Тёмный

Ultra-wide angle lens battle: Sigma 8-16mm vs. 10-20mm Hands-on Review 

cstan
Подписаться 477
Просмотров 156 тыс.
50% 1

Опубликовано:

 

2 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 73   
@relaxingnature2617
@relaxingnature2617 3 года назад
I had the sigma 8-16 for a few years it's great ..its the widest DSLR non-fisheye "rectilinear lens"
@Twobarpsi
@Twobarpsi 2 года назад
That's exactly what I'm looking for!
@MrWinotu
@MrWinotu 7 лет назад
8-16 my vote! - more sharpness on the edges, no coloring issues, less chromatic aberration especially in corners! 10-20 is 7/10, 8-16 is 9/10
@Twobarpsi
@Twobarpsi 2 года назад
Good review! I will buy the 8-16mm.
@Loco-um4qv
@Loco-um4qv Год назад
How is it?
@Twobarpsi
@Twobarpsi Год назад
@@Loco-um4qv I actually went with the Canon 10-18mm. The more reviews I watched convinced me it was better for video because of the image stabilization, and quieter autofocus. I actually use it a lot for video now. I'm very happy I bought it over the Sigma.
@PolluxChung
@PolluxChung 6 лет назад
I settled with the 10-20. The lack of filter thread on the 8-16 is a deal breaker for me.
@xmeda
@xmeda 8 лет назад
There is no substitution for Sigma 8-16 on APS-C cameras.. and the same applies for Sigma 12-24 for fullframe. Btw on Pentax or Sony even the Sigma 8-16 is stabilized.. by body. EX on sigma is reserved for high-grade lenses aimed on professional photographers and die-hard users... even my 50-500 bigma is EX DG. And filter size of 8-16 is not 72mm. Just the lens cap has this diameter, but you need much bigger square filter with holder or circular at least 90mm big and hold it manually in front of lens...
@AGH331
@AGH331 8 лет назад
Sigma might claim that the EX series is pro-grade, but it really isn't. It might have been in a distant past, but these lenses are not weather sealed, the build quality is decent, but nothing to rave about, and optically they range from good to very good, but hardly outstanding.
@markharris5771
@markharris5771 7 лет назад
AGH331 Totally agree, Sigma's Art and Sport ranges are closer to pro standard. Also they can take circular filters including variable ND filters and even if you used the square or rectangular filters you would still need a filter ring of the specified diameter.
@SHINdanny
@SHINdanny 7 лет назад
"...a phased plasma rifle in the 40watt range, the UZI 9mm..." sorry but your accent reminded me of that movie scene :D I´m fine with the older SIGMA 10-20mm (4.0-5.6) but also very curious how the 8-16mm will perform, which I recently bought. Thank you very much for your nice vs-review, and think about visiting a doctor soon (it´s a heavy "shaky hands"-syndrome you have).
@cstan
@cstan 7 лет назад
dannyLEE Hahaha, awesome scene. Got me.
@WhatAreYouBuyen
@WhatAreYouBuyen 8 лет назад
Very in depth review! Good job, though I would suggest showing some sample pictures earlier on or while you're talking to give a better idea about the actual image quality of the lenses themsleves
@cstan
@cstan 8 лет назад
Thanks for the ideas and the feedback! :)
@WhatAreYouBuyen
@WhatAreYouBuyen 8 лет назад
Yeah no worries mayte! Love your vid, made me make up my mind about which one to get! The F3.5 one! It's just that your cinematography of the lenses is beautiful and all... hm but make for quite boring subject matter to be blunt. I enjoy seeing some of your sample pictures and video though, gives a great idea about the lenses, especially video performance! Keep up the good work!
@BryanMalloch
@BryanMalloch 8 лет назад
Great stuff! Thank you for making this! I think I'm going to go with the 8-16mm as well! Love that UWA look!
@cstan
@cstan 8 лет назад
Thank you for the feedback! :-)
@AhmedRecon
@AhmedRecon 6 лет назад
Endlich! Ein vernünftiges Video über die zwei Objektive! Ich habe mich für 8-16 entschieden. Liebe Grüße
@photovideooz4084
@photovideooz4084 2 года назад
10-20mm f/3.5 EX works on full frame start from 14mm , it's a nice feature. Also photo comparisoin at 6:17 is the older 10-20mm f/4-5.6 not the 10-20mm f/3.5, the 10-20mm f3.5 is the newer lens with better optic performance.
@noelinemarks2763
@noelinemarks2763 8 лет назад
Hi there I bought the Sigma 8mm-16mm. I put it on my NikonD3300. However, when I take photos on 8mm I get round photos. The vignetting around the photo is black. What am I doing wrong? Can anyone help please?
@VueeyLe
@VueeyLe 8 лет назад
Do you still have the hood cap on? Because you're suppose to take that off while taking photos (there's a separate hood that attaches the lens cap onto the lens)
@noelinemarks2763
@noelinemarks2763 8 лет назад
+Vueey Le Thank you. It took me about an hour to figure it out haha
@Babyvipe
@Babyvipe 8 лет назад
you have to remove the round lens hood
@KeikoFXDesigns
@KeikoFXDesigns Год назад
10-22mm is really sharp.
@relaxingnature2617
@relaxingnature2617 3 года назад
Gopro "superview" is 170deg rectilinear non-fisheye
@rollertoaster812
@rollertoaster812 2 года назад
Good review. Can you please share a link to the website you mention at 6:15 ? Thanks!
@SARAIDIGITALNETWORK
@SARAIDIGITALNETWORK 3 года назад
Which one of them is compatible with Nikon d3200
@ivanc.torres9934
@ivanc.torres9934 5 лет назад
Can you use the Sigma 8 - 16 on Sony a7r iii without much vignetting in your opinion? Concern is full frame v aps-c. Thanks!
@slyvillaestiva4299
@slyvillaestiva4299 4 года назад
Wow thank you. I subscribed right away because I learned something. Thank you
@360Tinyplanet
@360Tinyplanet 7 лет назад
Which one for FX??
@Linkman247
@Linkman247 6 лет назад
Just ordered the 3.5 10-20mm Sigma. Thanks for the review.
@Profrominglewood1
@Profrominglewood1 6 лет назад
u like it
@stephanuswidjaja105
@stephanuswidjaja105 5 лет назад
pls answer
@Linkman247
@Linkman247 Год назад
​@@Profrominglewood1never was notified of your reply. I realize this is late but I took it to Ireland and really liked the sigma 10-20.
@Linkman247
@Linkman247 Год назад
​@@stephanuswidjaja105never saw your reply. Realize its years later but I took it to Ireland and got some great shots.
@ilyavorobyev9534
@ilyavorobyev9534 8 лет назад
Thanks for such a good explanation!)
@cstan
@cstan 8 лет назад
+Ilya Vorobyev Thank you very much for the feedback! :)
@rddelta1606
@rddelta1606 5 лет назад
which is better wide angle lens for Nikon 5300, intermediate budget
@MCasarreal
@MCasarreal 6 лет назад
SO happy you showed the lenses zooming in and out and focusing, my major concern is the SOUND that noise the Sigma sense makes and I'm planning on using it for Blogging and the one I'm looking at at a used lens store makes that loud noise which is caught on camera. Any other wide angle lens suggestions for my Canon?
@cstan
@cstan 6 лет назад
Hey Mary, sorry for the delay! Didn't have any sound problems using the Sigma lenses at all. Do you use external mics? As a blogger I highly recommend you to do so. For Canon lenses I recommend you to have a look at the STM lenses - they're focussing vloggers. Regarding the focal length it depends on the scenes you want to record. The EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM might be a good starting point. Best wishes!
@MCasarreal
@MCasarreal 6 лет назад
cstan thank you!
@cstan
@cstan 6 лет назад
You're welcome! :-)
@Okay_Okay123
@Okay_Okay123 8 лет назад
Cooler Vergleich, in dem Bereich könntest du richtig Erfolg haben auf RU-vid.
@cstan
@cstan 8 лет назад
Danke dir! :)
@jimdawson8370
@jimdawson8370 6 лет назад
Very good video ,Really enjoyed how you put this together, straight to the point and very helpful. Thank you.📸🤘🤘
@colinire15
@colinire15 6 лет назад
Excellent review and laughed at your comment 'ugly as hell' lol. I also love your accent. Just subscribed.
@deWTFvids
@deWTFvids 8 лет назад
great video! you definitely deserve more subscribers! good luck!
@cstan
@cstan 8 лет назад
Thank you! Happy to hear this! ☺
@vartolomei55
@vartolomei55 6 лет назад
Tokina 11-16 2.8
@lildrummer08
@lildrummer08 5 лет назад
For vlogging on an aps-c lens, do you recommend the 10-20mm?
@cstan
@cstan 5 лет назад
Hard to say, depends on the scene. But if you want to show more than just your face you should have a look at it. ;)
@evanthonypaglinawan
@evanthonypaglinawan 8 лет назад
Hi, can i use the 10-20mm on a FX body, whats the effect? Thank you
@cstan
@cstan 8 лет назад
Hey! As far as I know it's possible to use full-frame lenses on APS-C cameras but not vice versa. You're welcome!
@rishinrao
@rishinrao 8 лет назад
Can we use the Sigma 8-16mm lens on camera with FX format. As of now I have Nikon D5300, but if I upgrade to a FX format camera can I still use this?
@cstan
@cstan 8 лет назад
Hey! I don't know for sure, to be honest as I'm a Canon user. But for the Canon cameras, it's possible to use full-frame (EF) lenses on the APS-C models (EF) - but not vice versa. I assume that this is the same for other camera brands.
@rishinrao
@rishinrao 8 лет назад
Thanks!
@cstan
@cstan 8 лет назад
+Rishika Rao You're welcome! :)
@jarodsown2596
@jarodsown2596 7 лет назад
with nikon you can use dx on fx and fx on dx, but if you put a dx lens on fx body you will get vignetting. but you can always use the crop option on the fx camera and crop out the vignetting.
@b-h-t
@b-h-t 2 года назад
@@jarodsown2596 but be carful. It often works and the mount always fit but as far as I remember, FX & DX bodies have various amount of space in front of the mirror/sensor. Some DX lenses in some zoom positions may damage your (FX) camera.
@leanderbuerk
@leanderbuerk 8 лет назад
Gutes Video. I've chosen the 8-16 mm !
@cstan
@cstan 8 лет назад
Danke für das Feedback! Hoffe, Du bist mit dem 8-16mm zufrieden. :-)
@harerama051982
@harerama051982 7 лет назад
thnx bro for great information
@MoehreTelevision
@MoehreTelevision 8 лет назад
Danke! Sehr interessantes Video! :)
@cstan
@cstan 8 лет назад
Vielen Dank! :-)
@decibeldb1053
@decibeldb1053 8 лет назад
Best review so far.
@cstan
@cstan 8 лет назад
Thank you! :-) So happy to hear this!
@decibeldb1053
@decibeldb1053 8 лет назад
NP! lol wish we could go shooting sometime.
@PorfiryiIvanov
@PorfiryiIvanov 8 лет назад
Hello! Which of them is sharper Sigma 8-16mm or Sigma 10-20mm?
@cstan
@cstan 8 лет назад
The Sigma 8-16mm offers better sharpness, but also slightly more vignetting.
@robbiemify
@robbiemify 7 лет назад
Lean to focus, rubbish review....
@joshuaclark8144
@joshuaclark8144 7 лет назад
Schon abfack wenn man kein Englisch kann nh? haha
@cstan
@cstan 7 лет назад
*abfuck
Далее
When Goalkeepers Get Bored 🤯 #3
00:27
Просмотров 1,1 млн
Учёные из Тринидад и Тобаго
00:23
DO'S AND DON'TS OF WIDE ANGLE LENS IN 10 MINUTES
9:12
Просмотров 217 тыс.
Laowa 8-16mm f/3.5-5 lens review
8:08
Просмотров 20 тыс.
Affordable wide angle lens [Samyang 14mm review]
9:11
Просмотров 337 тыс.
Lens Data - Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM Review
5:04
Sigma 8-16mm VS Canon 10-22mm on Canon 90D
5:37
Просмотров 4,9 тыс.
When Goalkeepers Get Bored 🤯 #3
00:27
Просмотров 1,1 млн