UK/EU Trade Deal: What Does Johnson Want? - Brexit Explained 

Phasair - Johnson wants even more then that. He wants to sell unicorns for gold coins.

Well he compared following EU rules and regulations to gain access to the single market to following our regulations on things like single use plastics to gain our market. As if not following the latter and agreeing a tariff free trade deal would completely undermine our market. It’s at best an ignorant speech and at worst a very manipulative one.

Then he will be able to say look at how mean the EU is when we only demanded something so trivial. And you can bet his inbred voters will swallow it all, hook line and sinker.

Your so funny, of course that's not going to happen but each side has to ask for the maximum perceived advantages at the start of any negotiation then they can both claim that they compromised to reach a deal.

Earl Minime And you think that 27 countries should just open their asses to some twat who wants free access? You are right. We just throw UK out and that’s it.

lol,yh,Johnson is a fraud

you think he cares about his supporters? bless, that's sweet, the real answer is Wahtever keeps him in money and power

@@stocktonjoans Same can be said about Corbyn :)

@@wanrazul not really, all you have to do is compare their voting records to see the difference

@@stocktonjoans Wasn't he paid by RT and Iran's PressTV? I'd bet he got Soviet money in his pockets before the failed experiment collapse. The same failed experiment he wants to conduct on the UK.

@@wanrazul you need help kid

There's also the fact that the commonwealth is spread all over the place, geographical proximity matters in trade.

@@DaDunge with ocean transit and air planes for time sensitive cargo, it is less important than ever and going down. How else would China be the worlds factory. But to me it is clear that the Brexit brits just want to relive the good old days of when they were the star quarterback with their gang behind their back. What they fail to realize that everyone else in the football club grew up, have a full time job, and have a mortgage to pay. Funny, the UK would rather be a vassal of the USA than an equal in the EU.

@@DrKosmos Perhaps but it is still significant, only more or less direct to consumer items travel by plane everything else travel by boat and yes shipping doesn't take the years it used to but time is money and transports are expensive. If you look at which countries trade you will see that countries that a re regionally grouped trade far more with one another than they do with similar countries further away. And china may be the worlds factory in some resepcts but mostly for items that are relatively high price per weight. There's still plenty of industry left in Europe and America.

@@DrKosmos that's not what the studies say. Halving the distance doubles the volume of trade.

They have their own currencies because it's a good idea, even the UK wouldn't want them to use GBP. Why? If you have different fiscal policies you need to have your own currency. That's why Thatcher kept the UK out of the euro and nobody complains about it, not even remainers (although they would have fallen for it). That's why Greece is a vassal state and has no way out. The commonwealth will welcome free trade deals, why wouldn't they? The UK won't do what the EU does and force them to open their borders or adopt 1,000 regulations a day. The commonwealth is alive and well because its members want it that way.

Lucas Amorim possibly intentional? "Just to interject here..."

@@benhansberry thought that but it happens later band it's Abit odd

That was probably the worst editing I've seen on this channel, I like these guys but this was just pure laziness

Editing of Brexit is not very good either.

if I had to guess, their editors might be stretched thin between their eu and us channel, so editing might be a little sloppier. just speculating though

There are probably some people who want to only get eu or us news. Or brits who only want UK news.

DeviilReaper if I had to guess, it’s probably do to how RU-vid promotes and monetizes videos. I’m not a youtuber but some of the ones i watch have mentioned in the past that if they post lots of different kinds of content and but some of it doesn’t get as many views, RU-vid sees that as poor performance. RU-vid wants you to watch EVERY video of a channel your subscribed to or they’ll think the channel is dying. By splitting up content between channels you can somewhat counteract this.

it's the analytics. a channel that has stable repeat viewers on all of their uploads will be promoted better and more often than a channel that is drawing a different crowd with each video upload. the real reason not to have as many channels as they do is to avoid spreading themselves thin. they'd do well to double-down on UK politics. i can see an argument for them having an EU channel but their US one seems unrelated and redundant.

Because they refuse to raise standards to our level, nor loosen their regulations to our liking. We want a different kind of economy to what the EU has. The EU claim this is about 'fair' trade but in truth it's not fair, it's protectionism.

@@Bushflare the uk want free trade, not fair trade. The eu wants fair trade and not free trade. They are not the same. The eu has minimum standards that are raised continiously ensuring everybody has to adhere to the same minimums. And that makes it fair. And countries who want to exceed so can do so on their own innitiative. Free trade still enables countries to increase on their own innitiative but takes the bottom out completely. If the uk really wants to keep their high standards engaging in free trade would only threatnen them and open themselves up to what he is saying he will not engage in himself. And the eu's objective has always been to better peoples lives and the environment. And the always rising minimum standards are there as insurance to make sure every eu member participates in this. If you do not want to increase peoples quality of life or the way we treat our environment you indeed have no place in the eu and should leave.

Bushflare up until now Britain has benefited handsomely fron “EU protectionism”! Good luck with “America the First”!

If we increase our standards then it makes no difference the only reason to say no to the rules is if you want to drop the standards.

@@baronvonlimbourgh1716 If you think that’s been the EU’s objective then you indeed have a place in the EU. They need gullible saps like you to stay convinced that the EU is in any way necessary for a cleaner world. Moreover, if the EU was ACTUALLY invested in making the world a cleaner place it would prevent outsourcing to China and India, places which REALLY have no investment in making their processes economically sustainable. But I’m sure the EU, with it’s “objective” of raising standards and preserving the environment wouldn’t just allow that sort of trade to continue unabated because the EU is as corrupted by business interests as every other government... surely they wouldn’t... (Enjoy your globalist corporate superstate. The moral high ground has never looked lower.)

@Fhjthnl Lol Iuyo simple people, simple assessment.

@Fhjthnl Lol Iuyo I fart in your general direction

The leadership on both sides have very sophisticated and nuanced reasons for their Brexit positions, but they can't admit to any of those things in public so the whole conversation seems to be dualistic, simple, fear-driven and emotional by necessity.

@@mikebaker2436 Yes. I also firmly believe that Johnson is actually a genius, and has cleverly hidden this fact from everyone as part of a secret plan that ends in a masterstroke of utterly unknown epic proportions. And I know this, because the opponent's arguments, that have been made in public, are good ones. Clearly, therefore, Johnson must have an equally good argument hidden away. I can see no flaws whatsoever in this argument.

@@corneliusantonius3108 watch out unless you're prepared for 10,000 deaths.

Doesn't him doing that and us not ending up in war kind of prove that the premise of the EU, while good intentioned and successful in many areas, has it's limits? If the UK can actually "tear itself out" and not plummet into war then perhaps the EU peace process tool could be applied sometimes and not others.

You mean the ECSC. Not the EU.

If that's the case than why doesn't EU just take in every country on earth and achieve instant world peace? EU is not the UN, peace isn't EU's mission which is probably why they are among the top arms exporters. EU is more akin to Holy Roman Empire but in reverse. HRE was a super-national hegemony that became weaker and more de-centralized over time, EU is a a super-national hegemony that is becoming more centralized over time. What the UK did was to simply trade away the benefits of being a subject to the empire for more independence. Whether or not you consider this to be good trade or a bad trade depends on your priorities.

Back in 1946 when Churchill first came up with the idea of European Union, who at that time would have believed that France and Germany could ever work so well together? But rather than looking back, we must strive for peace in the future. At the moment we have the US in decline and the world about to become dominated by China. However a United Europe given its combined GDP, population and democratic governance would be the dominant superpower. It’s this future prospect I think Churchill had in mind.

@mininmalta 123 I'm not saying that the UK was somehow in a lower position than say Italy, or France. Those countries are all in the same position as subjects to the same super-national entity; that is to say, every country in the EU is a subject to the EU. EU's eventual goal is to unite Europe into being a single continent country like the USA.

Two words: bendy bananas.

@UCLRY9eLiaKr-LNtrIp3MD6g Who buys boxes of bananas or cucumbers? You're actually arguing for regulations over how bendy bananas are!!! Even the EU had to drop that idea after they got called out for it - you're an idiot.

@ Regulation 2257/94 (bendy bananas) Was made because people ware not buying bendy bananas which made them rot on the shelf to then be thrown away and become "our" waste. After Regulation 2257/94 the bananas which ware previously "waste" ware now not imported and there for the garbage disposal has seen a slight reduction which means less money spend by the state/people taxes. You may say that is insignificant but 1000 insignificant things makes a change.

@ Supermarkets ware getting them in packs with the rest of the "shipment" rather they wanted or not. When i say people i dont mean corporations that put them on the shelf but the people like me and you that ddnt both them.

@@alexbazen130 Are you drunk? I have no idea what "When i say people i dont mean corporations that put them on the shelf but the people like me and you that ddnt both them." means. Help us all out here. Get a night's sleep, have a couple of coffees and proof read before you hit that Reply button. BTW 'I' is written I not i. Or perhaps you are only five years old...

Spaghetti Road omdsss 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Copy cat

The benefits go chiefly to consumers.

@@Cotswolds1913 That doesn't mean anything, since everyone is a consumer.

Ixian Technocrat Yes, everyone is a consumer, hence it benefits everyone with regards to their consumption. It also frees up Labour in your own country, for more productive uses since its not being wasted doing things which can be acquired from others at lower cost, and that frees us purchasing power to spend on new and other things.

@@Cotswolds1913 That's completely contradictory. If another country can produce a product cheaper than your country, and you place a tariff or create a trade barrier on that country, prices are going to go up for that product. If it's an essential material like steel, everything that uses steel will also go up in price. Nobody wins in brexit

Ben Cofield I’m the one arguing in favor of free trade here. Also Britain is going to have a lot freer trade with a larger percentage of the world market, after Brexit. America alone is larger than the EU.

It's more like corporate is telling your boss to pamper you in all these ways he cant afford, and he has to cut salaries to afford it. He severs the branch from corporate, so you lose some benefits in the short run, but you keep your full salary which will increase your productivity, earn the firm more revenue, and in the long run increase your pay even more.

@@3seven5seven1nine9 he is talking about standards and how it is unacceptable to him to accept minimums that he wants to stay above.. Like me saying i will never accept a job that pays double the minimum wage until the minimum wage has been done away with from regulation. That is a red line for me and i rather walk away until the minimum no longer exists. Why would i care that the minimum is lower if i am going to earn more anyway. It makes no sense. Or is this something you regularly do? You are talking about somethig completely different that nothing to do with his statements in this particular video... Please stay on topic.

@@baums547 You're literally getting paid more. This is proven to increase productivity in employees, regardless of short run benefit dips.

@@baronvonlimbourgh1716 I picking at his example. Don't talk down to people if you don't even know what they're talking about, thank you.

@@3seven5seven1nine9 i had no intention of talking down to you. Sorry if it came across like that. Sometimes thhings sound different in writing then it is supposed to. My apologies!

Cuppa coffee at the desk.

Eating a free breakfast in a free country in a free EU. And lots of ☕️

@@goodyKoeln 3 free,s that can't be possible

@I'm an 80s Kid In free is just because somebody else payed for me. 🤫

Uk will be the next breakfast for the USA.

IT IS POSSIBLE THO, LOWER YOUR STANDARDS TO China AND India, AKA 1 POUND/HOUR WAGES. There, you can now too compete in WTO

Exactly and also in a side note China owns alot of shares and businesses from UK. Which is done with the help of your former PM of all things.

Not entirely accurate in regards to the US, whilst they may have lower quality standards in some industries they also have higher wages than most EU countries.

May I ask, which 'lies' you are referring to? But EU- not any campaign, if you would be so kind.

@@alexanderhorwath506 the main on I annoyingly hear is the idea that we don't have sovereignty. The eu laws people say we were forced to adapt were voted for by our own meps we have not lost sovereignty as he himself said, UK laws are more stringent than EU yet he also says that we are taking back control. That's one the reason I put this comment on this video is not to say the video contains lies but rather as a message to TLDR in the chance they will see it.

chris david - the media, arts and academia, is chock full of Left wing bull💩. It’s actually nice to hear balance when listening to TLDR.

Joel Reis He thinks that he can create the biggest trade block by getting everyone under the UK rule... USA and EU included 🙄 And of course the old Imperial countries Indian included. You know that everyone loves him.

Fhjthnl Lol Iuyo Culture of idiotism? 👍 Ok. That’s fine. We don’t want to be part of that. Don’t let the door 🚪 hit you on the way out 🥳

If a multinational want to sell a medical machine in the us, the machine and also the machine production process must follow a lot of standard, to sell on Germany a lot of other standards, to sell the same in both states must follow both regulations at the same time. Up to a certain point it's the same kind of requests Europe pose to commercial partners, in other regards it's less so.

@@Kaisenama That is false

@@Kaisenama No one can be sure at this point in time, although the speech premise made by Johnson is still a strong one [we wont follow their laws, because they dont follow our laws, and neither one of us has any say over the other's laws].

wanting to compete in FREE TRADE in WTO terms, while CHINA AND INDIA exists, when dumping is real...unless they will make 1pound / hour salaries an reality in UK future, then UK will NEVER EVER be able to compete Its why US got so desperate lately also, they start losing the war on competition on basic markets (not highly technological ones tho), thus "THE TRUMP trade war" Outside of big trade blocks or economies....there is nothing but 3 actors that influence everything. China, US, India...how will UK compete with them , to make it so UK products will be more desirable , both in terms of price and quality, huh?

Boris said that it will be a fantastic Deal. He didn´t specify for whom though...

Boris demands a unicorn from the US, like he tried at the EU and failed. He assumes the US is a softer, less capitalistic negosiator, willing to help the UK for social reasons.

The European Union are absolutely petrified of a competitive UK. This is why they keep autistically repeating the term *_”level playing field”_* We don’t want it and we don’t need it. We are not scared of competition, you are. So you’re not going to get it. There will be a Free Trade Agreement based on nothing other than like for like reciprocity and basic element of international diplomacy. I’m calling it.

@@thegrandmuftiofwakanda It sounds like you're saying that the EU doesn't want British products coming into the EU tariff-free, but also that the EU will sign a deal allowing British products to be sold in the EU tariff-free. Why do you think the EU will do this?

@@thegrandmuftiofwakanda lol.. you really think you are the bully in the school yard....sorry, the rest of the world has graduated and reached adulthood ... No , there WILL NOT be a free trade agreement, until you bend upon the EU's standards and demands .The EU WILL NOT allow you the tips and trick you planned to do as unfair competition . And if you don't do it, more then half of "your " industry will move to Europe and you will pay double for your strawberries ,... not to mention insulin and other VITAL stuff you do not produce .

speedy, I’m going to attempt to clear up the monumental incoherency that you and so many others hold in your confused little minds on *_”YEH BUT COS MUH REGULATIONS AND MUH STANDARDS”_* ,because I still see both sides of the divide fucking this up : 1.) An exporting country follows the *_”YEH BUT COS MUH REGULATIONS AND MUH STANDARDS”_* of the country that will import their goods. I am aghast that this needs to be said. 2.) This does NOT mean that the exporting country has to apply the same *_”YEH BUT COS MUH REGULATIONS AND MUH STANDARDS””_* to its imports, or domestically manufactured goods for domestic distribution. *THIS APPLIES REGARDLESS OF IF OR NOT THE PARTIES HAVE A ‘YEH BUT COS MUH TRADE AGREEMENT’ OR NOT* I am sick and tired of the abject spastication on the above two points that would be immediately apparent to anyone who has attempted to find a steering wheel in a car or plug in a kettle in both the UK and mainland Europe (which face it, most REJOINERS haven’t). So if by *_”YEH BUT COS MUH EU’S STANDARDS AND DEMANDS”_* you mean anything other than this and you are referring to their impotent attempts at power and land grabs then all I can say to you is this : If a non-country like Canada doesn’t agree to such ridiculous demands then why the hell do you think a mighty powerhouse such as the UK would?!

James Hutchings, No that is not what I am saying at all. I have attempted to bring clarity to you children with my most recent post below. Read it and try again.

Rolls Royce is German owned (BMW) and Jaguar and Rover are both Indian owned (Tata); Aston Martin is a public listed company on the FTSE 250.

@@hudldevice1092The Americans really messed it up then. No wonder Trump wants 40% tariffs on EU cars.

Britain voted to join the EEC, a very different organisation to what the EU has become and is moving towards! EDIT: And it was a 67% majority not a 75%!

@@hellojustjoe You're right, it was 2/3s, not 3/4s. I stand corrected.

@Elliot Roger fan account : Even back then, it was clear, that it would eventually lead to a European federal super-state. That has always been the vision of many leaders in post-war Europe, with step-by-step integration by at first joint management of war critical resources, then integration of trade, then ever closer cultural and political cooperation, further forming a joint legal framework with the ultimate goal of a joint Europan nation based on the priciple of subsidiarity. That was always clear.

Gianni bude - No Johnson does not read treaties nor understand them. Bluffing and lying are his style.

@@TorianTammas Boo hoo, I'm going to say nasty about Boris because my side lost.

Exports to every jurisdiction have to comply with the laws of that jurisdiction - of course. The difference is that the UK can choose to ignore those regulations for other markets. For example it can make vacuum cleaners as powerful as it likes now - but not a month ago.

@ Which company asked for that? Please share the name and why they demanded it. If you fail to provide that we can assume that nobody wants it.

@ You consider him.not a lazy liar? Well he got fired twice for lying.

They are expecting it too be an easy walk, sow they take a break

"Easiest deal in history", remember?!

Timwi Heizmann the border in regards to trade between the two islands will be on the Irish sea now, so Northern Ireland is still in the trade and customs of the EU

I dont want to be in the EU mafia no deal fine with me

mark edwards Yep, it looks like that is what the Tories have mind too

fred bloggs We are not seeking 'benefits' - we are merely demanding to be treated just like any other 'foreign' country. Does the EU demand any conditions from the Chinese? Open your eyes - it's the EU that is seeking benefits from an independent UK (ie: access to our fishing grounds) The EU sells more to the UK than it buys from us - who is going to suffer more from a trade freeze? The EU produces nothing that we can't get from other parts of the world. The potential of a Commonwealth Free Trade Area is enormous.

Ok I may be biased as I live on the continent but ...... I can retire at 62 rather than 67 in the UK on an index linked 2/3rds final salary, my wife has 42 days of annual leave partly due to Work Time Directive and my children enjoy 12 months paternity / maternity leave that they share as they see necessary for each of their children born. Why would we want our neighbour undercutting our work/life balance through cheaper imports, we have enough trouble controlling the effects of the Chinese exploited labour force. In a few years time we can discuss health, consumer and environmental laws and compare the EU with England and the USA which is already way ahead of England in that domain.

@@ASH61143 Yes Mr Bloggs, and that is precisely why France is in the mess that it's in. Your retirement age + 2/3rd salary and all your other 'benefits' are unsustainable in the long run which is why Macron is having painful bowel movements. You're probable on the edge of another revolution. The British Government will do and act in the interests of the people who have elected it. You've had no say in the matter since the 1st of January. btw: England ceased to exist as an independent kingdom in 1707. I live in the United Kingdom.

Looks to be an accident

Same.

Multi-dimensional chess where the best you can hope for against each higher-rated player you are up against is a draw. That sounds like the plan of a strategic savant.

haha. someone reads the independent

Not that I don't agree that Boris's word is sketchy as fuck, but all politicians lie. None of them are worthy of your trust.

@@iwannabentley I don't read any newspaper, because I prefer to think for myself rather than be indoctrinated. However, you'll find that a fact is a fact.

@@FireBlade9773 if fact is fact then it should be easy to point me to a factual source?

@@FireBlade9773 You don't read any newspapers? How does that not surprise me.

Making things up and then attacking them is called the straw man fallacy.

@ Myself, like the Tories, don't care about your philosophy lesson.

@@MrWhiteVzla Not often you hear someone call themselves an idiot. Well done!

@ ok

@@Jackwoody413 No, the UK has said it will not follow any RULES...pretending that a trade deal can be made without both parties for example need the same standard of goods. There is no comprehensive trade deal in the world today where both parties don't agree on the same rules for products that are to be sold in both markets...

prove it

@@iwannabentley are you serious?

@@stocktonjoans yep.. Prove it! And not "facts" from left wing msm..

@@iwannabentley XD you're cute kid

@@stocktonjoans I knew you'd struggle with that one kid.

Good. Let them go. They're a nett cost to the UK so go.

@ The Nukes and most of the oil rigs are in and around Scotland you idiot..

Mr__Clyde So you want 'independence' - then what are you going to do with that 'independence'? Your complaint has been Scotland, in a union of four, is not being listened to. How do you think that situation will be improved in a union of almost thirty? Scotland will be obliged to adopt the Euro - how is that an improvement on the current arrangement?

@@ClydeC The ownership of the oil rigs is not scottish so what are they going to do? Steal them? Build their own? Same goes for the nukes. Goodbye Scotland.

We're the fifth largest economy in the world, with a GDP larger than eighteen of the EU twenty seven put together; we're one of only five permanent members of the UN Security Council; and we purchase 18% of the EU's total exports - that's who we think we are. The point Johnson is making is that we're not expecting the EU to follow our rules and regulations and we won't be following EU rules either - that was the point of Brexit. We're happy to offer the EU zero-tariff, zero-quota access to our market in exchange for the same in return. If the EU doesn't want that kind of mutually beneficial arrangement then we will pursue an Australia-style arrangement. That is all Boris is saying.

@@hudldevice1092 used to be the largest economy,used to be. How far is Australia?do you think that they will give you lower tariffs?I seriously think it is more than 8%, and without us, you will not have enough fresh food in your stores. I don't want EU to give you any deals,we have had it with your demands, "we want this,we don't accept this, you have to give us this", we are"special"; east Europeans are not good, a hitlerist kind of thinking. You have nothing against the Allah akbar killing your kind but you have something against 1-2 million of east Europeans doing your shitty low paid jobs. Come back, brothers and let them stay with muslims,Indians and pakistani,they live on benefits and don't bother to work much but they are fine with those. Don't give them any deal at all. We will be fine without the Albion's perfidity.

@@emilia13ful For a start, I didn't say 'largest economy in the world', I said 'fifth largest economy', although we were the largest economy not that long ago. Before we joined the EU we imported the bulk of our 'additional food' (additional to what we grew) from outside Europe; once we joined, because of the Customs Union, we switched to buying food from the EU. We currently grow around half of our own food and buy around 30% from the EU. If the EU is not prepared to offer us a reciprocal zero-tariff, zero-quota trade deal then, once we've fully left the EU at the end of this year, we will doubtless begin to import more food from elswhere again because it will have become comparatively a lot cheaper. We used to import a lot of food from Australia fifty years ago, so if it was possible then I'm sure it's possible now considering the improvements in transport that we have seen in that time. The same goes for places like Brazil, which also grow a lot of food for export. Without being hamstrung by EU tariffs, we will be buying food a lot closer to world prices and have greater choice. As I say, the figure I've seen is that the UK buys 18% of total EU exports (depending on how this is calculated), which is a lot; this highlights the extent to which a free trade agreement, as described by Boris Johnson, would be mutually beneficial. We agree on one thing, though: I'm not really that bothered whether or not the EU changes its position regarding a free trade deal. The deal Boris is offering is a fair one and a reciprocal one. We didn't vote to leave the EU only to enter into a trade agreement that commits us to following EU diktats and regulations that fetter our domestic economy (which accounts for 80% of our GDP). A free trade agreement similar to the Canada/EU deal would be ideal, but a relationship closer to that between Australia and the EU would be fine. The vast majority of people in the UK have no problem whatsoever with fellow Europeans, whether from Eastern Europe or Western Europe. We are European and will be European now that we've left the EU. After enlargement, it is true that the principle of free movement put a lot of pressure on the infrastructures of Western European countries, but there is little personal animus with the people that have moved here. The UK has had a Polish population since the 1930s/1940s, and integration has been successful. The issue since 2004 has been one of scale. That said, every EU citizen living in the UK at the time of our official leaving date (31st January) has been given the right to apply for permanent residence. That seems pretty generous and fair to me. We certainly don't like returning Jihadis and most of us are very concerned about the affects on our society of mass immigration from outside Europe and the Anglosphere; but this has nothing to do with our decision to leave the EU. Our desire was to return decision making to this country and to shake off the straight jacket of the EU's Single Market and Customs Union - and also to be free of interference from the ECJ. This we will do, whether the EU likes it or not.

Canada doesn't have tariffs or quotas with the EU and isn't in any of the institutions you mentioned nor did they pay a single penny for it

@@Andy-em8xt u may wanna check that again lol

@@Andy-em8xt Well said. And we're offering the EU tariff and quota-free access to our markets as the quid pro quo for the same access to theirs - a simple and fair arrangement that benefits both sides. If the EU isn't interested in a free trade agreement then that's fine: we can pursue an Australia-style partnership.

@@MegaRoFLL Ok technically only 98% of tariffs were removed between the EU and Canada.

​@mininmalta 123 The UK gave up it's fishing waters just to be told how much fish they can catch from the EU. This was done so they could get a better deal in other areas (back during the masstrict treaty).

What a joker!😂😂😂

I fully agree. End of discussion.

dumping come at a cost, specifically lower wages, no rights for workers (yes, not even paid sick absence), no social security....they need to CUT COSTS from somewhere, and the first thing they will turn their eyes upon will be the workers lol, poetic in some twisted way, the ppl who voted for brexit will be the ones who will get fucked first

tell that to India, China....the actual powers with whom you will compete

@@MegaRoFLL Nobody needs to tell anyone that dumping is a myth. It's simple economics, it doesn't matter whether people believe it or not. If India and China want to send the UK subsidized goods then let them - great! A few jobs might directly be threatened but 60M brits will benefit from cheaper goods. British workers and businesses can then be more competitive - a net gain in both jobs and wealth. Read Basic Economics by Sowell, you won't regret it.

@ how will anyone be more competitive than China and India in manufacturing and IT, or than US in high tech is beyond my understanding. Outside BIG trade blocks ( in the wild) you have very few options, you either deregulate to the point where you reach China and India standards, aka 1 pound/hour wages, no sick paid leave, no social protection and trash wages to be able to compete in manufacturing sector, IF you have the industry for it also, ofc, if not, ppl will buy from China and not from you, ppl will build in China and not in UK And for High Tech US style industry...yeah, that would be a never.

@@MegaRoFLL India. Competitive. Hahahaha. Hahahahahahaha. How's your Tata car? China is a problem so tell me what is the EU doing about that?

Could happen, or become a Chinese state

@@De1tAStreaM yeah. A chinese Island in the Atlantic. In that case the EU and USA would isolate the country.

That makes no sense mate, Boris is all for free trade.

Lol