Honestly to me Roy looked pretty good in both except is more accurate in undisputed. Aesthetically fight night champion looked too dark, some punches looked awkward as well. In undisputed they need to fix the stiffness of the body when throwing punches. In the beta players were able to spam one punch and also stun or knockdown people with jabs. Anyway Roy mocapped punches in Undisputed so it's of course better.
That's because current systems have to render 8 times the amount of pixels to arrive at 4k compared to 720p which was the 360 and PS3's native resolution. I seriously wish they would just shoot for 1440p as the standard for game systems and PC. Most people can hardly tell the difference unless you have a big ass screen.
@@shonmoody1706 That's why the future of realistic graphics will not be based only on resolution because high resolution is good but at the same time you will notice the typical glitches that will let you know it's a game. The real evolution will be in the graphics themselves and the post-processing.
Undisputed's punching is a little janky but it feels pretty good. FNC is better imo, but Undisputed is looking really good. When the full game comes out, It's a definite buy for me.
@@yulboothe4540 yeah honestly like of course I want this game to be better but at the same time the punches look jerky and robotic almost. Idk the game is only in its beta process so it could be better
Fight night champion = head bobbles off every punch, camera shakes to make it seem impactful. Very much arcade looking. Undisputed= not every punch lands, like a real fight. Punches look more realistic. Conclusion, fight night has a fan base and a bunch of fan boys.. who think their fight night is the best game when in reality they are delusional idiots. Who love fake arcade trash games like fight night champion
You are dumb ash.. every fighter in fight night felt the same. Undisputed already more polished and it’s not even close to release. Pass on it goofy you don’t deserve to play the sh*t anyway.
