Total War: Attila - Sassanid Empire Campaign #1 

Every loser loves Sassanian empire.

@@tasinal-hassan8268 Nah. You must haven't read a lot. They're awesome, a worthy imperium to rival Rome, and it has quite an array of badass and intimidating enemies to face off, ranging from Rome to Indian kingdoms, from White Huns to various steppe hordes, numerous rival Parthian clans within their own imperial hierarchy, all the way to their final, most worthy challenger; the Rashidun Caliphate. Every man that admires stalwart determination and an astute intellect to survive against such adversaries loves the Sassanid Empire. They lost in the end, weakened and destitue, but they lost against a powerful, competent enemy that rivals their own will and ambition, if not exceed it entirely. That's grand enough for me. Plus, the last of their surviving royal family fled to the Tang Empire and continued the struggle to reclaim their empire for a long time (watch the Kings and Generals vid on the topic), so if that ain't badass and determined, then you must got a pretty narrow view on what constitutes those two virtues. So yeah, think first before typing nonsense.

Kamsahamnida 🇮🇷❤️️🇰🇷

@Amirhossien Kouhestani am Greek we respected you in the past as rival and now respect you as friends

@@tasinal-hassan8268 Every loser lover loves the enemy of Sassanid empire like Valerian

Yeah the only thing i dont like are the factions, most of them have boring units and sassanids are too big, romans are too irritating to play and the huns are boring because you canr settle

@@polatyilmaz3547 yea that's why I play age of charlemagne and mods based around it. If you want to enjoy Grand Campaign in attila play Himyar Desert People. It's not boring, variety of units....oh and you don't have to deal with the huns

@@starwars910 what age of charlemagne mods did you play with

​@@polatyilmaz3547 At least Hun play differently

It's Persia 🇮🇷

to me it sounds something similar to like PHAERJHA

So they sacked the capital then, but never permenantly settled there. I agree that it's a very strange phrasing (what is the definition of "eastern lands" here? Judea and Syria not eastern enough?) but I kinda see what they're getting at.

I think this is supposed to be biased and basically propaganda, i.e. "they might have taken some of our lands, but they never TRULY conquered it, and had to give it up again soon[TM] after."

Zakback First define conquer. I define conquer as annexing a region and settling it and influencing it for many years, more like 100s. Invading a region and holding it a couple of months is not conquering it. Rome conquered Levant and Egypt but not Mesopotamia.

that was against the parthian not the sassanide

Stellar_Fungk so Napoleone didn't conquer all of Europe? What did he do then? Your definition is stupid.

Isaiah Reitan 'fishing with a golden hook'

The eight military interventions of the U. S. have a purpose, make corporations more fifthly rich that they already are, not matter the human and the economic cost, the U. S. is making a classical Roman Empire mistake, fighting expensive wars in multiple fronts, that become completely pointless, but they don't care, they can burn the whole country to the ground, destroy their own economy, and they still they wont even care.

"When a youtuber with under 100k subs is a better military strategist than the entire US government." I love that naive statements like these get upvoted by brainlets that think they 100% know how the world works and think they are smarter than experts.

Yeah, because nothing better than corporations gaining billions and screwing you over.

Yeah "muh evil companies" literally the basis for every conspiracy theory. How about you provide some evidence for your claims? And how is "gaining billions" wrong in any way? Big companies provide a lot of jobs and yes they make a lot of money what's wrong with that? Don't answer with "it's common knowledge", no not all companies are evil even if this would make the world so easy for you to understand. It's a unjustified simplification and really dumb assumption as well. But I guess it's cool to hate on everyone who makes money in your early 20s but you will grow up some day trust me:) ps: Not american before you even go that route.

/s

hardest faction to fight as as slavs probably, in year 455 rn amd my war with them still continues. had 4600 vs 3900 siege battle against them and they won against me becouse they had too much horse archers, they defeated me like how Crassus was defeated at Carrhae

Holy fuck, you really did things different!?!? You mean we're not all exactly alike?

I bet lots of people play like he plays , i dont , i respect his playstile , and i respect all the things that he did on total war but i have my playstile.

You'reThatMantis must be that Australian heat going to his head

He should play as kush

Why doesn't He like it?

WE

​@@FilipMoncriefyeah bruh why doesnt he like it, its like most challenging total war and i played all historical ones other than medieval 1 shogun 1 and those new ones

Iceheart he dislikes it compared to the older TWs

He likes it a hell of a lot more than Attila and yet look, here's an Attila campaign.

He will do a playthrough since he gathered the 300 $ through subs and donations in twitch.. Should be coming out soon

Nice, wonder which faction?

I never cared about penalties, I always base the building construction of what units it would give me, how much public order I would get, and how many provisions. Specially provisions, if you pay attention to that you would get a famine, and famine are a pain in the ass.

a bit of a necropost but, theyre much better off dead and their territories integrated inside his borders, imo vassals are nothing more than backstabbing deadweight

Jesus fuck, please don't do a this is total war. I love Rome 2 and all but that'd be just painful to watch.

viewable on resolution of your choice?

Egypt in the crusades dlc for medieval 2 is extremely ez too

He said in the stream that he'll do the odd campaign.

loso loaded uncivilized people razing all the land

green mushroom they are Persian not arbs

He has none.

Yes! Sasanids empire and parthian empire and achaemenid empire are all iranian👍but from differrent families for example achaemenid and sassanid empires are from persian group(people) and ashkanian empire (parthian empire) is from parthian group. All 2 of them are from aryan nation

@@machoman3058 but after the dead of Alexander n during Rome era like Julius Ceasar.. How come it takes to for the Empire to restore.. Like just maintaining Persia Empire instead of Sasanid Empire.

@@machoman3058 parthians were Persians too though. They claimed ancestry from the achaemenids and cyrus the great.

No this is the base game. Last Roman does not have Sassanids

Just gifted 150k to the sas empire to try and butter them up to a military alliance as I own pretty much half the map and they are the other half. No dice, 341 points positive attitude, it doesn't matter, they won't ally :/

@@TinyTalesBookClub Are you considered unreliable or untrustworthy? Break enough treaties and declare enough wars too early and no one will ally you, no matter their opinion.

Steadfast, never break treaties and only go to war when others declare it on me or my allies ask me to (so i don't break my alliances)

The prophet Of the pasta gods. I wonder if khorps is still hunting you

Joe Winter actually he never hunted me

maybe cause he doesnt like Attila

ProCOMMANDO38 he says it’s one of his least favourites

coul someone please elaborate for your komrade?

Gentleman Jake the Sassanids/Persians are not Muslims (that’s hundreds of years later) and they are not arabs

32 gigs well, there in Syria so they gotta be Sunnis!!!! JK dude, I know that there not actually Muslim it’s just that I was attempting (foolishly I might add) to be funny.

IT would be very exciting if he did this is total war challenge with the sassanids.

Sure would! Just as exciting as if I poured gasoline on myself and struck a match. Fuckin idiot.

Hey, for some people it is through pain that they find enjoyment.

yet still better than rome 2

Attilla is easily the best since Medieval 2

attila is possibly the worst total war ever made, and the sales and the player numbers back this up

Rome 2 is a hell of a lot better than Attila. It was hot garbage at the beginning but all the updates did wonders for the game. Attila is still a steaming pile of shit sandwich.

The worst total war games are both Warhammer that is the biggest mistake and killed the Total War series