Biden has been on national television, all networks, three times since the shooting, the first time just about two hours after it happened, and again at 1pm and 8pm Sunday, and with this prominently figured. If you've missed this, I guess it's one further datapoint about media coverage in this election.
The wife of the fire chief that died said that she heard nothing from Donald Trump. Joe Biden was talking to her by phone and gave a little comfort at an awful time for her family.
This video has really missed the mark & misjudged the mood in America right now. On what planet is this a springboard for Biden to revive his campaign? Bias shines through this video, disappointing because it’s not like New Statesmen
@@ilof8125 Then that's the conclusion they came to - they looked at the possibilities and decided they probably wouldn't happen or if they did they wouldn't work. That's how discussion works - you look at the situation, you weigh it up and come to a conclusion. We don't get enough of that as far as I can see.
Why the Bolsonaro moment ain't mentioned more recurrently? It was similar event on a similarly incindiarry politician to see how politics has dealt with an event like this
I think it's because the guy that took the photo is probably charging exorbitant prices. So people can't afford it or he already sold the rights to a news outlet.
Ex-Brit, now American here. These guests are living in some parallel universe if they think Biden can turn this thing around. I've talked to some undecideds here over the weekend and to a man and woman they're voting for Trump in Nov. As I will be...
@@xunqianbaidu6917 You don't have to. Over at The Hill they were discussing this this morning and they said word from Dem sources is the Dems are now resigned to Trump being reelected as our 47th. Polling on Friday had Trump leading in all the swing states and taking Nevada. There's now multiple paths to 270 Electoral College votes for Trump and that was before this heinous act on Saturday near where I live. That iconic picture alone will ensure Trump's victory.
@@global_nomad.yeah, it’s stupid. The Americans can call them what they want, but generally we don’t refer to ex presidents as president in the uk. So, yeah, they should stop
Ludicrously out of step. I'll never understand the need of British pundits to talk with an American that wouldn't get booked for public access TV in the US. You have ill-informed your viewers. You could at least get a milquetoast never Trumper to talk with.
Hi all, 1. Look for inconsistencies: If you listen carefully to the gunfire, it doesn't sound like clear bursts of fire as you would expect from the assault weapon found in possession of the downed, alleged gunman. Instead, it sounds more like a series of discrete shots. 2. Identify the beneficiaries: Who stands to benefit from this event? Who else? How might they be connected? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-o4jcKXicZ3Y.htmlsi=UiH5ydMkUD1ko6mQ ru-vid.comL1bwklRWKWQ?si=ML6Ubge4seBexyNm 3. Examine the evidence: Have any medical reports been published? What do eye witnesses report? 4. Follow the media coverage: notice whether it seems coordinated or excessively uniform, including the comments on this video. 5. Check for a pattern: See if similar events have happened before and they followed any similar patterns, such as the assassination attempt on Pope John Paul II. What do all these factors tell you?
Why would someone (you) who's clearly right-wing MAGA (1) watch New Statesman videos, and (2) expect them to reflect your political views? IMHO, you might be better off sticking to Fox News and Newsmax.
