Тёмный

Top 7 Best Strategic Bombers in the World 

US Military News
Подписаться 1 млн
Просмотров 1,7 млн
50% 1

A strategic bomber is a medium- to long-range penetration bomber aircraft designed to drop large amounts of air-to-ground weaponry onto a distant target for the purposes of debilitating the enemy's capacity to wage war.
We lists some of the Top 7 Best Strategic Bombers in the World operational Today.
Other videos you might like:
The Biggest Aircraft Carriers ► • The World's Biggest Ai...
No One Wants to Fight the A-10 Warthog ► • Why No One Wants to Fi...
Javelin Anti-Tank Missile ► • How Powerful is Javeli...
🔔 SUBSCRIBE TO US ► ru-vid.com...
Thank You

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

8 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,5 тыс.   
@Paul.Douglas
@Paul.Douglas 2 года назад
The B-2 is not "primarily" operated by the US Air Force. It is operated ONLY by the US Air Force.
@nicholasmupchurch604
@nicholasmupchurch604 Год назад
No crap we all got that without that pointless input
@myparadiseing
@myparadiseing Год назад
@@nicholasmupchurch604 The U2 program was with the Air Force and then the CIA took it over for a while - or have you forgotten the "1960 U2 incident". So it's possible that any other organization of the U.S. security/defense apparatus can justify taking it under its wing (see what I did there?).
@kylietravers3466
@kylietravers3466 Год назад
No one NO ONE CAN BUY THE B-2 SPIRIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@TeezMalt
@TeezMalt Год назад
True
@kylietravers3466
@kylietravers3466 Год назад
@@TeezMalt every nation will get the b-2 but it’s 2.2 billion dollars well sadly the whole planet cannot buy the B-2 spirit
@honeybadgergaming4816
@honeybadgergaming4816 4 года назад
Everybody gangster till the sky start screamin
3 года назад
Don't run, you'll only die tired.
@bolu1563
@bolu1563 3 года назад
บํอว่าถีงได้กาพคุน
@ath_i
@ath_i 3 года назад
Brrrrrrt
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
Чё бро?!
@hukedonfonix1671
@hukedonfonix1671 2 года назад
70 B1B Lancers ready for action at any given time, that's awesome
@JK-zq9vw
@JK-zq9vw 2 года назад
Where did you find your research for this video and the B-1b Lancer? There’s a whole lot of details about this aircraft that are worth listing. I literally broke my back about 6 different times over 10 years working on them. I still get chills watching a low level, wings swept, very high rate of speed flyby! I miss my maintainer family a lot as well.
@johntomasik1555
@johntomasik1555 Год назад
I found it funny that they named a hanger at Edwards after Bennefield, who screwed up and killed his crew in testing of the B-1.
@ralphdavis9670
@ralphdavis9670 Год назад
@@johntomasik1555 Is that so?
@diantownsend3350
@diantownsend3350 4 года назад
Seeing the TU-160 last year in South Africa was incredible!
@pamcheney3239
@pamcheney3239 4 года назад
B1 ripoff. Its like they were all in bed together.
@thesim3164
@thesim3164 4 года назад
@@pamcheney3239 Lmao not even look same
@1dasergebnismussruckgangig196
@1dasergebnismussruckgangig196 3 года назад
@CAG Hotshot That is the reason for military espionage. Das ist der Sinn der Militärspionage.
@traveler9397
@traveler9397 3 года назад
@CAG Hotshot Funny thing is, you've done the same to the Germans in WWII, reverse-engineering u-boats. And did you forget the Russian yak-38 and yak-141. F-35's vtol design? LOL.
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
Seeing the Tu-160 flying to Venezuela two years ago in California was ... The spectators had to change diapers ...
@Arcsecant
@Arcsecant 4 года назад
You forgot Canada's Beaver class Cessna 303, two-man bombers with both smoke and frag hand-released grenade payload variants.
@stevenjohnson4283
@stevenjohnson4283 4 года назад
Aboot the best plane evr made aye!
@hqco3rdmedbattalionfmfpac953
@hqco3rdmedbattalionfmfpac953 4 года назад
Arcsecant good one years later 🇺🇸⚓️
@Retroscoop
@Retroscoop 4 года назад
It isn't strategic, and anyway, the Canadians are ruled out since their Avro-adventure. So are the norty British with their TSR 2.
@otyliciu
@otyliciu 4 года назад
@@Retroscoop what do any of those have to do with bombers?
@otyliciu
@otyliciu 4 года назад
The "Beaver," the single most iconic bush plane of all time, is an all-Canadian design built by de Havilland of Canada. As the old saying went, the Beaver was your "half ton truck with wings" and its larger cousin, the Otter, was your "one ton truck..." These aircraft have, for over six decades, been absolutely essential to the Canadian economy as the vast majority of Canada's uninhabited North is not accessible by road. On a side note, American actor Harrison Ford (of Han Solo fame) has one among his collection of aircraft and calls it his personal favorite... "the rugged spirit of the wilderness embodied in a thoroughbred Canadian design."
@phantomgaming4588
@phantomgaming4588 3 года назад
The list on the b1b lancer didn’t seem like it was going to end lol
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
b1b is going to end lol
@bronyguy6103
@bronyguy6103 4 года назад
Thank you for your service
@mrsmith3444
@mrsmith3444 3 года назад
Based on range and payload capacity you said ... Since they can refuel midair lets stick to what they can carry: 1 Tu-160 40000kg(about 88000lb) 2 B-1B 34000kg(about 75000lb) 3 B-52 31500kg(about 70000lb) 4 Tu22M 24000kg(about 53000lb) 5 B-2 18000kg(about 40000lb) 6 Tu-95 15000kg(about 33000lb) 7 H-6 10000kg(about 22000lb) but i guess that's why you're "US" military news...
@bootymane9907
@bootymane9907 3 года назад
B2 is undetectable by radar mostly unless its a very targetted search between multiple bands and the B1 Lancer has the speed and ability to quickly get in range and shoot long range cruise missiles and then exit the area its not always about oayload
@jontom71
@jontom71 3 года назад
B2 perfectly easy to track in damp/rainy weather
@EvgenyPaleev
@EvgenyPaleev 3 года назад
@@bootymane9907 Stealth only applies to American taxpayers. The Serbs shot down the invisible man with a household microwave and an old Soviet rocket... I shouldn't have destroyed your fantasies
@brizzled5193
@brizzled5193 3 года назад
Евгений Палеев pogs imagine losing a stealth bomber to a microwave
@traveler9397
@traveler9397 3 года назад
And the unit cost. Don't forget that one.
@samarmohan9891
@samarmohan9891 4 года назад
Your channel should be much more popular. It is very good.
@kgedeongedon5933
@kgedeongedon5933 4 года назад
b-3 ?
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
Of course! In Russia we like to see Bonhomme Richard fire... BlackLifeMatters riots in the democratiest country of the World... Please, continue... We are watching... And waiting... )))
@vesko65
@vesko65 2 года назад
Tu-160 is by far the best bomber today
@SNOWDONTRYFAN
@SNOWDONTRYFAN 4 года назад
The new The Northrop Grumman B-21 Raider will be a massive game changer which will pack the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb, the B-61-12 thermonuclear gravity bomb, and the Long Range Stand Off (LRSO) nuclear-capable cruise missile. Note It is only one part of a family of strike systems. The Air Force conceived Raider as one piece in an overarching architecture of systems designed to support long-range strike missions That “family” of systems (as the Air Force calls it) includes air frames, munitions, reconnaissance systems, electronic warfare platforms, and resilient communications channels. Some features of this architecture, such as the role played by reconnaissance satellites, are not publicly discussed. B-21 will have the functionality to tap into any feature of this architecture that is useful in accomplishing its strike missions.
@loftagqx
@loftagqx 2 года назад
May I ask? A year has passed, has there been any news about what you described in your comment? How are things going with the ultra-long-range. super heavy and hypersonic systems??? Still not???
@SNOWDONTRYFAN
@SNOWDONTRYFAN 2 года назад
@@loftagqx all I can gather from the countless new and exotic announcements coming out of Russia and China is that they appear to be talking big time up those weapons that you mention, the Americans and the rest are as per usual less talkative about the comings and goings of theirs !
@loftagqx
@loftagqx 2 года назад
@@SNOWDONTRYFAN on, hypersonic tests are carried out systematically, though all unsuccessful... well, for the rest, only money is knocked out in Congress... every year )
@cessna172pilot2
@cessna172pilot2 4 года назад
Hello from Russia, American friends🇷🇺🇺🇸
@alphaandomega1275
@alphaandomega1275 4 года назад
No, we are NOT friends with Russia !
@alphaandomega1275
@alphaandomega1275 4 года назад
@@otavioa7544 , Chill ? I am just telling it like it is. No sugar coating it.
@burneraccount1394
@burneraccount1394 4 года назад
ALPHA and OMEGA our governments might not like one another but as civilians there’s no point in hating each other
@cessna172pilot2
@cessna172pilot2 4 года назад
chanctonbury63 where is Boris? I don’t see him.🤷‍♂️
@vaclavkolar6750
@vaclavkolar6750 4 года назад
@A E Putin or Trump wheres the difference?
@chrisalan1187
@chrisalan1187 4 года назад
Very interesting
@ahmad000almahdi
@ahmad000almahdi 2 года назад
« إِنَّ اللَّهَ وَمَلَائِكَتَهُ يُصَلُّونَ عَلَى النَّبِيِّ ۚ يَا أَيُّهَا الَّذِينَ آمَنُوا صَلُّوا عَلَيْهِ وَسَلِّمُوا تَسْلِيمًا » 🥰
@steveshoemaker6347
@steveshoemaker6347 4 года назад
U got the right stuff....Thanks..!
@ghoz323
@ghoz323 4 года назад
At last for 17 years, I found Leaflet Drop icon from CC Zero Hour in a real photo 5:49
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
I have understood almost every word in the sentence (CC have excluded), but can't understand the sentence... Can you translate this to simple English with comments?
@Artem-go4ub
@Artem-go4ub 3 года назад
TU160 Number one! =)
@myusername3689
@myusername3689 3 года назад
Too bad ballistic missiles are replacing supersonic bombers :(
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
@@myusername3689 Tu-160 (White Swan, not blackjack) is the best strategic missile carrier. X-101 can fly 5500 km. Nuclear variant X-102 - more distance. We can do the Fallout game is real for you with Tu-160 from our territory. And White Swans are only one part of the Triad.
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
@@myusername3689 >Too bad ballistic missiles American missiles - yes, you right. Minuteman is bad, Tomahawk is worst. American industry is still in degradation. Russian RS-28 Sarmat with ordinary warhead penetrates (like a hot knife into butter) through your missile defense. Sarmat can carry hypersonic glider Avangard, as you know. The Burevestnik? The Poseidon? Don't be a menace to Russia while drinking your juice in the hood.
@myusername3689
@myusername3689 3 года назад
@@boogabootoo I never said russian missiles are bad I just said they’re replacing their bombers with missiles.
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
@@myusername3689 Bomber can be used to destroy ISIS, for example, without a strong air defense system. And only. Multilevel air defense system like in Russia makes them useless. S-500, 400, 350, 300, Buk, Tor, Pantzir, Tunguska... And we don't take into account fighters and interceptors.
@philchristmas4071
@philchristmas4071 Год назад
The Lancer is just nex level badassery!! 🇺🇸💪
@braddavis4276
@braddavis4276 Год назад
THE B-52 STRATA FORTRESS IS TRUELY AWESOME. LIKE A FINE BOTTLE OF WINE THE OLDER IT GETS THE BETTER IT FLY'S 🔥💥🎇🎆💯🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 !!!!
@lordisback1947
@lordisback1947 3 года назад
It's partiality I think the russian tu160 is the heaviest,fastest and most payload carrying bomber in the world and putting it on number 3 is not fair,this is a us sponsored channel, so guys those who need real comparison or top 10 videos check other channels who will show unbiased comparison.Thank you🙏🇮🇳
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
@Madulas pag Basa B1 or B2 can only deliver to papuas or beduins... S-300, S-350, S-400, S-500, Tor, Buk, Pantsir can stop all your fling irons... and F-22, F-35 too... ))) Envy & keep yelping "America Über Alles"!
@Jbolo123
@Jbolo123 3 года назад
boogabootoo none of that made sense lol
@lordisback1947
@lordisback1947 3 года назад
@@boogabootoo these russian defences are pretty much harder to penetrate as russia is good in making air defence systems in comparison to others.and when the s500 will be ready then nothing existing now the names you mentioned is useless and will be overwhelmed by s500😅
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
@@lordisback1947 Our air defence is multi-range. S-300,400,500 - protect long & average distance (S-500 even near orbits). S-350, Tor, Buk - average. Pantsir - near distance & it guards the S-... And all of them are working in a bundle, exchanging info about targets.
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
@@Jbolo123 None of you & your country made sense ))
@Dukky1968
@Dukky1968 3 года назад
Too bad the Vulcan is long retired. It belongs alongside these aircraft for its iconic design, its wartime service in the Falklands, and especially for the truly glorious howl of its Olympus turbojets at full throttle. The Bear may be louder, but the Vulcan is sweeter.
@Coxman
@Coxman 2 года назад
I stood at Biggin Hill with my lad a few years back. Saw a Vulcan flanked either side by 2 Typhoons. It was the loudest noise from engines I will ever hear in my life. The Phoons turned on after burners went vertically in the just as they were about to pass us. I'm telling you, the ground was shaking when the Vulcan flew slowly pass. Sweet is the correct way to describe it. Not sure the Vulcan can carry the latest weapons or if it could, carry then very far. Nice thought though. But the UK government believe that the sub is the best platform to launch our nuclear deferent so i can totally why the UK doesn't have strategic bomber of their own. Because we sure know that could build one just as good as the Americans.
@FunkMasterJunk
@FunkMasterJunk 3 года назад
I love the Paint Job on the Back Fire.
@davestravel8759
@davestravel8759 4 года назад
beautiful but dangerous birds..😯
@lol911000
@lol911000 4 года назад
9:25 that's really a mouthful
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
What does it mean? Can you comment?
@RH-ke3od
@RH-ke3od 4 года назад
Nice vid for newbies..tbh they are the top 7 because they are the only 7 in service
@donaldmurray978
@donaldmurray978 4 года назад
And your point is master?
@RH-ke3od
@RH-ke3od 4 года назад
@@donaldmurray978 exactly what I said above
@donaldmurray978
@donaldmurray978 4 года назад
Oh. Thank you master. We are all stupid and rely on you infinit wisdom oh master. What a tool
@RH-ke3od
@RH-ke3od 4 года назад
@@donaldmurray978 well you said it..not me, but some do have intimate first hand knowledge on this subject. These 7 airframes are the only "strategic" bombers still in service
@donaldmurray978
@donaldmurray978 4 года назад
@Matthew McPeek lies
@chaosleocait8604
@chaosleocait8604 3 года назад
I’ve seen the B-2 Twice, both times it was SO AWESOME. They flew right over my school
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
it's funny - you proud american technique from the previous century because in our century america can't build anything normally working... f-35 - typical example )))
@remcorbe5240
@remcorbe5240 3 года назад
U.S. nambawan
@randomdude7301
@randomdude7301 3 года назад
@@boogabootoo Then why are Russia and China trying to copy American stealth strategies with their failing SUck-57 and Junk-20?
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
@@randomdude7301 Stealth tech is an old Soviet Russian tech, published in last centure in free & open papers, like pop mech ))) Your Fuck-22 & Fuck-35 is only flying irons & can be detected with old Soviet radars. And i'm not talking about S-400 etc... ))) Suck off & envy...
@generichuman8224
@generichuman8224 3 года назад
@@randomdude7301 u do know america needed to buy yak38 tech to make the f35 XD yet again people another overly biased american and yes I am also fully american ACCEPT THE FACT THAT AMERICA ISNT ALWAYS THE BEST COME BACK WHEN UR NOT BIASED
@steven2212
@steven2212 4 года назад
Well done
@carlfromtheoc1788
@carlfromtheoc1788 3 года назад
The Tu-16/H-6, the Tu-95, and the B=52 are (give or take a bit) based on designs that are 65+ years old and all will be surviving another 20+ years I bet. Basically all USAF and Soviet/Russian gear - the Chines h-6 is a licensed produced copy. Nobody else has a need or ability to operate long range strategic bombers.
@badlandskid
@badlandskid 2 года назад
Makes you wonder if they are even relevant
@frankfan9127
@frankfan9127 Год назад
@@badlandskid they are still very useful since they can be used to launch hypersonic missiles. Smaller fighter craft doesn’t have that much space to host these missiles.
@badlandskid
@badlandskid Год назад
@@frankfan9127 good point
@BBCharger5spd
@BBCharger5spd 4 года назад
Not sure if you implied to the contrary - but you listed the B-1B as being able to carry B61/83 bombs - which yes it can physically carry - but the B-1B is not longer a nuclear capable bomber as it has been converted to conventional bombing duties only. Loved the video!
@dianapennepacker6854
@dianapennepacker6854 2 года назад
This is old. Are they still going to make it a missile truck? (Working with platforms like F-35 and such) Or is the B1B dead
@mihalis1010
@mihalis1010 2 года назад
What's the difference between nuclear capable and not? I assumed that a bomb as a bomb, and as long as the weight could be carried, any plane could drop a nuclear bomb.
@BBCharger5spd
@BBCharger5spd 2 года назад
@@mihalis1010 Nuclear Capable I believe incorporates specific shielding and coatings to deal with radiation. The USAF only has a few airframes that care designated as "Nuclear Capable" which include the B-2 Spirit, B-52 Stratofortress, and I believe the F-16. This may not be an exhaustive list (as I am not a USAF airframe expert or maintainer) but I do know the B-1Bs lost their Nuclear Capable designation during some refitting years ago and their emphasis is now on conventional armaments.
@friendsofdickjones6266
@friendsofdickjones6266 2 года назад
@@BBCharger5spd American nuclear Shields comes built into tthe bomb not the aircraft.
@Jabba.Da.Hutt_
@Jabba.Da.Hutt_ 2 года назад
@@BBCharger5spd what are you talking about, the B-1B-D&E Models are “nuclear” capable. The B-52, B-1B and B-2 “bomber wise” are all “nuclear” capable. Idk where you’re getting that the B-1 isn’t but it is, and you can’t say the B-1 isn’t coated with “nuclear shielding” means it’s not capable, who knows maybe the B-1 is coated with a protection layer and the USAF hasn’t mentioned it or maybe the bombs/missiles are… who knows.
@markussnyman8695
@markussnyman8695 4 года назад
The tips of the propellers isn't what makes the Tu-95 so loud, Its because of the friction created by the counter rotation!
@kbk75yt
@kbk75yt 2 года назад
That Bone doing a roll…gets me every time! 8:05 🤙🏼
@Remi-eh5bz
@Remi-eh5bz 4 года назад
Tu-160 is something totally different
@GlobalRage
@GlobalRage 4 года назад
Junk?
@lightningbolt5431
@lightningbolt5431 4 года назад
@@GlobalRage B-1B?
@GlobalRage
@GlobalRage 3 года назад
@@lightningbolt5431 How many sorties has the B-1 flown? and then how many has the Russian? lol at ya bro! 600 mph 100 feet off the ground you hear it after it goes over your head...seriously you are clueless.
@lightningbolt5431
@lightningbolt5431 3 года назад
@@GlobalRage How many against organized army? Oh yeah some deseart niggas in XL size flipflop. Send that against a country which actually have an army. Even ground force will shot it down. I never heard it or never will because it will eat dirt before it come any closer to my country.
@boggyeman659
@boggyeman659 3 года назад
@@lightningbolt5431 you are a paper tiger barks and don't bite,and too much propaganda about your junk tech
@josealfredogonzalez2023
@josealfredogonzalez2023 4 года назад
The Tu 160 it's better than B1
@mcblaze1968
@mcblaze1968 4 месяца назад
B-21 going into production says hi from the future.
@ruhulaminofficials702
@ruhulaminofficials702 4 года назад
Thanks
@danieldreher6780
@danieldreher6780 4 года назад
Loud and Proud the Tupolev Bear is to be respected for the load it carries!
@markr3673
@markr3673 2 года назад
Oh yeah the plane can be heard by submarines!! That’s why any Russian bomber is a piece of $@%}!!!
@well-blazeredman6187
@well-blazeredman6187 4 года назад
Yes - the B1's potential weapon loads will be in the test next week.
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
What is the load - again bricks? )))
@aircraftengr5763
@aircraftengr5763 2 года назад
I love the b52 sooooo much
@marleyboy7732
@marleyboy7732 2 года назад
I'd be like a child during Christmas if I was the pilot for the Lancer. And heard that list of ordinance. That was so cool.
@shubhamgautam710
@shubhamgautam710 4 года назад
India never operated TU 22M. However Indian navy had used TU 92(now retired).
@vinodkaka5225
@vinodkaka5225 4 года назад
You are absolutely right but still it is confusing to mention here that not only this channel but several others YT channels from time to time have reported about India operating Tu22M3 Bombers with its operational bases operating from car nicobar airbase/ Landfall Naval airbase in Great nicobar island 😅😄😃😃😅
@ScotlandProfessional
@ScotlandProfessional 4 года назад
Did you know that the Tupolev Tu-95 Bear was the plane that dropped the Tsar Bomba?
@thegruffalo5383
@thegruffalo5383 4 года назад
Bobby Liberator464 that grants it ultimate bomber rank
@jaf8016
@jaf8016 4 года назад
@TheOGGamer0428 Xbox-Minecraft yes but actually no, thanks to the data of Tsar Bomb the Russians have managed to build a nuclear torpedo with a power of 100 megatons called poseidon.
@jaf8016
@jaf8016 4 года назад
@TheOGGamer0428 Xbox-Minecraft yes. But that weapon is for ultimate defense. If you want peace prepare the war
@marcelosmarquesdepaula5898
@marcelosmarquesdepaula5898 4 года назад
@TheOGGamer0428 Xbox-Minecraft Really....!!!!!!!!
@coastalcapybara
@coastalcapybara 4 года назад
@TheOGGamer0428 Xbox-Minecraft It was a scientific project, no one would want to drop the Tsar' Bomba on civilians.
@stefansasu3763
@stefansasu3763 4 года назад
Nice
@MeMyselfI_69
@MeMyselfI_69 3 года назад
Good lord the B1B payload capability 08:34. That was one long list.
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
You can use b1b to transportation of bananas... There is no any useful war tasks for this flying iron...
@aaronpingol1566
@aaronpingol1566 2 года назад
the best bombers are b52 and tu95 they tried to replace it many times but they outlived them and still strong
@ferdypl322
@ferdypl322 2 года назад
The vulcan was better than the b52
@Hattonbank
@Hattonbank 2 года назад
Are you kuddin’?
@ferdypl322
@ferdypl322 2 года назад
@@Hattonbank look up operation sky shield
@Hattonbank
@Hattonbank 2 года назад
@@ferdypl322 I know about that, but the Vulcan was withdrawn 40 years ago. I could argue that the Victor was better, or the B-58 or Nirage IV both in different ways. I loved the Vulcan but it could not really be compared some of those on the list.
@ieiomon4401
@ieiomon4401 3 года назад
Tu-160 and Tu-22m3 are the best, because they are now able to carry hypersonic weapons.
@MrTunaChaser
@MrTunaChaser 2 года назад
First you have to have a hyper sonic weapon that works. So far, you ain’t got it.
@ieiomon4401
@ieiomon4401 2 года назад
@@MrTunaChaser kinzhal works. And as of now, so does the zirkon. Have a nice day.
@BannedByMe
@BannedByMe 9 месяцев назад
@@MrTunaChaser 2 years later we can now confirm you were wrong.
@cliffordwilliams6805
@cliffordwilliams6805 4 года назад
Gotta try that
@jebediahgentry7029
@jebediahgentry7029 3 года назад
Watching a B1 do a barrel role is freaking amazing
@TripleAce1
@TripleAce1 3 года назад
It was a Roll not a barrel roll.
@jebediahgentry7029
@jebediahgentry7029 3 года назад
@@TripleAce1 as long as it's King's Hawaiian I won't argue over terminology.
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
What is the containment of the barrel - is it was a salt cucumbers?
@samarmohan9891
@samarmohan9891 4 года назад
Wow, all three of our bombers are on this list! LETS GO USA
@thesirmaddog8209
@thesirmaddog8209 4 года назад
lol... That is ALL the bombers of the World
@Predator42ID
@Predator42ID 4 года назад
@@thesirmaddog8209 Which is both hilarious and sad.
@thesirmaddog8209
@thesirmaddog8209 4 года назад
@@Predator42ID Actually its good cause its less tension than if more countries had them
@thesirmaddog8209
@thesirmaddog8209 4 года назад
@@mlodyczaja LOL... Name them... I know I keep up with Aircraft... Only 3 countries have them China has one and Russia has 3 and U.S. has 3 for now, the U.S. soon will be down to only 2 types
@thesirmaddog8209
@thesirmaddog8209 4 года назад
@@mlodyczaja ??? They just listed 7 ReWatch
@Chris_In_Texas
@Chris_In_Texas 4 года назад
6:55 Love the fog lights.... 😎
@timf6916
@timf6916 4 года назад
Cool
@kevinluschak5241
@kevinluschak5241 2 года назад
These birds are pretty amazing! Seems they are used alot during war.
@deadliftalot
@deadliftalot 4 года назад
I have not watched it yet but number 1 is probably the b2 stealth bomber
@alexzasokhashvili3412
@alexzasokhashvili3412 3 года назад
and thats a joke, b2 is designed for hollywood, not for war
@rishikeshpatil9442
@rishikeshpatil9442 4 года назад
The Tu-22M3 was never operated in India as claimed at 04:07. The Tu-142M were operated by the Indian Navy for maritime reconnaissance and ASW, which are replaced by Boeing P-8I Neptune. Any of the Indian Armed Forces never had Tu-22M3.
@vlis1926
@vlis1926 3 года назад
В общем: джибию джибифайф, фон джибию.
@kenchow6741
@kenchow6741 4 года назад
Love our military, the best in the world.
@arthas640
@arthas640 4 года назад
It's kind of crazy but a single US super carrier has a larger "air force" on board than 70% of the worlds militaries, often a single super carrier is enough to establish air superiority in most areas. Also, the worlds largest air force is the US Air Force, with #2 being... the US Navy and the US army still appears in the top 10 depending on how you count them. The Army though doesnt have that sophisticated of an air force, they mostly have older air craft and drones, but the US Air Force and Navy both have top tier quality air craft.
@a.p.mexico1071
@a.p.mexico1071 4 года назад
@@arthas640 It's kind of crazy that one single russian supersonic missile launched from a submarine, a navy ship, a plane or a truck 5.000 miles away, travelling 20 times the sound speed can disappear a US Aircraft Carrier in the middle of the ocean.
@JoshuaNJones
@JoshuaNJones 4 года назад
I'm pretty he ment to say that the B-2 spirit is operated Solely by the U.S. Airforce instead of primarily.
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
You must send them all to Russia, Russian S-300/400/500 needs some targets for praxis ... )))
@KPearce57
@KPearce57 4 года назад
1991 in the sand box we could see the B-52s headed East about an hour later they were on the way back to Diago Garcia.
@ssnfocko5309
@ssnfocko5309 4 года назад
I was first armored 19k thank you for your service as well
@IskanderYari
@IskanderYari 4 года назад
The black Jack is such a beautiful plane
@dangertrebor
@dangertrebor 2 года назад
Copy of the B1, same as the Soviets copied a stolen B29.
@sapphire0906
@sapphire0906 2 года назад
f35 is a copy of yak 141
@zabaleta66
@zabaleta66 4 года назад
B-52 and the Bear are the real champions..... decades of service and decades more to come.
@otyliciu
@otyliciu 4 года назад
They both outlived multiple plans to replace them (the other surviving bombers on the list weren't specifically planned as replacements).
@user-sq7of4te2c
@user-sq7of4te2c 4 года назад
сам себя не похвалишь-никто не похвалит
@voodooo3971
@voodooo3971 4 года назад
da eto tochna
@enevvv
@enevvv 4 года назад
Все очень правильно расставлено. Я бы еще на третье место B-52 поставил. Твой путин за все время ни одного стратегического бомбардировщика не построил... То, что представлено - это старая советская техника. Китайская копия Ту-16 и то посовременнее будет.
@ThatCarGuy
@ThatCarGuy 4 года назад
Love the B2. One of the craziest planes to ever be designed and flat out the best bomber ever designed.
@jsmariani4180
@jsmariani4180 4 года назад
It needs a computer to compensate for flight instabilities, is subsonic and outrageously expensive. The TU 160 carries a bigger bomb load and has a longer range, not to mention supersonic capabilities. If it wasn't for it's stealth, the B2 would be near the bottom of the pack.
@ThatCarGuy
@ThatCarGuy 4 года назад
@@jsmariani4180 LOL blocked, enjoy trolling elsewhere. Trying to compare the TU160 to the B2 and actually thinking the TU160 is better. The B1B lancer, carries a larger payload by over 20,000 pounds, has similar speed(Being the B1A model is even faster then the TU160, and they didn't mass produce it, why? Speed ruins stealth and gives a higher RCS) and it's nowhere near as good as the B2, but by your logic the B1B must be the best bomber ever since it carries a larger payload then the TU160 and has similar speed. Trolls kill me. Enjoy trolling others.
@user-xj9lp3fs7m
@user-xj9lp3fs7m 4 года назад
@@ThatCarGuy well have the trolls claiming that the f 35 is way better than the su 57 kill u?
@1dasergebnismussruckgangig196
@1dasergebnismussruckgangig196 4 года назад
​@@jsmariani4180 That is correct and, moreover, the B-2 has never competed against an equal opponent, a real air defense. His "enemies" were always hopelessly inferior "enemies", as if an adult man were taking away the toys from the little boys in the playground. Das ist korrekt und dazu kommt noch dass der B-2 noch nie gegen einen ebenbürtigen Gegner, eine richtige Luftabwehr, angetreten ist . Seine "Feinde" waren immer hoffnungslos unterlegene "Feinde", etwa so als würde ein erwachsener Mann den kleinen Jungs, auf dem Spielplatz, die Spielsachen wegnehmen.
@alex-lm9wy
@alex-lm9wy 9 месяцев назад
@@jsmariani4180 yes, but is stealth, so is first
@user-ek8mz7qh7h
@user-ek8mz7qh7h 4 года назад
Nice video . 😎
@shprotos4724
@shprotos4724 3 года назад
- list of best with range and load capacity - B-2 №1 pick one
@chr0min0id
@chr0min0id 3 года назад
Other bombers: “Noooo! You can’t just pull off maneuvers that only a fighter can do!” The Bone: *Haha do a barrel roll!* 8:09
@pixynowwithevenmorebelkanb6965
@pixynowwithevenmorebelkanb6965 3 года назад
I T C A N O V E R C O M E S O F I S T I C A T E D A A B Y R O L L I N G L M A O
@majed8192
@majed8192 2 года назад
Not sure how that roll would be useful against a jet fighter, even the best bombers don't stand a chance, their safety is in far distances or being accompanied by other allied jet fighters
@johnlewis8891
@johnlewis8891 2 года назад
Never liked Tu-95 before but it just looks so cool in the 21st century!
@waltersmilitaryclips1968
@waltersmilitaryclips1968 3 года назад
B1b still my favourite
@abolama8664
@abolama8664 2 года назад
B52 is magnificent. But costly compared to bear.
@serghw
@serghw 3 года назад
I'm sure you know, but for "some reason" forgot it... TU-160 should be on first place)
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
Ту-160 не какой-то там бомбардировщик, Ту-160 - ракетоносец... Этим всё сказано... )))
@serghw
@serghw 3 года назад
@@boogabootoo, и не просто ракетоносец, а стратегический этить-колотить)
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
@@serghw Прости, слово "стратегический" забыл упомянуть... ))) Но для них всё-равно B-1B - лучший! И Патриоты их самые лучшие! И даже летающие индейские топоры - Томогавки, - тоже! )))
@serghw
@serghw 3 года назад
@@boogabootoo, как говорится, Задорнов был прав!
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
@@serghw В эпоху толерантности - ну альтернативно одарённые! )))
@Grasiesyy
@Grasiesyy 3 года назад
Ту 160 превосходит б2 в разы
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
Читаю - превосходит 62 в разы... Не втыкаю... потом догадываюсь, что "б" - это не цифра "6"... Ставлю лайк... )))
@Grasiesyy
@Grasiesyy 3 года назад
@@boogabootoo хахаха 😹
@kevinluschak5241
@kevinluschak5241 2 года назад
I love the F117 Stealth!
@grovsey3656
@grovsey3656 2 года назад
Vulcan is the coolest of all time.
@stevecherk1022
@stevecherk1022 4 года назад
Tu160 surpasses all these bombers in most indicators. Speed, maximum altitude, combat load, range. B2 spirit can not develop even half the speed of the Tu160 and carries a load almost half as much. Yes, it is theoretically inconspicuous, but only theoretically. A serious air defense system it will not pass, it will be perfectly seen and destroyed. At the same time, the Tu160 may not enter the air defense zone at all. The Use of X101 cruise missiles with a range of up to 5500 kilometers allows you to solve a wide range of tasks at a safe distance without using any stealth. Although these missiles are of course much more expensive than conventional bombs.
@danielbeaudin7888
@danielbeaudin7888 2 года назад
but b-2 invisible
@wanderer2542
@wanderer2542 2 года назад
@@danielbeaudin7888 invisible😂😂😂
@loftagqx
@loftagqx 2 года назад
@@danielbeaudin7888 The F-117 was also completely invisible, but in 1999 it was shot down by a missile created in the USSR in the 60s of the last century - the SA-3 Goa. The Su-35 in Syria easily detected and filmed the invisible F-22. Do you believe the propagandists from the Pentagon telling fairy tales to increase the budget?
@vantrinhnguyen987
@vantrinhnguyen987 2 года назад
B-52 is powerful bomber - Vietnamese are the only ones could shot down these superfortress , about 35 of them. Now you can see B-52 wrack in Huu Tiep lake, Hanoi.
@johnhudson8950
@johnhudson8950 3 года назад
The B52 is a BADASS!!
@allgood6760
@allgood6760 2 года назад
Cool planes 👍
@chrispaw1
@chrispaw1 4 года назад
Giving some info in miles and some in KM’s in confusing, it would be great if you could harmonise the facts
@VL071071VL
@VL071071VL 4 года назад
Самое смешное,то что ТУ - 95 и Ту - 160 стреляют ракетами дальность которых 3000 км! Им не нужно куда то лететь,им нужно подняться в воздух!!!!!))
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
Ну вообще-то, Х-101 - неядерный вариант, летит на 5500 км, а ядерный - Х-102, еще дальше... Пущщай супостат трепещет... )))
@texanpride2007
@texanpride2007 3 года назад
TEAR DOWN THIS WALL!
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
@@texanpride2007 What does it mean? Типа - о чём ты, чувачок?
@user-kk7wu1lc3w
@user-kk7wu1lc3w 3 года назад
И быть унечтоженными системами пво или перехватчиками.👍
@NickNZ
@NickNZ 4 года назад
Big targets!
@shaints3
@shaints3 4 года назад
hey nick they can and will defend themselves ! enmey can launch we send back 30 of the deadly air weapons !
@coreydavis3810
@coreydavis3810 3 года назад
The B-2 sprit bomber is my favorite bomber
@cameronc1509
@cameronc1509 4 года назад
Why does it feel like the USAF has been the Russia’s R&D department for the last half century?
@otyliciu
@otyliciu 4 года назад
@@mburnhors Why does their "copy" fly nearly twice as fast as our "original" then? Reality is that the laws of math and physics are universal and different nations, building aircraft to meet similar strategic requirements, are likely to produce similar solutions (1+1=2 is true everywhere, not just in 'Murica).
@otyliciu
@otyliciu 3 года назад
@CAG Hotshot The Tu-22, from which the Tu-22M was directly derived, first flew twelve years earlier than the B-1A. Neither the variable geometry wing nor new power plant, the most notable changes in the Tu-22M, were American inventions. Sometimes, it is better to base arguments on what actually happened (any professional discipline will demand it) than on what you would simply prefer to imagine.
@lbh2776
@lbh2776 3 года назад
A single Tu-160 with 12,300 km (7,600 mi, 6,600 nmi) practical range without in-flight refuelling, carry 12 kh 101/102 nuke payload range 4500-5500km.. Who need stealth when you can launched standoff missile from great great distance and return to base safely.. Think smart.
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
Они до сих пор считают важным незаметно проникнуть на территорию противника! Хотя их прекрасно видно - у нас многодиапазонные радары. Но эту идею "Amerika über alles" - можно вышибить только Русским Ядерным Молотом Правосудия и Возмездия! Он бьёт только раз - но навсегда!
@lbh2776
@lbh2776 3 года назад
@Massimo Hack What range B2 standoff missile ? How many weapons load B2 can carry ? Before you talk nonsense..please check info about Tu160 and Kh101/Kh102.. Why this aircraft being no1 for weapon load and speed for bomber, jamming and range with minimal support. About the missile this aircraft carry, check how far this missile can go, weight of the warhead and if this is missile Kh family are STEALTH ? After that you can comment..
@calvinmchopa2222
@calvinmchopa2222 4 года назад
Nafikiri ubora na kutoonekana kwa ndege husika kumezingatiwa. Tanzania
@reggiecactus2810
@reggiecactus2810 4 года назад
No government in either Russia or America is good, but you shouldn’t hate the civilians in either country. Hello from Australia
@Gamerboy-gy1rl
@Gamerboy-gy1rl 4 года назад
*AMERICA🇺🇲🇺🇲💪 RUSSIA!!🇷🇺🇷🇺💪*
@subscribeforgoodluck1806
@subscribeforgoodluck1806 4 года назад
America🇺🇸💪 Russia🤏👎!
@pjdu5yifutd
@pjdu5yifutd 4 года назад
@@subscribeforgoodluck1806 lol rager just fuck you.
@pjdu5yifutd
@pjdu5yifutd 4 года назад
@@subscribeforgoodluck1806 poor kid return to COD
@santibaston3167
@santibaston3167 4 года назад
the b1's weapons... holy! can you repeat that lmao
@milokhanh313
@milokhanh313 3 года назад
TU 160 has deadly red carrots :V
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
@@milokhanh313 Ты про ядерные смертоносные морковки? )))
@abolama8664
@abolama8664 2 года назад
Bear is contiguous especially if it is occupied with turbo fan.
@haraldschurr1035
@haraldschurr1035 3 года назад
hey - you are unmistakably the speaker of WATOP too !!!
@chanakyareborn
@chanakyareborn 4 года назад
No offense, but I guess, the Vulcan did deserve a place in here. Even if you had to make a list of Top 8!
@harryvellenoweth7110
@harryvellenoweth7110 4 года назад
I know
@gavcom4060
@gavcom4060 4 года назад
Amit Sharma the Vulcan ain’t in operation today
@harryvellenoweth7110
@harryvellenoweth7110 4 года назад
Yeah it’s my fav plane
@zabaleta66
@zabaleta66 4 года назад
No longer in operation.
@Retroscoop
@Retroscoop 4 года назад
If you see what a complicated effort it took to drop a few bombs on the Falklands, I'm not even sure it can be called "strategic".... But I saw it flying above the house I was born in, and on the Belgian Air Force Base of Kleine Brogel, it looked impressive indeed, although I prefered the early white version compared to the camouflage outfit. And I'm sure if you would have added the Vulcan, the French would object their Mirage IV is not in the list etc.
@user-dp1ju8wo1x
@user-dp1ju8wo1x 3 года назад
С ТУ 160 вся эта хрень рядом не стояла!
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
С их воспалённым самомнением - они пупы Земли... ))) Но ничё, мы тут партизаним, разадём люлей... Присоединяйся! )))
@alexbienymal9666
@alexbienymal9666 3 года назад
Porque no mencionan el armamento completo y variado que puede transportar el tupolev 160?
@teddy.d174
@teddy.d174 4 года назад
Ask Howard Hughes how he feels about counter-rotating propellers.
@ericlegard6005
@ericlegard6005 4 года назад
They need to base these rankings, on which one has whooped the most ass over the years. That would be the B-52 by a mile.
@Acheiropoietos
@Acheiropoietos 4 года назад
The Bone does it with more style, and speed.
@otyliciu
@otyliciu 4 года назад
...also suffered the most combat losses.
@medic6039
@medic6039 4 года назад
13o0tylici0u5 because it saw the most combat...
@otyliciu
@otyliciu 4 года назад
@@medic6039 Seeing more combat doesn't make an aircraft design any better ... seeing more combat or less is purely the result of politics. If the U.S. had turned isolationist following 'nam and never sold the F-15 to Israel or deployed its own to the gulf, would the F-15 be a worse 'aircraft' simply because it hadn't seen action?
@bildo85
@bildo85 4 года назад
@@otyliciu you dodged the point of the comment the B52 has by far seen the most combat there would most likely see more losses in combat. It had nothing to do with it being the best bomber.
@horselips
@horselips 4 года назад
My favorite bomber is still the Bear. It's the Chuck Norris of airplanes.
@otyliciu
@otyliciu 4 года назад
It was a remarkable solution, using technologies at hand, to a strategic need many thought beyond Soviet technologies of the time.
@otyliciu
@otyliciu 4 года назад
@Archangel Migel For a jet, however, the B-52 isn't as exceptional as the Tu-95 is for a turbo prop (literally the fastest non-jet aircraft ever made).
@otyliciu
@otyliciu 4 года назад
@Archangel Migel As they first flew during exactly the same year, it is rather hard to call one an "imitation" of the other. As per which has destroyed more targets, that is a result of foreign policy as much as it is of the aircraft. Russia simply has not embarked on many foreign wars where they felt compelled to actually use their strategic bomber force. The cruise missile capability is one the Bear also has. Most effective strategic bomber of all time? So, in your view, the B-52 has performed a greater role in the U.S. military than the B-17, B-24, B-29 etc.? That makes sense.
@shahnawazmughal6608
@shahnawazmughal6608 4 года назад
B2 my favourite. Northtrop
@boogabootoo
@boogabootoo 3 года назад
Northtrop flying iron... The best flying iron in the world! )))
@hadoan1752
@hadoan1752 4 года назад
I like the weapon US, compact, perfect..
@user-vu9dr9vv3i
@user-vu9dr9vv3i 4 года назад
B-1, B-2, B-52 неплохие самолеты, но их время практически истекло.
@Silicified_0
@Silicified_0 3 года назад
Тогда и время ту-22м3, ту-95, ту-160 тем более
@sandeeprai450
@sandeeprai450 4 года назад
B-1B is not a supersonic bomber it is subsonic
@shaints3
@shaints3 4 года назад
right but the b1 is supersonic ! b1b is different airframe !
@sugardaddy62
@sugardaddy62 4 года назад
Sandeep, you are wrong. The B-1 is a mach 1 bomber which makes it supersonic.
@jeanjacquesmbuyi3763
@jeanjacquesmbuyi3763 4 года назад
Content de suivre les découvertes récente et anciennes
@johnhudson8950
@johnhudson8950 3 года назад
The B2 is the baddest ass of all the badass bombers.
Далее
Top 5 Fifth Generation Stealth Fighters on the Planet
10:08
Why This Obsolete Bomber Will Outlive EVERYTHING
18:16
The 10 Advanced Weapons of USA that Will Enter Service
12:47
I Visited the Most Overpowered US Navy Warship
16:34
Просмотров 304 тыс.
The Insane Engineering of the A-10 Warthog
16:27
Просмотров 18 млн
Top 10 Best Fighter Jets in the World 2024
12:25
Просмотров 1,1 млн
Неразбиваемый экран!
0:23
Просмотров 43 тыс.
don't throw your faulty fan
0:24
Просмотров 1,2 млн