U.S. Supreme Court Oral Argument: Former President Donald Trump's Colorado Ballot Eligibility 

So when will the court decide? I predict they will decide 9-0 against Colorado.

Thank You for having this broadcast.

Best way to get news, straight from the source. Thank you @CSPAN, just want facts, not pundits.

Why did we not see this in the media? Thank you for airing !

Thank you for posting this. The world is watching the supreme court.

I AM CANADIAN AND I AM PRAYING FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. STAY STRONG AMERICANS AND STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHTS. FIGHT BACK.

Thank you for the broadcast. I appreciate it!

Thank you for this unadulterated hearing.

Trump Opening: 8:00 Anderson Opening: 1:01:40 Colorado Opening: 2:01:12 Trump Rebuttal: 2:14:14

What a magnificent country this is - that allows freedom of speech and the people's access to the legal arguments in the Supreme court1

I'm proud to say I listened to the whole arguments. Did a lot of rewinding to make sure I understood what was being said. The ruling will most definitely be 9-0 in favor of Donald Trump, and any justice who does otherwise will lose all credibility.

Half a million views, for CSPAN! That's very encouraging that citizens are taking this much of an interest in today's culture.

It is particularly funny for Mr. Murray to say that it is "unlikely" that a lower court could reach a different conclusion than SCOTUS the same actual day that Hawaii said: "Nope, the SCOTUS ruling on the Second Amendment doesn't apply to Hawaii!"

Listen to our fellow Canadians stand up America fight back

Jonathan Mitchell is a brilliant attorney…..What a mind.

An insurrection that only lasted a few hours without being armed with tour guides WOW the one we had 155 years ago was a lot different from what I read

This Jason guy should be a politician instead with the amount of time he is not answering the question and replying back with completely something else

Facts and law that is what they supreme court should focus on... opinions or threats should never matter.

No one has been charged with insurrection.

I love being able to watch history in motion. thank you c span

"Integrity is the very breath of justice. Confidence in our law, our courts and in the administration of justice is our supreme interest. No practice must be permitted to prevail which invites toward the administration of justice a doubt or distrust of its integrity." Wheeler, Chief Justice of Connecticut, 1928

in the end The founding fathers did not want a king or anything to do with a king.

Thanks, C-SPAN.

Who picked Murray to present oral arguments before the Supreme Court? This clown couldn't win a high school debate.

Suddenly everyone is a legal expert ..

That last caller is not very well informed

Thank you for allowing citizens to hear the case.

Thank you C-Span.

It's hilarious that when they are trying to hold the black signs up toward the end, all we can really see is "TRUMP" "TRUMP"!!! Lol.. thanks for the advertisements, guys!

1:00:05 - 1:01:25 every American needs to hear this.

Timestamps! 00:00 - Understanding the Situation 07:44 - Legal Disputes and Interpretations 12:18 - Congressional Role and Qualifications 19:11 - Enforcement Acts and Precedents 25:21 - Impact of Court Decisions 32:16 - Enforcement Mechanisms 36:12 - Historical Context and Precedents 41:34 - Constitutional Interpretation 46:08 - Debates on Disqualification 50:44 - Congressional Legislation 55:23 - Removal of Federal Officials 59:57 - Framers' Intent and Legislation 1:06:07 - State Authority and Election Procedures 1:15:18 - Supreme Court Review and State Powers 1:24:31 - Congressional Authority and Insurrection 1:31:30 - Judicial Process and Uniformity 1:39:11 - State Disqualification and Federal Law 1:45:25 - Preserving Electoral Integrity 1:53:09 - Safeguarding Democracy 2:00:02 - Legal Proceedings and Eligibility 2:08:52 - Ensuring Due Process 2:15:07 - Impact on Executive Actions 2:21:03 - Post-Oral Arguments Reactions 2:25:52 - Concerns on Constitutional Rights 2:33:38 - Policy Positions and Criticisms 2:38:25 - Presidential Immunity 2:46:16 - Election Security and Trust in Democracy

Actually, I was very impressed with justice Jackson and her non-partisan astute inquiry! Also justice Gorsich was very impressive as well. There was not a 'weak player' in this hearings and all the justices proved why they serve on the US Supreme Court with their brilliant collective analysis.

It’s almost like there needs to be some sort of set standard for what insurrection is and how to determine if is person engaged in that act. Say like a law and a criminal conviction on that law.

Thank you Andy!

Time for me to Leave now and dust off my shoes

i miss being able to watch C Span. I have youtube tv and I don't think they offer it.

Whos been charged with insurrection????......no one......

Colorado lost the case, I can see it a mile away

Listeners of scotus arguments should not use the frequency of justice inquiry as a gauge of efficacy or accuracy of arguments

Thank you for this report.

I will never understand in America how a court that is suppose to be neutral are filled based on politics.

One vote per person not ballot harvesting change people vote.

Colorado got its head handed to it!... This could be a unanimous decision.

"We know what's best for you, but we can't trust that you know what's best for you. Therefore, we will remove your constitutional right to vote your own way. Oh and remember, it's all in the name of democracy."

Judge Alito was talking about the Big Man.

Gotta love the same people asking about precedent when they’re all on record saying that RoeV.Wade was settled law and there was no way they would ever overturn it, and then did.

Removing ANY candidate from a ballot WITHOUT a conviction makes us a banana republic.

Someone doesnt get that other courts disregard supreme courts interpretation all the time. Especially with the 2nd amenedment 😂

If Griffin's case was correct... What?

I can't even listen to Jason Murray's argument without rolling my eyes. It must be really tough for the justices to keep a straight face.

He did nothing?! He had been telling them to get the National Guard for weeks!!!

Listening to these fine people actually give me hope! Politicians and high level government officials have perverted this country But it seems we still have some really pure minds at the Supreme Court and each of these justices seems to be genuinely seeking the truth and nothing else

After hearing both Anthony, i can say trump is a good recruiter cuz we all go to school but not the same way.

Does anyone remember the” insurrection” during the Kavanaugh hearings? banging on the Supreme Court harassing senators in their elevator disrupting Q&A?

"He did nothing. Nothing. He did nothing. Nothing. All he wants is Wingstop"

I'd like to be one of the first to say welcome back to the White House president Trump

The court heard the call and hung up on it.🤬

When did CSPAN start having commercials? It use to be viewing our government in action was free from commerce.

Jason Murray remotely answered any of the justice’s questions and raised no valid argument to enforce this case. The fact that this case reached this court is laughable. Grateful to hear this argument, however, he wasted their time.

The fact that the law is so complicated is really a problem

TRUMP2024 TRUMP2024 TRUMP2024

America will never have a King period ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️

So I'm hearing a lot of questions about how it would work practically, and across other states since they're not contesting the self executing part, just the evidentiary requirements that may vary from state to state.

Murray simply does not know how to listen with nuance and clarity. He became defensive and really angered several of the Justices and rightly so.

Trump 9-0 win 🏆. Period

E was waiting to see if any of them were effective in securing the Presidency for him ….. 😢😢😢

Why is this my 5th time listening to this lol😂😂

Hooo these guys know their stuff! Interesting the intellectual back and forth going on...great job at the Trump Attorney's AND SCOTUS!

Why U cut it off ?

Nobody knew…. Nobody seen…. Nobody heard….

Jason Murray is trying his hardest to argue for a case that has zero logic to it.

1:58:59 this part is really making my f****** brain hurt right now😂😂😂

Just a question... Why would CO make a ruling that abnegates all the other state's rights?

Could you add more ads please? I could barely hear the arguments

Isn't it illegal in America to pass yourself off as an official - police officer, lawyer, police?

7:58 STARTS

What a Load of Rubbish they are saying about D.T he will be back at the white House.

Trump personally appointed a 1/3 of the judges ruling. I'm sure it'll be a fair ruling 😂

Even the judge who did griffins case took it back sir omg he even took it back 19:07

No Conviction No.Evidence, not guilty could never be pleaded in this World in history. and also the World to come . ❤

What is funny is that Murray is essentially arguing that the Union states would have trusted the former Confederate states to have unilateral authority to remove Grant from the ballot in 1868 while also having military deployments in the south at the same time to assure fair and equal elections. The fact this is even a Supreme Court case is hilarious.

I’m a Coloradan and despite the way this makes us appear, most of us are deeply disturbed by our local government and this attempt to take away our rights

They are a disgrace

In terms of present legislation, if States do not enforce Sec 3, who does?

Was Trump convicted of Insurrection? Did I miss something?

When did a insurrection happen I'm lost who got convicted of insurrection

Nobody I have heard will say they maid the wrong decision

Kisah kes dalam Chrome,bila di tugaskan untuk menilai mengkaji semua aspek dalsm filem tersebut ,adekah boleh di jadikan kes hak hasasi manusia ,,iaitu wanita atau lelaki...soalan yg di tanya,jika sesiape yg di tugaskan untuk menilai adekah ia kes atau tidak ????

If this goes through I will never recommend a customer to visit Colorado.

Why wasn’t he outside of the court shaking his tambourine this time? Because he’s a coward! 😂😂

Why the leading questions?

Interesting.

Gorsuch is solid...

128:30 Gorsuch just wrecks Murray

Imagine the office of the Presidency is not mentioned in article 3....😂

Exactly gorsuch hinges on some sense of uniqueness as cause for reversal or at minimum inaction on part of scotus

This is what Thomas Jefferson warned the American people about.

Leaving out politics, leaving out the facts of the matter, and just deciding to address the right of one state to do this ... this is so purely constitutional that the justices all were probably having a good old time working together on a purely constitutional interpretation of the one thing they love and live for - the constitution.

They need a Talking Stick or something. They keep interrupting each other lol

The corruption and the field is very seriously Biased .. Too not see this is understand when issues are brought out of the air and woodworks!