U.S. Navy Has a Nuclear Submarine That Can Destroy A Country in Minutes 

I hope we have really fantastic interceptors too.

I really don’t think we have shit on Russia. I pray to 🙏GOD🙏 I’m wrong!!! And if we have good interception technology, we don’t have enough.

@@creescrazylife901 you dont have to worry about Russia much here at home, we have much more suffocated weaponry thank to Trump that is, only problem is having the right guy in the White House to use them without hesitating!! But I'm with u I pray we never have to find out!!🇺🇸💪💯

@@creescrazylife901 I think you may be correct. But, Russia is a poor country. Maybe they are just BSn us on the amount they have. I hope.

@@creescrazylife901 amount doesn't mean everything. It's all about how effective they are. Also, both probably have a shit ton more than what the public knows or what we 'think' we know.

Yup...my US Navy veteran friends who served as submariners call these subs "Krakens" and for a very good reason.

We honour their service while we strain ourselves to find a way that overcomes war. New thinking and new faith is needed. My father fought in Holland in WWII.

Submarine in world war 1 ?? Really ? Wow I thought submarines are started use second world war onwards . U2 boats . I never knew the submarines had a very vast history

He was a hero, we salute for the fallen of The US Army

Ohio class submarines have 24 hypersonic missiles trident d5 with 8 nuclear warheads each can be sent to different target's. enough to wipe out all Russia and China. there is 18 of those subs

You're right each missle can have 10 1.5 Megatron warheads

@@ralphharper2414 actually they are 475 kilotons each and can all be sent to different target's. that's 8x24 475kiloton nuclear warheads on just one sub there are 18 of those subs. that's 3456 475kiloton nuclear warheads enough to wipe out all of Russia and some

@@boostjunkie2320 the one we had were 1.5 Meg on trident c3 on an old Franklin class boat

@@ralphharper2414 the Trident 2 D5 holds 8 475kiloton warheads on the Ohio class submarine

If people Stopped hating America for no reason and we’d have no reason to do this.

So it’s all the fault of every other country?

@@johnmoore9862 it's not any particular country's fault. It's humanity's fault. It's a flaw in our DNA and genetics that makes us this way

@@thepearl28. That is a much better reply than SinCity’s comment. It does seem we all have deep deep tribal attitude & are programmed to dislike others who live differently from us, & that applies to all.

Wake up. Human beings kill each other. It’s our nature.

You are right. But we do feel the nerves! I served on a Dutch submarine. Walrus class. In a NATO exercise we attacked many ships, including sinking the U.S. aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt CVN-71 after two attacks and we managed to sneak away. We also sank many of the Roosevelt's escorts, including the nuclear submarine USS Boise, a cruiser, several destroyers and frigates, plus the command ship USS Mount Whitney. After many stressful hours the celebration makes it all worth it.

I served as a Missile Technician Chief on the Ohio, and 3 other smaller SSBNs. It is dedication to duty, pride and professionalism that drive us. The Ohio and her 'siblings' have been out there since the early 1980's. And yes, they could do what is said, although the men and now women would only do so on the orders from the President.

@@tomkiley6370 shipmat those of us on the floating city above admire you and appreciate you all. Anchor Up

@@GWS-schouwen I assume the Carrier and its escorts was expecting your attack and was listening for you, but failed. Reassuring for you, not so much for the sailors on the carrier.

@@minerran That's right. They knew we were out there, but didn't detect us and expect us from the direction and place we came from. I think the strength of this class, besides the fact that these subs are small and silent, that they are very good in undeep waters while American subs are good in deep waters of at least 200m/650ft.

Exactly! Imagine iff russia or China had such a weapon.

@@barbaraedwards4802 They do tho, both sides would be annihilated within hours

@@Lubet0TheGreat we will see how good the Russian and Chinese subs are when the yanks knock seven bells.out of em, lol

Russia's navy is significantly weaker no doubt. Their strength lies with their huge amount of mobile land based Topol ICBM's. Just as effective but far less expensive. Biden is very wise not giving Ukraine the capabilities to attack Russia beyond their border. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has gone poorly to say the least but they have always been willing to accept massive losses in order to achieve victory. They've already inflicted $960 billion in damage on Ukraine. It's going to be a very long winter for them. No matter how long it takes, Russia will prevail.

i may be wrong but if we're talking about Virginia class subs, the navy has 21 of them, 20 are active.

W E R U L E

Hey Karl, we are in this together, brother!

@@jeffparker9791 Absolutely mate!👍

🇺🇸 🤝 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 friends for life, hope you're all keeping well

@@jonathannoonan8596 Nice one mate.All the best from over the pond! 👍

well, unfortunately there is "MAD" . Meaning, you shoot they shoot back and all is a part of history by then

As a lifelong resident of Michigan I thank you for your service.

And your point is what?

Thank you for your service I can never express how grateful I am to you God-bless and wish you the best of luck in life

What was your rate?

@@patrickbukowski9667 ET/RO

There is NO defense against incoming Missiles. Only 100 need to make it around the Globe 🌎 to end the human race.

I docked and worked on the Benjamin Franklin down at KingsBay ,Georgia when I was stationed on the USS OAKRIDGE and then undocked.

Thank you for your service Sir🖖

No one asked

@@RoadRunnerProduction No one asked what?

My cousin was on the Ben Franklin about that time frame, not sure if blue or gold crew though

Like all defense, better to have than not to have

@@Dobrulez70 That's why those north koreans build nuke. The usa cannot push into their land without the threat

We are tired of this ...this one has this one has this one has even North Korea has ...if it is the end ww will die

According to God's word earth has only been here bout 6000 yrs

@@JamesJustice-rs5yc 🤣

Von Steuben (Gold) 77 - 79 refits out of Holy Loch, Scotland.. real nice place!

nucsublant??!!, that is funny, and no such thing!

Thank you for your service @ G. Howard. US Army 1977-81

Small world , was an ELT on USS LAFAYETTE gold SSBN 616 , 3 patrols out of Holy Loch . Fish and chips every other night. Pints of heavy 69 pence.

Thank you for your sacrifice

Area51 👌🏻

They have.

Alien technology of flying on a broom. 😂

LOL first build hypersonic weapon, Russia is far far ahead of USA in nuclear weapons,hypersonic weapons, missiles defense system, iCBM technology, USA nuclear weapons are 15 kilo tons while Russian are 50 mega ton, Russian nuclear bombs are far far damaging than USA, and also Russian iCBMs are faster and can go longer than USA, Russia is the one who built rocket engines to usa. Your own generals said the USA have no defense against Russian hypersonic weapons. What a joke.

@@johnlopez1604 Russia's nuclear capability is ancient like the rest of it's military. That's been proved in Ukraine where they took a battering by western armaments. U.S. and Europe have a missile defense system, better intelligence, quicker response, Russia would be annihilated before it's first hypersonic intercontinental missile even enters orbit. United States will never advertise it's capabilities, like Russia, because this is a sign of fear. The two militaries are miles apart, U.S. main adversary isn't even Russia, it's China. Russia is now a bankrupt state.

that wouldnt destroy any country.. people over estimate the blast radius of these weapons and fallot.. Its hillarious people live in the cities that were bombed by the USA in japan.. :)..it only takes a few years to recover not decades

My dad told me about Trident III when I was 6... I'm 40.

@@KrGsMrNKusinagi0 yes that’s true, but that was also in 1945 with a much smaller warhead in relative terms. In the event of an all out war, you’d have hundreds (or thousands) of much more powerful nukes blowing dust and debris into the atmosphere. Nuclear winter is a real, and terrifying, outcome.

What scares me is sooner or later a technical problem could set one off, it nearly happened in the state's I believe

typhhon

You are right on the money with your comment,Thank you for your insight.

Yeh even the last 50 years unbelievable tech (mind blowing).

Sad, but true. Everything technological has changed......But WE havent.✝️

You're absolutely correct what a very intelligent man you and you are God-bless and hope all is well

We are nearing the crescendo of this , all this will culminate into either a dystopian hell on earth with AI dominating and enslaving us or wipe us out entirely. And Jesus is coming soon :D

George Carlin: Earth will shake us off like a surface nuisance.

Dude, they don't have anything that can reach us and we have the ability to stop anything far from landing on our soil.

@@gpnulife that's what you think. Why do you think they rise prices here so it may go to the military. Lot the government don't want us to know.

@@gpnulife top generals in the US have stated in the event of a full exchange, MAYBE we could stop 30% of missiles, if we're lucky.

@@gpnulife The first mistake in war is under estimating your enemy. Now I don't believe the people of Russia are our enemy, but just like the USA, Russia probably has weapons not on the hooks and not known.

Interesting. I think you would.

50 years latee and that scream of the b52 still intimidates the world! Can't imagine what it must have been like during those really intense years when Ivan was looking very scary

@@MrNb131 Easily shot down these days though.....😕

@@earljohnson2113 yeah this ukraine war is showing that big machines can be neutralized with hand-held weapons, whole different ballgame

@@MrNb131 yep, lots n lots of simple stuff beats huge monumental stuff.

WOW.

Nice One

He was wrong because everyone will be dead. RAD will contaminate the water and soil, crops will not grow and die and anyone that is left after the first strike will either kill themselves or die of starvation or radiation.

@orrett - I think one needs to distinguish between the Permanent/Deep states of both Russia & the US (and the PRC too) vs. their people. The peoples of the world of course, do not want war. The Russian people certainly do not. But the Permanent/Deep states of both Russia and the US want what is in their "interests". Its clear Putin does want war with Ukraine, and their land. Probably Transnistria & Moldova too. Maybe the Baltics. He already has Belarus, and hegemony of Kazakhstan. But the US Permanent State too has a history of waging wars to further its "interests". --We were notorious for using force to further our economic interests in Latin America pre-WW2. And pretexts were arranged (Gulf of Tonkin, Iraqi WMD) for wars against N. Vietnam and Iraq. No elected or appointed officials were ever held accountable --- via the equivalent of a Nuremburg Tribunal for those "mistakes" -- keep in mind, 2 MM southeast Asians died from that conflict. And America just "forgets" to hold anyone accountable. ... American "mistakes" are often more bloody than Russian maliciousness.

Great, I am smiling already!

The Russian army has proven ro be incompetent and their sub would probably end up blowing its self up if it was ever used

Yes, but doesn’t work that way. Approval can be retrospective. Executive order can approve the order to launch depending on circumstance. US has a no first strike policy, not a no instant retaliatory response. Russia MUST know that MAD applies just as much today as it did in October 1962

Russia have more Nuclear warheads ,,incase of an attack its who fires fast without esitation because they are massive destruction with no winners ,,but all that matters is who fires fast for more accuracy

@@boxing.ascetic I remember the cold war ,,SOVIET UNION KGB was mostly ahead of the Americans

proof of a troll is found in the randomly generated username, comrade.@@user-jm5ho8pq5t

😂🙈

😂🤣😂

@@soulabear9146 tf is funny

@@teronmillen59 Murican Arrogance 😂

@@soulabear9146 compare US Military spending to others. Maybe you can see something there.

@@auggieazure8633 US Military Industrial Complex spending all that Monopoly Money, on faster ways of Killing

junk

@@KepperKleen Donkey Face AOC HERE!

Please don't bomb the lingerie haul girls.....😕

@@earljohnson2113 😝

Not really, it's a bit limited in how far and in which direction the warheads from the same missile can be targeted.

@@QuasiELVIS close enough for Hand grenades and horse shoes and, oh...... Nuclear Weapons...🤔

@@earljohnson2113 are you talking about china?

@John Cliff lol u mean the bellarus of Putin or the israelíes immigrants/setters?! Stay home and do another job, actually u r worse, crazy Putin claims that they r defending thier borders but Bush and blair and their very well paid mercenery(paid soldiers r merceneries) traveled accross the globe for that!

How do you know ?

Because he has a brain and it's common sense...

@@Desekratedd Are you a nuclear weapons expert ?

@@cbing4036 🤣

You know if the shit did hit the fan and nukes were launched. I'm sure rich people living in there lavish shelters would still live like rats underground for awhile but after the bombs go off their supplies would eventually run out! Either way let's just hope it never happens and we don't let idiot crazy dumbasses like trump or putin kill us all!🤞

They would have a better shot at shooting down one of our B2's than an ICBM. And shooting down a B2 is damn hard. Basically it would take an extremely lucky shot.

We'd better beef em up again.

Finally, l a person that knows what is what, Hoo Ya! For those that don't know, that is what we said in Navy Deep Sea Diver training.

@@tweekrseekr8816 I'm a muff diver. So Hoo Ya !

If I was an enemy of the United States I wouldn’t make the mistake you just made… There’s more than enough in our arsenal to kill the entire planet 20 times over no matter where the detonations actually occur, the food supply of the entire planet would be contaminated within 96 hours and won’t return to an edible state for at least 60 to 150 years… no human would survive more than a few months… I’d say we still have more than plenty if we should need them… And if ours aren’t enough the other 15,000 that would be launched in retaliation would finish the job… I’d say you are very incorrect that it’s not every bit the deterrent is very much as strong as it’s ever been… And I wouldn’t be so sure there are fewer out there, the newer physics packages are tiny, many more than you think could be lurking in few delivery packages, and let’s not kid ourselves as to the number of devices in orbit shall we… And they don’t have to destroy hardened targets my man, they just have to get within a couple hundred miles of the grain feilds, that’s how they kill!

This is what happens when UK and US put there heads together and make a super killer sub they both use! UK has a very similar version but the main point of these subs is the Trident missile system

Yes, YOU might struggle with that rope lash up thingy as shown in this video.

I couldnt handle being inside a small space for months on end.... I heard you need to pass very heavy screening and a lot of psychological tests to be able to serve on a sub...

@@tigerjonn thank you for your response, yeah guess it’s not for everyone I love the sea and it’s something different

If German soldiers were tried and found guilty for following orders and killing civilians then what punishments should militaries face for threatening to destroy the entire world.I In this video the narrator proudly tells us that one submarine has the power to destroy the world several times over.This is complete madness!!

That is why Russian wants to be left alone. But no, the US pushes nato to their boarders to encircle them, poking the bear. When they plead and plead, no response until they react. And the Commedian in Ukraine does not know he is being used. He wants nato to confront Russia on his behalf and to start nuclear war.

Yes but made in China it'll probably be rusty by now

@@donlofting4268 I do bet you will find a lot of made in china stuff in the US submarine aswell

Nuclear fallout from even one destroyed nation would destroy this world for thousands of years or more...three would be no winner...all human life would be extinguished and any life that would possibly make it underground would live to die there in their fancy coffins.

Drop nuclear bombs on civilians knowing that there will be no response, as is the American way. But Russia and China are not Japan in 1945. Russia has more nuclear weapons than the US.

Russia propaganda that's all

@@andreyg.2388 Russia being broke?

@@speedmaster001 Such unsmart question... Read more macroeconomics, I'm not gonna teach you.

@@andreyg.2388 Dude 760 Bilion$ vs 56 Bilion$ Defense system make a lot of diference 🥲

You sure? Unless Isreal and North Korea have secret nuclear weapons they do not have enough to wipe out the US landmass.

@@ajcso7844 The radiation cloud, that develops after the explosion, would be spread by the wind. The radiation alone could potentially kill millions of people and make vast areas of land uninhabitable. According to scientific analysis that I’ve seen on RU-vid. In any event the enormous devastation from the initial detonation and the spreading radiation poising would make survival unlikely for millions of people. The infrastructure would be destroyed by the explosion and the ability to get food, water, and medical treatment would be extremely difficult at the very least. It might be a blessing to die in the initial explosion rather than experiencing a slow and painful death in the aftermath, IMO.

@@larrys9879 Oh wait nvrm I misread the information. The estimate could go up to 100.

That won't stop any of the people you just mentioned. They are not stupid but they are mentally unstable and want to rule the world.

I remember a quote some where between the POTUS and the USSR General Secretary from the cold war: "I can destroy you a thousand times over. Yes Mr. President, but I only need to destroy you once."

Oh but it will. Bible Prophecies must be fulfilled. Christ and the Angels (aliens) will save our hide though.

Nah, the weapons today aren't as powerful as those from the 50's and 60's but still devastating.

@@Alps6408 I beg to differ.

Thats the thing people need to absolutely understand. Nuclear holocaust is a lose/lose situation. Period.

“They” have junk

@@USAMontanan that "junk" is enough to wipe out US and make it uninhabitable for 100+ years. Search Cobalt bombs

@@thanikk990 I agree 👍

much bigger actually.

you are over estimating russian tech.

@@waybee100 err they just sent a rocket into space, I'm sure they could hit a target the size of murrica

@@johnfrancis2215 on a good day….lol. Which day depends on whether they remembered order the fuel delivery….lol

🤣🤣🤣 sure

The US could fight them both from their chairs at the super bowl........

@@harbselectronicslab3551 Hahaha

Your hope means the doom day

@@weigangfu8826 It is the dooms day the way things are heading.

Like there tanks....Junk.

@@scottrobinson2286 Waiting for you on your tanks....

@@denym2209 I don't understand your question, I'm worried for the poor Russian soldiers who's tanks get blown up easy,also there subs not to reliable with the recent tragedies in past.

@@scottrobinson2286 Russian tanks, unlike European and American ones, have an automatic ammunition loader, this is their advantage in battle and at the same time is a weak point, since the ammunition is located inside the hull and therefore, if a rocket or RPG is successfully hit, the ammunition explodes, and the abrams or other tanks, the ammunition is located in the back of the tower and there are special knockout panels, in addition, all European tanks and American tanks did not participate in serious wars against a modern enemy who has modern anti-tank weapons, so now it’s hard to say which tanks are more effective in such conflicts expensive abrams and leopards or cheap t 72s that were produced like Kalashnikovs.

3miltoiletseat

I sure hope you're right. I'm thinkin that space shuttle wasn't going up back n forth just to study bees in space...😉

@@earljohnson2113 or research on perfumes

If it makes you feel better, we spend nearly six times as much on healthcare. If we could cut that in half we could double our military spend AND pay off a $1 trillion in debt a year.

@@masterchinese28 I know

Forgot about the nukes bro say smthng to russia now boy

@@FFNeptune what do you expect me to say to the Russians or more to the point the Russian milary. They have embarrassed themselves enough so I will abstain

@@scottaubrey9046 ye conquering Ukraine is embarrassing nice and Biden going Iranian instead of Ukrainian

@@FFNeptune but my Russian friend Russia is not conquering Ukraine, it has just had it's arse handed to itself in the North and is struggling to hell in the south and that's without mentioning it's flagship has been sunk. That victory parade in May is going to one hell of a job to pull off that's for sure

@@scottaubrey9046 flagship sunk n everything still ? Wht u gonna do the fight is on and russia is winning and ye russia is using a very less amount of military power in Ukraine and we r also selling oil to our allies like India so don't worry ukraine gonna go down and u guys provoked russia to do it

Quiet while doing so is more to the point.

Canada is a big country still no place to hide.

Wow, what if one goes off accidentally

Question, how does that firing of the weapons work? What's the process? What stops someone firing one off?

@@PHTV11 It takes multiple to fire a nuclear weapon. I won't get into details. No one person can fire a nuke.

@@slowgoat6089 It would not be a nuclear explosion. The warheads are not armed until they are launched. It takes a certain firing sequence for a nuke to go off. Otherwise, it is just the TNT that explodes. But it will leave radiation scattered about, just not the same level as a nuke detonation.

That's why I laugh at the people who think our military is weak. Secrecy is a good thing to have. The enemy will find out what we have when we use it on them. No reason to parade your game plan for the world to see.

They target cities with multiple warheads, to account for possible "duds" or targeting errors. And I think you may be confusing the effects of a multi-megaton warhead. You don't get into TRUE city killing warheads until you are in the 2-3 megaton range. Which are about as big as we (the US) have. We definitely have the know how to create multi hundred megaton warheads, but the effects of one that large are unknown, largest ever detonated was the "Tsar Bomba" at approx 50 megaton.

Triple the number and 2/3rds of those warheads will destroy much of the USA.

Yes, I guess it's true that a single Trident can destroy only 24 cities. My thinking was wrong. But 24 cities would be over half the population of virtually all the countries in the world. Pretty gruesome stuff. I think we can reduce nuclear arsenals world wide.

28 cities to be exact

@SMAC_SOLDIER2102 -_- yeah they only have 3 of those while US have 14 multiple it or divide doesn't matter US has more nuclear warheads

💯💯💯💯

No One wins that sir is why we have them - No one wants to kill there family Oh except evil ones , Ones who dont have a soul & It aint Russia, USA = AIPAC .

Albanian USA the best.👍. The real matatan.🤔.

Yeah. That's great to know the US will use you as cannon fodder.