Тёмный

Type 055 class: Is this class a destroyer or cruiser? 

Military TV
Подписаться 747 тыс.
Просмотров 87 тыс.
50% 1

In today’s episode, we are going to take a look at Chinese Navy’s Type 055-class Is this class a destroyer or cruiser? If you eager to know more, don’t go anywhere and stay tuned.
The People Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) Type 055 guided-missile destroyer Nanchang was commissioned at a naval base in the city of Qingdao, located in the eastern China’s Shandong Province on 12 January 2021. With the NATO designated name of Renhai-class, Nanchang was the first new warship to enter service with the Navy in 2020. Due to its dimensions and range of capabilities, the ship was classified as a cruiser by the United States. In addition, as the United States Navy defines a large multi-mission surface combatant with flagship as a cruiser, it can be concluded that the U.S. expects Type 055 to have a similar role as the Ticonderoga-class cruiser.
Given its superiority, the Renhai-class is arguably more than a destroyer. It has the potential to outperform its predecessors, the Luyang-class destroyers, in terms of strategic air defense, anti-surface, and subsurface capability. It outperforms any of China's neighbors' surface combatants of a similar class, particularly the South Korean Sejong-class destroyer and the Japanese Atago-class destroyer. The warship is definitely a great addition to strengthen China’s blue-water combat capacity. At the same time, the cruiser-like destroyer will also affect the balance in the region.
All content on Military TV is presented for educational purposes.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
/ militarytv.channel
defense-tv.com/

Опубликовано:

 

14 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 308   
@sebastijanglozinic8630
@sebastijanglozinic8630 Год назад
I have to admit, i find the Type 052D and Type 055-class ships to be absolutely gorgeous. With that sleek, low RCS hull shape and the bright grey paint scheme.
@NeMayful
@NeMayful 2 года назад
One of if not the most beautifully designed ship in global water indeed. Man just look at this thing at 1:04. Clean AF.
@lxjilyfe
@lxjilyfe 2 года назад
doesn't matter if it's a destroyer or a cruiser, as long as it looks good.
@Niatnuom_Esiotrot
@Niatnuom_Esiotrot 2 года назад
Its a destroyer with cruiser characteristics.
@ALWH1314
@ALWH1314 2 года назад
@@Niatnuom_Esiotrot so, Japanese Izumo DDH-183 is a frigate with aircraft carrier characteristics. How about Zumwalt, a ship with pyramid characteristics?
@Niatnuom_Esiotrot
@Niatnuom_Esiotrot 2 года назад
@@ALWH1314 That's a money shredder with stealth characteristics. Its inappropriate to classify it as a ship.
@NeMayful
@NeMayful 2 года назад
@@ALWH1314 lolol fking hilarious.
@Serolfarim1
@Serolfarim1 Год назад
Look good in youtube until they got into real conflict, russian tanks and planes getting taken down by the javelins and stingers, weapons that were on shelves for quite a while before they arrived in Ukraine.
@hx3060
@hx3060 2 года назад
relax everyone it's a fishing boat.
@alirazi3028
@alirazi3028 2 года назад
That’s rubbish and you wouldn’t say this if you come face-to-face with it in real life. 🙄
@cielo7911
@cielo7911 Год назад
@@alirazi3028 relax,it’s a joke in China, we sometimes call our warships fishing boats because our military photographers don’t seem to know how to make the ships look big, instead they always make them look as small as fishing boats in the photos😂
@xartimus18
@xartimus18 Год назад
Haha, Sony makes a better one. Fishing boat look good on outside!
@HUA-XIA
@HUA-XIA Год назад
战忽局的同志别装了😏
@youarebeingtrolled6954
@youarebeingtrolled6954 Год назад
Y so wollied😂
@GreatMasterGaming
@GreatMasterGaming 2 года назад
that prounciation of Qingdao made my brain slightly hurt xd
@gadgetgasspoll2923
@gadgetgasspoll2923 2 года назад
Kuingdao 🤣
@amarylsigma6891
@amarylsigma6891 2 года назад
What's the right pronunciation then?
@GreatMasterGaming
@GreatMasterGaming 2 года назад
@@amarylsigma6891 in chinese the letter Q is a very light kind of "ch" sound. so Qingdao pronounced is "ching dao"
@zsarimaxim692
@zsarimaxim692 2 года назад
@@amarylsigma6891 Qing pronounces like chin.
@yuluoxianjun
@yuluoxianjun 2 года назад
@@zsarimaxim692 Maybe Chinn is better english prounance
@ethanmac639
@ethanmac639 Год назад
Destroyer = air-defense for carrier strike group(s) & offensive attack role vs surface ships Cruiser = ABM shield & land attack role & secondary role of air-defense when needed for CSG Frigate = Anti-submarine role in CSG's & light secondary roles of air-defense and offensive attack vs surface ships
@kw8435
@kw8435 2 года назад
Considering the type 055 role in the PLAN navy's carrier battle group, it could potentially be called a cruiser in western standards (again, there are still ridiculous examples like germans designating their 8000 tonned F125 ships as frigates). However, unlike the Ticonderoga class, the ship is not know to serve any dedicated roles in the battlegroup and preforms very similar antiship and air defence roles like it's predecessors. Thus, it is usually known to most chinese military analysts as an enlarged version of type 052D, which up to date is still in mass production, forming a high low combination of primary surface combatants for the PLAN navy.
@MrFlatage
@MrFlatage 2 года назад
Haha here is the Chinese edit troller. Who is screaming for Xi that China has carriers? Lmao! Cannot use capital letters like children in 1st grade, lol! So easy to spot Chinese. Cannot use basic grammar. No 50 cents for you.
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
It’s a light cruiser…I’m really struggling to see how so many are failing to grasp this concept.
@christopherchen6170
@christopherchen6170 2 года назад
@@aaronmonke6825 can you elaborate why its a light cruiser and not a large destroyer?
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
@@christopherchen6170 tonnage and displacement. 10-12k tons is a light cruiser. 15k like the zumwalt is a cruiser comfortably. Anything over 20k is a heavy cruiser Anything larger then 25k tons starts blurring the lines into capital grade classment pending ship class.
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
@@christopherchen6170 Navies have been clever with words to try to get things approved by government and hoped no one is paying too much attention to notice.
@alancranford3398
@alancranford3398 2 года назад
Cruisers are capital ships and often are command centers for fleets and expeditions. If there's no separate flag bridge for commanding a fleet, it's a "destroyer." Cruisers need but don't always have facilities to run an entire expedition.
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
They are not capital ships. Capital class assumes first rate size and armament. So Carriers, Battleships, and Battlecruisers are Capital Ships. Even the heaviest cruisers are not in that class. Kirovs are the only BC’s of capital grade in the world that’s still in service and it dwarfs whatever you call this. You can have stand in flagships and then there’s The Flagships.
@lzyJ
@lzyJ 2 года назад
Although the Type 055 destroyer are big step of Chinese Navy, but the Type 003 aircraft carrier which like little Hawks but more advanced are much more attractive to whole world, closest to US.
@dasasda2595
@dasasda2595 2 года назад
best part is it costs $900mil ,a us destroyer costs 1.8 billion
@marcelpavlik7976
@marcelpavlik7976 2 года назад
because cheap labour force
@iqbang9236
@iqbang9236 2 года назад
It's because of its high efficiency in production, indigenous technology, equipment, and weapons.
@joshuaraewa-ay9684
@joshuaraewa-ay9684 2 года назад
2 13,000 ton beautiful sleek destroyer Vs 1 9,800 utilitarian yet sleek destroyer. Pick
@zhli4238
@zhli4238 2 года назад
Obviously, this can affect Japan’s reactions. To ensure Type 055 will not start a new naval arms race, China classifies it as destroyer. The argument is supported by Type 055 roles will be carrier group defense not a flagship. Japan and South Korea read American faces for own plans. Zumwalt is bigger and classified as destroyer.
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
These are only play on words and they hoped no one noticed too much. 055 is a light cruiser, Zumwalt ls a cruiser being 15000 tons of displacements, they call them destroyers in hope they can keep getting funded till someone notices…Japan is the biggest perpetrator of calling a ship class something it’s clearly not, like their Izumo Class destroyers….
@CRS.AE1235
@CRS.AE1235 5 месяцев назад
zumwalt is a bloody faliure
@stc2828
@stc2828 2 года назад
Zumwalt is a destroyer, Type055 is a fishing boat!
@haikaloronsentnel138
@haikaloronsentnel138 2 года назад
YEAH ID!0T!!!
@paullamhk
@paullamhk 2 года назад
是的~
@alirazi3028
@alirazi3028 2 года назад
You would have to be a nincompoop to say Type 55 is a fishing boat! 🙄
@stc2828
@stc2828 2 года назад
@@alirazi3028 It's a Chinese meme that every Chinese knows.
@iqbang9236
@iqbang9236 2 года назад
The Japanese 26,000-ton helicopter carrier "Izumo" was called a frigate. Yes, you heard it right.
@pratyushojha
@pratyushojha Год назад
It is what the PLAN says it is. Because they are the ones who have designed it. They are the ones who decide the employment doctrine. So they are the ones who decide exactly what this ship is.
@yuluoxianjun
@yuluoxianjun 2 года назад
The most dangerous thing is always very beautiful
@Kane-ib5sn
@Kane-ib5sn 2 года назад
Ticonderoga class, for example is not a Cruiser. Sure, it may be designated a Cruiser, and have the 'functions' of a Cruiser, but it is not. it's either a Super-Frigate or a Super Heavy Frigate - since Destroyers had a specific offensive task in WWII, while also including an escort task for major capital warships...or a convoy. Cruisers on the other hand, in WWII often joined up with other capital warships for offensive tasks, primarily - surface raiding, or hunting down other capital warships. they were used as more solitary units by themselves - because they had more stores, greater range. lastly, Cruisers had armament and more armor; which basically says that they are meant for surface warfare almost exclusively, but had air and anti-sub defenses just in case. the only remaining Cruisers in existence is the Kirov-class.
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
Kirovs are Battle Cruiser’s old boy…they are of Capital ship grade quality in size and armament and only 50 feet shorter then a Iowa. Most cruisers of late are light cruisers and don’t even come close to the heavy cruisers class of 20,000 tons. A Kirov is 28,000 tons so well over twice the size of a cruisers displacement.
@Kane-ib5sn
@Kane-ib5sn Год назад
@@aaronmonke6825 you're not accounting for the change in displacements, over time - everything has gone up in displacement, by a factor of five or greater. nor, are you accounting for the lack of armor that the Kirov has - it simply isn't suited for receiving much in the way of surface damage. if it were a battle-cruiser, which did in fact cross-my mind, it would be very close to a WWII battleship displacement - because we're talking in modern-times now. where, an aircraft carrier now weighs up to 100,000 tons. in my estimation, it is only a cruiser. a battle-cruiser in the modern-era, would weigh as much as an American battleship, such as the Missouri. nice try, though. you've got to understand, i've been following warship designs since the early eighties, all the way to the present - Jane's warships, everything. and even before that era...
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 Год назад
@@Kane-ib5sn ummm no SoDaks and Iowas were 2-3 times the full load of a Kirov in displacement. It’s a battle cruiser. It’s speed, range and complement are of capital grade and the armor of a cruiser. While displacement is larger then a early dreadnought. Ergo it’s a Ship design enigma that confuses many on what it’s “class” is= battle cruiser.
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 Год назад
@@Kane-ib5sn Carriers need to be that big because of the growing size and weight of aircraft. Since WW2 they have gotten quite large….To maintain the complement of previous classes hangar size had to grow and thus more larger ships were needed. There are reasons we don’t build 50k plus ton surface warships anymore they are irrelevant and so is your subjective reasoning on the navy…This is rather elementary.
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 Год назад
@@Kane-ib5sn 100,000 ton battleship or battlecruiser would absurd Oldboy. Say it out loud and you realize how silly that is.
@iqbang9236
@iqbang9236 2 года назад
Why does Japan call the 26,000-ton helicopter carrier Izumo a frigate? not even a destroyer or a cruiser.
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
That’s a play on words to adhere to their “self defense force” clauses. Treat it like the Graf Spee. It’s a light carrier wink wink I mean destroyer…
@alanOHALAN
@alanOHALAN 2 года назад
they will build a 80,000 ton carrier and still call it frigate.
@jerrymelendrez2072
@jerrymelendrez2072 Месяц назад
Japan is still under the effects of a treaty they signed after the 2nd war. It's a consequences that prohibits japan to create, build and even operate an offensive military force. But the japanese government has been bending and seeking loopholes from this treaty to modernize their "defense force". Js Izumo here is an example. It's named a frigate since a frigate is an escort ship and not an attack ship.
@ryank3281
@ryank3281 2 года назад
Not sure about it’s true battle capabilities, but it does looks good.
@user-no8or5ls4v
@user-no8or5ls4v 2 года назад
@@juhao356 颜值就是战斗力吗?
@spencer7404
@spencer7404 Год назад
It doesn't matter. It's a command ship. You won't just be facing one type 055 ship. The same goes for F-22 and J-20.
@mingsong1491
@mingsong1491 2 года назад
Type 055 is a super destroyer,not cruiser。cause the cruiser can perform separate battlefield masking tasks,like Glorious Class,and Kirov-class Peter the Great nuclear-powered cruiser
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
Pytor Velikiy is a battlecrusier... Its a capital ship. 055 is a light cruiser.
@ethanmac639
@ethanmac639 Год назад
battlefield masking tasks?
@LordEmperorHyperion
@LordEmperorHyperion Год назад
And capable of sinking US carriers
@ethanmac639
@ethanmac639 Год назад
@@LordEmperorHyperion exactly!
@ethanmac639
@ethanmac639 Год назад
don't worry, i am sure China will build a massive powerful cruiser class
@paullamhk
@paullamhk 2 года назад
No worry, 055 is just a fishing boat
@alirazi3028
@alirazi3028 2 года назад
That’s rubbish and you wouldn’t say this if you come face-to-face with it in real life. 🙄
@johngauntlett4915
@johngauntlett4915 2 года назад
With all of its capabilities, why not just call it a bruiser?
@startrek1127
@startrek1127 2 года назад
Because the Chinese Navy no longer needs cruisers.
@MrFlatage
@MrFlatage 2 года назад
Because every 6yo navy cadet knows that would classify it as battlecruiser.
@ryanhuang3875
@ryanhuang3875 Год назад
Lol, 130mm naval gun is not enough!
@bg24955
@bg24955 Год назад
Destroyers are beefed up version of torpedo speed boats. Cruisers are gun platform. Battleships are bigger but slower protected gun platform. Modern ships are missile based. Doesn’t fit, does it?
@apsgeneralstudies5673
@apsgeneralstudies5673 2 года назад
LOOKS LIKE A CRUISER , WORKS LIKE A CRUISER , FIGHTS LIKE A CRUISER , So what it should be called ?
@aphrodo1688
@aphrodo1688 2 года назад
Actually, it is used to fish.
@busariatanda2296
@busariatanda2296 2 года назад
Definitely a CRUISER, 100%
@roybutty9483
@roybutty9483 2 года назад
big ship
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
Light cruiser
@abcdefgh-hz6pk
@abcdefgh-hz6pk 2 года назад
A Boat
@archangel7052
@archangel7052 Год назад
055 can now launch hypersonic anti-ship missiles.
@王星瑞
@王星瑞 7 месяцев назад
Type YJ-21?
@Yakupcxs
@Yakupcxs 2 года назад
Will there be a video about the destroyer tf 2000, also it is expected that the Atak 2 t929 will be placed on this ship
@kevinyu-it8lc
@kevinyu-it8lc 10 месяцев назад
I like it cuz it just looks badass AF,haven't seen any boat cooler than this nowadays.
@ThatCarGuy
@ThatCarGuy 2 года назад
It's a destroyer as modern ships all have gotten bigger. Modern frigates are coming close to 1970-1990s destroyers in size. So when modern cruisers start to be built they will be 20,000+ long tons.
@MrFlatage
@MrFlatage 2 года назад
Sorry Chinese fake name troller. It is designated as Renhai cruiser class under UNCLOS and International Law. Your lies have failed. Facts from official democratic sources easily defeated your BS. No 50 cents for your comrade.
@Absolut531kmh
@Absolut531kmh 2 года назад
@@MrFlatage what?
@Absolut531kmh
@Absolut531kmh 2 года назад
@@MrFlatage tf is wrong with u
@MrFlatage
@MrFlatage 2 года назад
@@Absolut531kmh Ah here we have the slander hurling troll who cannot end sentences. Yes there is something very wrong with you. Off topic trolling for all to see! No 50 cents for you comrade. Facts will be facts.
@Absolut531kmh
@Absolut531kmh 2 года назад
@@MrFlatage what? XD
@aison2735
@aison2735 2 года назад
Now destroyers are more and more like cruisers, and the boundary between the two has been blurred
@陈文辉-u5z
@陈文辉-u5z Год назад
Zumwalt class is larger than 055, but it is still classified as a destroyer by the United States
@MultiMagnis
@MultiMagnis Год назад
IT is a cruiser but some wish to classify it as a destroyer in name as to make it seem as a non threat application. cruisers are the first to get a target lock in an all out ship to ship war
@511132123211356
@511132123211356 2 года назад
whatever cruiser or fishing boat, looks great, and it's great
@KondorDCS
@KondorDCS 2 года назад
What mistake would it make if it's classified as a cruiser or a destroyer? It will be doing the same thing.
@百亿补贴勋多多
@百亿补贴勋多多 Год назад
Don't be afraid, everyone, it's just an armed fishing boat
@SULFURIOUS
@SULFURIOUS 2 года назад
Modern Cruiser, it has many traits of the capital ship. Modern "cruisers" can be only slightly bigger than a DD's, mainly because of the technological progress, and China has it all (sadly).
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
It’s not a Capital ship, it’s a light cruiser…Heavy cruisers displaced 20,000 tons and are not Capital grade. Capital Ship assumes first rate in size and armament. Kirovs are the only BC’s in service of Capital Ship grading and they dwarf whatever you call this tin can.
@SULFURIOUS
@SULFURIOUS 2 года назад
@@aaronmonke6825 I never said it is a capital ship, read more carefully.
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
@@SULFURIOUS I did, it bears no traits even close to a capital ship..
@SULFURIOUS
@SULFURIOUS 2 года назад
@@aaronmonke6825 depends on a country... I wouldnt call US normal one... Most cant even dream about CV or even LHA or just simply it doesnt make sense for it (mediterrean, baltic where whole area is within land air planes). Even check out German Fleet, it kinda fits in with some traits. Most countries do not need long range power projection fleet.
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
@@SULFURIOUS Countries are irrelevant to ship class designations. Draft, displacement, size and armament dictate that, not subjective opinions in the matter.
@winterstang7084
@winterstang7084 2 года назад
It is fishing boat instead of cruiser. But I love this.
@musa7010
@musa7010 Месяц назад
Don't worry it will soon catch your cod 😂😂😂
@lingth
@lingth 2 года назад
it's a destroyer because I am sure a bigger one is going to come.. lol.. i wonder if China will build something similar to the Kirov
@fragfmgill
@fragfmgill Месяц назад
They seem to be entering the bigger is better phase so i wouldnt be suprised. Which is strange as all the other navies around the world are going smaller than bigger.
@fragfmgill
@fragfmgill Месяц назад
its defiantly a cruiser which is strange as the west is certainly shrinking their ships than making them larger.
@edwardtang1977
@edwardtang1977 2 года назад
It doesn't matter if a cat is black or white, as long as it catches mice. You can call it a panda.
@Cid-4-Cid
@Cid-4-Cid 2 года назад
Clever little one.
@edwardtang1977
@edwardtang1977 Год назад
🐼
@u.s.s.commanderalanmw9203
@u.s.s.commanderalanmw9203 Год назад
Type 055 is arguably a destroyer. But in terms of weapons, this is literally a Crusier (Or in my terms, a Battle-destroyer/crusier)
@amunra5330
@amunra5330 9 месяцев назад
Maybe a Heavy Destroyer?
@gn0me420
@gn0me420 2 года назад
10000-13000 tons, i'd say it is an enlarged cruiser, but today it's more about what kind and how many missiles you can carry.
@oweerogee1263
@oweerogee1263 2 года назад
it's definitely a cruiser, although load amount is not the only standard, calling a 12000 ton warship a destroyer, or calling a 8000 ton one a frigate, is just ridiculous.
@shanshan2077
@shanshan2077 6 месяцев назад
Is it important? The Japanese even call an aircraft carrier a destroyer :))
@MrSchwabentier
@MrSchwabentier 3 месяца назад
and Germany calls everything a frigate. Because destroyer sounds too brutal...
@diogocatalano9557
@diogocatalano9557 Год назад
In my opinion they are themost beautiful ships nowadays, along the Admiral Gorshkov.
@redhongkong
@redhongkong Год назад
some nation still use main gun caliber to determine ship classification. nothing wrong with it been a 130mm destroyer XD. maybe a lead destroyer.
@sergeantblue6115
@sergeantblue6115 Год назад
Destroyer leaders, large destroyers and super destroyers are kind of a middle ground between cruisers and destroyers, its description is rather vague since you can classify these ships as either of them, Nanchang fits in this ambiguous category of ships. Weight wise the type055 would be comparable to the light cruisers of ww2 and slightly heavier than the Ticonderoga class cruisers. Length wise it would be around the length of helicopter carriers(such as the hyuga class, chakri naruebet, IT trent etc.) and slightly longer than us cruisers but still smaller than russian cruisers(slava/kirov class). I'd like to hear from your opinions since the results is still inconclusive.
@tvgerbil1984
@tvgerbil1984 Год назад
It is said to have built-in facilities to command a battlegroup and would probably be classified as a cruiser in the USN. It has heavy anti-surface, anti-aircraft armament and also the displacement equivalent to a Russian cruiser, allowing it to have the power and endurance to strike out on its own. So it would probably be classified as a cruiser in the Russian Navy. It would probably be classified as a destroyer in the Japanese Navy because the Japanese like to classify anything bigger than a trawler as destroyer. It would probably be classified as a cruiser by the British because the British just hasn't got one anymore.
@ALWH1314
@ALWH1314 Месяц назад
Japanese labels their Izumi carrier as a frigate, 055 should be a corvette.
@-00N000N
@-00N000N Месяц назад
Does not matter when the ship fails when a 5cent computer chip fails from the factory below the apartment next to the naval yard.
@harus3921
@harus3921 2 года назад
ArlieBurk Sejong Atago are all destroyers. Why is 055 not ?
@johnsilver9338
@johnsilver9338 2 года назад
If this had AN/SPY-6 and Brahmos cruise missiles together with Tomahawk and LRASM for antiship and land attack roles, with SM-3 for ballistic interceptor and SM-6 and SkyCeptor missiles for air defense this would be the world's deadliest destroyer.
@regizeelement8511
@regizeelement8511 2 года назад
Type 55 has better weapons and systems… on,y Burke Flight 3 can compared, which is not in service yet
@dadidadida123
@dadidadida123 2 года назад
Why 055 want to get downgraded?
@johnsilver9338
@johnsilver9338 2 года назад
@@dadidadida123 Its Type 346 radar is ok, but its not the best. So to itz weapons. In terms of antiship missiles, its YJ-18 is outranged. It also dont have a longer range air defense interceptor.
@panyimao
@panyimao 2 года назад
@@johnsilver9338 😄🧠
@ozsharpener
@ozsharpener 2 года назад
It's far beyond that with its shared aperture, multi band AESA radars.
@ChandranPrema123
@ChandranPrema123 2 года назад
4:00 Is that an American Flag on a Chinese Ship,Why?
@tianlingchen5523
@tianlingchen5523 2 года назад
Because it was a friendly visit
@sshao8128
@sshao8128 2 года назад
It’s international navy’s ceremony. When your visit other country‘s port, raise their flag at the main mast for friendly and polite.
@MrFlatage
@MrFlatage 2 года назад
Why do you believe such a flag exists? There is no 'American Flag'.
@sshao8128
@sshao8128 2 года назад
@Francesco Zhou In 2016, 153(type052C) participated the RIMPAC
@MrFlatage
@MrFlatage 2 года назад
@Francesco Zhou Ah the Chinese denial troller. Lacks the intelligence and education to ... end sentences, lol!
@bullymuguire4088
@bullymuguire4088 Год назад
Amazingly described
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
“It’s a light cruiser”
@ALWH1314
@ALWH1314 Год назад
Korean Sejong class and US Zumwalt class are both bigger than 055. If 055 is a cruiser, those two are battle ship then.
@王星瑞
@王星瑞 7 месяцев назад
Sejong is a bit smaller than 055
@IrishCarney
@IrishCarney 2 года назад
I bailed out after three mistakes. For starters, it's the People's Liberation Army Navy but you forgot the apostrophe-s. Each subsequent mistake cost you more credibility until I gave up.
@ah5878
@ah5878 6 месяцев назад
Western tradition naming the class with the first ship name, so it should be Nanjing class, where is the “Renhai” came from? If Japan calls carrier a frigate, Germany calls destroyer a frigate and U.S. call the giant Zummwalt a destroyer, 055 should be a corvette.
@自律生活
@自律生活 Год назад
055 is beautiful
@alanOHALAN
@alanOHALAN 2 года назад
Nobody uses cruiser designation anymore. It is obsolete like battleship.
@jimmywang525
@jimmywang525 2 года назад
beautiful beast
@user-vv7ir1pl4j
@user-vv7ir1pl4j 2 года назад
When china makes a cruiser thr west will call it a battleship
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
No I call it a light cruiser…
@Agent77X
@Agent77X Год назад
More of a cruiser then a destroyer due to size!😮
@A350Airways
@A350Airways 6 месяцев назад
It's ironic that, in the pre-WW2 era, especially in the 1920s, cruisers might have had significant firepower for their day and size, but they were limited to 10,000 tons (at least in theory); today's USN seemed to classify as cruisers virtually any principal surface combatant with a displacement of 10,000 tons or more...
@octeapartyblog3294
@octeapartyblog3294 2 года назад
Why is there a big U.S. flag on this Chinese ship next to a big Chinese flag?
@MrFlatage
@MrFlatage 2 года назад
Study your maritime protocols and UNCLOS.
@yuluoxianjun
@yuluoxianjun 2 года назад
When USA and China is still friends
@HideeyeeL
@HideeyeeL 2 года назад
Modern Warships brought me here 🎮 📲
@marisa5457
@marisa5457 7 месяцев назад
it is the weight of a heavy cruiser in ww2
@stevenwong2777
@stevenwong2777 8 месяцев назад
What a thirty years in Hedong and thirty years in Hexi
@kuri7154
@kuri7154 2 года назад
Reminded me of the Victory II-class star destroyer somehow
@akmalhafiz8763
@akmalhafiz8763 2 года назад
For me it's a cruiser
@fungames24
@fungames24 Год назад
It should be called a carrier because it carries things.
@Terracotta-warriors_Sea
@Terracotta-warriors_Sea 2 года назад
If Korean Sejong the Great-class is considered a destroyer with 10k tons full displacement, 128 VLS cells and 16 anti ship missiles, then Type 055 with its 112 VLS cells are rightfully classified as destroyers.
@xinyiquan666
@xinyiquan666 2 года назад
korean destoryer? that crp, it is self claiming 128 vls cells ,but more than 2/3 of its cells are empty and have no function, korean ship use everything made in US, CHINESE destroyer is puerly domestic made
@jimmycho7256
@jimmycho7256 2 года назад
Sejong the Great-class is a joke🤣
@lagrangewei
@lagrangewei 2 года назад
Sejong VLS is misleading, half of those are actually short range missile defence due to it need to operate close to the DMZ. the Type 055 VLS are alot bigger than those short range VLS, in fact each of it VLS can carry 4 short range missile. the Type 055 firepower is therefore more than double that of the Sejong.
@alexyan999
@alexyan999 Год назад
韩国人的船 128个单元直径可比055的小多了,不一样的东西 不能看数量了。
@zhangyi5145
@zhangyi5145 2 года назад
neither destroyer or cruiser, might be just a fishing ship🥶
@WBCY2024
@WBCY2024 Год назад
Type 055 is 11k tons, US zumwalt is 15k tons. If zumwalt is designated as a desteoyer, why isnt the renhai type 055? 😂
@umu8934
@umu8934 2 года назад
Small destroyer in a size of cruisers
@regizeelement8511
@regizeelement8511 2 года назад
Stoopid…. Ticonderoga is only 9000 tonnes lmao
@japanesebattleshipyamato5115
@japanesebattleshipyamato5115 2 года назад
Type 055 class I think this ship is not destroyers because is big ship and this ship is a cruiser
@jaarongarcia8280
@jaarongarcia8280 Год назад
Si su fabricante y propietario dice que es un destructor, eso es. Lo que opine Estados Unidos o el nombre que quiera darle, no tiene importancia.
@jamesharris4695
@jamesharris4695 2 года назад
Why is it flying an American flag at 1:37?
@liangxu
@liangxu 2 года назад
I think it is an old picture which was taken at the time when US and China still could have a joint navy drill.
@alanOHALAN
@alanOHALAN 2 года назад
Pan Pacific exercise.
@musa7010
@musa7010 Месяц назад
Pleej saaar after Dumbwalt class indiot navy Kalakutta class destroyed is best saar
@jara312312
@jara312312 2 года назад
"made in china" is supposed to throw away after using couple of times
@Cid-4-Cid
@Cid-4-Cid 2 года назад
You know nothing about China,哈哈哈哈哈哈
@alirazi3028
@alirazi3028 2 года назад
You are ignorant. For your information, Chinese-made military hardware are much higher quality and more durable than Chinese-made consumer products.
@Sinister_Crimson_Titan_MW_2800
I love this ship
@Cid-4-Cid
@Cid-4-Cid 2 года назад
You don't need to care about its positioning, just one thing need to know that we can crack down on imperialism. 不需要知道它的定位,只需要明白,我们要干帝国主义就可以了。
@youarebeingtrolled6954
@youarebeingtrolled6954 3 месяца назад
Its Chingdao not Queuing dao
@naiboz
@naiboz 2 года назад
It’ll be whatever they call it, these classifications get more meaningless every year
@aaronmonke6825
@aaronmonke6825 2 года назад
It’s simply a light cruiser not that hard…
@Wargamer_Asian
@Wargamer_Asian 2 года назад
Type 055 is a super saiyan destroyer and she is powerful than 🇺🇸 USA DESTROYER 🇺🇸 👏
@FahrurRoziqin
@FahrurRoziqin Год назад
it's a Cost Guard ship
@xushenxin
@xushenxin 2 года назад
This class should be called boater class, because it kind of looks like a boat.
@thomas_jay
@thomas_jay 2 года назад
It's a destruiser.
@Absolut531kmh
@Absolut531kmh 2 года назад
Smart
@铺陈卷子
@铺陈卷子 2 года назад
所有评论就服你
@alexwang9914
@alexwang9914 2 года назад
it can shot bullistic missile to reach 1000 km range too
@supernodream
@supernodream 2 года назад
The gun of 055 is less than 203mm, so it's of course NOT a cruiser.
@大毛猪乔治
@大毛猪乔治 2 года назад
055的垂直发射单元的口径有800MM
@kadrikada4834
@kadrikada4834 2 года назад
We should call eliminator.
@dadahan-qf5mg
@dadahan-qf5mg 2 года назад
It's a fishing boat
@chinadragon7713
@chinadragon7713 2 года назад
its not what the Americans thinks it is, its what the Chinese say it is
@daveincv
@daveincv 2 года назад
It bigger then a Ticonderoga...from the 80"s so it a Cruiser and it is looks really good. the Tico's are falling apart. But the US will make something better soon. and we can play ww3 together
@Bonjour-vw7wb
@Bonjour-vw7wb 2 года назад
Pronunciation of Qingdao 🙈
@bprogressive
@bprogressive 2 года назад
why renhai just call 055.
@startrek1127
@startrek1127 2 года назад
05 stands for Destroyer and 5 stands for Type 5
@zplee1357
@zplee1357 2 года назад
nope, 054 is a frigate, and 056 is a corvette, infact PLAN don't have regulations by 05 stands for Destroyer. destroyer's, frigate's, corvette's code in PLAN's planning in order by project-review. 07 stand for amphibious is right. Renhai is NATO code name. PLAN don't use this.
@Bohemian0522
@Bohemian0522 2 года назад
if by Western standard, this should be called the Nanchang class after its lead ship. I'd usually just call it Type 055 or Nanchang class. Never a fan of NATO reporting name cause it sounds stupid and makes no sense if you understand Chinese words.
@georgejosol6773
@georgejosol6773 3 месяца назад
First class immitation made in china. Not battle tested for display only and bullying
@alsouza8284
@alsouza8284 11 месяцев назад
destroyer
@Δ.Ανδριοτης
@Δ.Ανδριοτης 2 года назад
It is a cruiser.
@小水獭一般兵
@小水獭一般兵 2 года назад
good
@weilee1155
@weilee1155 2 года назад
1:33 Why Chinese ship fly US national flag?
@chencl-vs2du
@chencl-vs2du 2 года назад
赴美参加的环太平洋军演
@williambenedictalava2634
@williambenedictalava2634 2 года назад
She is a Cruiser to me.
@Mr.Su-35Flanker-E
@Mr.Su-35Flanker-E Месяц назад
It's a destroyer and and NOT a Cruiser
@飒飒-o3i
@飒飒-o3i Год назад
Type055 just a frigate😏
@DaveSCameron
@DaveSCameron 2 года назад
We humans just can't help ourselves can we, doesn't anyone read history anymore?
@yuluoxianjun
@yuluoxianjun 2 года назад
The only thing we human learn from history is:We human never learn something from history
@Cid-4-Cid
@Cid-4-Cid 2 года назад
Haha, there is only one thing in the history book: survival of the fittest.
@DaveSCameron
@DaveSCameron 2 года назад
@@Cid-4-Cid That's quite profound!
Далее
РЫБКА С ПИВОМ
00:39
Просмотров 521 тыс.
An in-depth look at the Type 26 frigate design
13:50
Просмотров 448 тыс.
Top 10 Russian Warships ❌ Top 9 Russian Warships ✅
11:05
Top 10 Destroyers In The World 2024 | Ultimate Ranking
15:39
Indo Pacific 2022 - Day 2: Surface Vessels
14:46
Просмотров 153 тыс.
Combat Fleets: Type 055 Renhai-Class Cruiser
5:30
Просмотров 12 тыс.
РЫБКА С ПИВОМ
00:39
Просмотров 521 тыс.