UK's David Cameron on what happens if US can't deliver funding to Ukraine 

🤔

Ukraine doesn't

@@ghi95 say biden apologies American apologies

Nobody needs the $$$ more than the legal citizens of the US. $33 trillion in debt and we still want to throw money at foreign wars - seriously ???

indeed Isinth Israel a rich country ?

😂😂😂 just like cheque signing approval in Companies…

They can't - one budget, not three

That’s right, combining aid to Israel and aid to Ukraine is an undemocratic scam. The issues should be separated because American society views these different conflicts differently.

CAPTAIN BONE SPURS AKA DONNIE TRUMP THE SORE LOSER WITH BONE SPURS KNOWS A FEW B.S.DOCTORS 😅🤣. I'm going to give you 11,780 thumbs 👍 up for your comments on Captain BONE SPURS 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣👍.

Ask Joe bidwn how to use asthma to get out of a draft, an how is it the gop fault you seem very out of touch with reality

I'd prefer the entire US military develop bone-spurs right before deployment to Ukraine.

Use Ukraine money to make medication affordable for you

@@mechalovessquirrels18 no worry. The GOP will make sure they prices go up, and then that the Medicare and Medicade disappear. What a false argument to stab Ukraine in the back

Ukraine is not important. What important is that you can not annex territory of other nation by brutal force. if you allow this to happen in one place, this gonna spread all over the world including North, Central and South America. Should you be concern?

​@@user-hd4fm8qq9uyes, though Ukraine is important for other reasons. It is the second largest country in Europe that supplies 10% of the world's wheat and other crops. It is sandwiched between the EU and Russia and therefore provides a natural barrier. It also happens to have some of the biggest confirmed deposits of shale gas in Europe, etc. It is also a strong democracy, which is a big reason Putin can't stand it

I think the border could use more funding. However, the fact that some (not all) of the Republicans decided to use the issue of supporting Ukraine to get what they want is a terrible idea that may ultimately cost this country and the free world if the deal is not done soon

Regrading Brexit his intention was only to bluff to get what he wants from EU, but it became real really fast as next day he resigned.

you really need to cut down on the mind altering substances. Cameron's mistake was to assume that the country would back him up on remaining in Europe if he bought off the right of his party with an offer of a referendum. Little did he realise that Anti-semite Corbyn would also prove to be anti-european. This should have been a walkover for remain until the Corbynite cultists sided with the Johnson cultists......truly a match made in heaven!

The English wanted Brexit because businesses were getting cheap labour from African, Indian, Bangladeshis and Pakistanis coming over from the continent. Use your brains. Greed corrupts everything. Then these so called asylum seekers got UK citizenship and migrated to other places like the US, NewZealand and Australia

he looks like paul mccartney had a muggle kid with benny hill

Brexit is the worst that the uk has done need to re join the eu

@@stabishop1769 neither does the US..

@@r2hildur nah, not really our problem either...

It's the world problem as Israel wants gaza and Russia wants Ukraine you will know they want every country in the world next unless you are just going to lie down and let them run you over

satanyahu, hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

You russian fascist. ...you will fail your war.

Most of us progressed after ww2. The Russians seem to still have their heads stuck in the 1940s

​@@DerekYoung1just like Israelis

@TheAbelExperience true but its not like Iran Russia and the Arab states funding their proxies helps or Hamas stealing from their people and blaming Israel and the west helps either. I just hope it's not revenge and a peaceful solution might actually be found from this

At least they didn't stole their main land from the natives, like the US or Australia

Britain has not taken anyones land!, If youre talking abouty Falklands?, Argentena were never there, never have been. When the british farmers settled there A long time ago , it was empty and had never been owned by the lying argie bargies.

That's just how deals are done if you have more than one party

Brexit has destroyed the UK economy but this guy is not responsible for the vote of idiots

U.K. has been very solid on Ukraine. It’s the EU that has some issues with rogue members like Hungary

Yes, but some people do learn from their mistakes

What if I don't support funding either nation?

The Aid Is there . The Aid was there in february 2022 . These stories the public hears sees Are not entirrlly truthfull Because of war time

zero support for either

@@stevestoll3124 To bad. You're in the minority of a majority rules system.

You need to lower prices in America

Yeah, we need to defund the military-industrial complex, as they are the LARGEST DONORS TO CONGRESS. If you want a Congress that prioritizes healthcare for Americans over F-16's for foreign countries (who end up turning against us, for example the USA gave F-16's to Venezuela and now the USA is potentially going to having to fight it's own F-16's to defend Guyana from Venezuela which is preparing to invade Guyana using American-made F-16's). The irony here is, Ukraine may very well collapse and more American equipment end up in Russian hands. If the Ukrainian front collapses, you will likely see 100 Abrams tanks fall into Russian hands, much like how the Tal*ban are in possession of $80 billion of US military equipment, there are videos of the Tal*ban using USA humvee's to patrol their streets, not to mention the Tal*ban now have over $1 TRILLION of American-taxpayer funded infrastructure built for them, the USA built airports, highways, schools, hospitals that all now benefit the Tal*ban. America is insane. I called it out for 20 years, saying we were REWARDING the Tal*ban by doing nation building for them. Heck, if some African country wants to get a TRILLION dollar of free infrastructure, all they need to do is attack and then watch America roll in to rebuild them at a cost of trillions. That's not deterrence. If we wanted real deterrance after 9/11, then the USA could have just nuked Kandahar and Kabul and then nobody would have EVER dared attack America again. Instead, America gave the countries that attacked us TRILLIONS of dollars and then IMPORTED millions of Muslims into our country, virtually guaranteeing more attacks (especially once a big war with the Middle East over Israel breaks out, i.e. if the USA attacks Iran, then all of their cells will activate, and if America starts a wide war with the middle east we suddenly will find millions of muslims inside our borders becoming extremists.... after all if we announce a draft to fight an Arab-Iranian alliance against Israel, do you think Muslims in America will agree to fight FOR Israel against the Arab-Iranian alliance that is now forming?). Point is, all of this was a lie to benefit the military industrial complex and NEVER about security. If it was about security, they'd have built a giant wall on the border, ended all visas from countries that attacked us, and there was zero need to kill 500,000 civilians of Iraq/Afghanistan and then import millions of muslims into our country (Bush actually INCREASED student visas to Muslims by 500% after 9/11 even though the hijackers all used student visas, literally increasing it fivefold the very method they used to enter our country, while leaving our borders wide open). It's basically like if someone in your house was murdered, would you tear down your fence and leave your front door WIDE OPEN while you run outside randomly shooting bullets at some street five blocks away, killing several of them, on a street that isn't even close to you because you "suspect" a gang on that street's involvement? And then spend millions of your money to rebuild all the houses on that gang's street and give them weapons to "train" those you "think" aren't in that gang (but you did kill their family members so giving them guns is pretty stupid)? That's basically what we did...

Not only arms suppliers but alliances too,such as NATO, ANZUS, ect

Only a fool would make their own nation's defence subject to the whims of the Republican Right.

sooo, it is good for creating jobs in US and giving Ukraine needed weapons to protect themselves against Russia. Both sides seem winning

​@@user-hd4fm8qq9uboth parties actually agree that supporting Ukraine is a must. The problem is that some Republicans (not all) thought it was a good time to play political games, all while implications of not defending Ukraine could be catastrophic and could ultimately lead to WW3

Well, the shutdown is self-inflicted. Vote for someone who will work for you and help the Common man side of government to govern and not for self-interest.

try that again...sober.

You got that right, Thanks!!

around 1 trillion dollars military budget. lol. you can buy russia for this money

the uk is broke

True we are broke in the UK all are money is going on electric and gas food is a white goods only at the moment

The UK added another 3.7 million to Ukraine funding 2 days ago. Do your homework your question leads people to believe that we are the only ones funding Ukraine 45 countries are funding them which speaks for itself as to the importance of our future and theirs that we should be funding them. Unfortunately people actually think the internet is news in our country instead of a of uneducated people’s opinions who don’t even understand that our foreign policies are in place to stabilize and protect National Security we don’t live like they do in their country because of those stabilizing policies.

@@chrisstainer3090 The UK added more funding 2 days ago.

They have….

Difference being the Taliban are content with ruling Afghanistan. Putins aspirations spread far beyond Ukraine...

Did we fuck we don't want the territory we just believe it should be free to choose its own fate, and let's be honest why would they want to be part of a dictatorship of a failed country like rusdia? When theu could live as free people. Forc9ng people to be russian is not freedom

If russia took Britain would you think britaon lucky? Or oppressed?

russia cant take ukraine how ar they going to take the UK@@cyberash3000

@@cyberash3000 Probably lucky, given the World Economic Forum's agenda for Britain is to force everyone in tiny apartments, remove all petrol cars, have a police state, and "You'll own nothing and you'll be happy". It's like they took their ideology straight out of Alduos Huxley's mouth and made it their religion.

​​@@cyberash3000Британия захватила кучу всего в своё время. И сейчас владеет многим, где есть нежелающие быть в её составе. Так что на себя посмотрите сначала.

That's a weird talent. Not even sure how that would work

What makes you think they don't?

Sure and if the US would not have helped in WO2 then at this moment we in Europe would be speaking German.

@@exeuropean It has nothing to do with WW2. They don't care about Freedom and human rights, they care about profits.

Booooooooooooooo thumbs down 👎🏻

Putin🥰🥰🥰🥰

Great to have you on the side of democracy!

You can support Ukraine by enlisting in their army not lip service

@@watchdogac9551 ❤

😂😂😂 wow how out of touch with reality

​@@LoveLove-jg9ol....research...

By way of Trumpty Dumpty the Orange Menace!

The GOP get their directions from their constituents who are genuinely worried about their southern border.

What happened to those Ukrainian flags you idiots waved so proudly??

Shouldn’t have funded this proxy war in the first place. Neocons are the dumbest people on planet earth.

Go live in russia then. This is not the end of any U.S. power. It's called political infighting within our own politics, a bunch of idiots more loyal to russia than anything. If anything, not funding it will help the U.S. because we need to take care of things here also.....we aren't the world's police nor the world's slush funds. So everyone else better step up.

I couldn't agree more

The US dollar is stronger than it was in the 1980’s in terms of how much it’s traded, how much of it is in other countries foreign reserves and it’s value relative to other currencies such as the Euro or Yen or Pound or CAD or Yuan. This is all readily available information if you actually took the time to research it. But smooth brains like you spread made nonsense The US economy, which is at $26.95 Trillion in 2023, currently makes up a whopping 25.8% of the global GDP which is $104.6 Trillion in 2023. This is the highest percentage of global GDP we’ve had since the early 2000’s and higher than it was in the 1980’s. The USA is relatively as powerful as it has ever been. It’s the only major economy besides India which is currently growing well. And the only developed economy not on the brink of recession

@@HuskyOwner-bl1jf You’re probably not even a real person. Your account is only 1 month old. A telltale sign of a Russian troll

We do. And military aid: commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9477/

They are, everyone is

@@fredgfysmith6171 not as much as the United States

They are.

@Napalon793 collectively, everyone else is doing more. You guys currently look like a bunch of clowns 🤡

Europe has been funding aid, sending lots of equipment, and training Ukrainien troops in their countries genious. Also Europeans pay more taxes then you for all those things you listed like "free" health care

Eh. Europeans pay for those things by having higher taxes and well-balanced economic policies. Also. Combining financial and humanitarian aid Europe have sent more to Ukraine than US.

@markusolofzon No Europeans can pay for more social programs because they don't pay nearly a trillion dollars on defense a year. Their taxes are not sufficient. You can't squeeze blood from a stone.

For military equipment. Not cash funds to keep social services running. The liquid capitol is used to pay for social services, pension, salaries of government employees.

Dude stop talking. There is no funding for even military equpment.

@@strangeke7750 that is correct, the funds allocated for Ukraine are sent to US defense manufacturers so new stock can replaced aging surplus.

What clarity? Firstly Russia is not on their own. Case in point being Putins recent visit to the UAE, which to be honest is a glimpse into how the entire Muslim world feels about Russia. Africa hates the west, most of South America does too. China and Russia are best friends, India and Canada are going at a tit for tat which if it continues will continue to sour relations between the west and India. Which will only push India further into the eastern block which would basically be the end of the West's Indo-Pacific strategic planning. Ukraine is sure as h#ll not winning this war as Putin is just drying out their resources. They will end up settling and ceding territory or resulting in a full defeat when the west is no longer able to sustain it's donations. Which will result in people like Zelensky fleeing overseas (Literally only being able to live in America as he will not be safe anywhere in Europe, Asia, Africa, Australia or South America). NATO itself is starting to fall apart. Netherlands and Turkey are targeting each other, Europe will be forced to start prioritizing it's own security as the Americans grow weaker over the coming decades which will lead to tensions between the NATO block as the political centre in the group shifts as each localized NATO region attempts to push it's own agenda. There is no clarity here. The only clarity is that the people living in their western first world bubbles are so deluded into thinking that their might is what it used to be decades ago. These types of people need a good dose of reality.

@@geodive5542 say you don’t know why Putin went to the UAE without saying you don’t know why lol. Keep dreaming Vatnik.

@@edmurth LOL, so 192 of the UN agreed on a resolution regarding gaza. Which including a fair amount of the NATO block baring the US,UK,CANADA,ISRAEL,AUSTRALIA and a single other country... NATO already seeing differences. Massive surge in anti Muslim rhetoric across Europe, case in point recent winner of elections in the Netherlands. Living in Africa I know for a fact how much of Africa hates the west due to colonialism dating back hundreds of years. You clearly don't know what you are talking about here. This grand display was a fuxk you to the west, regardless of the propogandist media channels you are so clearly plugged into. Facts, not whatever you want to see. Saudi Arabia itself was seen to be all buddy buddy with Russia. US congress just blocked aid to Ukraine because of it's borders falling apart. Do you need another dose of reality? Clearly are living in the western fabricated bubble I am referring too.

@@steven-gd6hp lol, propogandist. Don't complain later. Ignorance is bliss.

Putin fan boys are out and about. Supporting a murderer

😂😂😂😂😂😂

The aggression didn't come in a vacuum, little buddy. Had Ukraine stayed neutral none of this would have happened.

Since when is corrupt Ukraine "justice and winning side"? It's lining Ukraine oligarch pockets, to hell with them and their corrupt 3rd world country. We need our money at home, not backing the side that has already lost. Ukraine is toast, it's done.

Neutral !? They signed a pact and gave up their nuclear weapons so that Russia be appeased! Nope they still invaded, have you not seen the Russian’s expansion plans? Get your info right

It’s amazing how you libs are so easily manipulated. Do you ever question what the TV tells you?

Stop bullshiting. There is no victory for Ukraine. At best it will be a draw and at worst Ukraine loses. Ukraine tried to push the Russians out and it just meant high Ukraine losses and very little extra land.

Putin will win in Ukraine regardless.

Look at this fool with Lying Genocide joe talking point.

Putin won't stop at Ukraine, next could probably be a NATO country, hello WW111

​​@@joycebaron672Точно, например, Финляндия 1500 км забора-это хорошее место😂😂😂

The Pilgrims Society must be getting desperate to resort to rerunning that contender 😂

is this the Nazi army of Ukraine - any questions??????? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-pvD4nNG3gH4.html

their kids throw rocks at tanks.

Terrorist is a meaningless word anyway

One man's terrorist is another man freedom fighters. The British Empire also call the India Freedom fighters terrorists. Now they are hero's there.

🇪🇺🤝🇺🇦

Oh well 800 billion to the military doesn't help.

Facts

So why don't you want to save the world? Tom Cruise, the "rock" Johnson and the rest seem to do it all the time.

BS America only entered the second world war 2 years in. France saved America from the Brits. During the war on terror after 9/11, other countries militaris lost proportionally as many service men as people who died in the 9/11 attach. America brokered a deal in the past that later allowed for Russias invasion. 11 other countries donates more to Ukraine than the US..and the list goes on

Seems lack of knowledge and emotional IQ let this media be free of objective reason for the statements above. At present, we see more evidences of a failed state in Ukraine than anywhere else, i.e.: - corruption - no law system protecting citizens - unlawful seize of properties - defective democracy - lack of freedom - no freedom of speech - oppression against opposition - prohibition of political parties - non-court prosecutions - secret jails run by State Security Service of Ukraine - application of Army and terrorist acts against own citizens - purposeful application of Army in residential city districts - sentencing for political reasons - racism in the most ugly forms in the world and many many other things else... Such failed country can not win anybody in principle. The Western antiRussian policy kills Ukrainians every day...

Bro, they actually threw the Russians way back during their (Russia's) original assault. The problem is that the Russians had many months to fortify their positions. But we could still attrite them. In fact, I do think this is the current strategy. Eventually, they won't be able to sustain the losses.

@andresmorales5807 Actually No.

Nice try, comrade)) Ukraine can and will beat Russia provided the West supports Ukraine with supplies.

Brexit wasn’t about isolation. It was about greater independence. The UK wanted freedom to make free trade deals with nations like the US or India which they didn’t have in the EU

@@tylerclayton6081 Okay but they could have stepped back into the EFTA, sort of associate members of the EU, to keep most of the economic benefits without political. Sweden and Finland were there before becoming full EU, Switzerland and Norway are still left.

don't agree for more ukraine support, or any useless war that is nothing but an endless money pit, where hundreds of billions of dollars can't be audited and we have no idea where the hell all of it went.

Brexit was actually about something opposite to isolation

Brexit was stupid, but the UK is not now and never has been isolationist in its entire history.

the UK is spending a lot, they gave the long range missiles that allowed Ukraine to defeat the Russian Black Sea fleet and reopen the corridor for the grain ships, but the UK is too small to cover all the needs to defeat Russia, Russia is a big country, it needs a combined effort of Europe and the US, Russia is allied with Iran and China, they will start more wars, directed against the West, a defeat of Russia is an important step to world peace

😂😂😂 I'm in the global South & I think otherwise

Yea this was really well done. I watched it twice

Of course

This "dude" is famous in Britain for 2 things, 1) having sexual intercourse with a dead pig(look it up if you don't believe me) 2) initiating a vote to leave the EU which he campaigned against and then lost. Cameron is an utter failure as a politician and as a human being

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-_ISVnLVH-Xk.html

Well quite simply, President Putin regards the fall of the Soviet Union as the greatest geopolitical disaster of the 20th Century. He wishes to restore it as part of his imperialist ambitions. He is starting with Ukraine and then will probably move on a Baltic country who would be a NATO member. That will trigger NATO's article 5 which means NATO will be at war with Russia. Putin already believes he is at war with Russia given the support the West has provided to Ukraine to date. Americans will be crossing the Atlantic to fight in Europe once more.

It’s over Russia!

You havent seen the size of Russia on a map have you?

Of course those dumb MAGAs can not understand.

He didn't enable Brexit at all - the British people did.

@@marviwilson1853 no it was his choice to allow the vote to go to the people.

But that was Part of the DeaL The parTy makes HIM pm , then , at some Point he guives them to ConsuLt the people

Eng & Walkes voted leave

Scotts & Ulster s voted remeinn

UK is broke

European here. We already do. But its still not fully replacing american aid unfortunately. We need the US. But it also helps the US. European countries like Germany are now buying american LNG instead of russian gas. Which I, as a European, am glad about. Id rather my taxpayer money goes to a friendly and democratic country like the US than a terrorist dictatorship like Russia.

America has given more than Europe. What are you smoking. 😂

​@@bass7100it didn't, but it is still playing a huge role in supporting Ukraine, especially when it comes to supplying munitions and weapons. Incidentally, this helps to rebuild the US defense sector that has been neglected for way too long

@shortrandomusername lay off the crack the Defnese sector has been getting record profits year over year. I know I work in it.

What's nonsensical bullshit is not being able to face the reality of the word by burying your head in sand, then go on thinking you've won something intellectually.

@@MutatedPizzaBoi If the US, UK and Israel truly were facing the reality of the world (I'm assuming you meant "world" and not "word"), then they'd recognize that they created this mess by stealing the Palestinian's land in 1947 when they "gave" Palestine to Israel. What did they think, that everyone would be cool with that? Then, in order to take Gaza and the West Bank, they have purposely undermined the Palestinian Authority AND SUPPORTED HAMAS BY GIVING THEM MONEY AND WEAPONS, so that they could then turn to the rest of the world and say, "See? This is who we have to negotiate with. They're savages. We have no other option but to take all of the land!" (which is what they've really wanted to do from the beginning). For those who think what I just said is incorrect, google it for yourself. There are literally pictures of suitcases full of money sent to Hamas from Israel. **THAT** is the reality of the world!

I'm no fan of Cameron, but what exactly is nonsensical about anything he says here? Or are you just jeering for the sake of it?

​ @Pooter-it4yg every statement he makes is false and delusional. Let's go 1by1 - we (who's we - UK??? ) economically outmatch Russia 30:1 - which shows he has no clue about what economy actually is. - money will make a huge difference - no, they won't. money cannot fight and you don;t shoot the enemy with money. It's soldiers, weapons and ammo - Ukraine has won back 50% of the territory - BS, we now know perfectly well RU did not and did not want to take over that territory - destroyed 20% of all attack helicopters. Hmm, I though they are destroying 120% of all Russian helicopters every other night - driven Russian fleet from the Black Sea - at this point I believe he's clinically stupid. Are you one of those who also believe all of that crap? You do understand if 10% of this was true, Ukranian troops would have been in Moscow a year ago.

@@Pooter-it4yg I suppose he kind of half deflected the question of whether the Americans are committed to supporting Ukraine, he just waffled about and said yeah it felt like it, it's the right thing to do and Ukraine is doing well etc, it sounded positive but really I think he didn't have an answer. He was then asked about if the Israelis bombing Gaza was turning the young palestinians against peace. He kind of just said Hamas bad, Hamas problem, must kill Hamas. Which is true but the real question was coming from Israel's carpet bombing of arabs.... in the middle of arab land... under the full view of their neighbouring arabs. You can look at it a different way, if all the arabs turn on Israel, is Cameron going talk them down by presenting them with the same "hamas bad" answer

If two neighbors are fighting, there's an Englishman that has visited one of them yesterday (c) Irish proverb

Russia trained Hamas and is behind all the evil in the World

Americans on streets discussing situation in Ukraine ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ye7-zszZrCk.html