UK Elections: How each network revealed exit poll results live 

Sounded like it too 😂 Was quite appropriate considering it was in the MNF studio tbf

POTM Starmer more than makes up for the out-of-position Sunak, and the 13 overall Farage is maybe the worst right winger in FIFA history.

WHEEZING it genuinely does

🤩🤩🤩

Sounded more like Babestation!😂😂

Its embarassing anchoring, makes her seem uneducated

@@jackm1310 or she's just REALLY into politics

@@phalanx9005or she’s just really horny over politics

​@@jackm1310if they were uneducated kinda like you they wouldn't have understood what those numbers met.

Just for context, earlier in the broadcast (not shown in the clip), Kay Burley said she'd deliberately sequestered herself away from the results of the exit poll so she could have a genuine reaction alongside her guests. As she's arguably the politics matriarch of Sky News, I'm not surprised at her reaction as she knew it would send shockwaves throughout UK politics and give her the opportunity to produce some really juicy content.

Watching that I laughed so hard!

They're known as 'Geebeebies' for a reason.

Their Russian handlers were used to the colours of the American parties

@@John-qz8fq "known as" by who? A narrow minded, easily led minority of people who ironically spell their own 'GBeebies' insult wrongly?

And was out of sync with the announcement unless they knew it was wrong but being professional and not saying anything until it was corrected I think they would have announced it at 10:00 otherwise rather than have that delay

Half their viewers? So roughly 16 people?

I mean classic GBN … mu favorite .. labour has only have 5 prime ministers …. Tories did that in 6 years!!

@@kevoreilly6557 Most ironic flex ever

They must've thought we have the real news. Everyone else has "fake news"

@@_Blu-jay shock horror, a typo on live TV 🤦‍♂️

Do they know that swapping the numbers around doesnt actually change the results? lol

​@@OBIIIIIIIIISilly Tories.

@@OBIIIIIIIII No, they don't. they want a post truth world.

And then a looooong pause to allow their viewers to stop watching and go on on twitter without the actual numbers lol.

That moment was precious!!!! 😂

I think she meant more as in the conservatives lose rather than labour win. Not that I agree with her, seems like a right stuck up mare lol

They didn't win it chaps, the Tories simply lost it catastrophically.

@@Perrygallo which means Labour won. Do you not understand what words means.

GB News being completely ignorant of reality as usual.

GBnews lol

Everyone else watches one of those channels to get the results 😂

Burley and co. were on edge too ig

I stuck to their coverage after dancing around the networks for a bit. All seemed a lot more enjoyable for some reason

Sky news were defo Edging

Kay burley has done some great things for there reporting

@@Thedarkknight2244 Agree. The best was the interview with the vice-chair of reform. an hour later Farag goes on about how "main stream media" has not interviewed one reform candidate. Man, she put him in his place...not that he realised it.

It was utter chaos though with the tories

Putting up with Ruth Davidson was awful

I think Kay burley has got the show to inject a lot of energy into the broadcast

LBC and GBN too

They was behind for a lot of the coverage.

Channel 4 was actually watching itv coverage because itv owns them (Their News)

BBC graphics too simple and boring commentary before showing the exit poll. sky was miles better

Why does it need to be entertaining?

I'd say ITV's was the best. No music, just the chimes and bongs of Big Ben. Much more gravitas.

@@BCJ1985looked cheap and tacky

@@THEVIEW-tx5yd yeah, ITV tried the least, just their regular news studio look

Did you actually watch any of GBnews' election coverage? It was more broad-minded than the sky presenters moans of joy over the result.

Which non biased channel do you watch then?

Probaly Channel 4 😂

Cheapskates

and gbn getting labour and conservatives the wrong way around lmao

Yes, Tom Bradby made a right pig's ear of it right at the crucial moment. Dreadful.

they are waiting for the BBC to produce the graphic so they can copy it...takes time to type it up

​@@finthegeekso true

They won't have access to the information if they don't contribute to financing the exit poll.

I will say, I was watching the BBC's Northern Irish coverage, so I only saw Labour and Conservative results until they had a more comprehensive graphic thirty seconds later. I think BBC Scotland did it best, although I don't know how BBC Wales did it. I like that the BBC wasn't as gimmicky as Sky.

@@jacobtodd1622 not all broadcasters have the figures ready, they have to wait for the announcements from other sources and update their own graphics accordingly.

That’s was a sky news sting

They didn't. They want a post truth narrative where they can claim that nothing is true, just your personal opinion. It is a long game. Awful.

Andy Burnham the labour mayor of Manchester was making those noises haha

And Talk tv not showing there disappointment by trying to spin negatives on labour's and lib dems result

@@gregoryshtevensh6868 As was Kay Burley.

Isn't Sky owned by Murdoch, who would want a Tory win?

@@anthonydpearson no, he sold all shares in Sky in 2018

GB news tried its best to copy trashy American news but was completely unsuccessful

GBnews actually had decent coverage overall, the wrong graphic was soon remedied.

@@luke5837 They'll be glad they have their white knight ready to defend them 🤣

@@prappsy3028 did you actually watch their coverage? If not, you really have no argument here.

​@luke5837 GB news can't even get their audio right. Even after being around for three years

@@samuelstevens248 on a normal day I'd agree, there is no excuse for audio or graphics issues, but the scale of the election coverage was definitely not what GBnews is used to or equipped for, errors were a given.

Well, the exit poll was sponsored by BBC, Sky, and ITV, so they can have the numbers on hand to show when Big Ben strikes 10, and others have to wait to copy down the numbers.

Probably because Ipsos didn't give them the numbers in time due to the fact that they didn't commission the poll with BBC, ITV and Sky

Actually Channel 4 had the best coverage over all, including some hysterical back and forth between Alistair Campbell and Nadine Dorries. You missed out.

@@Bolachas25Emily Maitless’ rambling at 10 o’clock was awful, but you’re right, overall their coverage was good.

They didn't fund the poll like BBC/Sky/ITV so I guess didn't have the same ability to post instantly (ITV and Channel 4 coverage being produced by ITV means they likely had the info at the same time)

Loved the stunned silence In the GB News studio . Some of them clearly in denial up until that moment

That silly bint's rant about how labour don't win elections seconds before the result is priceless 🤣

@@garykelly6669 how, literally everyone knew this, infact the polls were showing double digits for the conservatives

@@94Coolperson To be fair, Labour didn't really _win_ per se - it's more that the Tories lost, and Labour merely got in by default.

@@Tredenix oh my mistake so who did win lol

Nah I Loved Channel 4

Canada 1993 was a phenomenon and the worst ever result of its kind. This is still a collapse, although a smaller one in comparison. A smaller door is still a door. The final result, some 121 seats, is at the lower end of the worst predictions for them.

For context, this is the lowest number of seats the Conservatives have had EVER. In 1906, they had 129 seats. The second lowest result in history was 165 seats in 1997. This year, 2024, they got 121 seats. (Of course, you're right that 2 seats would be lower... but this is still a historic loss.)

People forget, that Labour won a landslide with just 35% of the vote. Parties lose elections normally on that figure. Plus, in the end the Tories were just 9 points behind. not 20 as predicted by other polls. There were also 6 million people who chose not to vote as it was the lowest turnout for years - 61%. The volatility of voters no longer guarantees any party a victory from one election to the next. The Tories are over 200 years old, they know how to bounce back. Farage will get on everyone's nerves by Christmas and two days in to the new Government they are already talking about closer EU alignment and scrapping a popular Rwanda policy. Anyone, literally anyone, can win any election these days regardless of current seat numbers.

She might get a job emptying the bins out back of the BBC offices. That would be fair.

​@@neilwilson5785Still too good for her

And to rub it in further the BBC forced Fiona Bruce to cover the Starmer campaign. Glorious.

Obviously Laura Kuernsburg was very disappointed on the BBC

Nah sky news over did it. BBC looked proffessional and clean.

I think it's a question of personal taste. BBC was very "clean" and was probably the best for a broad audience watching all over the country. Sky News was much more dramatic and delivered for the political junkies. All the other Channels were trash. I was particularly disappointed how ITV fumbled, because with C4 and the conservative news channels I would've never expected better anyways

Sky was pathetic. Sounded like she was having an orgasm. Bbc had big Ben, king arthur and professionalism.

Thought Sky was awful. Much prefered the BBC - so much more professional

That's right wing media for you

You are the problem with politics

I mean to be fair, it's the news. It should be formal and pedestrian, it's not a Marvel movie lmao

Sky news was pathetic sounded like she was having an orgasm

Have uploaded here ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0OSU41cZipc.htmlsi=a95GCGgh7Y0cauvQ

I saw a clear liquid running down her legs

They didnt do the exit poll, sky, itv and bbc commission it. So they have to read it out, probably watching bbc or reading it from the website.

Our electoral system is a joke. Reform literally got more of the overall vote, almost a million more votes, yet they only have 5 seats, and Lib Dems have 71. Please explain to me how that's fair?

​@@coolperson962first past the post, baby! the country's pretty much fucked so might as well fuck it even more.

nah channel 4 was the best in terms of elections branding..

Bbc and ITV were the most professional and easiest to watch, sky was childish

To be completely honest, none of them were great, what was going on at the BBC? No animation, the camera just cut to show a CGI graphic.

Thanks but my internet brain only understands and S to F tier list.

Disagree. Im sure Campbell and Harman were delighted. And even Stewart. I think they had the best coverage. Their guests gave different perspectives which makes any discourse worthwhile. And they were not constrained to say their views. Imagine Harman trashing Truss/Kwarteng mini budget disaster when Kwarteng is sat beside her.

I did for about a solid twenty-four hours from 10.00 pm on the Thursday. It was utterly brilliant from start to finish and the unsensational way the coverage was handled in a beautifully relaxed studio made the night all the more exciting. I don't need to be told to get excited, thank you. I can do that all of my own accord. I usually go for BBC, or at a stretch ITV, so the Sky News election night experience was a revelation, likewise the coverage of my favourite bit of a new government - the Friday afternoon procession of the new Cabinet, which really gives the impression of a new beginning. It was perfect timing when Angela Rayner arrived on one side of the split screen while Nigel Farage was getting his thugs to eject the protestors from the Reform UK post-election meeting and they were talking of her difficult upbringing as a real person of the people as opposed to Farage's grotesque pretence. I was a little tearful.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂