur bad beats more than ur bad play prior to it

It’s just sickening when your playing tournament and some shit crazy happens and u get a bad beat

I might be stupid, but what did the guy do wrong?

@@woif00 He took ages "thinking" about whether or not to call when he flopped a really strong hand and any muppet knows to go all in here with a flush on the flop. Essentially wasting everyone's time and not really respecting the other players, hence the justice when he gets beaten by the full house on the river.

@Brendan Wood And we all know there is no way he would, he COULD, ever fold this hand. He's the short stack. He flopped the nuts. What the fuck!!??

Disgraceful?? Lmao

I feel that they over reacted to say he was being “disgraceful” imo

I was so confused by that one didn’t adreus have him beet the whole time

Why was his reaction disgraceful? I don't get it

@@MudStuffin it's disgraceful because AA is the BEST starting hand you can have in the game their playing & it's an etiquette thing. When you have premium holdings it's not a mystery as to what you're going to do & it's super disrespectful to take 5minutes making a decision that's a no brainer!! You're NEVER folding in the spot that douche-hole was in so why pointlessly drag shit out when you & everyone else in the room already know what you're going to do when holding AA at a final table facing a preflop jam! Unnecessary & classless or he really is a complete moron who luck-boxed his way to the final table. His teammates probably got him to that spot idk tho.... Either way it's not a good look 🤦‍♂️🖕that guy lol

@@MudStuffin He has literally the best hand it's possible to have on that flop, and sits there for 3 minutes thinking about calling all in, with the STONE COLD NUTS. He can't be behind, it's literally impossible, and there is no way he is ever going to fold. So sitting acting like he has a decision is just dumb

@@pandabearguy1 dumb yes but disgusting and disgraceful? I think it was an over reaction from them all

:D :D

Haha

Still whines about it

Phil you odiot

@@user-wj9xp3fy8y lol are you sure you don't want to edit that comment a little?

I dunno about that. I didn't see it as slow playing. Tournaments are different. You might think he's already got trips and you want to decide whether you REALLY want to risk it all on whether or not the board pairs...I'd think about it too. If the difference is like $50K in a tournament, you might WANT to wait and think about it a sec.

Stephen Henley He had the nuts. There is never a reason to fold when you have the nuts, ever. Also, his opponent couldn’t have had trips when the board didn’t have a pair.

Stephen Henley dude I am taking about flop; He is all in to call and he has nuts. it doesn’t matter which tournament you in, it is a snap call.

@@stephenhenley7452 bs , thats what people call instant call

@@marcosvidal1293 As someone who's played in 1000+ person tournaments, no

He was more happy than Don! :))

Never seen a slow roll that bad before...never!

What did he do wrong, like I've never played poker so I don't know what he did wrong

@@ubisoft_is_ass7740 Its called slow roll in a definite call situation which is disrespectful in poker

Rightfully so, if that 6 hadn't hit he might have been lynched, disgraceful slow roll

No he still had 4 outs? two aces and the two 6s

@@michaeltaliau1673 There was one six on the board and one in his hand. One was folded which means only one left can exist in the deck. That plus the two aces in the deck is 3 outs. Look at the timestamps I linked.

@@brontesenthcorrect

Mabuchi "Gambo" vs Justin Phillips. .

I feel like if that happens to you, you deserve some sort of prize lol that was brutal

Jeff King read this .5 seconds before outro... my eardrums thank you

And it destroyed pool halls in America

SMaze17 how much was riding on that one hand? Butterfly effect for real!

You know you're right. That might be the most influential card in the history of the game. Very fitting that it's the ace of spades.

How so?

Why do u say that

100% true. He is just a massive fish. You can clearly see that due to his reaction and preflop play. People's emotions are misinterpreting the situation. Stfu

If he would of actually folded he would of been alive still lol. I don’t shame his slow roll if he was actually contemplating folding because of intuition on losing lol. I once folded a top set on a rainbow flop in a 2/5 game only to would have lost too a flush against two players on a run out. I had a weird feeling even with top set and that feeling was right and I saved a stack of about 1700$

@@pitchbuckets2860 intuition is the #1 attribute on the felt

He flopped the "nuts" with KdQd which is the best possible hand you can have on that board. It's considered disrespectful because his equity to win the hand is always higher than his opponent. Worst case scenario is if villain flopped a set of let's say aces, although KdQd would been slightly a 65% favourite. In this scenario he was a 82% favourite to win the hand. In any scenario given- Andreas would have the nuts(best possible hand) on that board and he's thinking about the call - that's why it's considered disrespectful. You dont fold the best hand when you to a 100% know you have it, he was just slowrolling for some reason. Aaaaaaand he's a shortstack with less than 4 big blinds which makes the whole situation even more ridiculous.

Simon Todorovic Gotcha, understood. Yeah that’s in pretty bad taste of Andreas but justice was swiftly served

@@simontodorovic287 so, what was actually disrespectful? what should he have done differently?

@@VU212009 instant call would have been the suitable option. You don't fold the hand when you can be 100% sure you have the best hand available in the situation, so there is no need to slowroll like he did.

Also, he was raised all in so there was no reason to hollywood because there was no continuation bet for his opponent to do. So, there was no reason for any hesitation except for some TV time. That is considered very disrespectful of your opponent and to the game.

because there's like a milion of similar hands and this is just one random video on youtube that chose 5 of them

andreas was enjoying his flush "win", taking his time trying to act like he is thinking it over when in reality all he could've done was either fold or call. It was a dick move because nobody would fold with his cards, but he was savoring the moment with his acting

Hollywooding before an all-in call with the nuts is ridiculous and stupid.

It doesn’t show double gutter outs. If he would have hit an 8 on the turn it would have shown that as one of his outs on the screen

If an 8 came, then the "outs" would be updated and they would add an 8 for 5 outs total. They don't compute 2 cards ahead and show every possible winning formula, just what would swing the win on the next card.

That was the river card that changed poker history forever.

Bigga Winna Crapsa whys that? Asking for a friend ..

@@fedfreds832 The term was created after Chris Moneymaker, a 27-year-old accountant and amateur poker player from Tennessee, United States, outlasted 838 other players to win the 2003 World Series of Poker (WSOP) Main Event, thereby winning the US$2.5 million prize and the title of World Champion.[1] Moneymaker became the new poster boy for poker, inspiring potential players to believe that "staying at home in front of a computer screen could be more profitable than going to work."[1] His improbable win also started a new era in poker in which "a nobody could topple the feared pros."[3] According to an article in the Las Vegas Sun, Moneymaker's victory has been credited with launching the "poker craze", along with assistance from televised tournaments with hole-card cameras and the increased popularity of online poker.[4] Moneymaker gained entrance to the 2003 World Series of Poker by winning a $86 poker satellite tournament at the online poker card room PokerStars. This win gave him a seat at a table in a larger satellite tournament whose grand prize was a seat at the World Series of Poker in Las Vegas, Nevada, which costs $10,000. Moneymaker won that tournament and went on to compete in the 2003 WSOP event.

Enforcados Futebol Clube gotchu just the underdog unknown name from a small city won one of the biggests poker tournaments. Crazy

@@fedfreds832 In context, he had a cooler last name.

Takes skill to get to those moments tho

Nathaniel Hester no it doesn’t

Ok Boomer

Nathaniel Hester shut up zoomer

the ignorance is real here.

Nut full house would be aces full, doesnt really matter tho

so basically the guy had the absolute nuts on the board (which means he has the best possible hand at that time) and he was going to call anyway but he just took his time to kinda rub it in. It's something called slowrolling which is a very douche thing to do.

Probably calling pre to when it's super clear push/fold decision. Phil Hellmuth liked to do that.

Because he had the nuts (best possible winning hand at that point) and he still took so long to commit his chips wasting everyone's time.

And also making donocca think he was ahead. It's a sick feeling when your opponent takes a lot of time and shows the best hand, especially when there's no betting left. This is why people hate slow rolls. In cash games of small pots, it's fun but in big pots and tournaments, it's disgusting.

Garrett why are they all so happy when that guy loses

Dale Prokop because he had the best hand at the time, and his opponent went all in so there was no action behind him to try and bait in. So he was just wasting time. Its whats called a “slow roll” Its extremely poor etiquette to slow roll

Facts

straight boi

@@k-time with the ace high, eh. Ive honestly never been sure if that was an all around rule

@@quartercrow3464 1 year late but are you actually that stupid?

He had the stone cold nuts on the flop Everyone would’ve snap called that also he didn’t have much left so he wasted time for no reason

They are just babies, "waaaaah he took too long to call waaaaah" they need to get over themselves

He slow rolled the opponent. After the flop he had flush, the top combination possible at that point of time, with chances of opponent having shot at winning very low, yet he pretended he was thinking whether to go all in. Such a behavior is considered disrespectful.

@@nikaburduli1589 meh people are such cry babies.

@Rodrigo C. It’s because he was wasting everybody’s time. If the bet wasn’t going to put him all in then fair enough, drag it out and make it look like you actually a decision to make. But doing it like he did was very shitty

If that truly was the case then he is a moron. Folding after flopping the nuts is a losing play no matter what, and no one should ever even consider a fold in that situation. But he's obviously not a beginner player, I can't think of any logical reason to take this long to put it in when you're a 4 to 1 favorite to double up in the worst case scenario.

Doesn’t change the fact that he still had the nuts and 3 big blinds behind and someone hitting the full house is still incredibly slim

Andreas flopped the best possible hand on the flop (Nut flush) and Donnacha flops 2 pair so he puts Andreas all in but Andreas doesn’t snap call even tho he’s short stacked and has the nuts so he basically wasted everyone’s time for no reason

He obviously did….

Yes he was wasting time with the nuts on the flop you can never fold that even if you think that your opponent has a set of aces. It should’ve been a snap call

@@mingi1489 i personally think everybody getting lippy with each other is a worse show of sportsmanship, and everybody seems fine with that. He was trying to bluff the hand he had to win the pot. Isn't that an attribute of poker? I'm having trouble understanding why this isn't ok but shit talking somebody is fine?

@@52BLUE tf are you talking about lmao wdym bluff the hand? There's no point in bluffing the hand when your opponent is all in when you have the nuts and there aren't any other players to act behind. He's wasting time for absolutely no reason. He deserved to get trash talked because of that

When you have a flush like that you're pretty much a winner every single time...so playing slow at that time is seen as bad sportsmanship.

They're mad that hes taking so long even when he's sure to win

yeah the guy has the post flop nuts but still chooses to put a bit of an act on. no need for it.

The difference with online poker is they are programmed hands via a computer and man made where as a live deck is live (shuffle and deal) in that moment . Those online poker hands are recorded in the millions and are replayed over and over because its all predermined and basically rigged.

Not as bad as I felt for Laak at the end though, I love that dude, he's super cool and nice all the time.

on the first clip

He had the best possible hand on that flop and only had four big blinds left so there was no decision to be made when he was pushed all in apart from "call". It's disrespectful to slow roll what is the best possible hand given the current board.

@@conornolan5032 Of course there's a decision, he could have folded.

@@TheMarlinspike There should only be one outcome. Therefore, in theory, there is no decision to be made.

@@TheMarlinspike He could have folded? Hahahaha, he had the best possible hand in that scenario, no player in the world is folding a nut flush when the flop contains the ace of diamonds and you hold the next two best cards in the King and Queen of diamonds. GTFO you mug or better still sell your house and come play me heads up for €250,000 if you think there's a decision to fold. 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

He has the nuts bruh there’s zero reason to ever fold that on the flop… if you’re ever folding the nuts on the flop then poker isn’t for you

At the very very worst, having an 80% chance to win and taking a minute to go all in is ridiculous. With that few chips he won’t make it to another point where he has chances that high. Not instantly calling with a nut flush while already committing a huge chunk of your stack is stupid

Sorry but this makes no sense. Do you always debate if it if not you’re gonna call a bet when you hold the nut flush? Like really? How is this something you don’t already have an auto response with? I really don’t understand it. You have 80% chances to win. It would be like debating folding pocket aces pre flop. If you don’t like 80% chnace of winning, I really don’t understand how you could play poker at all.

I believe it's called a "slow roll", meaning that a player trying to "fake" having a weak hand with his gesture and facial expressions or something along those line to "trap" the other play into think he has a weak one so they may bet higher or something. It's consider not very sportmanship because it's basically making the other person feel bad for thinking he's (the slow roller) having something terrible.

In other words, when you have the best possible hand like the guy at the flop had, and he waits and thinks

It’s disgraceful because the other guy is already all in since he’s bet is twice the total amount of Andreas chips. Here any one with 2 money brain cells could instantly call because the entire point of slow playing is to get other person to do a “all in” but Andreas already got that on flop and STILL acted like he could still milk more. When obviously after an all in, there is no more milking. Essentially Imigine if someone flops a royal flush and the opponent goes all in. If the person with royal flush took 1 full minute to call his all in- people would get mad because wtf is he thinking? Obviously he is not gonna fold a royal flush and he will have to show his cards and there is no probable card that can beat it. It’s just bad sportsmanship.

His opponent bet enough chips on the flop to put him all-in, so there was no option for him to check behind, raise or re-raise the pot. His only options were to call or fold. Since his hand was a flush from the flop, he had the best possible hand and therefore had no decision to make except to call. I mean, why would you ever fold the best hand on the flop? But instead of snap-calling, he decided to pout around, and scratch his head, and act weak. All the grandstanding and Hollywooding is called slow-rolling. It is completely unnecessary, because he doesn't have to try and induce a raise or call from his opponent because all the possible chips that could be in the pot already are. It's pointless and wastes all the other player's time and given how long it takes to play multiple rounds of poker it is considered extremely disrespectful, rude and bad sportsmanship.