What a MESS 

You can break free turn 2 by migrating.

Event chain of Sassanids being mean to you can lead to guilt-free liberation war.

Raiding doesn't give you any unreliability, just raid your own liege and annoy them enough to make them declare on you instead 🤣

That one was so enjoyable as an spectator. A breath of fresh air from the classic somewhat cheesy "aganist the odds" battles we usually see from Legend. Quick and so intense.

You def arent the only one. Some times these battles just get out of hand . Lines break you get surrounded and theres just a blob of carnage before you know it

Not enough hills and Armstrong Guns. 😅

I never have battles that don't look like a complete mess

Who cares if you are unhappy? Then dont watch the video its that simple

Wtf did you do with your country man? Its totally chaotic man

From my personal experience Lakhmids are extremely boring and easy campaign. Plus iirc there is an event chain that keeps lowering either your PO or relations with Sassanids, if you keep pissing them off they will attack you themselves (no reputation malus).

With lakhmids try to get semitic paganism ( Best eastern religion since minor setrlemens give food) and play around defense, conquer arabia egypt and gg ez your elite units Based on religion are shyt anyway so semetic paganism is just waaay bettter

Don't forget the "but that will go away over time."

@@asraarradon4115 *Manuel song starts to play in the background*

- Legend on his Germany playthrough.

If you leave the cursor on the stars for authority/ cunning it tells you the effects

You forgot AI agent spam. Every turn I get about 10 new agent notifications to let me know my army can't move or my general is dead.

@@swamplife3148 Oh yeah, that one was also great. Especially when you are stuck somewhere in the snowy hills pursuing the last army of some dumb horde faction just to be blocked, suffer 99% attrition and see their army come back to kill your ass with the 10 other AI factions that traveled half the world for you despite being at war with literally every other faction on earth. Good times. This is why I reinstalled the game multiple times and then abandon it after playing for about a day. I just get the flashbacks of all the annoying stuff in mid/late game and it saps all the fun out of the experience

Mods can change most of that

A Rubik's cube has a set pattern you can generally follow to solve it 100% of the time. I also don't think the analogy really fits for Attila. Attila is neither too complex in mechanics, nor too simple. It merely has some parts that are annoying to deal with, and other parts that aren't. Shogun 2 is more simple, but is also harder as the Realm Divide is actually a lot harder than anything you'd deal with in Attila, since Huns are more an annoyance than a threat to me in all of my campaigns. Shogun 2 is also the only Total War game I do not play on the hardest difficulty for most of the time. Attila has a lot of things that would be more interesting if you had more ways to interact with it. For instance climate change has no way to mitigate it, there's no building that increases fertility to offset it's reduction, unless you're playing the Slavs, in which case you can just increase fertility with their religion building. Romans are also terribly designed in terms of progression. You advance down the tech tree only to lose crucial techs you start with. This would be less of an issue if they either replaced the buildings with less efficient versions, showing a loss of understanding older designs, or if you could simply not research the techs that cause you to lose the legacy techs. However you can't do that, eventually you will lose all of your access to building sanitation buildings, which means if you claim new territory and it doesn't have sanitation already built, too bad. Now most issues I have with Attila stem from the campaign side of things having several annoying aspects to it. Though mods do solve a lot of these issues. Attila has some things I like, for example, I like the politics, it's not as complex as Rome 2's but it also doesn't have nearly as much penalties as Rome 2's does. If you don't want to deal with it, you can mostly ignore it, though you really shouldn't ignore it. I like sieges in Attila more than a lot of other titles, sieges and settlement battles in Attila are fair and give you as a defender a good advantage without it being ridiculous. I can with potentially beat one or two full stacks with just a garrison if the situation is right (though sometimes you can't do anything, and it's just a matter of causing casualties to slow the enemy). I like that there's positives and negatives for most buildings to make you think about what to build. Though some buildings have penalties that far outweigh their benefits and as such you simply ignore those buildings even if you make a bit less money then you otherwise would. The limited build slots is a debatable thing as some people prefer Medieval 2 where you can mostly build everything, or have enough build slots to get all the good buildings like in some other titles. Whereas some people like the more limited aspect of these slots in Attila. I don't care too much either way, though certain regions having arbitrarily less build slots is utterly bizarre in my opinion. Most large settlements have 6, but some have 5, not sure why. Most minor settlements have 4, but some have 3, again, not sure why. I would prefer most every historical title to have actual population for the settlements rather than the arbitrary growth system, but that's just cause I prefer that. I also like family trees, so Attila has that and it's good to have. I prefer when diplomacy makes sense, which to be fair most total war games do not handle well. So Attila not having the AI try to haggle most times is annoying, but that's the case with most titles. 3k is the big exception though, it's diplomacy is very good. Other games after 3k usually at least have the option to balance the deal to see what you can get or offer to get said deal, which I like. Auto not telling you the result of the battle is annoying but I do not have a problem with it, I think auto being unreliable in terms of truly knowing the exact outcome is fair for taking the fast approach of clicking a single button. Though Attila has bad auto as you can basically spam spears and auto most fights easily. I don't normally do that because I usually play head to head with another person and so my armies are balanced to ensure that I have experienced units when I do fight against the other player. Final annoying thing is the AI is utterly cowardly in how it fights, it runs away most of the time, and has no interest in actually beating you, it just wants to annoy you. Most titles have this problem as well, but some are more noticeable than others. And these are my thoughts on Attila, overall I have mixed feelings, with mods it's pretty good, but it has problems, though so do most games, just depends on if you can accept them or not.

Like in any total war game

@@Vadim_Ibragimov If you talk like that, you never played Attila

@@mattvonel4039 700 hours, 5 completed campings on VH. Never felt AI is more overpowered than in other games. About anti-player bias it's just ridiculous. Compared to, for example, Shogun 2, AI factions in Attila don't unite with each other trying to wipe player out. Although I love Shogun 2, the AI in this game is incomparably more evil towards player, than in Attila. But nobody speaks about it. People just repeat Legend's word about scary biased Attila. Yes, on difficulties above medium AI never has problems with money and public order. But is the situation in Rome 2, Shogun 2 and warhammer different? I've never seen AI surrering from the luck of money in this games. But biased and anti-player here is only Attila, of course!

@@Vadim_Ibragimov You may be right, but I don't care nor respect you for your profile picture

@@Vadim_Ibragimov The thing is Atilla mechanics are extremly punishing. And the AI is not effected by it. Yes in Shogun 2, everyone will declare war on you, but your econmics are not effected.

DONT UPVOTE THIS FUCKING BOT!

Doing God's work recommending him here.

@@dale6947 it is literally a bot account it and another few bot accounts comment on every one of Legends videos in annoying similar but slightly different ChatGPT sentence variations.

​@@dale6947someone please remind me us this later when I'm home

Yes you are right with that bro, so thats why he got the untrustworthy pentalty

Most people would say the franchise peaked at Medieval 2 or Shogun 2, but that's just popular opinion. I think it's good to have negatives and positives for buildings, but they need to be reasonable and balanced, Attila has some buildings that just aren't worth building at all even some of them may give you lots of money. Also the climate change mechanic for the campaign is kinda stupid, firstly there's no historical record of the time period experiencing a massive cold shift from what I could find. And secondly, most factions have no means to combat or reduce it's penalties. It just applies across the map evenly despite the fact desert region would probably be better if they cooled down a little. The only faction that can combat climate change is the Slavs, who're a dlc culture. And then you have the Romans who get shafted due to the loss of legacy tech which means late game they have no sanitation in newly acquired regions, unless the AI thought to build sanitation. Limited build slots is hit or miss for some people, I don't mind one way or the other, except that some regions have arbitrarily less build slots for no given reason, most major settlements have 6, but some can only have 5, most minor settlements have 4, but some only have 3. Which annoys me. I also prefer population as a system, rather than growth, at least for historical games, population wouldn't work quite as well in Warhammer due to races have vastly different population numbers in lore, Skaven would number in untold billions, while Dwarfs and Elves would only number in the tens of thousands. Attila has problems, some of which are easily fixed by mods, and I do like that. Some are not, but eh. Every game has issues. I wish that some bugs would've been fixed, but I could say the same for other games, like 3k. Now that one, that's a real tragedy. So much potential wasted because of the bad dlc it had shortly after launch. Which don't get me wrong 3k has it's own problems, formations don't look right, crossbows don't behave right, elephants are broken when used by a player, tigers are broken period (mostly due to how other units interact, or rather don't interact with the actual tigers for the most part). Units take too long to properly brace in order to counter cav. AI pathing when they're attacking a city can be botched, and lead to a slideshow as the frame rate dies. But so much of this could've easily been fixed had CA not abandoned the game. Mods can fix some of these things but not all. Really I just want CA to listen to their community with these games. Total War has the potential to have amazing games in it, it just requires better foresight and management. I play both fantasy and historical, I just like Total War in general, but they need to handle these games well. Historical games need to play in a certain way, you can have a romance mode for some of them, I think it's fine, but you can't neglect proper balance and polish.

@@darkrite9000 Yes, these games could be amazing if they were more mod able. Shogun 2 was the only one that I didn’t feel like I needed mods to play. But I don’t enjoy that game anymore which Is weird because it was once my favourite. It think it’s the UI that I don’t like the most. When in battle I want to clearly see which class of unit is which. I can’t tell WTF is going on in Shogun 2. Rome 2 kind of has the same ugly banners. They are so unhelpful for me to differentiate the units. Attila, 3k and Troy have much improved battle UI. Each game does have its pros and cons. Rome Remastered is my least favourite. There’s not much about it that’s appealing to me.

@@lateralus6512 I don't have as much issue with the banners in Shogun 2, but I don't really like the double line of unit cards when you have two armies in battle, it somehow feels harder to organize and effectively see than the single line of thinner unit cards. I do however think that sometimes it can be hard to tell what's going on. I for the most part enjoy most total war games modded, Shogun 2 and Medieval 2 are the only ones I could play vanilla for a long while, but after spending so long on Shogun 2 vanilla I usually use mods for it too now.

Well hard to say with how the campaign may have gone up to that point. Zoroastrism is the religion of Sassanids so they might have converted because of Sassanids spreading that to them since they start next to them. And depending on what they where doing, they may have expanded into roman lands a bit later, regardless even their starting religion wouldn't have been the majority in all the regions they claimed. Though they've clearly converted a long while ago to have not only built several buildings for the Zoroastrism religion, but also have several high level magus' around.

Based on my experience, it isn’t due to a unique trait specific to the desert factions but rather a trait specific to the religions they follow.

Those wars were probably just from being unreliable. People not even close to you will declare war if your reliability is low.

Stay off drugs

its not Genshin you Baka!

It is so strange than attila run as shit for some people whereas i never had a problem with it

problem with CPU most of the time. Try decrease units size (max is 160). Rome 2 and Waha2 buggy at the end too when you take half the map and in ATTILA u start as the global empire waiting to die)

@@Saloman4ik It is certainly a CPU issue, I'll try it, as much as I do not want to. I know I've read it doesn't utilize the multi-core systems and that's the major issue with it's performance. Now it may for some systems but it certainly is every bit as horrible in performance on my system as I feared. I knew it had issues when I bought it but hoped my system wouldn't get the perf issues. And at worse I assumed it'd at least stay above 40fps and I could deal with it. But it literally drops below 30fps in any battle above like 30 units total and it is horrible.