Trump Launches Massive Airstrikes Against Syria After Chemical Weapons Attack 

Dont do it its a trap

that game is awful please dont play it

im already playing :( ive been nolife grinding for 2weeks now

@@SuperCrumpets If your having fun keep playing but I advise you to stop

This game will literally kill you.

Sabaton song when?

Morale remained high.

😂😂😂​@@maxpeterson8616

​@benjamintherogue2421😂

America.. Fcuk Yeah!

Just wait till you understand what the US space force is doing to the Ukrainian conflict

And a commander in chief who lets them do their jobs.

​Yeah the commander in chief launched so many strikes that he had passed the amount of strikes obama did in his 2 years and than just stopped reporting it lmao...warhawks absolutely loved how much he liked to order then .​@@namenameson9065

@@namenameson9065 political 🤡

True, thank god for that. I wouldn't want to see what Chyna would do with something like that.

😂😂 10/10 comment

You never detect the mach 2 bumblebee...

Meanwhile the F22's flying in the Syrian airspace: "Would You intercept me??? I would Intercept me..."

F-22: send me enough Syrian planes so I get to be a ace All I had were ballon’s and ufos and I’m fkin tired of this air to air vegan diet

@@Jeffrey-hu2gb Menwhile Uncle Sam: Kid No! Airforce: Kid Noooooooooo! Grandpa BUFF: Hehehehe, You go get em Kid! Franklin: Malicious racoon squeaking accompanied with sounds of angle grinder and blow torch

😂😂😂

😂😂😂😂

👁👄👁...He's in the god damn walls!! ＼(>_

Nahh F22 be like "In your hood, just chillin' Sup?"

"uhhhhh we're in your base... and we have all your dudes... so, yeah"

Where did you get that idea?

@@xthebumpx I don't know. It's happened so many times over the years they all just sort of lump together in my head.

@@floydlooney6837that’s very understandable

@@floydlooney6837 You may be recalling the strike from the year prior in 2017 when 59 Tomahawks were fired from USS Ross and Porter in retaliation for a chemical attack.

The media couldn't find a way to criticize Donald Trump about this so they had to minimize it and under-report instead.

Defensive CAP sure is easier if you can do it over ENEMY airspace...

The syrians are scrambling 4 Mig 29s aaaaaaand they're dead.

Ah yes. Third world dirt country.

"would you intercept me? I'd intercept me." F-22 circa HLC 😂

They did this one like a war maps game

That was in 2017. There is another government now, hiring people for diversity motives, not merit. You get what you vote for.

That’s coz the smartest people are busy coordinating those missiles, and the rest of us… well it’s known 😂

We've been trying to reach you about your car's updated registration

I feel you. (But it's spelled losing* btw)

If the task was given to military it would get done

I mean to be fair „almost 20 years old“ is still pretty young for an advanced aircraft. The Viper had its first flight 50 years ago and it’s still considered to be pretty modern.

@@JR-ut2ne No it's not. The F16 from 50 years ago is nothing like the one's flying now, even if the airframe is the same the onboard avionics and electronics is not. The lowest model/block which still makes sense militarily is block50/52 or MLU which are quite comparable. Ofc this depends on what you deem 'making sense' and that depends on the money one's willing to spend and the mission profile you're trying to fill in.

@@MarvinWestmaas You‘ve got a point. Of course a new Block 70 Viper is a whole different beast than a Block 5 but it still remains the same airframe and even the very early examples had stuff like full digital fly by wire, relaxed stability and maneuvering characteristics that are still state of the art today. In general the advancements in aircraft’s aren’t as quick anymore as they were in the 1950s or 60s so we‘ll get used to „old“ airframes still being state of the art.

@@JR-ut2ne I had a lot of family working at Fokker, Fokker was involved in the Dutch production line I been 'proud' of the F-16 al my life I think she is the sexiest looking fighter without canards ( .. canards just add a little extra ). They are still excellent energy fighters, it's just that this isn't as important anymore. Still not many planes, except those with trust vectoring, would want to get in close with an F-16.

Well the tech is 1990s..

Murica

@@POPJack1717dude this is so odd, the RU-vid auto translate is translating “murica” to “kill”, like wtf? Fucking commy bastards

Murican brothers in arms 🇬🇧

@@stonedfish99Gotta love the English, hello from the USA 🇺🇸

That same tactic has been built into the nose cone of the F35's with some interesting abilities.

Yes, superpower that failed to punish Syria for use of chemical weapons

RAAAAAHHHH🇺🇸🇺🇸🗣️🗣️🦅🦅🦅

People sometimes forget that the US still has by far the strongest military in the world and that even Russia and China combined can't really compete (especially back in 2017 when china was definitely far weaker than it is now). Imagine how much stronger could US military get if they just stopped wasting so much money on overpriced defense contracts. Cost-efficiency isn't an American strong suit but the US defense budget is still massive enough that all of the great powers combined still wouldn't have comparable capabilities.

And that shit is rookie numbers compared to og gulf war

That's $120 million for you...

I saw a meme saying something like that! hilarious

We used to have a submarine we could fly in, too....

Artillery wins battles, logistics wins wars.

30 min worldwide delivery or the next one is free!

I think there's a group actively fighting each war 24/7 in a simulation, so all they have to do in an instance like this is flip a switch and go live.

I can get a burger joint set up in an hour just gimme the means of acquiring a grill

Google battle of Khasham That’s what Russians look like fighting Americans

@@looinrims Wasn't it the battle where US forces obliterated the Wagner Forces (at least that what I assume were the enemies) by heavy firepower including a goddamn AC-130 gunship and many other air units.

@@bahamutknight5783 yes that’s where Wagner fucked around, and found out They even made a holiday and monument about it in Wagner as if they won

Yeah I really enjoy watching this stuff

@@bahamutknight5783 "Hit 'em as hard as you want." -Mattis

I love how every aircraft was the cutting edge of UK, France and US air forces and then the EA-6 just rolls out saying "Like the old days over Kwuait". She was a beautifull bird

@@paolocalzone7186 Loud too

He got lost back in ‘91 and just decided he’d stick around until somebody came back to find him lol

Whats the story on that one? Why did they bring out the old warhorse?

There were already Prowlers getting sent to museums when this one was flying a combat mission.

Those issues have been fixed btw

French Navy**

@@angelusdr9676I don’t believe you 😂

@@TheLordPolar Uncle Sugar has to test missles now and then on live targets to avoid things like having sent torpedo aircrews on suicide missions to launch Mark 14 torpedoes that hadn't been tested and didn't function for the first 2 years of war with Japan. It's all being paid for by the usual generous donor.

​@@over9000andbackYour lack of knowledge is as hopeless as your opinion

We seem to have more aerial re-fuelers than many countries have aircraft

@@floydlooney6837 yeah shame the US uses it for the wrong reasons.

Well, as a country, we've only been at peace for like 40 seconds lmao

War is chaos, and we Americans excel at chaos!

Well I mean it’s not surprising considering they have almost 800 over sea bases

"IM BUILT DIFFERENT!!"

Dracula Flow

​@@Noah-es5iz"I'm him"

@@carbonylgroup12888this sh*t aint nothing to me man

@@Oliepolie LMAOOOOOO you all made my day

"You feint with a brigade. We feint with a carrier strike group. We are not the same."

​@@atomf9143"We have carrier, too! The powerful Admiral Kuznetsov , equipped with many aircraft, far superior to your F-35, will make you tremble in fear!"- Russian bot

Those are not decoys. Those DDGs were probably tasked with destroying the Russian ships, if they wanted to fight. US Destroyers have 8 Harpoon anti-ship missiles and 6 torpedo tubes. The DDGs also have 90 to 96 Mk 41 launchers, which can be loaded with rocket propelled vertical launch torpedoes.

they were real destroyer and were actually capable of making the attack syria and russia thought they were going to do but at last it was not those destroyer but the one behind.

@@Nmille98and yet they’ll still run scared when we release the kid. “Would you intercept me. I’d intercept me.”

*entire Russian fleet starts heaving anchors* Syrian government: "Hey, hey, hey! Where are you guys going? I thought you were gonna like... They're gone."

Four of the Ohio class subs were converted to SSGN (guided missile subs). These SSGN carry 154 Tomahawks per sub.

While the US surface fleet is imposing, a lot of people forget what lurks below the waves. The US submarine fleet is insane.

Each Ohio class SSBN has 24 Trident II SLBM launch tubes, but four of those tubes were deactivated under New START which reduced the total number to 20. The four Ohio class SSGNs had 22 launch tubes converted to carry clusters of seven Tomahawk cruise missiles each for a total of 154 Tomahawks. The remaining two launch tubes are converted to swimmer lockout chambers for Navy SEALs or USMC MARSOC teams.

@@christopherwang4392 Cool

Thou shalt not fear what you can see.

To be fair, that's a tiny force lol

Meanwhile russia is straggling to supply there special military operations but they fixed the issues at snail pace what happened.

​@@robertungsod691While Russia/USSR was always at a logistical disadvantage, the dissolution of the USSR crippled Russian logistics and the ability for Russia to project power beyond its borders. It's been widely discussed that Russia has long declined from a superpower to a regional power and its influence continues to wane. They simply cannot afford to wage a conventional war at anywhere near the scale of the U.S.

Well US doctrine always stressed the importance of logistics every since we became a world power due to us being separated by two oceans

There is a huge difference between regional superpower that can deploy mass forces across its border and a global superpower that can deploy mass firepower anywhere on the globe. There is only one global superpower, and that superpower has made it a point to not be territorially predacious and gather enthusiastic allies.

Same thing the democrats do.

just like the Jews but we don't hear the same outrage regarding them

@@gouverneur2001 the Jews did…what again?

@@gouverneur2001 that's what i've been saying... Well, least some folks are noticing now that things have really gone hot out in the east again.

@gouverneur2001 are you regarded or just stupid? There are protests DAILY and it is the most decisiveness topic I've seen in my lifetime.

It is freaking WEIRD. And people want to make him President again.

@@timothyhouse1622I mean why not

@@timothyhouse1622 Nah that was awesome

@@timothyhouse1622 "erm u shouldnt vote for him bc he was weird (in my opinion) on the internet"

​@@timothyhouse1622 stupid bot. Go away

While the whole operation is super impressive, I think I'm also most impressed by how quickly this was thrown together. This isn't like ww1 where the coalition took 5 months or something to plan, this was an enormous operation with forces from like 5 major NATO nations involving naval and air assets thrown together as a *response*. Hell of a thing.

“Superpower” or bully?

​@@ArenBerberian if we have to be, both.

A very diplomatic response imo

@@ArenBerberian Found the Syrian

hahahaha :D

Such is the russian way

womp womp syria lmao

I mean that’s what the Russians have done, and Assad is Russia’s bitch During the war from 2014 btw not after 2022 as normies would think

Sounds like ww1 Germany crying when Americans used shotguns while they are literally gassing hundreds of miles of land

Just a superpower, doing superpower things, to a decrepit paper tiger. Nothing else to it.

While doing so across the world, while russia struggles with its smaller neighbor lol

The S-300 and S-400 are extremely, extremely large missiles. Flying telephone poles. They had no chance to have any effect on 60 incoming missiles. It would've been an effort in vain, those targets were getting destroyed no matter what.

On a country that isn’t being backed by 7 of the top ten worlds largest economies

​​@Red-Magic incorrect, the size isn't the issue at all, and munition interception is one of the primary objectives of those sites. There were other factors at play that prevented the interception

Honestly? I think it goes hard.

​@@lucasworden1017 Hoping tr*mp goes hard straight to prison for Jan 6.

@@lucasworden1017what are you talking about?

@@SaltyCanadianhuh?

@@SaltyCanadian its also unbecoming of a politician to wear blackface...

no way LMAO

lmfao the man's a comedian. we need him back in office

Common trump W

@@skytron22 We do not need a pedophile rapist felon in office.

What a joke of a president 🤣

“Captain! One of the missiles has malfunctioned!” “…And?” “Won’t the effect of the strike be degraded?” “…Just let me know when we hit the target, Lieutenant.”

Oh hello funny upside down man, nice to see you here. Patiently standing by for the Russian Air Force Part 2 vid- can’t wait! Please don’t go too hard on the MiG-15 🥺

Video on 2nd Battle of Kursk where?

You beat the 114th Russian keyboard brigade here, they're tied up on Twitter right now lmao.

@@matthiaslenzen9462Give it time, even Perun is letting it play out

@@christopherchartier3017 I know, i just want a meme of a 136-year-old Manstein sitting on a research vessel in the North Atlantic saying: its been 81 years.

Listen, there are two rules: Don't touch our boats, and don't touch a chemistry set

They made no mistakes here. Assad is an Ass. It's in the name

Wasn't him. Neither in 2017 nor in 2018. The UN investigation teams findings were silenced, intimidated and then a joke of a report was published after the higher ups made sure it said what it wanted them to say. You think this thing doesn't happen? Then you're extremely naive to how the world works. By the way, in 2002, John Bolton said the following to the head of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons: “You have 24 hours to leave the organization, and if you don’t comply with this decision by Washington, we have ways to retaliate against you. We know where your kids live. You have two sons in New York.” Why? Because he was doing his job, which meant that he wasn't towing their line regarding Saddam.

Assad: “Nah I’d win”

ah the classic "yes" joke XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

france kinda missed out ngl

@@Just_A_Random_Desk France found out it's system sucks and need fixes, that's the most valid test you can do

France always be giving up in fights.

They did have the foresight to send two backup guided missile cruisers. Maybe they knew.

@@biddyboy1570 Honestly, a very successful test. They learned that they have technical issues, they learned that they need more crew training on these weapons systems (which I'm sure are immensely complicated), and still got the job done regardless. 10/10.

What are you referring to, the aircraft performed without issue

If you count the missile being destroyed when it slams onto its target as the missile being destroyed by its target, then they had 100% rate of destroying the incoming missiles. Very impressive.

​@@MidWitPridethe target had successfully destroyed the missile lol.

Do you even listen? IF ITS A THREATH TO THEIR BASES AND PERSONAL... people are really that dense.

​@@LarryPigeon1cope harder

@@bigchooch4434 hes not wrong

Back when china russia north Korea and Iran were well behaved.

Made quite an impression on the Chinese. Also, the US politely informed the Russians ahead of the first strike to preclude both their demise and agitation

@@DesolatorsDayz Kamala 2024 cry about it

Trump 2024. We have videos of you guys crying about it last time 😂😂😂

@@jacobq.2204 You guys were crying a lot harder on Jan sixth.

The kid wants action!!

​@LunaticTheCat they were waiting for Russian fights to act, but they didn't act

These guys really wanted to down a Mig.

I bet the pilots could sneak up to an SU-30 and take a photo of them like in Top Gun lol

​@@noivern666Greetings! Hahaha! 😂

Hi

Ofc man these are some of the best documentaries on youtube!

Hi

Certainly!

No problem!! Keep up the amazing work!!

IT'S THE BEST CHANNEL. A GREAT CHANNEL. TREMENDOUS

It’s a great RU-vid channel. I walked in and said “wow that’s a great RU-vid channel”

The guy who runs it, he's a speaker almost as good as Jr.! About as handsome too I've gotta admit, and I've got a good lookin' kid! Sharp as a tack, The Operations Room, good people behind it.

YUGE CHANNEL

❤❤❤❤

Those pilots had to've been so bummed. You know they were super itchy for someone to come up and try to start some shit.

@@DustinHorvath1987 lol for real. I was reading yesterday for the for all of their Air to Air superiority they have, the F22 has yet to record a confirmed kill of an enemy air craft. Owing to the lack of air battles and dog fights, in the type of warfare since their inception. Im sure people who follow these things know that, but I just recently starting reading about them and found that super interesting.

RCS is too low, plus even if they did know they couldn't do anything as I'm pretty sure F-22 outrates SU-33 in most situations even with SU-33 3D thrust vectoring the only plane in the world that could beat F-22 in traditional eye to eye dogfight is a SU-57 and there isn't many of those. Anyways I doubt there will be too many SU-57 built since the Russians will probably move to trying to get a plane capable of competing with the F-35 since that's the new thing.

@@winterinvicta Except in the real-world what would happen is that a F22 would take steers from an AWACS or its own passive sensors, and just launch a Slammer from max range. The enemy jet would have about 3 seconds to react as the missile came out of nowhere and its seeker head locked on/made the threat-warning receiver light up. And the enemy jet would still never see the F22.

@@nikoleirosati2486 But they killed the spy balloon! 😂

Russia doesn't even have a chance against Poland. It would look like Tyson in the ring with a 1st grader.

They don’t even imagine it themselves. Putin has very clearly said that Russia wouldn’t stand a chance - which is exactly why they won’t allow Ukraine in NATO. They need their nuclear arsenal to remain as a deterrent and it’s hard to do that if NATO can deploy radars in Ukraine.

nato🏳‍🌈usa 🤣

​@@mithrandirthegrey7644 Just to clarify, the way Russia is not allowing Ukraine into NATO is by having a war with Ukraine... Ukraine will very likely become a member of NATO if the war with Russia ever ends. We (NATO) just don't want to be pulled into a direct conflict with Russia right now... Who knows what may happen in the future that may lead to NATO adding Ukraine anyway... Like if Russia is crazy enough to attack a NATO member because they are supporting Ukraine, or if it becomes obvious that Russia has become very weak economically, politically, and/or militarily and cannot really continue the war.

@@mithrandirthegrey7644 With their thousands of nukes, nothing would help prevent the end of the world if a nuclear war broke out and radars in Ukraine aren't needed for detection of a nuclear launch or a retaliatory strike. Russia doesn't want Ukraine to join NATO because they'd much rather control Ukraine themselves.

Meet back in 2034 and let's see what the history books say. I'm 20, and my high school U.S history book had a detailed chapter about the Obama Administration. So, I won't doubt that in only 10 or so years this will be written.

​​@@taiwandxt6493"On July 13th, President Donald Trump would be shot in the ear by would-be assassin Thomas Matthew Crooks at a Pennsylvania rally. He would proceed to post about it on social media."

Sir/maam.... While it is highly likely a back channel conversation went very close to what you describe, it is unlikely that the United States would ever spend this much gas, labor, and wear & tear on our toys for such a miniscule purpose alone. Syria? Chemicals? Tiny contingent of lost Russians? As everyone knows and chides us, we like our gas and we LOVE our national toys. Add to this that American generals are NOT graded by their American peers on the total destruction, but instead by the efficiency with which we achieve it. Think cleaver vs scalpel. The Joint Chiefs and Secretary of Doom would never allow such a massive expenditure (yes dollars & oil) or showboat this wildly without a larger / deeper message to the rest of the world and in particular our would-be military opponents. I haven't compared timelines of Chinese, Russian, or Iranian shenanigans, but I'm sure some intel with the big 3 would match up. Idiots in North Korea as a lesser non-existent threat, but just cause they get a severe case of the Dumbs sometimes. In my best guess, the message sent was not even delivered to Syria, or for that matter to Russia in the "don't respond" sense. They were just the unfortunate morons that through their recklessness ended up being the courier for the true message. THE United States (generally) only demonstrates this kind of total unnecessarily complex and coordinated Doom Attack for communicating superpower capability.... sorry let me try that again.... SUUUUPERPOWERRRRR capability to our top 3 or 4 adversaries around the world. Because this kind of attack is completely overwhelming for ANY nation on earth, it is extraordinarily effective in communicating to the other puppies getting itchy.... YO! Stop chasing the truck, or one day soon, you might just catch it and you're really not going to like that.

@@PatrickWhelan-Rock Political stuns are conducted 24/7, many with billions of $ in the costing. Don't be so naive. Just look at historical records if you want proof of USA doing this, but every single country in existence has done it and continues to do so to this very day. (By "it" I mean political stuns/PR moves/Political power plays)

yeah, it was definitely america caring about "human rights" and "war crimes" or whatever dumb shit, america has a huge track record of that lmfao. had absolutely nothing to do with everyone in the DoD being jewish, and trump taking hundreds of millions in campaign funding from people single-issue donors loyal to only israel

The thing is there was no gas attack on civilians after the investigation the BBC did apologize to Syria. Because the victims from the videos was brought to the UN and they were alive and well. The whole thing was setup by the west and white helmets because Syria won't sell oil in dollars. This is why US is still stealing the oil today. Y'all will believe anything to justify the west wrong doings you can literally look up the investigation online.

@@PatrickWhelan-Rockit’s geopolitics my friend. This was like 2 days after Trump was officially elected president, and one of his first acts. It’s a tone setter

It's such a massive flex, I love it

@@skytron22 It really is.

Trump talks his shit, and proceeds to back them up. Madlad

He's the leader America needs now. Other leaders can't fool him and he's the best person to negotiate deals for the US. Countries won't try to fuck around like they do under Biden

Rahhh!!🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲🦅🦅

Watch Operation Iraqi Freedom

That is all it was in the end, a show of force. I remember at the time it seemed so underwhelming. Also there were a lot of people talking about how much money USA spent in comparison to the damage they did. The ratios were wild. The Syrian army brushed it off and continued as normal.

@@adamwilliams5426Wow if the Russian soldiers fought as hard on the battlefield as their trolls do in the comments they’ve been in Kiev last year

@@adamwilliams5426 Did... for some reason I don't think you watched until the end. This strike eliminated Assad's will and ability to use chemical weapons. This wasn't a show of force, it was the use of force.

It also demonstrated how big of a threat the US is globally, considering they can attack anyone and anything with such efficiency. No country should ever be allowed such position.

@@goldbullet50 You're joking right?

It was one of my favorite aircraft when I was a kid, next to the F-14 which Top Gun mad that everyone's favorite. Sadly they've been retired in the years since then and it's now the EA-18G Growler which is a heavily modified F-18 Super Hornet.

The Prowler pulled up like a grandpa at a boxing match, and still did its job well.

Churchill is one of only a handful of people to have been awarded honorary American citizenship. Also his mother was American.

It also has an exchange program with the Royal Navy there's always a Royal Navy sailor on board.

its like we have like no rules with naming ships its really insane

​@RhoDesia-gr1wb Churchill was an allied leader of a traditionally maritime power, and was made an honorary U.S. citizen. The Naval Hisotry and Heritage Command makes recommendations for ships names to the Secretary of the Navy via the Chief of Naval Operations

Americans dislike most Brits but we do like Churchill. More than the UK presently does.

Hell yeah we had the whole world scared to get to even think of attacking us or our allies!!! now look at the world under Biden

Logistics wins the wars as always. hundreds years ago mongols with their mobile horses won wars. Now huge battle fleets with lots of moving parts all around the world wins wars. The problem is cost. You have to annihilate any enemy in order to maintain those costs. Or constant small wars can wears out those supply chains.

@@djan0889yes and out lack of will to actually win any wars. We always get distracted by politicians and commentators, who know very little about geopolitics

Dictators think they can get away with anything (and most of the time they actually can)

Terror. They want people too afraid to ever rebel again. It's the only thing propping up regimes like this.

Probably because they're very effective, and to an extent relatively cheap for how much damage they can do. Gotta remember not every country follows the same rules of war.

​@@spiceytaco95yeah but why attract the retaliation? They know the U.S. won't let them get away with it. The losses they'll take from the strikes we'll respond with do way more damage than they'd save themselves from taking via the rebels

​@@spiceytaco95they are effective agains the non prepered And well noone expects a chemical attack in the 21 centry

Honestly, the US doesn't need nato. The US could actually defeat NATO by itself.

​@@POPJack1717That's because the U.S. might as well _be_ NATO.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Hows the war in vietnam and afghanistan go for them lol

@@RexEvil It's hard to win when your objective is to lose.

In Syria?

You had not legal right to be there. The US is steeling Syrian oil and starving the Syrian people for their own twisted gain, while lying to the world about the truth of the war….

@@scdrvesper6141 Probably Syria, Kuwait or Iraq. Or even Jordan. the region is satured with outposts

Syria, right outside of hajin. About 1000 meters behind the line.

Thank you for your service

we're so awesome sometimes lmao

compare this with the failure of the biden harris admin late last year and early this year

You only see the strikes from a random guy filming from his window but putting more than 100 cruise missiles on air at the same time multiple directions using different platforms is crazy hard to imagine. This is an only-NATO thing cos Russian already shown in Ukraine that shitty dictatorships can only hit hospitals or schools.

Check out the Battle of Khasham. Then check out Operation Paul Bunyan.

@@ialsoagree1634 Praying Mantis....Mayaguez Incident(though that one was messy)

It's the fact that Russians actually ran away that shows how scared they were. Besides you definitely want the Russians out of harms way to prevent a potential nuclear war.

@@langasikosana3540 No you don't. Russian soldiers killed American and Americans killed Russians in previous wars. No nuclear war happened. You people really need to quit being so easily scared of "nuclear war." Russia doesn't win that war either.....nor would they ever rebuild. They know this. Nuclear war would only happen if Russian troops were about to capture America or Americans about to capture Russia.

How Mattis lasted as long as he did with that walking OpSec nightmare is beyond me 😂

You're not suggesting it would have been a good idea for the US to hit Russian military with cruise missiles are you?

That is just a standard foreign policy thing. The strike was on Syria not Russia, and not Russian personnel.

considering that many people use Twitter including a lot of young people who might not watch the news, its an easy way to inform them on what is going on in politics

Trump tweets pre-2015 were absolutely golden. He was in his late 60s and shitposting daily. Being president killed his sense of humor.

WHERES FRANKLIN?!

😂😂last update was that Franklin was on a c17

@@mortemvenientem8147 What is this Franklin joke?

I heard they havent met back in 2017

​@@MM22966look up Habitual Linecrosser.

The French admiral must have been kissing people when that 3rd ship launched. Imagine all the jokes if all 3 had dropped the ball.

“FIRE ZEE MISSILES!” “But I am Le tired…”

@@Billy-vi8nu*le fatigue

Napoleon turning in his grave.

Mission report conclusion: "More live fire training is required"

I was thinking that they got so many Arleigh-Burke's, that they probably ran out of famous names to call them, so had to go across the pond to pick one up!

WC was far from based.

@@normiedeathsquad40 PFP checks out

Churchill had an American mother and was made an honorary U.S. citizen. The navy also had a frigate named after Harold Holt.

Well if a guy openly talks mad shit about doing something, right before it happens, I think credit goes directly to them.

Agree. Why not use the title, "U.S. Launches Massive Airstrikes Against Syria After Chemical Weapons Attack" ?

I mean, Obama got Bin Laden

​@@Mr_Sarcasum only credit that subhuman deserves is the 34 felonies he somehow racked up in addition to being a self admitted pedo

@@Mr_Sarcasum I... I don't think doing the thing you're absolutely not supposed to do should give you more credit in the end (even if it was admittedly hilarious lol)

Imagine being that third ship. No one expects to be the backup plan to the backup plan

unreliable as always

As a French I do hope the navy got its acts together by now, didn't hear about any of that at the time.

Why were they even there. US can do it by itself. Europoors

At least they got it off in the end...

Yeah that's nuts that those B1's are launching like a dozen *tomahawks* off of a *rotary* launcher. I've never seen one of those systems but that must be a hell of a machine if it can chuck that many splodey bois.

@@DustinHorvath1987 It's just like a soda machine...only bigger.

You haven't been thanked yet smh

Also how come all their research facilities and weapons stockpiles done 'sploded? Must've been built by the Russians, I guess.

What I want to know is if Russia was such good friends with Trump why he even ordered the strike... Collusion was always a hoax

Syrian civies still sleep, and if not, they're in night prayer. no aftermath footage? Idk, maybe Assad's loyalist is too good at it

Ahh those were the days, mean tweets and peace through strength 😊

Because all it takes is one threat to be carried out and we’re in the Stone Age. The growing callous disregard of nuclear apocalypse by arm chair generals in the west talking about nukes like they’re an archaic long forgotten threat is so alarming. We haven’t even had nukes for a century and already people are treating them like they no longer exist and should push ever closer to open war with other powers.

This shit has been going on since at least Georgia 2008. And I'm too young to remember either Chechnya | or ||, but I would bet on it.

Trump didn't order an attack. He isn't president right now and holds absolutely no power in government. You just paid a fraud youtube channel.

No one would survive on either side

​@@falkenlaserwe would survive because American technology is far superior to everyone else's and our delivery systems actually work. Any opponent would be glassed before they could get off more than a couple. NATO counties are far too numerous and spread out for much damage

That's nostalgic. Now all we get is American pickers, pawn stars, and ancient aliens. I miss those days.

@@TheJenor001 Scifi channel has wrestlers. Count your blessings.

Look at it from this perspective: They know they are probably in a weaker position, but if they shout, threaten, and make faces, the other side might blink and back off, and it costs them nothing to do it.

I wonder how the discussion amongst the Syrian/Russian was like Syrian Pilot 1: "Dude, we gotta scramble! Our bases are being slammed!" Syrian Pilot 2: "Na'h, most likely there are F22s in the sky now... there is no point."

They also serve, who maintain the sortie rate.

Thank you for your service.

@@kaliss7192 Thank you for thanking me but really as I said. I was just an Aircraft mechanic. I was lucky to never see actual ground in hands on fighting and combat. Besides, the discounts I got at Taco Bell over 10 years basically paid for it!

You’re not “just” an aircraft mechanic, without YOU those jets wouldn’t have been able to do what they did. You played your BIG PART in the operations and you should be proud of that, no matter what you did. Thank you for your service.

@@noynoybaqui Thank you for saying so. And I am proud of it. Everyone has a part to play in the machine!

that was a storm shadow

@@xenonfuel4496 And slow moving kamikaze drones (both in surface and air)

@@xenonfuel4496 yes storm shadow - a low observable cruise missile

Old and unfunny joke, amoeba

They didn't fail anything since their missile was still able to hit the target. You need to stop being hateful towards our ally, dude, seriously.

Stop your stupid propaganda idiot... 😊

Wtf are you talking about ?! France doesn't miss anything, the missiles hit all the targets. f... y.. 😁

The least ravaged Average France Hater :