Trying to Avoid Warrior w/ Zoo Warlock on Ladder ft. Gallon 

4 stats for 1 mana? It's practically a battlemage!

@@520_metal And Taunt too? opop

I remember Reynad used to run shieldbearer in zoo back in the day

Tempo

Calling that deck control is a massive stretch.

@@Mouse_Librarian it controls the board. So it is a control deck. Its not old fatigue-style warrior but it's not aggro or mid-range either

@@miorioff Zoo also controls the board, so is zoo a control deck also? No. Both of them are tempo decks which play very similar to midrange types. They try to win through tempo and only trade when advantageous.

@水銀燈 It isn't, though. By that logic, literally every deck in the game is a control deck since they all play minions and react to board states. You're overgeneralizing.

@@Mouse_Librarian Aggro-control is and has been a named archetype for decades

Concede and try again looks to be the easiest solve. Note that at the start of the video he was willing to drop rating to ensure better matchups. Especially since ranking up is easier than ever.

Yeah I've climbed pretty fast at low ranks with this deck by either starting with scrapheap imp turn 2 or by digging for answers by discarding hand of guldan on turn 2/3 them dropping 2 imps turn 4 in slower matchups. The deck has crazy highroll potential and good board swing tempo turns Vs aggro but I've found it very luck dependent

@@Osric24 only because he didn't care about the ranking to practise the matchups he will play against in a tournament where he bans warrior

@@herrkapilz7459 only caught that later, but tbh, advice still applies. With high roll aggro/ tempo decks, you go for winning or losing as fast as possible for fastest ranking by sheer numbers.

Yeah, instead of not drawing them, you should try drawing them instead

Could be a pretty cool Rogue card idea

No

PLATEBREAKER TECH

mountain giant rotated

hand isn't full most of the time anyway so even if it was playable mountain giant wouldn't be very good in this deck

Thanks! MG would probably fuck up the discard mechanic anyway

It would also clog up the hand of guldan discard effects a lot of the time

Besides what the other say, it is in principle bad. You only have a full hand if you get the second best combo of the deck (first is scrap imp + 1 drops, second is hand of guldan + discard), adding a card (MG) that is great only in the scenario where you already drew a good combo is not necessary, you already have the combo and are probably 50%+ likely to win. You need cards that are good when you're drawing bad and not have any of the good combos.