Toy Story Villains: Evil to Most Evil 🧸 

@WickedBinge Please Do Total Drama characters Good 2 Most Good

@WickedBinge Please make iCarly Characters Good To Evil, Honey, I Shrunk The Kids, Honey I Blew Up The Kid & Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves Characters Good To Evil & Stuart Little Characters Good To Evil?

Ghostbusters good to evil

@Wickedbinge Please do the casagrandes characters good to evil Please

Pixar Villains Squid Game

Me too

Me 3.

Me. His worst crime is petty theft.

Me

Me

Is it strange to say that the bensons, are even more unsettling than the mutant toys?

@@joshcoy6748 Not very much

Are you excited about the new sonic movie!

@@LegoLuka-nx5xe yep.

I can tell because your back round is sonic

I wasn’t talking to you, but you do

Disney is just gonna milk it forever.

Agreed. We’ve all come across kids in our neighborhood who liked to blow things up just like Sid. And Sid is definitely not pure evil, given he didn’t realize that toys were alive when breaking them, but since the movie is from the perspective of toys, he can be considered an antagonist, albeit one of the least evil. But for Al, I’d say he’s more towards the middle. Sure, he’s a jerk and didn’t try to hurt anyone, but stealing is against the law and he never seems to learn his lesson and believes the planet revolves around him. Ordinarily, being a collector is a hobby, but stealing a valuable from a yard sale when the host makes it clear that it’s not for sale is a no-no. So, I’d say that Al is way worse than Sid, despite his intentions to keep toys pristine and repair any damages. Both of what they did was not to be condoned, but it’s hard to argue that Sid might need help, given the ongoing counter argument over Sid’s parents.

@Kevin Green exactly. Professor Zundap was just the sidekick

SuperBaddy4 Says: Milles Sir Axel Rod Is Sidekick

NO HES NOT!!! Miles Axlerod is the main villain, Zundapp is only his sidekick.

Big Baby didn’t kill Lotso. He threw him in a garbage bin for his lies and abuse. Also, Ken was not a liar, he and Big Baby were completely manipulated and abused by Lotso, who used them as his henchmen. And Demo Mode Buzz does not count because those were Lotso’s actions, not Buzz’s.

Burning 🔥 toys lotso ruthless

@@brandonscott5544 agreed

Bonnie is not a villain. She just didn’t play with Woody as often, that’s why he stayed with Bo Peep at the end of Toy Story 4.

Facts

Woody should of went with Andy

@@mrfredwilford facts

@@mrfredwilford Andy *chose* to give Woody away to Bonnie instead of taking him to college.

But Sid doesn’t know he hurting his toys there objects

They are around 10 counting secondary vilains, minor and two TV specials. So in my opinion just enought.

And most hated enemy.

According to his Villains Wiki.

@@The_Guy_25 But still true, even outside of Villains Wiki.

The wiki actually says he is the gang’s most hated enemy

@@The_Guy_25 Also true.

That’s correct. Zurg even claimed himself to be Utility Belt Buzz’s father and they bonded in the climax of Toy Story 2 as the original Buzz and the rest of Andy’s toys rushed to the airport to continue their journey to rescue Woody.

@@DavidBContentExtravaganza3967 Don’t count it. I’ve come to believe that Zurg is only a Buzz-exclusive villain.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 Thank you. I do wish Woody would encounter Zurg sometime in the franchise once the former resumes his villainy. He's a Toy Story character you know. Rex encountered him.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 Zurg is also a Toy Story villain so he'II remain in the franchise to appear more and Woody could encounter him one day. It would be great, wither you think so or not.

Stinky Pete turned out to have redeemable traits as evidenced by an online interview after Toy Story 2 hit theaters where he expressed his gratitude over his new owner, Amy, despite all her makeup and tattooed Barbie dolls. Despite his evil demeanor, Stinky Pete cares about Woody, Jessie, Bullseye and other toys and only wanted what was best for them. While he meant well, he wanted to reside in the museum for his own desire and being free of kid ownership was his problem and only his problem. He is also the first Toy Story villain to be sympathized with because of his tragic backstory.

Hazbin Hotel good to evil- Most Good😇: Charlie Morningstar. Grey zone😟: Angel Dust. Most Evil😈: Sir Pentious.

@@goddessbettyd5614 How is that possible?! Hazbin Hotel has several villains, we don't even know who's the satan of the show.

I've always thought the same. There was one episode of SVU where the older brother was bullying his sister by brutally wrecking her dolls, then escalates to drowning a dog and holding another kid hostage at gunpoint. I don't think Sid was right in the head until the toys scared him straight.

He's... A kid. Kids do wild things with their toys. This isn't the case of a sadist torturing animals, he's expressing his imagination on inanimate objects.

@@etcetera1995 there's some wrong with that kid. That's NOT normal, especially blowing them up.

Well, they tried to give him a choice to either do the right thing and change for the better or stay evil and bitter, but Lotso chose to stay evil and bitter when he chose to leave Andy's toys to die.

Well, Stinky Pete is actually less evil than Lotso. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity as kids never bothered to purchase him from a toy store and the rising popularity of space toys contributed to the termination of the Woody’s Roundup tv series. He was also distrustful of children due to Woody and Jessie’s respective situations with Andy and Emily, believing that children destroy, neglect and give away toys as they mature. He believed that The Konishi Toy Museum was the safest place for The Roundup Gang to live and only wanted what was best for the cowpokes and Bullseye. At least he redeemed himself in an online interview after Toy Story 2 hit theaters, expressing his gratitude over his new owner, Amy, despite all her makeup and tattooed Barbie dolls. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and their lives are solely bound for the trash. His excuse for harming and imprisoning innocent toys was petty and all over Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush, due to Daisy accidentally losing him at a rest stop. Other toys had no control over the situation and weren’t involved with him getting replaced. This sinister plan makes Lotso the punching bag for turning Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acting as the warden, snatching Big Baby away from Daisy, condemning Ken to death when he sides with Andy’s toys and reunites with Barbie and more importantly, nearly sending Andy’s toys to a terrible death at the landfill, even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his heartless pink fur from getting shredded. To me, Stinky Pete is like an overprotective parent or guardian fearing for their child’s safety or an unpopular person in society with little to no friends or has been single all his or her life. Lotso is like a school bully, whose behavior can never be corrected and ultimately results in getting expelled from school or even tossed into prison.

Gee. I should ask you for advice next time I’m told to write an essay.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 However, as this online interview was most likely made by people who weren't involved in the film, it's up to speculate whether this information is canonical or not. So he remains a villain and Woody's enemy in the Toy Story franchise overall.

@@DavidBContentExtravaganza3967 Of course and you copied that from VW.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 Just showing you that detail. Glad you understand my point.

Exactly.

He already did that, but are you talking about a remake?

Yes A remake

@@beetlejuice831 Oh, okay

@@beetlejuice831 I don’t think WickedBinge does remakes of previously existing videos.

Special mention to Mr. Potato Head

@@Joseph_Drew_III Mr. Potato Head is not a villain. He’s a neutral character. Yeah, he was disrespectful to Woody in the first Toy Story, but let’s not overlook his role as One-Eyed Bart, a wanted money thief. He’s simply cynical and grumpy all the time, although he does constantly prey on Woody’s insecurities.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 This is the first time I’ve seen someone read a reply but not the comment it’s under.

Woody really can’t catch a break in general. He is always getting the short end of the stick and getting little to no sympathy whenever he does.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 According to some references on the movies, it was implied that Potato Head was once Andy’s favorite toy before Woody came along. While it makes sense that he was very much jealous of the attention Woody was getting, it doesn’t make sense that he didn’t feel the same towards Buzz when he was Andy’s new favorite. Honestly we can understand the way Woody was feeling all because of how Andy was playing with Woody changed when Buzz arrived, he treated Woody like fodder for Buzz’s actions, and there’s no explaining that night he put Woody in the toy chest. As for Mr. Potato Head, he adores Buzz so much, and ruins the moment Bo Peep was trying to comfort Woody, pushing him to confront Buzz. And only he looked up at Woody complaining when no one else did, but then was shocked when Buzz got knocked out the window. What followed was him leading everyone on a mutiny against Woody, threatening him for if he ever returns without Buzz, and leaves Woody for dead after accusing him of “murdering” Buzz.

Big Baby wasn’t intentionally evil. He was completely manipulated by Lotso, who didn’t want him to stay with Daisy just because she replaced him with another Lotso plush.

How is big baby a villain

@@montanaworthen5515 Lotso manipulated him into believing that Daisy replaced them and Chuckles The Clown, when in reality, only Lotso got replaced.

Just like Ken, he follows Lotso's orders and catches any toy who escapes. But he turns when he realized that Lotso is a monster and lied to him about Daisy. Big Baby and Ken are kind of the same.

I couldn’t agree more. Lotso is a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 lol I actually read that entire comment. And I agree 💯 that Lotso is much worse than literally everybody else on this list

@@BullyMaguire2024 Thank you. I just happen to have common sense about Pixar villains. Heck, I even agree with the Toy Story 3 writers’ decision to punish Lotso. Test audiences who had sympathized with Lotso due to his backstory wanted him to push the button in the incinerator scene to redeem himself, but according to the DVD commentary, director Lee Unkrich explained that Lotso chose not to save Andy’s toys so that audiences who had gotten to know them for three films in fifteen years could care about the heroes even more, when it looked like the end for them, shortly before The Pizza Planet Aliens rescued them with the claw. Thus, Lotso's redemption was dropped. Another reason is because they did not want Lotso to get off so easy.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 even when looking at the thumbnail the first thing that came to my mind was “Lotso is gonna be the most evil”

@@BullyMaguire2024 Well, the thumbnail as well as the crimes Lotso committed were what obviously made him the most evil Toy Story villain. It’s hard to argue with that.

They should also make - Rio Characters Good To Evil - Cloudy With a Chance Of Meatballs Characters Good To Evil - iCarly Characters Good To Evil - Honey, I Shrunk The Kids, Honey I Blew Up The Kid & Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves Characters Good To Evil - Stuart Little Characters Good To Evil - Epic Characters Good To Evil - Victorious Characters Good To Evil - Bee Movie Characters Good To Evil

What do you mean good.There is no good villain and (sorry if I’m being rude)

@@caripavel6225 What Vika’s trying to say is that Lotso was effective at being villainous.

@@elibridgers2781 , @The Nebula Guy & @Cari Pavel Lotso indeed was the most evil villain in the Toy Story franchise. He was a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.

Yeah

I think also include adventures of buck wild cause is the 6th movie of the franchise

I’d argue Soto is worse than Gutt. The fact that Gutt is so goofy kind of makes him less of a threat in my opinion.

Ok but I also think Gutt is the most evil but he is kinda funny looking but Orson is more funny

@@Werten25 Gutt starts off that way, then when Manny destroys his ship then he becomes evil: also Soto didn’t enslave hyraxes or kidnap all the other animals that’s why Gutt is the most evil

@@Werten25 least evil to most evil : ice age 5 vilains (don't remember their names) < gutt's crew < Cretaceous and maelstrom < rudy < gutt < soto ?

Well he is literaly a hypocrite who wasted his chance for redemption and turned a kindergarten into a brutal prison for toys. His "tragedy" is not an excuse. He is literaly the only villain considered pure evil.

@@kacperaskawski3461 100%

@@kacperaskawski3461 Exactly! He was far from sympathetic despite his backstory. If you think about it, Lotso didn’t really care about Daisy herself, but only the attention that she gave him. Sure, he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but he had no right to snatch those two innocent toys and take his anger out on other toys, especially Andy’s toys. Not to mention that he ditched Andy’s toys to die in the incinerator portion of the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his hypocritical pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. What Lotso did was virtually inexcusable and unforgivable. Other toys had no control over him getting replaced whatsoever. Imprisoning innocent toys, even if they had owners and sentencing Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill was not the solution to getting what he wants. It’s hard to sympathize with a villain like Lotso, due to his immaturity and the way he handles grief.

@@WatWhatWat who's worse losto or rumplestulskine

@@JuJu-bq9uq Id say Rumplestiltskin

They should also make - Rio Characters Good To Evil - Cloudy With a Chance Of Meatballs Characters Good To Evil - iCarly Characters Good To Evil - Honey, I Shrunk The Kids, Honey I Blew Up The Kid & Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves Characters Good To Evil - Stuart Little Characters Good To Evil - Epic Characters Good To Evil - Victorious Characters Good To Evil - Bee Movie Characters Good To Evil

@@pbsfundingaddict790 Yes!

@@cuddlyfox980 Which Stuart Little villain do you think is the most evil? Smokey from Stuart Little 1, Falcon from Stuart Little 2 or The Beast from Stuart Little 3: The Call Of The Wild?

@@pbsfundingaddict790 I say The Falcon would be the most evil Stuart Little Villain.

@@cuddlyfox980 Why The Falcon?

No, Caleb had a valid reason to rank Sid higher than Gabby Gabby, compared to this. Sid Phillips is a disturbed kid who tears apart toys for horrific experiments. He will never stop and will go as far to even mutilate his innocent sister Hannah’s toys, including altering her Janie doll with a pterodactyl head. He even fed a Pizza Planet squeaky toy alien to his ugly dog, Scud, who also did everything he could to stop Woody and Buzz from escaping the Phillips residence. But you gotta look at things contextually. From Sid’s point of view, toys are not alive. Of course, he still holds on to this belief up until the end of the first Toy Story when Woody and the Mutant Toys formulate a plan that not only succeeded in scaring Sid, but also in rescuing Buzz from getting blown up on a dangerous handheld rocket. Little did Sid know that toys really are alive, even when breaking them and it’s really not appropriate to see him as the sadist that we think he is. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think? Gabby Gabby is an isolated pull-string talking doll who yearned to have what Woody had: kid ownership. Much like Stinky Pete, Gabby Gabby’s backstory was extremely disheartening, but she wasn’t distrustful of kids, unlike Stinky Pete. She moved on to find another child to spend her life with, unlike Lotso. Not to mention that her friendship with her henchmen, The Bensons was authentic in contrast to Lotso’s hasty friendship with the Sunnyside toys. Although it was sad that she was ultimately rejected by Harmony, it was unbelievably satisfying when she finally got the love of a child that she wanted for God knows how long as a result of comforting a lost girl at a carnival. While her schemes of risking the safety of Forky to obtain Harmony’s attention were inexcusable, Gabby Gabby’s plans were far from sinister and she was mostly misunderstood. Every toy, with a good or bad personality deserves to be loved by a kid, even Gabby Gabby, despite her misguided nature.

Exactly

That’s correct. Ken most likely only obeyed Lotso out of fear and uncertainty of what toxic punishment Lotso would’ve given him.

@@BullyMaguire2024 Hey, thanks for subscribing to me! Check out my latest videos and you can comment on my community posts!

@@pbsfundingaddict790 yw

Exactly

HES NOT A DOLL JOSEPH!!

that’s great that you love wickedbinge and I also like it

Lotso was indeed the most evil villain of the Toy Story universe. He is a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.

@Big Vinny I’d say Rumpelstiltskin would be the most evil.

@Big Vinny But according to the Shrek Characters Good To Evil video, Lord Farquaad was the most evil.

@Big Vinny This is how WickedBinge ranked the Shrek villains: Least Evil - Prince Charming 🥉3rd Most Evil - Rumplestiltskin 🥈2nd Most Evil - The Fairy Godmother 🥇Most Pure Evil - Lord Farquaad

@@pbsfundingaddict790 but rumplestulskine is way worse

truth

Smg3 gonna be middle tier

I couldn’t agree more. Lotso is a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 I saw that same comment in the reply section of another comment. I see you copied and pasted it.

@@BullyMaguire2024 Just trying to make a point about Lotso. Nice that you’re aware of that.

Yep, I laughed my ass off at that. We can’t gloss over how lazy Al is. He complains about driving to work on Saturdays, despite Al’s Toy Barn being located across the street and he could easily walk to there and back.

​@@pbsfundingaddict790Though because Al is a total fat ass he wouldn't have walked to work even if he was paid a million dollars.

WickedBinge doesn’t always give The Gold Medal Of Good to the main characters. It’s how they measure morality. For example, SpongeBob was ranked in The Good, but wasn’t The Most Good, due to his childish behavior and lack of self-awareness.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 & some main characters got the gold! Thomas can be cheeky, yes, but everyone has to have fun (if only I ever could!)!

@JamieGamePlayThrough WickedBinge said that they’re going to do Thomas and Friends on Good to Evil at some point and if you don’t believe me go check out the comments of the Rick and Morty Moments: Gruesome to Most Gruesome video

@@thiagopena3258 I don't not believe you. I just didn't know.

@@thiagopena3258 Really?

Demo Mode Buzz is Andy’s Buzz, Lotso just reprogrammed him to make him his slave. Also, Lotso’s Gang wasn’t intentionally evil, they were unaware of Lotso’s true nature until Andy’s toys came along and Woody revealed the truth about the cold-hearted teddy bear. More importantly, Lotso lied to Big Baby, who was rightfully Daisy’s toy and Lotso snatched him away from her because he was replaced with another Lotso plush and Big Baby wasn’t replaced. Like Woody said “She replaced *YOU* ! And if you couldn’t have her, then no one could! You lied to Big Baby and you’ve been lying ever since!” This basically means that Lotso believes himself above other toys and if he doesn’t have an owner, then no toy deserves to have an owner. WickedBinge didn’t count The Mutant Toys, Lotso’s Gang (save for Ken) or Demo Mode Buzz Lightyear probably also because they didn’t have enough of an influence on the Toy Story franchise.

⁠​⁠@@pbsfundingaddict790correct, DEMO mode Buzz Lightyear is not a villain because Lotso just reprogrammed Andy’s Buzz to think he was an actual space ranger so he could convince Buzz that Lotso and the other daycare toys worked for Star Command and that Andy’s other toys were minions of the evil emperor Zurg so Buzz thought that he was doing the right thing being a hero locking up Zurg’s prisoners, he thought that he was serving the Galactic Alliance so DEMO mode Buzz only counts as an antagonist not a villain.

My thumbnail Less sid Most stinky pete Most lostso hugging Bear

Nah I think Sid is

@@montanaworthen5515 @Joseph Walker A Simple Summary Of The Toy Story Villains Sid Phillips is a disturbed kid who tears apart toys for horrific experiments. He will never stop and will go as far to even mutilate his innocent sister Hannah’s toys, including altering her Janie doll with a pterodactyl head. He even fed a Pizza Planet squeaky toy alien to his ugly dog, Scud, who also did everything he could to stop Woody and Buzz from escaping the Phillips residence. But you gotta look at things contextually. From Sid’s point of view, toys are not alive. Of course, he still holds on to this belief up until the end of the first Toy Story when Woody and the Mutant Toys formulate a plan that not only succeeded in scaring Sid, but also in rescuing Buzz from getting blown up on a dangerous handheld rocket. Little did Sid know that toys really are alive, even when breaking them and it’s really not appropriate to see him as the sadist that we think he is. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think? The Evil Emperor Zurg was just as deluded as Buzz and admittedly was a hard villain to defeat, even for Rex. Since Zurg was a minor antagonist in Toy Story 2, there’s really not a whole lot to say about him. Even after Rex accidentally knocked Zurg over with his tail inside the interior of an elevator at Al’s apartment, he wasn’t the kind of villain that needed to be punished. It was incredibly satisfying to see Zurg bond with his supposed son, Utility Belt Buzz by playing catch, although Utility Belt Buzz declined to continue the mission to rescue Woody from Al and Stinky Pete. Al McWhiggin is a big thief donning a ridiculous chicken costume who has no patience for anybody or anything that gets in his way. The first boundary he crossed was stealing Woody from the Davis’ yard sale after Andy’s mom made it abundantly clear that he wasn’t for sale. Additionally, his manners towards public businesses are atrocious such as when he hastily dialed and demanded the cleaner to fix Woody, even though he never agreed on a specific date or time he was available. This is also evidenced by him yelling at the airport staff to be careful with his Roundup Gang collection. Let’s also not gloss over how lazy Al is. He complains about driving to work on Saturdays, despite Al’s Toy Barn being located across the street and he could easily walk to there and back. Not to mention inadvertently falling asleep on the couch and dropping his bowl of Cheetos on the floor, which was a failed attempt for Woody to retrieve his severed arm. The only nice thing we can say about Al is that unlike Sid, Al hates when toys get broken and wants them in perfect condition to earn as much money as possible. Like Hamm says “Crime doesn’t pay.”, which is a lesson that Al will unfortunately never learn. Stinky Pete is a resentful prospector doll because kids never bothered to purchase him from the dime-store shelf that he spent years on and the rising popularity of space toys contributed to the termination of Woody’s Roundup, a children’s western tv series that he was once part of. He was also distrustful of children because of Andy accidentally ripping Woody’s right arm and Jessie getting donated by her former owner, Emily. He believed that children destroy, neglect and give away toys as they mature. When Woody decided to go back to Andy after Buzz lectured him, Stinky Pete snapped and locked both cowpokes and Bullseye in Al’s apartment, revealing his true colors. Since Al planned to sell the Roundup Gang to make a profit, Stinky Pete came to the conclusion that The Konishi Toy Museum in Tokyo, Japan was the safest place for the Roundup Gang to live to prevent further disappointment and destruction from children. From Stinky Pete’s perspective, if kids didn’t want him, they can’t have him and it’s too late for kids to reconsider their choices. His selfish attempts to stop Woody from going to back to Andy were almost always successful until at the airport when Buzz and the rest of Andy’s toys rescued Woody and sent Stinky Pete away in the backpack of a girl named Amy, much to the prospector’s horror. Stinky Pete turned out to have redeemable traits as evidenced by an online interview after Toy Story 2 hit theaters where he expressed his gratitude over his new owner, Amy, despite all her makeup and tattooed Barbie dolls. Despite his evil demeanor, Stinky Pete cares about Woody, Jessie, Bullseye and other toys and only wanted what was best for them. While he meant well, he wanted to reside in the museum for his own desire and being free of kid ownership was his problem and only his problem. He is also the first Toy Story villain to be sympathized with because of his tragic backstory. Lotso is a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants. Gabby Gabby is an isolated pull-string talking doll who yearned to have what Woody had: kid ownership. Much like Stinky Pete, Gabby Gabby’s backstory was extremely disheartening, but she wasn’t distrustful of kids, unlike Stinky Pete. She moved on to find another child to spend her life with, unlike Lotso. Not to mention that her friendship with her henchmen, The Bensons was authentic in contrast to Lotso’s hasty friendship with the Sunnyside toys. Although it was sad that she was ultimately rejected by Harmony, it was unbelievably satisfying when she finally got the love of a child that she wanted for God knows how long as a result of comforting a lost girl at a carnival. While her schemes of risking the safety of Forky to obtain Harmony’s attention were inexcusable, Gabby Gabby’s plans were far from sinister and she was mostly misunderstood. Every toy, with a good or bad personality deserves to be loved by a kid, even Gabby Gabby, despite her misguided nature. Barring Sid, Zurg & Al, these toy villains not only act as a foil to Woody, but all of Andy’s toys. They can also act as a darker or lighter reflection of the villains from the franchise. For example, if Buzz and the rest of Andy’s toys left Woody to be sold to the museum instead of saving him, then Woody would’ve ended up like Stinky Pete and never returned to Andy. If Jessie, Buzz and the rest of Andy’s toys never let go of the fact that Andy’s mom mistook them for trash and threw them away, they would’ve ended up becoming like Lotso. Not every toy in the franchise was lucky to have a kid like Andy or Bonnie. Like Woody says, a toy’s occupation is a child’s plaything. Sans Gabby Gabby, a toy’s purpose is a lesson that Stinky Pete, Lotso or any true toy villains will never learn.

@Joseph Walker Yep, Lotso was the most evil Toy Story villain. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash.

Nah Sid’s a good kid who is just misunderstood & has a sad life since I can relate to him in real life. Lotso is definitely the worst evil Villain in Toy Story History in all of Pixar in my honest opinion

@@pbsfundingaddict790 true

I agree with you. From Sid’s point of view, toys are not alive. Of course, he still holds on to this belief up until the end of the first Toy Story when Woody and the Mutant Toys formulate a plan that not only succeeded in scaring Sid, but also in rescuing Buzz from getting blown up on a dangerous handheld rocket. Little did Sid know that toys really are alive, even when breaking them and it’s really not appropriate to see him as the sadist that we think he is. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?

Sid's mom makes him pop tarts. He got all the care he needed.

@@migfire Did you forget about the part where he skateboarded to Pizza Planet all by himself without any parent or legal guardian?

Thumbnail: 3. Sid Phillips (The Evil) - 10. Stinky Pete (The Evil) - 11. Lots-o'-Huggin' Bear

@Kevin Green @thepayne78 I thought the same thing. From Sid’s point of view, toys are not alive. Of course, he still holds on to this belief up until the end of the first Toy Story when Woody and the Mutant Toys formulate a plan that not only succeeded in scaring Sid, but also in rescuing Buzz from getting blown up on a dangerous handheld rocket. Little did Sid know that toys really are alive, even when breaking them and it’s really not appropriate to see him as the sadist that we think he is. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?

Big Baby wasn’t intentionally evil. He was completely manipulated by Lotso, who didn’t want him to stay with Daisy because he got replaced by another Lotso plush. Despite Lotso taking him away from Daisy, Big Baby eventually got fed up with Lotso’s abuse and selfishness and grew to residing at Sunnyside Daycare and was possibly in good hands with Barbie and Ken.

But are any of the characters truly evil? I’d say Good to Heroic is more fitting.

@@elibridgers2781 Jangles tried to kill our iconic trio for cryin' out loud!!

Inside Out Has No Evil Characters

If anyone's wondering, this is why I ranked Joy and Anger together and in the good tier. I know what you're gonna say, Joy should be ranked lower because of how she treated sadness or anger should be lower because of what he did to Riley, but hear me out. Yes, Joy treated sadness poorly, but it wasn't her intention. Same thing goes for anger. The reason why I ranked them in the good tier, is because even though they are what made Riley worse, they still love Riley, and they want her to be happy and as safe as possible.

@@dvqjacks7735 I actually think Sadness should be in bad to evil. She literally caused all the conflicts in the film. She *PURPOSELY* ruined *PERFECTLY GOOD MEMORIES* for no reason!!!! And when Bing Bong was upset, she decided to make him feel even worse! What a dick! I don’t know why everyone keeps saying she is more good than Joy because she truly is not, and she gets the bronze medal of evil on my list.

Exactly. Love is selfless, while Lust is selfish.

@@elibridgers2781 since lust is merely physical attraction whereas love involves caring about someone as a person

Exactly

Scud was just an ugly and mindless dog constantly preying on the destruction of Woody and Buzz and Utility Belt Buzz was basically just Buzz in his delusional space ranger mode.

The Buzz Lightyear from Toy Story 2 that thought he was a real space ranger is not evil at all he was just a minor antagonist because he thought our original Buzz was a space ranger who betrayed him.

That would be interesting.

The most evil would definitely be Captain Gutt or Madame Gasket.

I know and it annoys me that people who make these kinds of videos use those dumb excuses. Like for example, taking into account how successful the villains were. Being successful has nothing to do with morality. Another thing is not being taken seriously. Or being a coward. Like a lot of people make videos of Disney villains evil to most evil and they always seem to give Prince John a free pass simply for being a coward and it rly annoys me.

@@BullyMaguire2024 You’re right. Incompetence isn’t a virtue. And neither is cowardice. All that points to is that to be a successful villain there must be some vices that they don’t have (like sloth).

@@BullyMaguire2024 If the video you’re referencing is the one I think you’re referencing I watched it and posted comments on it but I wasn’t on it inasmuch as I haven’t made or appeared in any RU-vid videos

@@matityaloran9157 but still weren’t you on that video? I thought I saw many comments of you on that video.

@@BullyMaguire2024 I did post a lot of comments on that video yes. (I was just confused by what you meant by “were you on that video) since I wasn’t sure if you meant appearing in it or posting an online comment about it but yes I did post comments on that video.)

Exactly! Gabby Gabby’s friendship with her henchmen, The Bensons was authentic in contrast to Lotso’s hasty friendship with the Sunnyside toys.

Well Zurg actually tried to kill Buzz while Sid didn’t know the toys were even alive.

You read my mind. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?

Yeah, I’ve noticed that. It was most likely because Gabby Gabby wasn’t as serious as Sid, Stinky Pete or Lotso.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 the 4th movie didn't really have a true villain

Just because The Mutant Toys aren’t truly evil, doesn’t mean they have backstories. Their cause of villainy remains unknown and unexplored.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 wdym "the cause of their villainy"? There is no villainy of which to speak

@@JRENZO10 I mean, nobody knows why and how else The Mutant Toys became evil, besides Sid being the catalyst for their creation.

@@pbsfundingaddict790 but they weren't evil

@@JRENZO10 I meant to say they’re fake evil.