Understanding how Hillary Clinton would govern 

I don't blame her for not trusting the press. The main press in the U.S. is a disgusting joke.

remember when we thought trump couldnt win

I'm Filipino and I love watching American politics like I'm American, hahaha

Something tells me most people disliked this video without even watching the entirety of the video.

"I did not have a sexual relation with that classified email" -- Clinton.

How come you've covered her all this time and not discovered her pile of bodies, corruption, criminal business, etc?

I tried to read her platform. It was long, detailed, and without any apparent unifying objective, theme, or principle. Now it all makes sense. That platform was written by everyone she ever had a conversation with together.

"Why don't YOU get a drink with Mitch McConnell?" - Barack Obama

Frank underwood gets things done too

This is why I subscribed to vox. Not to agree with me on everything. But to present a smart intelligent subject on a complicated issue where I agree with some aspects and disagree with others. Well done guys.

Remember when people acted like it was a hard choice between Trump and Hillary.......I still hate those people

Watching this today is so depressing....

All people that vote for Hillary to not let Trump win are exactly what is wrong with America's politics.

Remember when she voted for the Iraq war? Even though 30 Democratic Senators voted against it. Was that listening to the people? Was that "getting the job done"?

Wow imagine having a leader that listens. The current Cheeto couldn’t even directly answer a question from the press

Listening was never something what was treasured in the American politics. Show is that what’s counts. That’s why we now have a clown as a president who entertains us every day

Vox make a video on clintons email scandal. Like so Vox will see it.

Money talks and Hillary listens.

America needs a leader that listens to its struggling people and helps rather than send the national guard to silence and control them.. smh

Even though I am watching this video 3 years and 8 months after it was made, it's content is no less relevant as we draw to the end of Trump's first term. This video explains so much of how & why Trump won, but also it explains much about human nature, and how Trump can win a second term. Clinton the Listener, vs Trump the Talker; People like hearing someone telling them simple solutions to complex problems. But, people don't expect or want to have to explain to an electoral candidate what the problems are, because they expect the candidate to somehow know and completely understand already, and to sound authoritative about it. And this is where human nature is at its most frail and most exploitable. I also see now how Clinton got foul pressed. Even I fell for it. 😕

I think part of this is the obsession with personality and character, over policies, that American politics tends to have. I'm British, and, generally speaking, we care much less about the characters of our politicians beyond whether they seem capable. Or at least, I do. By that I mean I don't give a rats arse about the Prime Ministers family or pets or religious affiliation...etc...etc. I don't care if they are 'nice', 'confident' or 'love the country!', and even if I did, whether they can present those characteristics while on campaign has very little to do with their political decisions while in power. To me, the only things that should really matter are, in order of importance; A. their intelligence and broader competency B. their position on _specific_ political issues e.g. GM crops, nuclear energy, HS2 (a controversial railway line)...etc C. their broader ideological positioning. On those grounds I really don't see much difference between Obama and Hillary other than Hillary having more political experience (which I count as a good thing). A Hillary presidency would be, as far as anyone can reasonably predict, a continuation of Obama's. That may be a good or bad thing, depending on your point of view, but regardless it's hardly a political earthquake. But, because American news media and society loves to obsess over character and the individual so much, that fact seems to have been obscured. I don't mean to sound superior here - in the UK we have our own issues - it's just something I've noticed.

*Opens umbrella for Shitstorm*

I'll always wish that Hillary had won.

Imagine how 2020 pandemic would be different with a proper leader

The elephant in the room is that she's a woman? Really? I would say the elephant is the long list of controversy and scandals she's directly involved in.

"She's a great listener alright" - Goldman Sachs

I was one of the few people to genuinely like the Hillary Clinton that I saw from watching her speeches. Now I understand why.

Never thought I'd say this, but.... I relate to Hilary Clinton.

Hillary bots where you at?

This pure propaganda. I forced myself to watch until he began trying to justify Iraq. She is always strongly in favour of Iraq.

this aged well

This is nice to know, I enjoy hearing how she actually possibly works. Too bad there's a man who has a hard time listening to anything but selective people, as president right now.

This is kinda irrelevant, but... "Hilary Clinton has been a major political figure in my whole adult life."... err what? She's 70, you're 30, she's been a major political figure in your whole life.

Vox, you forgot to put the "I'm Hillary Clinton, and I approve this message." at the end.

dang if only she had won. :(

She was ahead of her time. She would have been a great president.

Despite the very Pro-Hillary present bias, I think this is still a very fascinating and informative video. But take it down a notch next time, I like my press neutral.

Sanders' speeches didn't leave people marveling at his "political skills". They left people marveling at his integrity and ability to speak like a normal person in a position of power. Which is in large part what politicians are supposed to be. Vox does a lot of great things, bringing attention and education to lots of topics that deserve it. But viewers should be careful not to mistake a well-supported opinion for fact, and should not stop their train of thought when the video ends. Vox's productions make it very easy to do both of those things. Especially when Ezra Klein himself steps in front of the camera.

I love how you covered this story of Hillary Clinton!!!!!!!!! Kudos to you sir.💯

Don’t even wanna scroll down to see all the hate 🤦🏽‍♂️

Why do people consider this bias? Pointing out positives and negatives on a subject is not biased. It's not biased to say that ice cream tastes good but is unhealthy.

Listening? Bernie was listening to the people who need help the most.

We dodged a bullet

I love Vox. I love how they speak slowly, give you examples, and seem to have put forth a lot of work before making a video. I also like the way they talk to us. I'm not talking about this video specifically. I'm talking about all their videos.

I feel like the host of this and nerdwriter1 would get along

The problem with "what people say about her" is purely based on sexism. Would a man get the same adjectives if he did the same things? Don't think so.

2:23 for a second i read that as "tom hanks" and was instantly in a rush to find her cameo in forest gump

"She gets things done" like the Iraq war and her intervention in Lybia.

i can't believe theres so many people who dislike a video just because of the title... it doesnt even offend anyone

She's a good listener. Perhaps, but who is she listening to? Oh that's right, the 1%.

Good analysis,, you're a genius

its interesting to watch American Politics. *As George Carlin once said: "front row seat to a circus."* from Australia with love!

#letgarydebate You have a third option America

Still, she's the only thing inbetween us and the apocalypse.

You know who does both listening AND talking? Bernie Sanders.

If its hard to understand what he said, imagine Clinton as the teacher who listened to you when you were in trouble or pressure and just told you the best and easy way to overcome.

Well, she even listened to bernie.

okay she's a good listener. But your gonna ignore who she actually listens to? the corporate donors and rich lobbyist

Dude.. where do you get this music from??!!! It's so engaging with the video!!!

why are all the comments about the channel being biased, because im from germany and for me it seemes pretty legitimate

Also, she listens pretty closely to the Rothschilds thats for sure ;^)

Is this guy annoyingly naive or is he annoying because he's naive?

You always find what you're looking for

I'm watching this in 2018, and honestly a lot could also be applied to Elizabeth Warren. She listens. But she also talks, in a way I didn't feel Hillary did.

... From a hospital bed or perhaps prison ...

Actually the journalist guy is wrong. This guy is obviously not a trained lawyer (not even close). As a lawyer, you are not supposed to have presupposed positions and what you need to do is to formulate the most solid arguments for your clients.. She listens and spots the issues immediately because she is that good of a lawyer. When you are on a defense team, you are not going to care if the other team members just tried to kill your mother, you focus on doing what is best for your clients. The ability to work on behalf of the people without regards for personal feelings is exactly the reason why people on her team admires her but those who dont understand her find her cold and pretentious. But make no mistake, she understands politics and she understands people. When she becomes the president, be warned Republicans, that can may be the first of many Democratic years to come.

the more I read the ridiculous comments that were done a year ago and where we are now I hope that those people have figured it out that what they thought was stupid but I doubt that's the case

"Yes my boss is a nice person, make sure you report that"

this was one of vox's best article. glad they turned it into a video.

She may listen, but she doesn't hear.

This was he most informative video I have ever watched

Well that video didn't age well. Strange to see Vox still keep that video.

Shes pretty good at listening to her donors.

She does get things done. bad things.

Hilary Clinton has left the chat

Remember when trump said, ' look at that face who would vote for her?' Excuse me, first of all her look doesn't matter, her skills do Also trump looks like Cheeto does that affect your elegebility?

For those of us not in the USA and not biased to one party or the other, this is a fascinating, fair and honest review of Hilary Clinton. Well done Vox.

This really reminds me of what happened in Australia with our (also first female) prime minister Julia Gillard. Like Hillary, she entered government with a strong, almost incredible track record of getting sides to agree to things. She was well regarded and had personal friendships even with the other side of politics. She made a deal with three highly diverse members to form minority government and they supported her throughout. But like Hillary, she was branded as a "liar" as soon as the Right had some dirt to throw. They picked up on a broken statement she made pre-election to have no carbon tax to address climate change, and hung on it relentlessly. "Axe the Tax" was their Bolshevik-style motto. She was a liar, untrustworthy, the least believable of any prime minister in history. Her negotiated compromise and rational governance was attacked by the bitter losing party as "weak". Any attempt to point out the obvious sexist overtones of her criticism (calling her a "witch") was met with the charge of PC bigotry or reverse sexism. And so it went on, even as she kept making good policy with a minority government. Eventually, the far-right led Abbott government won out, but their unencumbered majority rule was overturned in less than two years as he broke promise after promise, making gaffe after gaffe and failing to cooperate with anyone. I think a similar thing is happening at present with Hillary. Sure, she has done some dodgy stuff, and she is influenced by big business, but she's hardly the most corrupt or dangerous US politician in history! Maybe try asking Henry Kissinger? She has been cleared of all serious wrongdoing. Yet I foresee a future in which the same small cabal of right wing mudslingers will take her down like they never could take down Obama. He was too strong, but she might be vulnerable. And that means that American political discussion (if you didn't think it possible) will reach yet another low.

We messed up

It sounds like Hillary needed a better PR team and that the press should have (and still should) taken their jobs more seriously.

Vox finally figured that to increase Hillary's winchances they need to stop making videos on how bad Trump will be and start making commercials for Hillary.

Another brilliantly made and well put together video Vox. Could you make a video explaining how you still believe that someone who's already committed treason is the best person to entrust as president.

It's too bad Clinton lost. She's an able politician. Americans would be safer and better regarded in the world.

yall almost swayed me a little, then i remembered it was Vox...

Propaganda if I've ever seen it

Vox... your bias is showing.

We had one intelligent, strong, experienced, calm candidate who would also make history as first woman elected. And we had Trump.Yeah...hard choice..

Thankfully we never had to find out

I'm a passionate Hillary supporter. I have been all my life. I heard some harsh things about Hillary in this video that I disagree with. So I sat back and said to myself "Hmm, that is another way of looking at it." My opinions have not changed, however, I have more information now and feel like a more informed human being. Maybe because I didn't put my fingers in my ears and go "lalalalala" the second I heard something I didn't like. Instead I-here's the kicker-listened.

I wonder how much money they got just to say this?

I think the most dangerous thing in the USA's politic system (next to lobbying) is that their elections are way too based on accusing the opponent of terrible and sometimes untrue things and hurting their image than really trying to represent the people. To me, it looks more like a war between kindergarteners than professional political debates. But this is a tendency that can be found in many countries now and shows that the entertainment factor becomes more and more important and the information and representation factor less and less.

They all said the same thing she really truly us interested in "how she can get paid off"

"I didn't watch the video, but here's my opinion about it...."

You sound smart so I'm gonna agree with you

Right when the narrator says "authentic" they show Bill and Hillary dancing for the camera without music.

Listening as a leadership style isn't a skill--it's a talent. Listening is also a skill, but as something one does naturally, it's definitely a talent--a naturally recurring pattern of thought, feeling, or behaviour. You can have the best listening skills in the world, but if it's not natural to you, you won't do it--or do it well, or have the energy to do it consistantly with near perfect performance--something that is possible if you have the talent for it.

To all of those who called this video a propaganda, do us a favor and look up the word, then come back and find anything that is and isn't. If you did find parts that aren't propaganda, then it isn't.

For everybody who's disliking the video without watching and assuming that Vox is too liberal, just watch the whole video ffs. They do criticize her towards the end (which I know will give all you Trump supporters a hard on)

She listens and writes down talking points to win debates. Not policies.

Vox before election: This is how Hillary will govern. Vox after election: (crickets)