Unbelievable 50-year Plan at Cape Canaveral! | KSC Flyover 

Good to see busy people doing what is good for the Space industry!

Thanks Max, Alex, Adrain, & NSF for another great KSC Flyover!!!!

The explanation of the proposed port expansion variants was very good! More of this please.

9:44 is my favorite part of the video.

Thanks Max and NSF team, great update.

Thank you NASASpaceflight for the latest Space Coast update. Please keep them coming. Always want to know about the progress of companies in the space industry in addition to SpaceX. What type of aircraft was used for this video?

Good update guys! 👍👍👍

you guys crack me up trying to make it seem like there is a lot going on at Blue! It's really hard to imagine a launch this year but I do wish them good luck because "more rockets, more better"!! As always, great job NSF and let's go SpaceX!

9:45 So we're just going to ignore that Das and Kevin got soaked? I need a story time.

As always this was awesome!

Good show!

So glad i have a membership

No matter where you go, work always continues at the orbital launch mount

Heeeeey, what's that Race to the World First Amirdrassil poster/displate with all the signatures in the back of Adrian's video?? I noticed! Didn't know he'd be WoW fan!

Glad that NASA is finally upgrading to the suprior Kerbal Space Center

great commentary guys well done

Great video NSF

This channel is fucking mind bending!

Nice video....BUT... did y'all forget to put in the music at the end??? lol

holy crap, I google mapped the port canaveral and i cant believe almost the whole port operates out of the west turning basin. the middle and east basin are almost completely un used by being in the space force base. you'd think rockets being ITAR and military controlled would grant them access to port in the middle and east basins, which would free up a lot of needed port access.

The base of the OLIT at LC39A is elevated several metres higher above the water table than OLIT1 at Boca Chica. This gives SpaceX the option of digging a flame trench similar to the one currently under construction at Massey's. Remember that the explosion that blew up the concrete during IFT1 was because the heat of the launch boiled the water below the concrete. I suspect that OLIT2 at Boca Chica will be erected on top of a couple of metres of landfill to separate the heat of liftoff from the water table.

Thank you Max and NSF team for these wonderful updates. lot of interesting news from KSC.

Alex has a spreadsheet 😂

great overview, BUT does the plan for 50 years take into account sea level rise?

I wonder, why are the starship launch tower segments being built not in the starbase? Any reason for that? First tower was built there, right?

Lots of stuff happening in this video

the sls launch pad being built is all there is opposite to elonz principle of the best part is no part,the thing has a lot of congested hardware

Great video, but respectfully, Alex needs a better quality mic!

Need t-shirts team hair or team bald ??

The QD arms can not move vertically on the existing towers, but then need to if Starship gets stretched in future versions. You should be able to see signs of this soon.

PLEASE get an audio person on the team - audio mixing is not very good, which is not helped by the fact that NSF doesn't do their own captions and I have to rely on crappy auto-captions to have half a clue what y'all are saying. Love the program, but I would love it more if I could actually hear you all consistently 😅

I can tell you having personally worked on the Range of the Future (now called SpacePort of the Future) that the port will not be going in at all.

👍🚀🚀♥️👍

5th, love the members early content

I bet the new OLM will be dropped down to ground level, with a ridiculous flame trench, in order to be able to launch Starship V3. It took the largest movable crane in the world to erect the tower, going higher would be a huge engineering issue, and V3 is too tall to fit with an elevated OLM. But dropping the OLM will allow it to fit.

why no ULA and Starliner updates????? not even a picture?

14:50 Disney

I fly rocket ship weather permitting

How much is NASA's new Starliners carrier? 1.5 billion .... 2.0 billion...for something that has not flown yet!

3rd. Nice job

Good information ;,tho ,presentation could be More professional ,and Technichal ,

You mean space x not nasa ?right

I didn't see any upgrades to Blue Origins PR team, it's a shame they have such a bad rep, but I guess suing NASA will do that. You'd think they might try and fix that damage. It's weird how two billionaires can produce such different atmospheres to their boyhood dreams. I'm rooting for both, but SpaceX are divisions ahead of Blue Origin, there's just not even a competition between them at this stage.

What's going to happen to all that investment when the sea level rises 1 meter? 2 meters? Seems shortsighted.

👏👏🖖

Cape wont let them launch without a Proper Flame Trench

👀🔎🚀👍

"Peace out Girl Scouts"? -- Things that make you go "hrrmmmm..."

Max Needs a different catch phrase!!! (loose the "Girl Scouts" part of it. ) Great video!

First and hello

Hi

Girl Scout? Weird. That a dig? You can be a girl scout.

Hello Sorry if im not a member or anything

Guy's, the early 2000's called. It want's it's man buns back.

Eliminate face shots of announcers.

Cannot understand half of what these guys are saying, gave up half way through. Their accents and cadence are all wrong.

Elon, I see you don't understand how the shape of the starship affects its safety during reentry. Structural changes is a must. My advice is please think about the starship as about a boat, landing on the surface of water with extreme speed. You shouldn't have arc shape of the Starship's bottom (belly). This is not a barrel. It tends to rotate because of arc bottom, as if it was a barrel landing on the surface of water with extreme speed. It will not swim smoothly, it will constantly rotate, as it was during the last landing. The bottom part (belly) of the starship body should be flat, as the bottom part of any boat is. Did you see NASA solutions? Wings of Challenger? Their solution was flat bottom. Slide, not dive. Starship is "landing" on the surface of the atmosphere, as a boat on water. The atmosphere to the vehicle with speed 40000km/h has consistency of water to the boat. Reentry is similar to swimming across the surface of the atmosphere, and should last as long as the speed will slow down in a natural way, due to friction. Don't push Starship to dive into atmosphere. What you expect is that a barrel with speed 40000 km/h will smoothly enter deep water. No way! It will rotate, jump, it will dive and jump, and constantly rotate, as it was the last time. This is why all steering features were broken, they were too weak for such an endeavor. When you make the starship (means a barrel) flat from the "bottom" (belly), it would be much easier to put tiles on the flat surface, maybe make a kind of "keel" to make the starship more steady, and starship will smoothly enter deeper parts of the atmosphere as the result. You have time, do not hurry, starship must slide over the upper part of the atmosphere, give it time, and make it more like a boat, not a barrel. Structural changes!

"Peace out girl scouts" Just like that... I never want to hear anyone from this channel again... that was so cringe, I stopped cooking to come tell you.