Set out to play a territorial game! Lets see how that goes... ●New Store● dwyrins-merch.... ●Twitch● / battsgo ● Support the videos and get rewarded! ● / dwyrin ●About● dwyrin is a full time U.S Go player and teacher
Yes, this is why i emphasized the though process with how to figure out if the move is fundamentally sound what to do about it. So you, too, can better plan how to handle these sorts of moves and not use them in your own games! good luck!
M17 just lives. It was totally reasonable and AI thinks it was one of the top moves in the position. It's unreasonable for dwyrin to think that it was just dead.
It's interesting to me how C3 was open for pretty much the entire game until end-game moves. Was it intentional that you chose NOT to invade that particular area in favor of the center strats? If so then that was not Basic - presumably the priority is Corner, then Side then Center. Playing for the Center instead of invading an open corner is not "Basic".
@@jacksonfitzsimmons4253 Bro you are way off base here. This has nothing to do with AI moves. I wasn't talking about early 3-3 invasions like the 3rd or 5th move. The lower left corner was open almost the entire game. It would have been reasonable to expect Black to either severely reduce or take away the corner from White in the Mid Game.
top invasion needed dealing with, the right side attack gave me influence that needed utilizing. breaking off from either of these to invade the 3-3 in gote would have been a very bad result. corner - side - center is for developing OPEN or uncontested corners sides and centers. i had already approached the corner, he claimed it. anything else is simply an invasion and wasn't large enough to play.
The invasion at M17 doesn't seem bad, and there's no reason to repeatedly say "it's dead". A single capping move at M15 doesn't seal the group. The whole mood of the beginning of the video (intonation, making faces at your opponent moves, ...) was very negative for something aimed at teaching people Go and where you're playing even against someone significantly weaker.
I agree with this as a constructive criticism. Maybe instead of calling it dead, just explain calmly why it's bad even if it lived (like he then showed in the video). Although I understand it's his way of reacting with such emotion, but definitely a habit that could be changed a bit for the sake of improving the lessons. Still the content is great and he managed to show us how to deal with it without using any overly complicated move.
Meh, if this were in-person face to face then you'd be right. But it's just an anonymous game. Like road raging on the freeway, it doesn't actually affect anyone emotionally, and the shock value helps you learn and remember
I repeat vital lessons in the game to ensure those moments stick out for those watching. there are hundreds of things to learn over the course of the game, but thats way too overwhelming. emphasizing game changing lessons over others will help viewers focus on the lessons most likely to improve their gameplay. thats also why i break out another board and go over alternate moves. As for the faces, can you give me a time stamp so i can see what you're talking about?
@@dwyrin You're just... completely wrong, despite doubling down. The invasion was a green move that only loses -0.3 points, which you yourself say is meaningless at anything but a pro level. Their invasion *absolutely* lives locally or escapes, it was a perfectly reasonable move to play, and your opponent's followup was all AI top moves until you backed off. OP is 100% correct, and your behavior around the invasion is such a bad look especially when you're already sandbagging. There's a trend in your videos of arrogant dismissiveness of your opponent's moves combined with wild overconfidence. Your attitude reveals itself to be "When I lose, it's because my opponent is flailing unreasonably and gets lucky. When I win, it's because my opponent is playing stupid, bad moves". This is exactly the reason why the critical reddit posts exist, and it's frustrating you continually avoid reflecting on it and instead choose to evade or make fun of any criticism you receive.
