Professor Dave Explains is also another channel you should check out. He just made a video on this, too. So, we do have some real physicists and intelligent people chiming in on this. And none of them agree with Terrence, who is just totally ignorant of math and science.
And yet somehow no actual mathematicians have ever encountered this ghostly "work" of Terrence Howard, but the legends say that if you listen carefully at midnight you can hear it howling at the moon.
That was a lot of words without saying anything. So what did he actually do? The only thing I could find is that he thought 1x1 should be equal to 2. This faulty logic did not fair well on his X account. Many year ago he was working on a degree that he did not finish in Chemical Engineering. You have to give some details to your account of a "Mathematical Genius" besides being a cheerleader without any thing to back up your praises.
His theory involves I believe 67 circles...no lines are straight. I have watched many videos on it and it is astonishing. Keep looking for the circles! :)
@@HistoriesMysteries95 Again, more words without saying anything. What specifically is his theory involving 67 circles? What's astonishing about it? How can you heap all this praise on him when that's all you know about it? Also, name just one mathematician that has praised Terrence Howard. Just one. You can't because there are none. Nobody takes him seriously because he's a delusional idiot.
Multiplication- a mathematical operation that indicates how many TIMES a number is ADDED to ITSELF. Does not Necessarily INCREASE the quantity. What for example is 1/2 of 2 or rather 2(1/2). Half of two is one. One is less than two. last I checked. P.S. I’m no genius by far but the whole 1^2=2 thing is just way out of my depth not to mention solipsistic as hell. P.s.s. I’m a little rusty on my math but I believe multiplication is formally proven by division?
Congratulations!! This is exactly the conundrum that warrants a pause & reexamination of the established rules. WHY is it that 1 times itself is the ONLY multiplier that fails to adhere to the inverse operation rule? Until I answer that question for myself then, I will keep an open mind to the possibility that Mr Howard’s assertion may have a valid and credible application. It’s like asserting a demand: it’s either this OR that! To which I respond why can’t it be this AND that? We live in a dualistic dimension so goes the tendency of thought. However, this is not the only dimension in existence. I’m slow to come to my own conclusions but understand the tendency to maintain & defend the status quo. Wake up & be bold enough to think for yourself as opposed to defending the status quo. Until you can answer the question regarding the inverse operation rule, the argument remains open & plausible.
2(1/2) = 1 Meaning that the factor of 1/2 has increased. The factor that is being multiplied is 1/2 BY 2 therefore the increase is measured by the factor being multiplied. According to the “Dictionary of Mathematics Terms” 2nd Ed. 1995 by Douglas Downing Phd, professor at the School of Business & Economics, Seattle Pacific University page 214 states; “Multiplication is the operation of REPEATED ADDITION.” That’s the established rule I’m referring to when I state that 1x1=2 is at the very least a possibility.
Sabine Hossenfelder just posted a short video about this. She's a very famous and successful physicist. Terrence knows absolutely nothing about math or physics. If you believe anything he said, please go watch her video. It only took her about 10 minutes to totally demolish anything he claims. She's not going to waste much time on this gibberish. She's way too busy for that, doing real science.
No, ChatGPT did. The prompt was probably "write me a 5 page essay on the mathematical genius of Terrence Howard." That's why it's structured like a school essay.
Hmmm... I'm not sure if you're being serious or sarcy(really). What has he actually done/accomplished? I don't see any great published and praised works- except the 67-circles theory.. which is "interesting", but that's about it. I'm genuinely asking.
@@nefuros551 - any idiot (with a bit of money) can register a patent. The idea doesn't have to be correct and you don't have to make a working prototype if it's a patent on a design. It just has to be something that no one else has patented. Terrence is living proof that an idiot can have patents.
What has he accomplished? Apart from demonstrating that he doesn't understand the most basic concepts in maths, he's also served up an amazing word salad of physics terms, none of which he understands.
Think for yourself... do some research and decide for yourself... That's what's important... having an opinion isn't so important. I think it's important to have a viewpoint. To agree and disagree are basic and fundamental. Find your truth and go do you. Beliefs are not facts but can serve as inspiration to the expansion of knowledge. Enjoy your search for truths... keep an open mind so you can change and continue. "The answers are within" understand the difference between beliefs and facts. It's when one has all the answers... what's left to explore and discover? Observe yourself... what one thinks becomes one's reality Would you rather be right or happy In short something to think about Negative and Positive projection from you is yours... 🔥 ❤
Mf are you KIDDING, we do know atleast a basic level to understand that he is wrong, ofc idiots like you have to question yourself instead of being able to use your own mind to come to a conclusion that terence is absolutely insane
@@approved_direct_care1435 lol. From the Oxford Language Dictionary mul·ti·ply [ˈməltəˌplī] verb obtain from (a number) another that contains the first number a specified number of times:
@@approved_direct_care1435 lol. From the Oxford Language Dictionary mul·ti·ply [ˈməltəˌplī] verb obtain from (a number) another that contains the first number a specified number of times:
Very deeply hidden. There’s no doubt that he’s a very bright person… And very charismatic and all of that. But he just seems to have inhaled his own fumes and I would love to be proven wrong. Why not?
Haters everywhere....terrence dashon howard is right and genuine man. You all hater should go get a life or better still hug a transformer. Terrence is a genius
Bro don't allow thoes who have no knowledge stut your growth. Do your thing. When it actually turns out to be true the world will try to jump on the band wagon. Do you bro and keep push.
Please, didn't he just confuse the operation of x with +? . . . As for the square root of 2, it's proximately 1.4 . . . Re 0, so we want to deny the great contribution to knowledge of the ancient Mayans, et al? . . . Yet more evidence -- tell me if l'm wrong -- that brothers should NOT do math.
Dude does not see the implication of his errors or does he? If 1x1=2 then what is 2x1 equal to? What is 3x1 equal to? What is 10x1 equal to? His 1x1=2 throws off all our calculations. Structures would collapse, electronic devices would not work. Dude does not see the implications of his errors or does he? If he can get you to believe 1x1=2, than he knows he has caught one.
Thank you Terrence Howard You know what you know when you know it Knowledge is not power The application of knowledge is power Action - Reaction Think for yourself What you think becomes your reality 🔥 ❤
But he doesn't know anything. He spouts meaningless gibberish. It only sounds good to people who are as clueless as he is. The rest of us know he's talking crap.
@Rkenyi He doesn't have proof of jack s***. His Terryology "paper" is a muddled mess of nonsense. And I don't need to prove anything since multiplication has been around forever and commonly understood by people as young as 6. Only TH seems to be confused about why 1x1=1.
Yaw need to go watch his video he did at Oxford college when he broke it all the way down what he’s talking bout a showed proof because in our math he showed how we got loops … that makes math don’t make sense
