U.S.-China Relations 

Imagine one of your friends/colleagues (the US) keeps telling you (China) that he wants to talk to you on one hand, but on the other hand is constantly supporting your younger brother (Taiwan) in severing the siblings relationship with you, and at the same time ganging with other friends/colleagues (G7 & Europe) in spreading lies to defame you. Do you wanna continue maintaining a cordial relationship with him?

China don't tell the US how to run their country, the US keep lecturing China on how to run China and even interfere with China domestic politics including Taiwan issue. How can China meet the US halfway?

1) The Taiwan issue is a season unending. There isn't a strategic reason nor urgency to change the status quo. Neither side want to fight. Why rock the boat? 2) If China doesn't invade Taiwan, would the US stop the hostility and be friends again? Of course not, Taiwan is the pawn, not the issue. 3) If you haven't noticed, China is kind of rigid. Western countries talk about "values", but China talks about "principles".

1. U.S.-China relations will worsen in the future. 2. U.S. has a strong belief in " DEMOCRACY AND PLUTOCRACY " and does not accept other types of regime. The Koren War and Vietnam war are two of the numerous examples. 3. China's rise has become a nightmare for U.S.for quite long time because U.S. does not have the mindset that " ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME " and that each country has its own right to choose the type of regime which best suits its own country's domestic and unique conditions.

On Kashmeri advice not to shout back. Americans are the type that would keep on pushing when ignored. . . like a toddler. Not pushing back would altogether be taken as a weakness by the very shallow young culture that's been chiefly moulded by Hollywood. That false sense of superiority that developed over the years of movies like Rambo and Mission Impossible. China shouting back, take it as a disciplinary action from a roaring elder.

The level of bias towards China in this panel is a bit shocking! I would hope that future discussions would be more balanced as there are legitimate strongly opposing views that this panel completely ignored.

A significant disagreement between the US and China is that China is self-governed and not under US control. The US has military bases in several countries, including Japan, South Korea, the UK, Australia, the Philippines, and Germany, which follow US directives. It may seem puzzling why China does not comply since the US has the strongest military power and advanced weaponry.

the panel reminds me of Dowagers of Middle Kingdom Won’t criticize CCP

46:10 Blinken trip was meant to address the political question of Taiwan. Biden has said on one occasion that US does not support Taiwan Independence. Blinken's job was to regurgitate that.

Excellent discussion !

China should promise to remain the status quo for next fifty years and focus on its own economic development. The three parties would feel much relaxed.

Imagine if China supports puerto rico independence and have warships off the coast of florida. US wants to keep playing the big kid on the block. China wants an equal relationship.

It is not too hard to see the way the former ambassador talked which showed his is a China hawk.

You should be afraid when America starts caring about you .

I think that the US has been accommodating China regarding Taiwan for many many years now. I think that you guys are underestimating China's ambitions and that's dangerous. What would happen if China took over Taiwan? How would it affect the US and the world? I didn't hear anything about this from you guys.

Lol these people are delusional

Does that India is an obstacle to BRICS currency and de-dollarization? Does India, is an obstacle to de-dollarization and BRICS unity? Will India's participation hinder the BRICS' ability to cooperate? Since India has refuted the BRICS country’s new currency, potentially in response to pressure from the United States, that could cause the group to disband by the US playing on the long-standing conflict between India and China. Many scholars argue that India has abandoned the Global South, which is merely a breach of its pledges to the BRICS. The sound argument is that India cannot influence the coherence of the BRICS group significantly, no matter how hard US-led West wishes or pushes India. Since many countries are interested in and so many prospective new members join BRICS, the group will likely scale its de-dollarization agenda, and plausible that BRICS will expand its de-dollarization objectives. Using India and China's protracted rivalry to its advantage, the United States is hoping it might be able to succeed, causing the BRICS to fail. This will have far-reaching consequences for the cohesion of the BRICS and, thus, the group's future. The United States takes advantage of the protracted dispute between China and India by proposing technology transfers in exchange for India's potential interference in BRICS-related initiatives. The United States also aims to contain China to maintain its hegemonic dominance. The United States is betting on the probability and peril of Indian BRICS sabotage. Due to their long-standing antagonism with China, it would be advantageous for the West, led by the United States, to exploit and manipulate their geopolitical advantage over the BRICS nations. The BRICS nations are dedicated to genuine collaboration and sovereign equality. The BRICS are advancing multilateral and egalitarian international relations, and their practice and expansion of these relations demonstrate their repudiation of the current flawed international order and distribution of power. Even if it takes longer than anticipated, this action will significantly contribute to forming a new global order. The appearance of the BRICS nations was a necessity. These nations are endeavoring to establish a mutually beneficial, independent relationship founded on parity. As a result of the unstoppable trend and the shared objective, the cooperation and cohesion of the BRICS nations have reached unprecedented heights, contributing to the organization's increased allure. The geopolitical entity BRICS will have a significantly greater impact on the current state of international affairs. Consequently, the United States-backed global order will confront new challenges. The fact that each independent BRICS nation can confidently assert that it is on par with every other member demonstrates that the BRICS are not governed by or used as a tool by a single government. This is one of the reasons why the United States finds the BRICS nations so compelling. Even if the United States is merely interested in joining BRICS, as other organization members have stated, it may be permitted. The United States could join BRICS if it legitimately desires it. India’s geostrategic position exposes as less stable than previously believed. Are they on the side that will inevitably prevail in history? Uncertainty exists regarding whether the Global South can rely on India as a dependable partner. A sound argument doubts India's geostrategic credibility by questioning its judgment and policies about global South issues. This is because the idea raises questions regarding Indian geostrategic discernment and policy about the Global South. Her current foreign policy should reflect her ambivalence about non-alignment.

a bunch of panic old men

Totally naive about the evil of CCP.

CCP does not play by international rules Please try visit Tibet with a picture of The Dalai Lama