Trump To Appoint Complete Lunatic To Crucial Office 

Educate yourself: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_coal_technology

Kevin Montrond Prevent them from going into the atmosphere, yes

Until we can harness all that energy effeciently and cheaply, we better stick with fossil fuels.

Realist We could if we actually invested and implicated an actual aggressive push for green tech. www.geek.com/tech/germany-produced-so-much-renewable-energy-it-paid-people-to-use-it-1654913/ It's possible if the people in power (government, Big oil, etc) actually gave a shit instead of petting our heads and telling us what a pipe dream the whole concept is while placating the "hippies" with incremental BS. You're helping to perpetuate that idea. You can keep your wiki "facts", my OP still stands because "less dirty" is still not CLEAN. Clean coal suggests ZERO pollution, and even if it's "not as bad" it's STILL polluting. The whole idea behind "Clean coal" at it's best is a misnomer that uses peoples lazy and gullible mind to go along with what the corporations want.

Andrew Mildenberg Obama tried a green energy push, and it failed...misrebly. www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/27/obama-backed-green-energy-failures-leave-taxpayers/ Again, I think green energy is great and we should invest, but the war on fossil fuels has to stop. Until green energy is cheap and effecient, we must rely on fossil fuels.

Grayson Brewer I was thinking oxymoron

Sycotic Deninard IKR, I am a Libertarian, but pollution like that imposes costs on another party, which is an initiation of force, which should be compensated by none other than the Govt. to have as a functional and theoretically correct purpose. Carbon credits was largely made popular by Milton Friedman himself, the father of the rebirth of Adam Smith economics that is Chicago School, aka Friedmanitism. He used an example of soot (old world for pollution I think) from smokestacks dirtying his shirt and hence, his wife's time, money for detergent and such being a cost imposed on him. It is direct and a violation of property rights of land (land is being infected, a initiation of force) and of body (worse health). I think this is something we can bring the Greens into the new Libertarian/Republican/Reagan Democrats with, along with the expansion of EPA as a legitimate function of GOVT to protect water/greenery. We have way to much pollution in America, we need to match the size of the industry, ensuring costs are ensued by who causes them.

low sloping forehead..descendant of Neanderthals

Spencer Bixby I am happy someone like yourself who works in that field firsthand realizes and acknowledges it.

Gas powered

David Roberts dam!

Wow, compared to all the other turk videos there are barely any trump supporters here defending his terrible cabinet...I wonder why?

Right now, Christie is on a long-term project of inspecting the underside of buses.

Whew! At least we dodged THAT bullet. Too bad we're targeted by a machine gun.

David Roberts We'll look back at Christie as the last recognizable human being being considered for a post in this despicable kleptocracy DJT is putting together.

Peter Chen in the words of the great George Carlin: the planet will be fine. It's the people who are fucked. Difference!

The earth has had times that it was one hot barren desert. Check the permian extinction. 96% of aquatic life died and 70% of all land animal went extinct. Earth recovered itself in 30 million years. The earth will be fine, but we won't be around to see it.

You can call it gallows humor.

blaze12771 Into hands of his Racist and hateful followers.

You mean "if this country will be in 4 years".

Same place. I wonder where the state of the human condition will be.

you guys seem to forget that Republicans said the same thing about Obama and the country still here

you know what the bush era people did

Future will be tremendously warm.

Kai Anttila No big deal. We will be dead by the time global warming has a measurable impact

RedCapitalist It's having a measurable impact now. Why do you think we'll be dead?

The impact is already measurable. Are you dead? I'm not dead. Pretty sure, although this *could* be Hell.

filonin2 It might kill off some people in the Middle East before I'm dead. No big deal. I can also live in airconditioned spaces for the rest of my life. No big deal

the people telling you what the decision-makers are doing will cause it? not the decision-makers themselves?

ting280 Dude, you know who I mean.

Tom J nah sorry, i really didn't. TYT's comments are so full of people who hate them now i just assumed you were one of them.

ting280 I'm willing to bet half of these trolls work for the FBI. Call me paranoid.

That much is certain.

Peter Perfect Considering who Trump is currently courting, I wouldn't be surprised

Duke could head the Office for Civil Rights.

Too scary. mike

Larry The Cable Guy for Secretary of Gittin' 'er Done.

Duke as human rights department HRD

He doesn't even know the name of the agency...

Ana is a ottomen slave holder

what senses?

Trump is not per se a bad (i.e. evil meaning) person. But he is incredibly immature as a person, and incredibly uneducated, and in addition to that completely uninterested in anything but his ego. He may be pushed into a reasonable direction by advisors, but also into a route to disaster. We will see what side will dominate.

black man snowfla Soapman The word you mean is 'Ottoman', with an a.

Someday the sun will explode too.

RancidWraith and hopefully by then we'll leave our solar system and be able to terra form planets

RancidWraith, you know full well you just compared two events that will occur at vastly different relative time frames. First off, the sun will not "explode" for billions of years, but if a runaway greenhouse gas effect takes place here, on Earth, it will happen over the course of mere centuries. So, one event will take place over 8,000,000,000 years from now; the other 100-300 years if nothing is done to prevent it. Complete logical fallacy of *EPIC* proportions, and the sad part is, there are people that actually spout this *bullshit* and *believe* it. (Hopefully you were just trolling/joking and don't actually believe that)

the sun wont explode. it will expand and eventually swallow our planet

+RancidWraith The time differential is in the order of 100 years vs 5 billion years. Congratulations on being flippant and uneducated with respect to a situation that if not drastically altered will make the planet so inhospitable to human life, leading to mass migrations of whole populations and global chaos, that any children you have will likely be forced to choose to not bring children of their own into a dying planet. But hey, we don't need to make decisions for our kids welfare, right ?

Not on steroids, but on crystal meth.

Jake K Bush, Obama and Trump are all three pieces of excrement.

Yes, the poop is great.

pope for president!

Pope is dope.

Yuri Nakamura The pope smokes dope

The pope's afternoon grope, of his favourite bar of soap.I don't think he can cope, without his foamy afternoon grope

It's cumulative. Dumbasses wrote all manner of names on the ballot.

The Visionary there is a substance that america is lacking, that is far more scary than anything youre thinking currently.....accountability.

astrea79 It's the principle

Mr420Spy Indeed ENTPs running wild everywhere

Wow, great point. That's my mind changed. "It's not that all conservatives are stupid, but stupid people tend to be conservative" JSM

Dee Smith are they all fucked- by their own ideological zealotry and ignorance?

thegaygaymerchannel all the trump morons on my face book got mad when I started using idiocracy to describe their vision.

Chris Gray all the Hillary morons on mine got mad when she lost

Idiocracy is not necessarily a way to describe something, but rather a social situation. If you're referring to the movie, Idiocracy means that genetic disaster that may occur, but I suppose Idiocracy could also refer to any social degradation caused by lack of prioritization and efficient, rational action.

thegaygaymerchannel Alt-Reich, I like that one. It's clever.

Have you ever heard of Dunning-Kruger? You need to...so busy calling people who actually fact-check and voted for the most honest candidate who thought of ways to pay for her proposals, had the experience and education, "morons" makes you fools look even stupider. You voted for a candidate who treated you like children, saying things as simplistically as possible, repeating them 3 times...and sure enough, you all repeated them in turn! The only morons are in your mirrors every time you use the bathroom. Trump did this for ego--he is lost and now willing to follow those same RNC fools who led us straight into economic and foreign-policy hell from 2000 to 2008. All the xenophobia in the world won't stop globalization. The walls that kept countries apart have been dissolving for centuries. First, man built ships that allowed them to explore the globe, then they built faster and better versions. So that now you can't tell what country the occupants of a jet are from without seeing the company and manifest. Then, man invented communications that permitted contact between people around the world, and even for less and less money so it's available to all. People share entertainment, clothing, and living tastes more every year. They dress alike, share music tastes, use the same technology, work similar jobs, have similar goals, and even eat alike more and more. We have a global economy whether you like it or not--when our economy went to hell from 1929 to the 30s, and again in 2008, the world fell with us. Trump is doing the exact same things Bush 43 did--huge tax breaks combined with huge spending (infrastructure instead of Medicare Part D Big Pharma giveaways and stupid, mismanaged, or downright fraudulent wars)....if you were bright enough to read economic predictions for the results of Trump's foolishness you would discover that ten years out we are in hugely negative growth spirals....instead of the steady 2% growth of Obama without recessions, we have modest growth with Trump's giveaway to the rich--3% instead of 2%, then up to negative 11%! -11% Picture that recession/depression. And those other countries who threaten Trumpers so much? Imagine how they feel! They never hurt us intentionally. But we'd be screwing them for the 3d time in a century.

wtf how is he hot?

Bruh you blind?

Joseph K Those sexy glasses and his idgaf about Climate change attitude....

E. M. Fisher lol

He’s like a vampire stuck at the wrong age….

Not if you're a greedy, repressed Republican.

working in the field i want to blame Al Gore, but its really the backlash from Al Gore, and the Reagan effect, solar panels are supposed to be unsightly and all the white people go "NIMBY!" cause they need their suburbs to be, um, yeah.

gisforgary It's funny to me because I think they look cool and futuristic actually. But that's just me.

Sometimes you get the peaked cap with death skull, sometimes you don't but, yes, those well-dressed, soft-spoken, soft-skinned pasty white guys are Hell.

It's their chance to get even for all the swirlies they got in school.

qhsperson They've got a lot of getting even to do then.

RancidWraith they encourage their utility to source clean energy. you can do the same!

RancidWraith solar power?

Found it! Check out the TYT take on Trump TV. Titled "Trump TV: About As Terrible As You'd Expect". Then go to the 4:56 time mark.

and What the f**k means..

Andrew Todaro he just might be. And America, a final term country.

Yeah yeah yeah... it's all our fault... doesn't have a thing to do with the fact that the choice was between Trump and a criminal who cheated her way into candidacy and tried manipulating her way into the oval office. Pull your head out of your ass. When the left stops being more corrupt than the Trumps they're competing against, they won't lose.

J Koz wow... excellent point!!! I can see that any minute now liberals are going to turn it around because they're so willing/able to carry out serious self examination and modify their approach.

+gracie12091 Well Gracie... you're overlooking A LOT of Clinton's corruption and you're claiming that a lot of LEGAL things Trump has done are "corrupt"... but either way, it's irrelevant because the majority of Americans disagree with your assesment of the situation. Don't bother blathering about popular vs electoral either because if the system were different the campaigns would have been different... and in any case he won, against a stacked system, in the world we live in and live in it you must.

there were third party candidates that you could have voted for...

you didnt hae to vote for either of them...third party

"Not everyone who goes to secondary school gets one of those diplomas, and the título really represents something beyond our high-school diploma, something akin a certificate from a community college in the U.S." Accounts of his education have been exaggerated, but he's still more qualified than the moron they talk about!

+Mike Cimerian THIS is what you had to say about this?

He's a Marxist antichrist.

You are welcomed to leave.

these facts have me triggered. waaaaaaaaaaaaahhh!!!!!!!!!

rich bound the unsubscribed button is just one finger tips away

Yer right, them climate scientists have nothing on a shill for the energy industry.

How is this whining? Also, no one gives two shits if you want to unsubscribe.

why not 1000? It was warmer 1000 years ago than it is today.

He's talking about a particular satellite temperature dataset that had seemed to show no warming for the past 18 years. They conveniently choose to dismiss 1997 because that was before a strong El Niño event (when temperatures rise), even though they did include the 2015 El Niño. So you have one El Niño temp rise and two El Niño cooldowns. However, the satellite data now shows a 0.18 degree warming because the satellite drift has been fixed this earlier this year. This drift was causing a discrepancy in the data. Ground temperature measurements, which many scientists call more accurate, all show warming in the past 18 years. The procedures in putting the satellite data together are very messy. So here's what NASA's global surface temp analysis says: In 136 years of modern record-keeping, the top three October temperature anomalies have been the past three years (2015, 2016 & 2014). In addition, the first six months of 2016 were the warmest six-month period in this 136 year temperature record. Every year new temperature records are broken.

***** You think land measurements are more accurate than satellites? LOL. Here is a map of NOAAs land measurements. More than half of earths land has ZERO data. www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/service/global/map-land-sfc-mntp/201609.gif How the hell can they accurately measure land data when half the earth has no data? Data is MADE UP to fill in the blanks. Thats called shitty science. I choose not to believe shitty science. You are more than welcome to. Satellites cover the entire globe with better accuracy. Satellites show NASA is exaggerating what little warming, if any, has occurred over the last 20 years, which is what Ebell is saying. According to satellites, records are not being set every year.

First off all, the surface temperature record goes back more than 136 years, which makes it better for separating trends from short-term fluctuations. The benefit of satellite data is, as you say global coverage. But like i said, combining satellite data is difficult. Satellites do not directly measure temperatures, and are subject to large systemic biases due to orbital decay, diurnal sampling drifts and changes in the satellite used. The uncertainty in satellite measurements is much higher and varies between the two different groups collecting the satellite data. Regardless of you opinion on surface measurements - which is kind of beyond the point, as they measure different things and satellite data goes through many more adjustments, or 'filling in the blanks' - the two methods combined still show a consistent global warming trend. Besides, more than 90% of the heat that the Earth retains ends up in the ocean, it’s how much the oceans have warmed that will tell us most about climate change.

***** *surface temperature record goes back more than 136 years: It goes back way more than 136 years. 4000 years: www.powerlineblog.com/ed-assets/2016/06/climate-civilization-gisp-chart.png 1 million years: www.giss.nasa.gov/research/briefs/hansen_15/fig1.gif Please explain to me how humans caused peaks of warmth in the past. Or if you can't do that, please explain how the current warming has nothing to do with the reasons why the past warmed. *combining satellite data is difficult: No shit, thats why scientists, computer programmers and engineers compile the data. *Satellites do not directly measure temperatures: News flash for you, thermometers don't directly measure temperature either. We measure the behavior of the mercury, or alcohol, or metal in the thermometer to get a temperature reading. Satellites measure the amount of radiation coming from oxygen in the atmosphere and convert to a temperature. Same concept, different medium. *more than 90% of the heat that the Earth retains ends up in the ocean: LOLOLOL. This theory was put forth to try and explain why there was no warming in the last 18 years. So you cannot deny an 18 year pause in temperatures and subscribe to this 90% theory at the same time. So you have contradicted yourself. Here is the abstract from the paper: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013EF000165/abstract The first sentence of the abstract says global temperatures have stalled. Which brings us back to your original post of why only 18 years. And by the way, the 90% of heat going into the oceans has been debunked here: judithcurry.com/2014/07/22/are-the-deep-oceans-cooling/ and here: hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/07/why-ipcc-exaggerates-greenhouse-forcing.html and here: hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/01/trenberth-debunks-himself-oceans-didnt.html

The issue of our time /s

D Fisher least of your worries , you better hold your breath!!

Calm down retards. No one is taking your guns. This literally isn't an issue.

enjoy ur guns while u can.. they won't save you from the rising tides/ and extreme temperatures and natural disasters.. that are to get worse soon..

Calm down retards there is no hard evidence that global warming exists. NASA has some website for it but its just to get more funding. The 99% scientists agree thing is a myth, those were 75 cherry picked scientists looking for funding. There are as many arguments that disprove global warming as there are that prove it. And there are thousands of scientists that don't believe there is enough proof, and even if it is true, it's occurring at such a slow pace that we'll develop several new energies or be wiped out by nuclear war or a meteor before it's a real threat.

I think the opposite actually. People come and go, but if you f*ck up the earth, it just may not come back. We may really need to find another planet.

I can't argue with that.

WW3 is unavoidable, but with third world countries, and it's not your psychological mexican fence which will stop the starving refugees.

profd65 Look for tyts video on TrumpTV and you will understand

"Surabees" = Fratboy Boris Epshteyn "calling out" his BFF Andy Surabian on the first day of Trump TV, "so people know."

Koch brothers ? Or military ?

SIR Peter Gembus or ManBearPig?

Probably Russian troll bot...

yoo yee Yup, that's what The Young Terrorists are.

SIoyvenheaven1 Huh? No no, that's not what I wrote, you are the Russian bot.

You want a cookie?

Kelly K you just took a *Trump*

I named it trump in honor of its trumpyness

Knappikus that happened the day Trump won the nomination.

@WillNaman. I think the US needs to stop living in it's bubble.

Zachary Leatherwood prime socializing skills. muted! feel free to talk to yourself ;)

p.s. lame-ass tattoo. later, hater!