UK passes controversial immigration Rwanda bill | BBC News 

Kagame rwanda is fighting with DRC congo, rememeber kagame is supporting rebels in congo and is well funded by UK and US , Rwanda is the arms shipment corridor to disrupt Congos minerals and ensure chaos and instability for same USand Uk to benefit .is like the Blood diamonds .

👏

Actually, compared to my shitty time growing up in Rochdale, I'm sure I'd like to take my chances knocking about in Rwanda

😂😂😂

@@user-sp5ws6nn8fare you sure? How?

Ok, But what is a viable solution then? All I’ve seen on social media for the last 2 years are people complaining about migrants coming over What is the solution? Someone please tell me

Have you been to rwanda ?Rwanda is not a democracy ,if you could say kenya ,but kenya is hosting the entirety of Somalia.

@@user-sp5ws6nn8f can’t be worse - England is becoming more and more depressing and overcrowded - economically we are sinking with debt, housing shortages and social care is dire

looks lovely

Ohh that interesting, why ?

whats your point?? why should they get decent housing.. if they dont like it then tough..

We love culture diversification,competence and learning from others.one thing we learned since 30 yrs ago is that people are first sustainable resources,every one here work hard every day to survive and we learned quickly Rwanda of After 1995 builded by Ugandan,Kenyan and Congolese any foreign come to us is hot resources we need to benefit his/her skills,we share little we have,they are welcome,we will happy to host them here.

U know what people in uk feel?

Rwnda have 90+% christians, they can accomodate some for now

They don't care, the Rwandan government are laughing and getting £1,800,0000 per immigrant !!

Yeah mate. Your cousins from Islamabad will enjoy the sunshine

bullshit

@@vinny.morales I'm not Pakistani but thanks anyway

@@mithingthooth_5449 You had a RU-vid channel since 28 Nov 2018 and you only have one video of some odd ballet cartoon. But yet you have a lot to say here. Don't tell me what to do because you are talking utter nonsense.

Hi , you can go to the Rwanda.🫡👋👋👋

@@yasnick8227 You had a You Tube channel since 22 Jul 2017 and yet not managed to post anything at all on the Channel. You are some RU-vid PROPAGANDA SPAMBOT.

then get fucked to rwanda

@@yasnick8227 You have a RU-vid channel since 22 Jul 2017 and yet you have ZERO content. Sweet F all! You have a lot to says here but You are some SPAMBOT!

Fear? Lol such a persecution complex

Don’t be fearful then - it’s freedom of speech

Rishi Sunak also feared being called a Right wing hindu extremist and people did call him that. But his service towards his country was his supreme priority. . The west keeps calling Modi, A right wing hindu extremist too.

but there are more migrants enduring discrimination and suppression😂

Exactly. The majority of us, our parents/grandparents have NEVER wanted them here but we've been forced to accept it!

I live in Australia. When we pushed the boats in 2012 our government copped a lot of international condemnation and were threatened with all sorts. However they sticks to their guns and would not be bullied by others telling them to run our country. It’s the only solution that’s had a modicum of success. But what happening now is people are arriving by air with visitors visa and a return ticket and then having the temerity to claim asylum once here. Also only a couple of months ago we had 2 boats arrive in the northern part of West Australia. The people were mainly from Pakistan. It seems that the government took the eye off the ball in terms of border control, and cut funding ! But that could cost re election at the next election. I have been here 35 years and have admired the Aussie government but the current one is the coming up short!

Are you an aborigine?

Aborigines didn't drive any foreigners from Australia but the British invaders went to drove the aborigines from the cities

​@@tchamola7572Spot on.

​@@tchamola7572So since the aboriginals didn't push them out they should do the same by flooding their country with potential terrorists? NO THANK YOU.

It is a deterrent

It's a roundabout way to say "Look, we messed up when we made the original asylum laws and international laws century/centuries ago. We never thought millions of people will from poor countries will pack up their bags and arrive at our shores for economic migration, mixed in with people who actually urgently need asylum. Since deporting is illegal without processing their application first, which can take years, so we reduce the burden by using Rwanda as the intermediary host." Anyone genuinely seeking asylum won't mind waiting in a safe space in Rwanda but anyone seeking economic migration won't want to be stuck in Africa. Hence the deterrent.

@@denkendannhandeln it's not working. Look at the statistics just for the Channel crossing - they're still trying and dying.

@@zaurukraus9296 Rwanda is a safe place ? Check how their laws treat various minorities. If a migrant reaches the U.K. and is sent to Rwanda chances are the migrant would go back to the country of origin or seek another European country. What country, other than the U.K. outsources their undesirables to a third world country ?

Because they know how weak you are this has been going on for 40years

Rwanda is full

Those are criminals not ordinal Rwandans. Don't confuse people here.

They are refugees by choice, running from the consequences of their actions in 1994. If they want to, they can go back to Rwanda.

Those are criminals who run away

@patrickmuhireroger8771 nobody wants your criminals. Why should others use their resources to host your criminals. They're still your nationals, your relatives, your family, your governments responsibility.

@vinny.morales yes, but they are still your nationals and your relatives. No one wants your criminals.

This immigrants are the people who fuels Engaland to be what it is.Its like US,US cannot be US without Immigrant ,Even UK will not be UK without immigrants ,you get to understand this are the people who make UK to be what it is todays with your Hindu Prime minister.

…is full of BS hypocrisy ,,,! . As Many English employ illegal foreigners for avoiding taxes and non social care etc… and the gov strangely keeping closed eyes? ! And btw,England isn’t full, millions of empty countryside all over the country ,kept empty to the uk people by some few riches owning the lands and not willing to share it, the usual . While uk people struggle in todays uk freefall caused by the gov since brexit,Covid plans,billions of wasted money for the US proxy rottened war in ukraine vs Russia.

People running from war should be protected, if they chose a xenophibic country or not matters little.

@@ankamafan yes

​@@ankamafanProtecting them and settling them in a rich European country are two different things.

But we can afford to meddle and finance other nations wars.

​@@Ghengiskhansmum even if that's true. How does that change the overpopulation issue? It doesn't!

Decline and decay thanks to 14 years of Tory chaos

Yes but BBC , LBC radio , doesn’t care about that ,or £££billions in aid to Hotels ,. And Islam.

You realize this will cost us way more money in the long run. This won't save us money

oh yes i can imagine the diverse BBC team crying in their soy altte

😂😂😂😂😂😂

They will kill themselves BBC ni igikoresho cya opposition ubundi..😂😂

@@benizungu7774 cyane rwose

U are on to something here

valid points and truth? this is the news,we don't do that here.

Colonists complaining after they sucked half the world's resources

Hello 😊

Most of these migrants are from Islam majority countries. These people are not going to many Muslim majority countries that are rich and wealthy. Does not seem any logic.

poor people, two much problem black people's

I'm not sure crowding Rwanda with different ethnic groups is good idea. The locals may feel the immigrants would have more services and support than the local folks. 30 years since the Rwanda genocide isn't long enough to declare the country stable.

Another racist way to destabilise african countries.

This is stupid. It's not gonna change anything, people are still crossing the borders and people are coming from your country by plane.

There won't be an enrichment of culture, this is Africa, the continent is already diverse, and most people here have a zero-tolerance policy for arrogance and selfishness. Africa has years of experience with tribalism, you'll find a mob with machetes at your doorstep if they try any cultural enrichment.

@@GolfWhisky Nah... We.want to see actual numbers. Govts don't just make decisions willy nilly without incentive. Economy boost is not good enough reason, especially since there has been history of protest and negative reception. What are the actual numbers behind that deal? Let's follow the "numbers" in the spirit of transparency... Lol!

The president gets some black money

They should just think of the money

This is bad for the Rwandan people longterm. Anyone can see it

Not true, britain has master builders and lots of them. There are enough houses, there are just too many immigrants needing housing.

@@Mikhail-lh4el If we were good at building houses then we wouldn't have a housing crisis.

when you make the world a worse place and do not want to face the heat.

Rwanda will work as a deterrent and as a consequence.

But. But.. but we are apparently living in the best times ever! The world is apparently better than it has ever been! 😅 yeah.. except for anyone who isn’t a billionaire.

@@diagorasofmel0s yh cos eating with knives and forks, clean drinking water and sewage systems is a terrible slight for you.

Money well spent. Its cheaper than HMP 😂😂😂

Bahahahaha hilarious 😂

Well if being deported was a certain, it might. Drowning in the channel is not certain.

We want to stop illegal immigration. What is wrong with that?

If they knew they will be sent to Rawanda, they won't cross the channel. Turn your brain on please.

Because it is all about “ Insh Allah “ . I lived in a Muslim country and I can see their weird mentality l it’s all Gods will , they have no fear of death , it’s all Gods will , Insh Allah .

They can always go home

This poeple offcours will find their way to Nairobi, and we already have all somalia in kenya .we hhave congoles, ugandans , south sudnese, ethipians , sudanese,randams ,burundians, nairobi will be overwhealmed.let the just stay in london.

Yes, most likely back on the next dinghy to chance their arm at entering into the UK again 😊

I bet they will be here in 6 months time

In congo , M24😂

His Indian ancestors must leave too

His country? Since when is it his country?

His country?

He's prime minister ig well I don't think people of uk will let anyone be their leader...​@@ZionWondimu-wi8dx

Risi country? The public didn't voted him in as a. So he can F off. He should go India and be their president.

Can you see the future?

@JackpotFernandez I can not see the future, but I can relate.

I live in South Africa and you are spot on. People in UK and Europe allegedly do not know what goes on over here. Even my relatives thought I didn't know what a dishwasher and other appliances were. We do get these things in Africa.

Like here are jobs here

​@@user-ix2ox4fm9dyeah, not sure we are that dumb. I suppose some people are, all they see are adverts for charities with kids with flies in their eyes. But most people know it's not a shit hole.

Just don't let them in ,in the first place! Literally thousands of males are here. They'll all turn to crime as they cannot legally work here. I support with some hesitation, the Rwanda idea. Better there than here

I can see only one problem with sending a cruise ship to the inland African republic.

Learn geography

Bro just you know chips and KFC chicken nuggets and McDonald’s burger 🍔 Rwanda 🇷🇼 is fames country even that people very cheap not safety wise you need knowledge then telling people 😕

@@Black1magic You get they were being sarcastic and talking about the cost of the flight, and a flight for for non British asylum seekers we may send to the country against international law. They were not talking about taking a holiday there. Just so you know asylum seekers normally don't have money to go to KFC very often. We don't let people who we have not yet decided whether we want in the country have jobs.

The growing economy of Rwanda is a shamble. It is build of blood money of genocide Rwanda has been doing since 1996 to Congo by routing their minerals on behalf of UK.

Because once they arrive there, they will have to work by force in the mines to repay the plane ticket 😉

Its not free. it's included on the deal

​@@45Shameek😂😂😂

free trip to venezuela haha

The current dictator isn't nice, lol. There's many reports of killing and torture right now in the Rwanda. How long has it been since the last genocide in Rwanda? 30 years?

So? Stay in France then.

@@captainbuggernutss-hl7be why, you are not in the EU so france doesn't need to keep them. point of entry only works for EU countries.

@@moos5221 I see you must care about Julian assange

They should of stayed in their home countries and made them a safer place.

They can also send you away because UK is nobody country we are all migrants in the world, go and learn history or go and do a DNA test.

How is spending hundreds of millions sending a max of 300 people to Rwanda going to stop the hundreds of thousands who want to come here?

Everyone we send, we take one back.........

@@wc8246 ask yourself why they want to come here. It’s because we’ve have and are spending millions on letting them. I know where I’d rather spend the money.

i salute the french people.. im half french but grew up in britain.. i love france 👍

most African immigrant problems are originated because of France and the country like Greece/Italy are suffering. Shame on you. If you really want to fix it then stop funding the warlords and decolonize Africa.

lmao didn't you guys get fucked by the nazis so now you wanna copy them

Glorious citizens....sure...

Considering they're leaving the country with the most generous welfare system in the world, (france) there has to be something more to this.

Because the French have deemed the dangerous, chancers and/or running from criminal conviction in their own land... That's what's more, we are getting the dregs of the dregs

The entirety if europe should deport illegal immigrants inclusing pro palestinians

For real though..

Several other countries, including EU countries, send their illegals there - so they can do it but we can't?

Inhumane ?? Lol another whining lefty moron who won't house them in his house

Remeber when Labour and Blair killed millions in the Middle East?

​@whiskeywarlord9425have you ever heard of HUMAN RIGHTS.

because it cheaper than supporting them in country...seems to me

Kagame is a sellout.the innocent rwanda population will be the ones to suffer all african countries are quiet about this.

My fear is bringing in people whose background you do not know.Be prepared for them!!!!!

Kiev isn't war zone

similar culture

Apparently we have to house fighting young men because

@@curiositycloset2359 why should rwanda have to tho britain should sort it out on your own

@@curiositycloset2359 Apparently its safer to walk around Rwanda than London

@@Stoicgenuis Rwanda = Sending Africans back to Africa 🤣

@@Stoicgenuis They can't figure out what to do with them they just sit in overcrowded hotels waiting on there cases to reviewed for the 10th time unable to work or do anything living off whatever money they brought with them.

@@cryp4life509 "it's an issue of resource distribution or there lack of" which means it's not sustainable... I am not a bot... The world will have to double it's oil production over the next 12 years to meet the global demand for oil come 2035. The number of cars on the planet will almost double in the next 11years..... Number of cars on the planet 2023 ...1.2 Billion............2035....2.1 Billion Only 150 million of theses cars , 2035, will be electric.... 80% of all electric cars being built today will not be on the road come 2035 80% of all gas cars being built today will still be on the road come 2035. Older car$ burn more oil and will need replacement part$ and repair$ look up .."Plankton endangered species"...

@@cryp4life509this minority EARNED this wealth by working hard for over 2000 years, while Africans by themselves never stepped out of Stone Age civilisation. Lazy way.

Human population needs to come down.

You're aware there's a difference between a tourist and a refugee?

@@Tom-ct6rp are you are of the difference between an illegal immigrant and a refugee? The Rwanda bill does not impact refugees or legal immigrants.

Way to tell us you have never traveled,

Yes it does, maybe read it before commenting, as then we won know for sure you lack intelligence ​@DanielGriffiths

@@arkatheistcc2353 Way to tell us you've never seen Arsenal play football. Look at their sleeve sponsor, dimwit.

A HUGE PATEL SMOKESCREEN .

A total crock of ****

Yep. Home Secretary can deport all of them. Have they. No

​@@kevingibson8371 a crock of asterisks

A country that have invaded colonized and looted dozens of countries now need to be saved from couples of thousands of asylum seekers from those countries.

It's not the answer though! It's costing us billions :(

@@greatgiginthesky9287 yes I’m aware of that! But it will keep our streets in the uk a tad safer! So I think it will be worth it.. I heard Rwanda is in need of engineers, doctors & nurses so they will be greatful for it Lol

@@LivingInReality. Worth putting ourselves in even more debt ehh. How about investing the money into more professions to keep the street safer? Also, you are assuming they are skilled individuals. Anyway, it might just be a big smokescreen. Let's see 😉

@@greatgiginthesky9287 if I said white, you would say black😂 enjoy your night 🤦🏻

Of course the government do. Who do you think? How they decide to spend it is their business afterwards.

​@@fgcpeak9591What a childish answer. Please let responsible people respond. Not you.

The weather is better.

They don’t, it’s being forced upon

I'll take it, better than any of the shitholes they've created here. Perhaps we can relocate, and the newbies can have the moldy slum housing here?

they entered the UK illegally to join their friends at Turkish Barbers and other organised crime. The UK has had enough and is planning to house them in Rwanda.

Peace be with you 💚 We Invite You To Join The Religion of Islam, as you may find peace. Islam is the latest Revelation from Allmighty God (Allah) for All the Human & Jinn kinds WorldWide. Our suggestion just Study all Religions including Islam, then you're welcome to convert to the religion of Islam in order to successfully pass this Test of Life and be saved from everlasting Punishment of the HellFire. We wish All the Best ❤❤❤❤

What do you mean racist

You’re right racism we are paying more taxes than all British people stay at home and job center ☹️

Considering the Zionist jews running your country Way to go

They belong in the UK. That is their rightful home

@@dibassarkar9182 Just having Uber with Sudan guy, he hates Australia so much because it’s not in his favourite side, Hamas. Enough is enough. illegal is illegal no doubt

The Dublin agreement required asylum seekers to be returned to their point of entry. Which was impossible if they wouldn't tell you. The Falklands has its own government, why would they accept thousands of migrants? They wouldn't.

Why would we send them to the Falklands? Would be much better to send them to rich white areas, rather than poor ones. It would soon be sorted out.

Enough, they've colonised Europe. Wake the fk up!!!!

That would result in the falklands demanding to join Argentina, because no one wants these illegal migrants to overwhelm and destroy their home / culture.

@@captainbuggernutss-hl7be Exactly, and why the Falklands? It's a tiny overseas territory, you'd barely be able to ship 10 asylum seekers there, they don't have the infrastructure for so many people. it'd also be expensive to transport and keep them there, as it's so isolated and is a 1st world country. I agree though that Brexit was clearly a mistake, it was then, and definitely is now.

Then stop uk government to fight abroad messing up people’s lives. These people would prefer to stay in their home country. You make a living out of someone misery by creating wars where Britain can sale its weapons, has to stop.

What made you run?

@@johnsitumbeko732 Kagame’s Regime injustices and political instabilities.

A: spell Rwanda correctly. B: the EU have nothing to do with us in regards to human rights. The EU is a trade organisation. You are conflating it with the ECHR which is the European Court of Human Rights which was founded due to the atrocities of WW2 and to protect human rights and freedoms.

​@@ChrisKeziahHyde The EU is no longer merely a trade organisation. It has free movement of persons, as well as goods and establishment. The EU also has its own binding Chárter of Fundamental Rights seperate from the ECHR

@@MrMywonderworld910 it's main purpose is for free trade and travel between nations within the EU zone yes but since we left the EU we are no longer bound to those "fundamental rights". But my point still stands that it's the ECHR that's responsible for human rights not the EU.

@@ChrisKeziahHyde The EU is becoming, through Putin's fault, an increasingly federated territory... at present, they are even talking about a European army, I am not saying that this will happen, but there is still for a short time, it was unimaginable... But where to get weapons? In France (in my beautiful country haha ^^) or in the country of Uncle Sam who wants to maintain his leadership everywhere even to the detriment of his own allies (I am thinking, among other things, of the submarine affair with Australia)

@@45Shameek I get the EU has it's problems but what does that have to do with the ECHR which is my original point? I don't think a European army will ever happen, purely because NATO serves that purpose already and is an alliance of countries many of which are from the EU. The worst thing we did (Brits) is leave the EU instead of trying to improve it. Bureaucracy has it's flaws but that's where if we elect people with the right attitude and mindset we could've improved a lot of the bureaucratic flaws. As for weapons, don't France already make a lot of it's weapons and doesn't rely as heavily on the US? France's nuclear deterrent is probably the most insane in the world but it works.

Hello 👋

How can you expect France to protect the UK waters when Boris lied and convinced you to leave Europe? The UK should have thought about this before they voted to leave Europe. Then paying France billions to protect their water. How silly! Before Brexit, there wasn't such a problem.

And France even safer where they should be seaking asylum in the first place

Then go

@@CricketEngland Not the way asylum works, asylum can be claimed in the country the claimant chooses usually one that they have family or historical connections with.

I bet it's safer than any major city

​@@MrDeadhead1952psycho boomer

Yeah getting rid of illegals will make the UK worse… ya dumb cant

One way only

There are a lot of stats that show it is safer than London!

@@wm2357 That's better than TFL

@@DunamisStorm Rwandas homicide rate is over 3 times the UK's

Greener pastures

Refugees from Rwanda processing in the UK are liars. It is safe. Now they can go back to Rwanda while they make their fake claims that they are not safe there. These are not refugees, they are tourists looking for jobs.

We aren't a country of hate. We hate people coming here absuing our resources and pissing on our values

​@@GolfWhiskygreat news

What Rwandan refugees? It's not 1994 anymore.

You think the streets of UK are safe ????????

On top of the 500m already spend will be 200k per person that will be deported. But of course the UK is swimming in money these days after leaving the EU and not needing to pay money to the EU, so it's easy for the UK to spend that money, the UK got plenty. I heard the UK was thinking of giving each citizen 200k but then decided to just pay 200k for every person they are deporting because they like immigrants more then their citizens.

​psycho boomers

What do you want people on the street to get stabbed.

@@moncy156 depends on the people tbh

@@moos5221 depends, and you think they are filtering them out?

500 million pounds well spend, plus 200k for each person deported. I'm happy for you in Rwanda, you made the contract of your lifetime. It's better then owning the largest gold mine in the world. Best thing is that you can just send the people right back and get another 200k pounds when you take them in again.

You know that asylum speakers are not allowed to work, until they have been assessed and approved, right? Those coming in to work illegally either arrive on planes and don't go home, or were trafficked in and don't actually get paid because the traffickers thought of your plan decades ago. Congratulations for belatedly coming up the same solution as people who think that sex slavery is a legitimate business plan.

You are a sick f*ck.

Elephant in the room: What does the Rwandan govt. stand to gain directly from it's UK counterpart by agreeing to the T&C of this deal? Why does this bit appear to be glossed over?

"The Investigatory powers act 2016" breaks Article 8 of the ECHR. "The Online Safety bill" breaks Article 10 of the ECHR. The government has never had to leave the ECHR to simply disregard inconvenient human rights laws.

It needs to be newest arrivals first. If they see people getting straight off the boat straight onto the plane they'll stop coming.

​@beebee_0136 the government has been given money.